Search

• 94.4% of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) would accept a COVID-19 vaccine • People of increasing age and previous influenza vaccinations were more likely to accept • Safety concerns and lack of information were top reasons for not getting a vaccine • 51.7% of people with MS initially surveyed received a COVID-19 vaccine by May 2021 • The decision to receive a vaccine changes with evolving perceived risks versus benefits Background & Methods: We conducted an online COVID-19 survey as the vaccines became available, utilising the UK MS Register, to understand people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) views on COVID-19 vaccination and the subsequent vaccine uptake rates. Results & Conclusion: 94.4% of 3191 pwMS surveyed indicated they would get a COVID-19 vaccine, while 5.6% would not. PwMS who have previously had an influenza vaccine, increasing age and the perception of having sufficient information about the vaccine were associated with increased likelihood of getting a vaccine. 51.7% of 3191 pwMS completed a follow-up survey indicating they received at least 1 dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. The proportion having had the vaccination based on their prior opinions was 53.2% in 'Yes' group and 27.0% in 'No' group, the latter reflecting a change based on their initial views. More information on COVID-19 vaccine safety in pwMS would be helpful for people to make informed decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Blood pressure management guidelines are widely available. Our aim was to examine differences in blood pressure on the same subjects in primary and secondary care. We identified 661 diabetic subjects with measurements with the aid of the SAIL databank. Blood pressure in primary care was significantly lower than secondary care. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Introduction: It is widely acknowledged that breaches and misuses of health-related data can have serious implications and consequently they often carry penalties. However, harm due to the omission of health data usage, or data non-use, is a subject that lacks attention. A better understanding of this 'other side of the coin' is required before it can be addressed effectively.Approach: This article uses an international case study approach to explore why data non-use is difficult to ascertain, the sources and types of health-related data non-use, its implications for citizens and society and some of the reasons it occurs. It does this by focussing on issues with clinical care records, research data and governance frameworks and associated examples of non-use.Results and Discussion: The non-use of health-related data is a complex issue with multiple explanations. Individual instances of data non-use can be associated with harm, but taken together, they can describe a trail of data non-use that may complicate and compound its impacts. There is ample indirect evidence that health data non-use is implicated in the deaths of many thousands of people and potentially £billions in financial burdens to societies.Conclusions: Harm due to the non-use of health data is difficult to attribute unequivocally and actual proven evidence is sparse. Although it can be elusive, it is nevertheless a real problem with widespread and serious, if largely unquantifiable, consequences. The most effective initiatives to address specific contexts of data non-use will be those that: firstly, understand the pertinent sources, types and reasons for data non-use in a given domain in order to meet the challenges and create appropriate incentives and repercussions; and secondly, are cognisant of the multiple aspects to this complex issue in other domains to keep benefits and limitations in perspective, to move steadily towards socially responsible reuse of data becoming the norm to save lives and resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights: [•] A qualitative dimension to understanding users’ desires regarding, and expectations of, health registers. [•] That there is a difference between what users think health registers would be used for, and how they want them to be used. [•] Users wish for social contact, exchange, and networking functions, from a health register. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]