Search

• We conducted a survey on vaccine shortages and stockouts in Europe in 2016–2019. • Vaccine shortages and stockouts were reported by 19 of 21 surveyed countries. • The vaccines most frequently affected were DT-containing and hepatitis B vaccines. • The most commonly reported causes were production issues and global shortage. • Vaccine shortages/stockouts had a relevant impact on vaccine services. National immunisation programmes require an adequate supply of vaccines to function properly but many countries, globally and in Europe, have reported vaccine shortages. A comprehensive view of vaccine shortages and stockouts in the EU/EEA is missing in the published literature. This study was conducted in the framework of the European Joint Action on Vaccination (EU-JAV). Twenty-eight countries, including 20 EU-JAV consortium member states and an additional 8 EU/EEA countries, were invited to participate in a survey aimed at collecting information on vaccine shortages and stock-outs experienced from 2016 to 2019, their main causes, actions taken, and other aspects of vaccine supply. Twenty-one countries completed the survey (response rate 75%), of which 19 reported at least one shortage/stock-out event. Overall, 115 events were reported, 28 of which led to a change in the national immunisation programme. The most frequently involved vaccines were DT- and dT-containing combination vaccines, hepatitis B, hepatitis A, and BCG vaccines. The median duration of shortages/stock-outs was five months (range <1 month–39 months). Interruption in supply and global shortage were the most frequently indicated causes. Only about half of countries reported having an immunization supply chain improvement plan. Similarly, only about half of countries had recommendations or procedures in place to address shortages/stockouts. The survey also identified the occurrence of shortages/stockouts of other biological products (e.g. diphtheria antitoxin in 12 countries). Public health strategies to assure a stable and adequate vaccine supply for immunization programmes require coordinated actions from all stakeholders, harmonized definitions, strengthening of reporting and monitoring systems, the presence of an immunization supply chain improvement plan in all countries, and procedures or recommendations in place regarding the use of alternative vaccines or vaccination schedules in case of shortages/stockouts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since the onset of COVID-19, several assays have been deployed for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. The European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) published the first set of guidelines on SARS-CoV-2 in vitro diagnosis in February 2022. Because the COVID-19 landscape is rapidly evolving, the relevant ESCMID guidelines panel releases an update of the previously published recommendations on diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2. This update aims to delineate the best diagnostic approach for SARS-CoV-2 in different populations based on current evidence. An ESCMID COVID-19 guidelines task force was established by the ESCMID Executive Committee. A small group was established, half appointed by the chair, and the remaining selected with an open call. The panel met virtually once a week. For all decisions, a simple majority vote was used. A list of clinical questions using the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) format was developed at the beginning of the process. For each PICO, 2 panel members performed a literature search focusing on systematic reviews with a third panellist involved in case of inconsistent results. The panel reassessed the PICOs previously defined as priority in the first set of guidelines and decided to address 49 PICO questions, because 6 of them were discarded as outdated/non-clinically relevant. The 'Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)-adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of recommendations (ADOLOPMENT)' evidence-to-decision framework was used to produce the guidelines. After literature search, we updated 16 PICO questions; these PICOs address the use of antigen-based assays among symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with different ages, COVID-19 severity status or risk for severe COVID-19, time since the onset of symptoms/contact with an infectious case, and finally, types of biomaterials used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of these guidelines is to identify the most appropriate diagnostic test and/or diagnostic approach for SARS-CoV-2. The recommendations are intended to provide guidance to clinicians, clinical microbiologists, other health care personnel, and decision makers. An ESCMID COVID-19 guidelines task force was established by the ESCMID Executive Committee. A small group was established, half appointed by the chair and the remaining selected with an open call. Each panel met virtually once a week. For all decisions, a simple majority vote was used. A list of clinical questions using the PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) format was developed at the beginning of the process. For each PICO, two panel members performed a literature search focusing on systematic reviews, with a third panellist involved in case of inconsistent results. Quality of evidence assessment was based on the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation - adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of recommendations) approach. A total of 43 PICO questions were selected that involve the following types of populations: (a) patients with signs and symptoms of COVID-19; (b) travellers, healthcare workers, and other individuals at risk for exposure to SARS-CoV-2; (c) asymptomatic individuals, and (d) close contacts of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. The type of diagnostic test (commercial rapid nucleic acid amplification tests and rapid antigen detection), biomaterial, time since onset of symptoms/contact with an infectious case, age, disease severity, and risk of developing severe disease are also taken into consideration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]