Search

• Gaps inside the forest increase habitat heterogeneity and species richness. • Gaps attract bat species within the forest, included forest specialists. • Gaps can play a vital role in bat friendly forest management. Gaps in the forest canopy appear to play a major role in local species richness as they increase habitat heterogeneity and border effects. In the case of bats, these small clearings seem to play an important role as foraging and commuting sites. However, further research is required to set the actual role of forest gaps on bat biology in order to consider them as conservation targets in forest management. In this study, we test whether bat species richness and activity are higher in gaps within a large Scot pine (Pinus sylvestris) forest than in the adjacent tree covered control sites. We also test these differences in the forest specialists since this group is particularly sensitive to forest management. To investigate this, we used bat detectors in 9 gaps and their adjacent control points during ten nights in July - August 2016 and 2017. The trends resulting from the analysis of 228,108 bat calls support that species richness and activity of bat assemblages were higher in gaps than in the adjacent control points. A similar pattern was detected in the most sensitive tree dwelling bat species. These results stress the importance of gaps as useable areas for the forest bat assemblages and suggest the interest of managing gaps for bat conservation within large areas of continuous tree cover. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human-wildlife conflict is a major conservation challenge worldwide, with negative consequences for people and wildlife alike. Large carnivores, despite their key role in ecosystem functioning, are persecuted throughout their ranges as a response to perceived or actual risks to livestock and humans. To promote human-carnivore coexistence, a better understanding of the determinants of conflict is necessary. A range of factors have been hypothesized to influence livestock depredation risk, including carnivore habitat suitability and connectivity, prey availability, and anthropogenic factors. Yet, the relative importance of these factors is often unclear. We analyzed and mapped livestock depredation risk for the Persian leopard (Panthera pardus tulliana) in southern Iran using a species distribution modeling framework. We used livestock depredation reports and interviews (n = 199) from 25 randomly selected villages together with predictors capturing leopard habitat suitability, movement corridors, wild and domestic prey, and anthropogenic pressure. Our leopard habitat suitability and connectivity analyses predicted 28 core habitat patches (>250km2) associated with mountainous and conserved areas, with partly severed corridors between them. Our risk mapping indicated that the chance of livestock depredation increased in areas with higher leopard habitat suitability. Conversely, depredation risk was lower in areas with more wild prey. We predicted the highest depredation risk in about 12 % of the landscape where urgent conflict mitigation measures would be most beneficial. More generally, our study shows that while conservation areas provide refuge for carnivores, these areas can also lead to higher levels of conflict, hence mitigation measures should be prioritized in their surroundings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]