Search

Antineoplastic drugs are pharmaceuticals that have been raising concerns among the scientific community due to: (i) their increasing prescription in the fight against the disease of the twentieth century (cancer); (ii) their recalcitrance to conventional wastewater treatments; (iii) their poor environmental biodegradability; and (iv) their potential risk to any eukaryotic organism. This emerges the urgency in finding solutions to mitigate the entrance and accumulation of these hazardous chemicals in the environment. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have been taken into consideration to improve the degradation of antineoplastic drugs in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), but the formation of by-products that are more toxic or exhibit a different toxicity profile than the parent drug is frequently reported. This work evaluates the performance of a nanofiltration pilot unit, equipped with a Desal 5DK membrane, in the treatment of real WWTP effluents contaminated (without spiking) with eleven pharmaceuticals, five of which were never studied before. Average removals of 68 ± 23% were achieved for the eleven compounds, with decreasing risks from feed to permeate for aquatic organisms from receiving waterbodies (with the exception of cyclophosphamide, for which a high risk was estimated in the permeate). Aditionally, no significative impact on the growth and germination of three different seeds (Lepidium sativum, Sinapis alba, and Sorghum saccharatum) were determined for permeate matrix in comparison to the control. [Display omitted] • Up to 127 ± 20 ng/L (feed), 38 ± 2 ng/L (permeate) and 1512 ± 70 ng/L (retentate). • Average removals of 68 ± 23% were achieved for the eleven pharmaceuticals. • Risk to aquatic organisms was decreased after nanofiltration. • Permeate did not affect the germination/growth of plants compared to control. • Degradation post-treatments are recommended after the nanofiltration process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Municipal wastewater (MWW) was treated by advanced oxidation technologies (AOTs). • Direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) was investigated as post-treatment. • Ozonation was efficient to remove 12 micropollutants (MPs) determined in MWW. • UV/H 2 O 2 as pre-treatment minimized the flux decline. • Flux decline was strongly related to the DOC content of the DCMD feed. In this work, the combination of advanced oxidation technologies (AOTs) and direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) was investigated for the treatment of municipal wastewater collected from the secondary clarifier of a municipal wastewater treatment plant (MWWTP). Average removal efficiencies of the 12 micropollutants present in the wastewater samples were higher than 95 % with ozonation (O 3) and photolytic ozonation (UV/O 3), whereas only near 50 % of removal efficiency was achieved with UV-peroxidation (UV/H 2 O 2). When the ozone-based processes were combined with DCMD, the concentration of these micropollutants were below the detection limits in the respective permeate, increasing the quality of the treated water. However, the permeate fluxes in DCMD were remarkably higher when the wastewater was pre-treated with UV/H 2 O 2 instead of O 3 , most probably due to the better disinfection achieved by UV/H 2 O 2. It was also confirmed that the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) of the wastewater strongly affects the permeate fluxes achieved by DCMD. In this regard, the combination of the oxidation and membrane separation processes is more appropriate for wastewaters with low DOC contents (< 15 mg L−1). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Graphical abstract Highlights • Exfoliated graphitic carbon nitride (g-C 3 N 4) was synthesised and characterized. • The metal-free photocatalyst was studied under visible light. • Efficient removal of micropollutants from secondary urban wastewater was achieved. • g-C 3 N 4 was supported on glass rings to avoid its recovery from treated wastewater. Abstract Heterogeneous photocatalysis under visible light was employed for the degradation of organic micropollutants (MPs) found in the biologically treated effluents of an urban wastewater treatment plant (UWWTP). The irradiation source consisted in 4 light emitting diodes (LEDs) with a nominal power of 400–500 W m–2 at 417 nm. Metal-free exfoliated graphitic carbon nitride (gCN T), which was synthetized through a simple thermal treatment using dicyandiamide as precursor, was employed as photocatalyst. The gCN T material was characterized using different techniques: N 2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K, electron microscopy (scanning and transmission) and diffuse reflectance UV–Vis. The photocatalytic performance of the material was compared to the commercial TiO 2 -P25, confirming that gCN T led to a remarkable higher removal efficiency of the target MPs. Most of these MPs were removed in less than 10 min to levels below the limit of quantification (carbamazepine > isoproturon > clopidogrel > diclofenac > atenolol > bezafibrate > tramadol > venlafaxine > fluoxetine). Indirect photolysis, resulting from the secondary reactive oxidants generated during the irradiation of the aqueous matrix components, was found to partially contribute for the elimination of the occurring MPs. In addition, the gCN T photocatalyst was immobilized on glass rings for use under continuous mode operation, a minimum residence time of 25 min being required to attain significant removal efficiencies. Phytotoxicity experiments showed that heterogeneous photocatalysis did not enhance the toxicity of the wastewaters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The degradation of two organic pollutants (amoxicillin and diclofenac) in 0.1 mM aqueous solutions was studied by using advanced oxidation processes, namely ozonation, photolysis, photolytic ozonation, photocatalysis and photocatalytic ozonation. Diclofenac was degraded quickly under direct photolysis by artificial light (medium-pressure vapor arc, λ exc > 300 nm), while amoxicillin remained very stable. In the presence of ozone, regardless of the type of process, complete degradation of both organic pollutants was observed in less than 20 min. Photolysis or ozonation on their own led to modest values of total organic carbon (TOC) removal (<6% or 41%, respectively in 180 min), while for photocatalysis (no ozone present) a significant fraction of nonoxidizable compounds remained in the treated water (∼15% after 180 min). In the case of photolytic ozonation, the kinetics of TOC removal was slow. In contrast, a relatively fast and complete mineralization of amoxicillin and diclofenac (30 and 120 min, respectively) was achieved when applying the photocatalytic ozonation process. The absence of toxicity of the treated waters was confirmed by growth inhibition assays using two different microorganisms, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus . Photocatalytic ozonation was also applied to an urban wastewater spiked with both amoxicillin and diclofenac. The parent pollutants were easily oxidized, but the TOC removal was only as much as 68%, mainly due to the persistent presence of oxamic acid in the treated sample. The same treatment allowed the effective degradation of a wide group of micropollutants (pesticides, pharmaceuticals, hormones and an industrial compound) detected in non-spiked urban wastewater. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Urban wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are among the main anthropogenic sources for the release of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) into the environment, which can result in toxic and adverse effects on aquatic organisms and consequently on humans. Unfortunately, WWTPs are not designed to remove CECs and secondary (e.g., conventional activated sludge process, CAS) and tertiary (such as filtration and disinfection) treatments are not effective in the removal of most CECs entering WWTP. Accordingly, several advanced treatment methods have been investigated for the removal of CECs from wastewater, including consolidated (namely, activated carbon (AC) adsorption, ozonation and membranes) and new (such as advanced oxidation processes (AOPs)) processes/technologies. This review paper gathers the efforts of a group of international experts, members of the NEREUS COST Action ES1403 who for three years have been constructively discussing the state of the art and the best available technologies for the advanced treatment of urban wastewater. In particular, this work critically reviews the papers available in scientific literature on consolidated (ozonation, AC and membranes) and new advanced treatment methods (mainly AOPs) to analyse: (i) their efficiency in the removal of CECs from wastewater, (ii) advantages and drawbacks, (iii) possible obstacles to the application of AOPs, (iv) technological limitations and mid to long-term perspectives for the application of heterogeneous processes, and (v) a technical and economic comparison among the different processes/technologies. Graphical abstract Unlabelled Image Highlights • Adsorption, O 3 , NF and RO membranes filtration can effectively remove CECs. • (Solar driven) AOPs appear competitive for CECs removal from urban wastewater. • When applying O 3 or AOPs ecotoxicological studies should be performed. • Lack of comparative investigations between consolidated and new processes • Conclusive evaluation of the most suitable and cost effective solution/s not yet possible [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]