Search

Abstract: Background: Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a coronary heart disease (CHD) risk equivalent. Selected studies have demonstrated less intense risk factor management and diminished mobility in individuals with PAD as compared to individuals with clinical recognized CHD. However, comparable data have not been reported from a nationally representative population. Objectives: To assess the prevalence, treatment, and control of cardiovascular risk factors among individuals with PAD as defined by an ankle-brachial index (ABI) <0.90 (but without recognized CHD) as compared with individuals with recognized CHD (but without PAD). A second objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of measures of walking dysfunction to identify individuals with PAD. Design, setting, and participants: We analyzed data from 7571 participants aged 40 or older who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2004, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of the U.S. population. Results: The prevalence of PAD without CHD was 4.1% (95% CI 3.6–4.5) compared to 7.9% (7.1, 8.9) for CHD (without PAD). Hypertension prevalence was similar, but treatment and control rates were lower among individuals with PAD compared to CHD (treatment: 69% vs. 84%, p <0.001; control: 50% vs. 63%, p =0.01). Treatment of hypercholesterolemia was lower among individuals with PAD (54% vs. 79%, p <0.001) but control was similar (83% vs. 85%, p =0.78). Diabetes awareness, treatment, and control did not differ between the two groups. Walking mobility limitations were specific, but insensitive, for the identification of individuals with PAD. Conclusion: PAD in the absence of clinically recognized CHD is under-treated and poorly controlled in the general U.S. population. Leg symptoms are not adequate to identify individuals with PAD, who are at high risk of ischemic events. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background and aims Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations have been associated with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Prevalence of low 25(OH)D and PAD differ between whites and blacks. However, these associations have not been studied prospectively or in a population based cohort. We tested the hypothesis that low 25(OH)D is associated with greater risk of incident PAD in white and black adults. Methods 25(OH)D was measured in serum collected at ARIC visit 2 (1990–1992). We followed 11,789 ARIC participants free of PAD at visit 2 through 2011 for incident PAD events. 25(OH)D (ng/mL) was categorized as deficient (<20), insufficient (20 to <30) or sufficient (≥30). PAD was defined by an ankle brachial index (ABI) of <0.9 at ARIC visits 3 or 4 or a hospital diagnosis with an ICD-9 code indicating PAD during follow-up. Analysis used multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regressions. Results Over a mean follow-up of 17.1 years, 1250 incident PAD events were identified. 22% of whites and 61% of blacks were 25(OH)D deficient. After adjustment for demographic characteristics, the hazard ratio (95% CI) of PAD in participants with deficient versus sufficient 25(OH)D was 1.49 (1.26, 1.76). Inclusion of BMI, physical activity, and smoking status attenuated the association [1.25 (1.06, 1.48)]. The association between 25(OH)D and PAD was qualitatively stronger in blacks ( p for interaction = 0.20). Conclusions Deficient 25(OH)D was associated with increased risk of PAD in black and white participants. Whether treatment of low vitamin D through supplementation or modest sunlight exposure prevents PAD is unknown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To explore the relationship between gender, native artery diameters, and outcomes of stent revascularization (ST) in the "Claudication: Exercise versus Endoluminal Revascularization" trial. Methods: A comparative analysis was performed of the impact of gender, age, weight, height, body mass index, and body surface area on revascularization outcomes at baseline and 6 months in 55 arterial segments of aorta, common iliac artery, and external iliac artery (EIA). Results: Women demonstrated smaller diameter of the EIA. However, the clinical outcomes of revascularization were not negatively affected by the gender-based differences. Conclusion: Gender-based differences are unlikely to significantly impact outcome of ST. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background:: Some risk factors for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) have been identified, but little information is available on PAD risk factors in individuals with diabetes. Methods:: Using data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, we assessed the relation of traditional and non-traditional risk factors with the risk of PAD in 1651 participants with diabetes, but not PAD, at baseline. Incident PAD was defined as an ankle–brachial index (ABI)&#60;0.9 assessed at regular examinations; hospital discharge codes for PAD, amputation, or leg revascularization; or claudication assessed by annual questionnaire. Results:: Over a mean of 10.3 years of follow-up, 238 persons developed incident PAD identified, yielding a PAD event rate of 13.9 per 1000 person years. Adjusted for sex, age, race, and center, the risk of developing PAD was increased 1.87-fold (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.36–2.57) in persons who were current smokers versus non-smokers, 2.27-fold (95% CI: 1.57–3.26) for baseline coronary heart disease (CHD) versus no baseline CHD, and 1.75-fold (95% CI: 1.18–2.60) for the highest quartile versus lowest quartile of triglycerides. We found no evidence of an association with other blood lipids or hypertension. Compared with the lowest quartiles, comparably-adjusted relative risks for the highest quartiles were 1.60 (95% CI: 1.10–2.33) for waist-to-hip ratio, 2.52 (95% CI: 1.70–3.73) for fibrinogen, 1.70 (95% CI: 1.17–2.47) for factor VIII, 1.73 (95% CI: 1.18–2.54) for von Willebrand factor, 2.15 (95% CI: 1.43–3.24) for white blood cell count, 1.81 (95% CI: 1.19–2.74) for serum creatinine, 0.55 (95% CI: 0.37–0.83) for serum albumin, and 2.73 (95% CI: 1.77–4.22) for carotid intima-media thickness. Persons who had a prior history of diabetes and were taking insulin had a relative risk of 1.97 (95% CI: 1.35–2.87) for future PAD events, compared with those with newly identified diabetes at baseline. In our final multivariable model, current smoking, prevalent CHD, elevated fibrinogen and carotid IMT, and a prior history of diabetes with insulin treatment were independently associated with greater PAD incidence. Conclusion:: These markers might be useful to identify individuals with diabetes at particular risk for PAD. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

: ObjectivesIn the current study, we hypothesized that beraprost would: 1) improve treadmill exercise performance and quality of life; and 2) decrease rates of ischemic events in patients with intermittent claudication.: BackgroundPrevious trials with beraprost sodium, an orally active prostaglandin I2 analogue, in the treatment of claudication in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) have been inconsistent.: MethodsPatients with intermittent claudication (n = 897) were randomized to receive either 40 μg three times a day of beraprost with meals (n = 385) or placebo (n = 377) in a double-blinded manner for one year. The primary efficacy parameter was treadmill-measured maximum walking distance, as assessed at three and six months after randomization. Secondary efficacy parameters included treadmill-measured pain-free walking distance and change in quality of life.: ResultsThere was no significant improvement in maximum walking distance in the beraprost group (16.7%) as compared with the placebo group (14.6%, p = NS). Administration of beraprost did not improve the pain-free walking distance (p = NS between treatment groups), and there was no improvement in the quality-of-life measures between the treatment groups. The incidence of critical cardiovascular events was 7.3% in the beraprost group and 11.4% in the placebo group (p = NS). There was a significant reduction in the combination of cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction in the beraprost group (p = 0.01).: ConclusionsDespite previous investigations suggesting efficacy, these results indicate that beraprost is not an effective treatment to improve symptoms of intermittent claudication in patients with PAD. The potential benefit of beraprost on critical cardiovascular events would require confirmation in a larger prospective investigation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]