Search

Stereotactic radiosurgery is one of the treatment options for brain metastases. However, there are patients who will progress after radiosurgery. One of the potential treatments for this subset of patients is laser ablation. Image-guided stereotactic biopsy is important to determine the histopathological nature of the lesion. However, this is usually based on preoperative, static images, which may affect the target accuracy during the actual procedure as a result of brain shift. We therefore performed real-time intraoperative MRI-guided stereotactic aspiration and biopsies on two patients with symptomatic, progressive lesions after radiosurgery followed immediately by laser ablation. The patients tolerated the procedure well with no new neurologic deficits. Intraoperative MRI-guided stereotactic biopsy followed by laser ablation is safe and accurate, providing real-time updates and feedback during the procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Perioperative cerebral infarction is a potential complication of glioma resection, of which insular tumors are at higher risk because of the proximity of middle cerebral artery branches, including the lateral lenticulostriates and long insular arteries. In this study, 3 patients received three-dimensional rotational angiography, which was fused with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for frameless stereotactic navigation during dominant-hemisphere insular glioma resection. All patients obtained a preoperative catheter angiogram with a three-dimensional rotational acquisition of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery. The pixel-based axial three-dimensional angiography data, thin-cut structural MRI, tractography from diffusion tensor imaging, and expressive language activation from functional MRI were uploaded into the iPlan software (Brainlab, Heimstetten, Germany) and fused. The target tumor, regional blood vessels, adjacent functional areas, and their associated fiber tracts were segmented and overlaid on the appropriate MRI sequence. This image fusion was used preoperatively to visualize the relationship of the mass with the adjacent vasculature and intraoperatively for frameless stereotactic navigation to optimize preservation of arterial structures. Three patients aged 27–60 years with excellent baseline functional status presented with seizures and were found to have a large dominant-hemisphere T2 hyperintense nonenhancing insular mass. Surgical resection was performed using multimodality neuronavigation. None sustained a postoperative arterial infarction or a perioperative neurologic deficit. Neuronavigation using a fusion of three-dimensional rotational angiography with MRI is a technique that can be used for preoperative planning and during resection of insular gliomas to optimize preservation of adjacent arteries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Brain metastases commonly manifest in patients with cancer, with ∼20%–50% presenting with 1 intracranial lesion. Among patients with 1, small brain metastasis and controlled or absent extracranial disease, it remains unclear whether aggressive intracranial management using neurosurgical resection plus cavity stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) rather than SRS/SRT alone is beneficial. In patients with controlled or absent extracranial disease and 1 brain metastasis ≤2 cm in size, we evaluated the effect of surgery plus SRS/SRT compared with SRS/SRT on oncologic outcomes, including overall survival. Methods We retrospectively identified 86 patients with controlled or absent extracranial disease and 1 brain metastasis ≤2 cm in size who had been treated from 2000 to 2015 at our institution. We examined differences in the rates of local and distant failure, use of salvage treatment, and other oncologic outcomes, including all-cause mortality. Results The baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 cohorts. The median follow-up period for the surviving patients was 38 months. On multivariable analysis , surgical resection plus cavity SRS/SRT was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.19–1.00; P = 0.05) compared with SRS/SRT alone. The 1- and 2-year rates of overall survival were 100% and 88% versus 74% and 52% for surgery plus cavity SRS/SRT versus SRS/SRT alone, respectively. Conclusions Aggressive, local therapy, including neurosurgical resection, might benefit patients with 1 brain metastasis in the context of controlled or absent systemic disease, even if the lesion in question is small. Further studies are needed to evaluate these associations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (IoMRI) was devised to overcome brain shifts during craniotomies. Yet, the acceptance of IoMRI is limited. Objective To evaluate impact of IoMRI on intracranial glioma resection outcome including overall patient survival. Methods A retrospective review of records was performed on a cohort of 164 consecutive patients who underwent resection surgery for newly diagnosed intracranial gliomas either with or without IoMRI technology performed by 2 neurosurgeons in our center. Patient follow-up was at least 5 years. Extent of resection (EOR) was calculated using pre- and postoperative contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR-images. Adjusted analysis was performed to compare gross total resection (GTR), EOR, permanent surgery-associated neurologic deficit, and overall survival between the 2 groups. Results Overall median EOR was 92.1%, and 97.45% with IoMRI use and 89.9% without IoMRI, with crude (unadjusted) P < 0.005. GTR was achieved in 49.3% of IoMRI cases, versus in only 21.4% of no-IoMRI cases, P < 0.001. GTR achieved was more with the use of IoMRI among gliomas located in both eloquent and noneloquent brain areas, P = 0.017 and <0.001, respectively. Permanent surgery-associated neurologic deficit was not (statistically) more significant with no-IoMRI, P = 0.284 (13.8% vs. 6.7%). In addition, the IoMRI group had better 5-year overall survival, P < 0.001. Conclusion This study shows that the use of IoMRI was associated with greater rates of EOR and GTR, and better overall 5-year survival in both eloquent brain areas located and non-eloquent brain areas located gliomas, with no increased risk of neurologic complication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background There is accumulating evidence that extent of resection (EOR) in intrinsic brain tumor surgery prolongs overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). One of the strategies to increase EOR is the use of intraoperative MRI (ioMRI); however, considerable infrastructure investment is needed to establish and maintain a sophisticated ioMRI. We report the preliminary results of an extraoperative (eoMRI) protocol, with a focus on safety, feasibility, and EOR in intrinsic brain tumor surgery. Methods Ten patients underwent an eoMRI protocol consisting of surgical resection in a conventional operating room followed by an immediate MRI in a clinical MRI scanner while the patient was still under anesthesia. If findings of the MRI suggested residual safely resectable tumor, the patient was returned to the operating room. A retrospective volumetric analysis was undertaken to investigate the percentage of tumor resected after first resection and if applicable, after further resection. Results Six of 10 (60%) patients were thought to require no further resection after eoMRI. The EOR in these patients was 97.8% ± 1.8%. In the 4 patients who underwent further resection, the EOR during the original surgery was 88.5% ± 9.5% ( P = 0.04). There was an average of 10.1% more tumor removed between the first and second surgery. In 3 of 4 (75%) of patients who returned for further resection, gross total resection of tumor was achieved. Conclusion An eoMRI protocol appears to be a safe and practical method to ensure maximum safe resections in patients with brain tumors and can be performed readily in all centers with MRI capabilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Older patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma have poor outcomes, and optimal treatment is controversial. Hypofractionated radiation therapy (HRT) is frequently used but has not been compared to patients receiving standard fractionated radiation therapy (SRT) and temozolomide (TMZ). Methods and Materials We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients ≥65 years of age who received radiation for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma from 1994 to 2013. The distribution of clinical covariates across various radiation regimens was analyzed for possible selection bias. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of hypofractionated radiation (typically, 40 Gy/15 fractions) versus standard fractionation (typically, 60 Gy/30 fractions) in the setting of temozolomide was conducted using Cox regression and propensity score analysis. Results Patients received SRT + TMZ (n=57), SRT (n=35), HRT + TMZ (n=34), or HRT (n=9). Patients receiving HRT were significantly older (median: 79 vs 69 years of age; P <.001) and had worse baseline performance status ( P <.001) than those receiving SRT. On multivariate analysis, older age (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR]: 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.10, P =.01), lower Karnofsky performance status (AHR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.03; P =.01), multifocal disease (AHR: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.23-3.61, P =.007), and radiation alone (vs SRT + TMZ; SRT: AHR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.06-2.79; P =.03; HRT: AHR: 3.92; 95% CI: 1.44-10.60, P =.007) were associated with decreased overall survival. After propensity score adjustment, patients receiving HRT with TMZ had similar overall survival compared with those receiving SRT with TMZ (AHR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.50-2.4, P =.82). Conclusions With no randomized data demonstrating equivalence between HRT and SRT in the setting of TMZ for glioblastoma, significant selection bias exists in the implementation of HRT. Controlling for this bias, we observed similar overall survival for HRT and SRT with concurrent TMZ among elderly patients, suggesting the need for a randomized trial to compare these regimens directly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To compare the diagnostic yield and safety profiles of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–guided needle brain biopsy with 2 traditional brain biopsy methods: frame-based and frameless stereotactic brain biopsy. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of 288 consecutive needle brain biopsies in 277 patients undergoing stereotactic brain biopsy with any of the 3 biopsy methods at Brigham and Women’s Hospital from 2000–2008. Variables including age, sex, history of radiation and previous surgery, pathology results, complications, and postoperative length of hospital stay were analyzed. Results Over the course of 8 years, 288 brain biopsies were performed. Of these, 253 (87.8%) biopsies yielded positive diagnostic tissue. Young age (<40 years old) and history of brain radiation or surgery were significant negative predictors for a positive biopsy diagnostic yield. Excluding patients with prior radiation or surgeries, no significant difference in diagnostic yield was detected among the 3 groups, with frame-based biopsies yielding 96.9%, frameless biopsies yielding 91.8%, and intraoperative MRI–guided needle biopsies yielding 89.9% positive diagnostic yield. Serious adverse events occurred 19 biopsies (6.6%). Intraoperative MRI–guided brain biopsies were associated with less serious adverse events and the shortest postoperative hospital stay. Conclusions Frame-based, frameless stereotactic, and intraoperative MRI–guided brain needle biopsy techniques have comparable diagnostic yield for patients with no prior treatments (either radiation or surgery). Intraoperative MRI–guided brain biopsy is associated with fewer serious adverse events and shorter hospital stay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this work is to present a new method for reconstructing patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) vasculature of the brain from a pair of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) image sequences from different viewpoints, e.g., from bi-plane angiography. Our long-term goal is to provide high resolution visualization of 3D vasculature with dynamic flow of contrast agent from limited data that is readily available during surgical procedures. The proposed method is the second of a three-stage process composed of 1) augmenting vessel segmentation with vessel radii and timing of the arrival of a bolus of contrast agent, 2) reconstructing a volumetric representation of the augmented vessel data from the augmented 2D segmentations, and 3) generating a 3D model of vessels and flow of contrast agent from the volumetric reconstruction. Unlike previous methods, which are either limited to relatively simple vessel structures or rely on multiple views and/or prior models of the vasculature, our method requires only a single pair of 2D DSA sequences taken from different view directions. We developed a new mathematical algorithm that augments vessel centerlines with vessel radii and bolus arrival times derived directly from the 2D DSA sequences to constrain the 3D reconstruction. We validated this method on digital phantoms derived from clinical data and from fractal models of branching tree structures. In standard reconstruction methods, reconstruction by projection of two views into 3D space results in 'ghosting' artifacts, i.e., false 3D structure that occurs where vessels or vessel segments overlap in the 2D images. For the complex vascular of the brain, this ghosting is severe and is a major hurdle for methods that attempt to generate 3D structure from 2D images. We show that our approach reduces ghosting by up to 99% in digital phantoms derived from clinical data. Our dramatic reduction in ghosting artifacts in 3D reconstructions from a pair of 2D image sequences is an important step towards generating high resolution 3D vasculature with dynamic flow information from a single DSA sequence acquired using bi-plane angiography. [Display omitted] • 3D imaging (e.g., MRA, CTA) of brain vasculature can help plan and monitor surgery. • 2D DSA has higher spatial and temporal resolution and is available interventionally. • We present an approach for generating 3D DSA from a pair of 2D DSA sequences. • The approach has 3 stages: augmented segmentation, 3D reconstruction, and modeling. • We introduce a new algorithm for the 2nd stage and test it using digital phantoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]