Search

One solution to the global nursing shortage is to increase the numbers of student nurses: clinical placements need to increase their capacity to host them. Capacity increases have previously been viewed as problematic if they increase the supervisory burden on registered nurses, and unsafe if they dilute students' supervision. The aim of this study was to assess the impact on specific patient safety measures (pressure ulcers, falls and medications errors) of having students in placement being educated in Collaborative Learning in Practice (which increases capacity) compared to when they were not. Audit data were collected from four NHS trusts in the South West of England in a retrospective cohort study. We received data on 5532 adverse events from 15 clinical areas in four NHS trusts, with 996 students on placement between January 2018 and August 2019. The risk ratio and mean differences for adverse patient events were favourable (RR = 0.9842; 95%CI 0.9604–1.008; mean difference 279, 95%CI 213–346, p = 0.01). There was no statistically significant correlation between increased student numbers and increased adverse patient events. Our data must be interpreted with caution, but we conclude that increasing capacity for student nurses in placements appears to have a positive impact on patient safety. • We examined the impact of increasing student numbers in placement. • We used adverse patient events: falls, pressure ulcers and medications errors. • Increasing student numbers in placement reduces the risk of adverse patient events. • There was a statistically significant impact. • Increasing student numbers appears not to be unsafe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Collaborative Learning in Practice is a model of placement learning for student nurses that is currently being implemented in the United Kingdom, apparently originating in Amsterdam. Potential benefits are reported to be increased placement capacity, reduced burdens on mentors as practice assessors, improvements in qualified nurses' job satisfaction, recruitment and retention, and better-developed preparedness for registrant practice amongst student nurses. We conducted a thorough, rigorous systematic review between October and December 2018 of the literature on Collaborative Learning in Practice to discover whether there was a research evidence base for these claims. We found nothing published in English in peer reviewed journals. We found 14 related papers, although these were about the Dedicated Education Unit concept, and we have conducted a narrative synthesis of them. Key findings support the assertions related to Collaborative Learning in Practice, albeit in different models of placement learning. Further research is necessary with Collaborative Learning in Practice stakeholders including staff and students, and regarding patient care metrics, to demonstrate benefits or otherwise and until that research takes place potential gains remain unproven. • Collaborative Learning in Practice (CLIP) is being implemented in the UK. • CLIP apparently originated in Amsterdam. • We attempted to systematically review the research literature on CLIP. • We found that there is none in peer reviewed journals. • We argue that further research is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article reports a study evaluating the implementation of Collaborative Learning in Practice models at a university School of Nursing and Midwifery with practice partners across the South West of England. We conducted four focus group interviews with 40 students with experience of Collaborative Learning in Practice placements, and two focus groups with eight clinical practice staff with responsibility for implementing and supporting such models in their areas. Data were transcribed and analysed using the Framework Method. Key themes were 'Real time' Practice of Collaborative Learning Implementation, Collaborative Learning as Preparation for Registrant Practice, and the Student/Mentor Relationship. We conclude that Collaborative Learning in Practice utilising models of coaching and peer support, offers benefits to students who are exposed to the reality of nursing practice from the beginning of their placement experiences, enabling them greater responsibility and peer support than under normal mentoring arrangements. Furthermore, there are benefits to the registrants because the burdens of supervising students are spread more widely. This is timely given the review of Nursing and Midwifery Council standards for programmes and student support and the need to increase placement capacity as a response to global nursing shortages. • Collaborative Learning in Practice can increase placement capacity for students. • Collaborative Learning in Practice offers benefits to students learning. • These include greater responsibility for patient care, better preparation for registrant practice and peer support. • Coaching can replace mentoring and should reduce their burden in relation to student support. • This matches new UK Nursing and Midwifery Council standards for programmes and student support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]