Search

Introduction: Penetrating gastric injury (PGI) is common and although primary repair is sufficient for most injuries, several areas surrounding the peri-operative management remain contentious. This study reviews our experience in the management of PGI and review the clinical outcome at a major trauma centre in South Africa.Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from January 2012 to April 2020 at a major trauma centre in South Africa.Results: 210 cases were included (184 male, median age: 30 years). Mechanism of injury was 59% stab wounds (SWs) and 41% gunshot wounds (GSWs). The AAST grade was predominantly (92%) grade 2 for all cases. 20% (41/210) were isolated gastric injuries. All cases underwent primary repair and there were no cases of suture line failure. Eleven cases (5%) had one or more injuries not identified at the index laparotomy: 7 were unidentified gastric injuries and the remaining 4 were unidentified non gastric injuries. There was no association between unidentified injuries and mechanism of injury or outcome. Fifty-seven (27%) cases experienced one or more complications. Eighty-two cases (39%) required intensive care unit admission. The overall median length of hospital stay was 7 (IQR 4-11) days. The overall mortality was 14%. GSW injuries were more likely to have additional organ injury, higher ISS and PATI scores, longer length of hospitalization, higher likelihood of ICU stay, greater morbidity and mortality than SW injuries. There was a slight increase in the wound sepsis rate as number of associated extra gastric injuries increased but this was not statistically significant. There was no difference in wound overall sepsis rate between SW and GSW injuries (2% vs 8%, p=0.121).Conclusions: Primary repair alone is sufficient for most PGI, but laparotomy is associated with high incidence of unidentified injury and surgeons must to be cognisant of the likelihood of these occult injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Gallbladder trauma is a rare injury. This study aimed to describe the significance of these injuries and the appropriate management strategies.Methods: A retrospective study was undertaken at a major trauma centre in South Africa and included all patients diagnosed with a gallbladder injury between January 2012 and October 2020.Results: A total of 51 cases were included (88% male, mean age: 38 years), with 44 (86%) penetrating trauma cases [28 stab wounds (SW), 16 sustained gunshot wounds (GSW)]. Of the 7 (13%) blunt trauma cases, five were involved in a motor vehicle crash, and two were injured via assault. All patients underwent laparotomy. Full-thickness gallbladder laceration or perforation was the most common type of injury (84%) and all patients with a gallbladder perforation or laceration had a cholecystectomy at index operation. Two out of 5 patients with a gallbladder contusion were managed conservatively without a cholecystectomy and the remaining three had evidence of gallbladder necrosis which were managed with cholecystectomy. Associated extrahepatic bile duct injuries occurred in 4% of cases, and 18 cases (35%) required intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The overall mortality was 8%.Conclusion: Gallbladder injury is rare but when encountered implies a significant degree of trauma. Although cholecystectomy is usually definitive, there is an association with other occult extra-hepatic biliary tract injuries. The severity of the associated injuries usually determines patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Primary repair is increasingly being used to manage rectal injuries, however, faecal diversion remains the main stay of rectal trauma management in our environment. • Rectal injuries are associated with high levels of morbidity such as sepsis and urogenital complications. • Rectal injury must be actively excluded in patients sustaining penetrating injuries to the pelvis, buttocks, perineal, or inguinal region or those who have experienced significant blunt trauma to the pelvis and perineum. This paper provides an overview of a single centre's experience with rectal injury over a decade. It hopes to use this data to provide context to our current approach to managing these injuries in the civilian setting. All patients with rectal trauma were identified from the Hybrid Electronic Medical Registry (HEMR). During the study period, a total of 88 patients with rectal injuries were admitted to Grey's Hospital in Pietermaritzburg. There were 80 (91 %) males and 8 (9 %) females. The median age was 31 (15–63) years. There were 9 (10 %) blunt mechanisms, 76 (86 %) penetrating mechanisms and 3 (4 %) combined blunt and penetrating mechanisms. Gunshot wounds accounted for the majority of sustained rectal trauma (71 %). There were 57 (65 %) extra-peritoneal injuries, 24 (27 %) intraperitoneal injuries and 7 (8 %) combined injuries. The grade of injury, according to the AAST grading system, was as follows, AAST 1: 16 (18 %), AAST 2: 63 (72 %), AAST 3: 7 (8 %), and AAST 4: 2 (2 %). Pre-sacral drainage and distal rectal washout were not performed. Almost all (55/57) of the extra-peritoneal rectal injuries were managed with proximal diversion (PD). There were five primary repairs (PR) performed in the extra-peritoneal rectal injury cohort. In four of these cases, this was accompanied by a PD. Of the 24 intraperitoneal rectal injuries, 15 underwent PR, of which 11 were performed in conjunction with PD. In total, 20 intraperitoneal rectal injuries underwent PD. All seven combined rectal injuries underwent PD, and three of the combined rectal injuries underwent PR with PD. There was urogenital tract associated morbidity in 8 %, gastrointestinal tract related morbidity in 8 % and septic complications in 11 %. Rectal trauma is still associated with a high rate of rectal/urogenital and infection related morbidity. Although pre-sacral drainage and distal stump washout have been largely abandoned in civilian practice, faecal diversion currently remains the cornerstone of the management of rectal trauma in our environment. Although there was a low rate of intra-abdominal septic complications in patients who had undergone diversion, this needs to be balanced against the low rate of stoma reversal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The phenomenon of extrajudicial "mob justice" and community assault (CA) has been documented in news reports and anecdotes from a number of low- and middle-income countries, but there is little literature on its burden on trauma systems. This study reviews a single center's management of CA victims and compares the spectrum of injuries seen following mob assault with those sustained via other forms of interpersonal violence (IPV).Methods: Clinical data, injury details, and mortality among injured patients (age≥18) hospitalized in a South African tertiary referral center from 2012-2018 were abstracted. Patients with penetrating injury or missing ISS were excluded. CA was determined at time of admission by either self-designation or by patients' escorts. Univariate analyses compared the presentation and outcomes for CAs and non-CAs.Results: Overall, CA constituted 5% of total trauma admissions and 8% of IPV-related admissions during the study period. Of 1,323 incidents of blunt injury following IPV, 239 (18%) were CAs. One in two CA victims (n=119, 50%) were struck by an identifiable weapon. Patients injured in CA were more frequently male (97% vs 85%), presented with ISS>15 (28% vs 21%), and had a shock index>0.9 (25% vs 19%) compared to non-CA (all p<0.001). Rates of operative intervention, ICU admission, and mortality did not differ (all p>0.05). CAs were more likely to be complicated by acute kidney injury (9% vs 1%, p<0.001) but less likely to involve neurologic complications (3% vs 10%. P<0.001) compared to non-CAs. Acute kidney injury in CA showed a pattern of significant musculocutaneous injury with rhabdomyolysis.Conclusion: CA contributes considerably to the high rates of IPV in a single South African center. Victims of such assaults sustain more severe injury with unique mechanisms and subsequent complications. This evidence supports the need to strengthen local governance and improve law enforcement efforts to prevent such violence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Rise of sub specialisation and low violence-related penetrating injuries in European cities require sufficient exposure • A 'golden standard' of international collaboration programs does not exist • A South African – European collaborative program creates a platform for trauma electives and training & teaching • Collaboration shows overlapping benefits like social responsibility and exchange of knowledge and experience • South African and military medical perspectives are reinforcing factors to improve acute care and medical leadership domains Recent terrorist attacks and mass shooting incidents in major European and North American cities have shown the unexpected influx of large volumes of patients with complex multi-system injuries. The rise of subspecialisation and the low violence-related penetrating injuries among European cities, show the reality that most surgical programs are unable to provide sufficient exposure to penetrating and blast injuries. The aim of this study is to describe and create a collaborative program between a major South African trauma service and a NATO country military medical service, with synergistic effect on both partners. This program includes comprehensive cross-disciplinary training & teaching, and scientific research. This is a retrospective descriptive study. The Pietermaritzburg hospital and Netherlands military trauma register databases were used for analysing patient data: Pietermaritzburg between September 2015 and August 2016, Iraq between May and July 2018 and Afghanistan from 2006 to 2010. Interviews were held to analyse the mutual benefits of the program. From the Pietermaritzburg study, mutual benefits focus on social responsibility, exchange of knowledge and experience and further mutual exploration. The comparison showed the numbers of surgical procedures over a one-month period performed in Iraq 12.7, in Afghanistan 68.8 and in Pietermaritzburg 152. This study has shown a significant volume of penetrating trauma in South Africa, that can provide substantial exposure over a relatively short period. This help to prepare civilian and military surgeons and deployable military medical personnel for casualties with blast – and/or penetrating injuries. The aforementioned findings and the willingness to shape the mutual benefits, create a platform for trauma electives, research, education and training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]