Search

Abstract: The Finite Element Method (FEM) is widely used in civil and mechanical engineering to simulate the behavior of complex structures and, more specifically, to predict stress and deformation fields of structural parts or mechanical bodies. In the former case, the coupling between different types of elements, such as beams, trusses, and shells, is often required, while in the latter fully 3D discretizations are typically used. For both, FEM leads to symmetric positive definite (SPD) matrices that, depending on the type of discretization and especially on the topology of the nodal connections, may be efficiently solved by either the Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient (PCG) or a direct solver such as the routine MA57 of the Harwell Software Library. Numerical experiments are shown and discussed where the effect of spatial discretization, different solution techniques, and a possible nodal reordering, is explored. The PCG preconditioner used is a variant of the incomplete Cholesky factorization with variable fill-in. It is shown that for structures with 1D or 2D connections, such as for example a bridge, MA57 performs usually better than PCG. In this case it is noted that some reorderings specifically designed and implemented for direct elimination methods can be very helpful for PCG as well as they yield a cheaper preconditioner and lead to a much faster PCG convergence. The main disadvantage is the need for an appropriate degree of fill-in for the preconditioner which turns out to be problem dependent and must be found empirically. However, in fully 3D problems, arising for example from the FE discretization of structural components or geomechanical structures, PCG outperforms MA57 while also requiring much less memory, and thus allowing for the use of much refined grids, if needed. With the aid of a large geomechanical problem it is shown that direct solvers may not be (even) used on serial computers due to their prohibitive computational cost with PCG the only viable alternative solver. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Contact mechanics can be addressed numerically by finite elements using either a penalty formulation or the Lagrange multipliers. The penalty approach leads to a linearized symmetric positive definite system which can prove severely ill-conditioned, with the iterative solution to large 3D problems requiring expensive preconditioners to accelerate, or even to allow for, convergence. In the present paper a mixed constraint preconditioner (MCP) is developed and implemented for the iterative solution of contact problems based on the penalty approach. A theoretical bound for the eigenspectrum of the preconditioned matrix is provided depending on the user-specified parameters that control the preconditioner fill-in. The performance of MCP combined with the preconditioned conjugate gradient is studied in two real 3D test cases describing the geomechanics of faulted porous media and compared to a well-established preconditioner such as the incomplete Cholesky decomposition ILLT with optimal fill-in. Numerical results show that typically MCP outperforms ILLT especially in the most challenging problems where very large penalty parameters must be used. Finally, a modification aimed at simplifying the MCP implementation and increasing its robustness is developed and experimented with, showing that the modified MCP can be viewed as an efficient and viable alternative to both MCP and ILLT, especially in problems where the size of the contact surfaces is large with respect to the global domain. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The numerical simulation of structural mechanics applications via finite elements usually requires the solution of large-size linear systems, especially when accurate results are sought for derived variables, like stress or deformation fields. Such a task represents the most time-consuming kernel, and motivates the development of robust and efficient linear solvers for these applications. On the one hand, direct solvers are robust and easy to use, but their computational complexity in the best scenario is superlinear, which limits applicability according to the problem size. On the other hand, iterative solvers, in particular those based on algebraic multigrid (AMG) preconditioners, can reach up to linear complexity, but require more knowledge from the user for an efficient setup, and convergence is not always guaranteed, especially in ill-conditioned problems. In this work, we present a novel AMG method specifically tailored for ill-conditioned structural problems. It is characterized by an adaptive factored sparse approximate inverse (aFSAI) method as smoother, an improved least-squared based prolongation (DPLS) and a method for uncovering the near-null space that takes advantage of an already existing approximation. The resulting linear solver has been applied in the solution of challenging linear systems arising from real-world linear elastic structural problems. Numerical experiments prove the efficiency and robustness of the method and show how, in several cases, the proposed algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art AMG linear solvers. Even more important, the results show how the proposed method gives good results even assuming a default setup, making it fully adoptable also for non-expert users and commercial software. • An Adaptive AMG linear solver for ill-conditioned structural problems is presented. • Results on more than 10 realistic examples prove its robustness and high efficiency. • Its performance is comparable or superior to other renowned state-of-art solvers. • It does not require tuning of user-parameters to achieve excellent performances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]