Search

• A PBPK model of meropenem for critically ill patients was established. • The % f T>MIC values varied greatly in different two-step infusion (TIT) strategies. • The TIT did not improve the PK/PD target attainment rate of meropenem. • Intermittent infusion was appropriate at MICs of ≤1 mg/L. • Prolonged infusion was recommended at MICs of 2–8 mg/L. The optimal method for administering meropenem remains controversial. This study was conducted to explore the optimal two-step infusion strategy (TIT), and to investigate whether TIT is superior to intermittent infusion therapy (IIT) and prolonged infusion therapy (PIT). A physiologically based pharmacokinetics model for critically ill patients was established and evaluated. The validated model was utilized to evaluate the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target attainment of meropenem. The PK/PD target attainment of different TITs varied greatly, and the total infusion duration and the first-step dose greatly affected these values. The optimal TIT was 0.25 g (30 min) + 0.75 g (150 min) at MICs of ≤2 mg/L, and 0.25 g (45 min) + 0.75 g (255 min) at MICs of 4–8 mg/L. The PK/PD target attainment of optimal TIT, PIT, and IIT were 100 % at MICs of ≤1 mg/L. When MIC increased to 2–8 mg/L, the PK/PD target attainment of optimal TIT was similar to that of PIT and higher than IIT. In conclusion, TIT did not significantly improve the PK/PD target attainment of meropenem compared with PIT. IIT is adequate at MICs of ≤1 mg/L, and PIT may be the optimal meropenem infusion method in critically ill patients with MICs of 2–8 mg/L. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several studies have demonstrated that the ideal therapeutic effect of linezolid cannot be achieved in critically ill patients with the recommended standard dosing regimen of 600 mg every 12 h (q12h). Moreover, the optimal strategy for successful treatment is still lacking. This study analysed factors influencing the efficacy of linezolid treatment and determined the target for successful treatment by logistic regression in 27 critically ill patients with staphylococcal infection who received linezolid 600 mg q12h. The results showed that only the 24-h area under the concentration–time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC 24 /MIC) ratio was significantly associated with staphylococcal eradication. Reaching 80% bacterial eradication required an AUC 24 /MIC of 120.5, defining the therapeutic target. Different dosing regimens were evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation to determine the optimal dosage strategy for linezolid. Although the probability of target attainment (PTA) was high (>99.9%) for the standard dosing regimen at MIC ≤ 1 mg/L, the PTA was almost 0 at MIC = 2 mg/L, thus the dosing regimen required adjustment. In addition, if the dosing regimen was adjusted to 600 mg every 8 h or 600 mg every 6 h, the major staphylococci (except for MRSA and MSSA) exhibited a cumulative fraction of response of >80%, showing a higher treatment success. These findings indicate that a strategy of high linezolid dosage may be needed to increase the probability of successful treatment at MIC > 1 mg/L. The role of therapeutic drug monitoring should be encouraged for optimising linezolid exposure in critically ill patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study evaluated whether contemporary echinocandin regimens achieved pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets in ICU patients and general patient populations (GPPs) and assessed caspofungin (CAS) regimens in hepatic impairment (HI) patients. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed using previously published data. Recommended dosing regimens of echinocandins in ICU patients, GPPs and healthy volunteers were evaluated: 70 mg loading dose then 50 mg maintenance dose (70/50 mg) for CAS; 100 mg q24h for micafungin (MCF); and 200/100 mg for anidulafungin (ANF). Moreover, CAS 70 mg and 100 mg q24h in GPPs, and CAS 70/50 mg and 70/35 mg in mild and moderate HI patients, respectively, were evaluated. Cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was calculated for each dosing regimen. For Candida albicans , CFRs for the recommended doses of CAS, MCF and ANF were 95.8%, 13.5% and 50.5% in ICU patients and 96.3%, 42.4% and 61.6% in GPPs, respectively; for Candida glabrata , CFRs were 99.4%, 90.6% and 44.6% in ICU patients and 99.5%, 97.1% and 59.8% in GPPs. For Candida parapsilosis , CFRs of echinocandins for standard regimens were <70%; only CAS 100 mg q24h achieved the target CFR. CAS 70/50 mg and 70/35 mg in mild and moderate HI patients were appropriate. Considerable interindividual variability was observed. For C. albicans and C. glabrata , CAS is good choice both for ICU and other patient populations, but for C. parapsilosis an increased dose should be considered. For MCF and ANF, administering higher doses with longer dosing intervals achieves better target attainment and should be investigated in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Objectives: This study evaluated the efficacy of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index for increasing the success rate of linezolid treatment based on Monte Carlo simulation, and compared differences between the calculated PK/PD breakpoints and those defined by committee for critically ill patients with linezolid treatment. Methods: A Monte Carlo simulation involving 10000 subjects was used to analyze the pharmacokinetic parameters and microbiological data of linezolid for an effectiveness evaluation at the corresponding AUC24/MIC values (area under the serum concentration–time curve over 24h/minimum inhibitory concentration). Results: As the PK/PD index of linezolid increased from 80 to 120, the corresponding probability of target attainment (PTA) decreased from 99.91% to 18.97%, with a MIC of 2mg/l. Furthermore, the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) reached <90% for several pathogens at an AUC24/MIC of 100–120, revealing a relatively lower efficacy with recommended linezolid dosing. Conclusions: These findings reveal that the target AUC24/MIC value of 80–120 requires further classification for more accurate assessment of the linezolid dose regimen. At a MIC of ≥2mg/l, the clinical outcome varies greatly for different AUC24/MIC values when applying the same dose of linezolid. In such cases, we suggest optimized adjustment of the linezolid dosage regimen. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Background: The number of reported cases of resistance to tigecycline is increasing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current standard tigecycline dosage regimen from a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) perspective. Methods: Pharmacokinetic parameters and microbiological data were analyzed by Monte Carlo simulation in an evaluation of effectiveness. Results: Tigecycline exhibits excellent in vitro antimicrobial activity, however the standard tigecycline dosing regimen fails to achieve the best outcome in vivo for the common drug-resistant strains, including Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter spp, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. This may result in a lack of response to tigecycline therapy or to a further increase in the resistance rate. Conclusions: In the absence of new drugs on the horizon, rather than using a single fixed dosing regimen, tigecycline dosing needs to be optimized in order to achieve the desired successful clinical response and to prevent an escalation in drug resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]