Search

This article sets out to provide a demographic analysis of the production of social inequality through IVF trajectories in a reproductive technology centre of a French hospital. However specific this example may be, it reveals one of the paradoxes of social inequalities in health: lay experience of risk in reproductive technology shows profound inequalities related to social status, despite the fact that equality would seem to be guaranteed in France, since the social security system covers the full cost of the treatments. We will try to understand this paradox through a lifecourse approach. Thus, it will be shown that social inequality in reproductive health is deeply rooted in social scenarios of infertility that lead to differentiated medical experience: there is little benefit and even a worsening in the situation of lower class women, who were faced with unpredictable risks related to the collective testing of these new technologies. Conversely, the possibility of inventing new lifestories, which may or may not include motherhood, was given to upper class women who take calculated risks to delay the scheduling of their pregnancies. In short, this study confirms that the production of social inequality in reproductive health can only be understood in connection with the social dynamics of lifestyles, resulting in specific medical patterns. This paper also leads to the assumption that these social scenarios are related to attempts to enhance the different forms of capital: economic, cultural and social capital. In addition, the presence of risks aggravates this inequality process. This raises another question: do reproductive technologies result in reinforcing social inequality? [Copyright &y& Elsevier]