Search

Great efforts have been made on the assessment of the effects of straw managements or tillage practices on rice yield and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, their interactive effects were not well documented. Based on a seven-year field experiment under a double rice system, we tested the effects of rotary tillage (RT) vs. plough tillage (PT) on rice yield, methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions with or without straw incorporation. As compared to straw removal, straw incorporation increased rice yield by 12.7% and 1.3% under the PT and the RT, respectively. Straw incorporation significantly stimulated CH 4 emissions under both tillage regimes in the late rice season, while no significant effect occurred in the early rice season. Compared to the RT, PT significantly decreased DOC concentrations and methanogen abundances, resulting in a reduction in CH 4 emission. The PT decreased yield-scaled global warming potential (GWP) with or without straw incorporation by 31.0% and 15.5%, respectively, as compared to the RT. Together, our results indicate that straw incorporation with plough tillage benefits rice production for higher-yield with less GHG emissions in double rice cropping areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High-yield varieties with low methane emissions will benefit sustainable rice ( Oryza sativa L.) production. However, no specific plant characteristics have been identified to be primarily responsible for rice variety impacts on the CH 4 emission. We conducted a comprehensive study through comparing effects of 66 varieties on CH 4 under both greenhouse and field conditions to identify rice plant characteristics that may significantly affect soil CH 4 emission. Although there were significant differences in CH 4 emissions among the tested rice varieties, no significant and consistent relationships were observed between aboveground traits and CH 4 fluxes or dissolved CH 4 concentrations in soil solutions. Yet dissolved CH 4 concentrations were significantly correlated with the mean CH 4 flux over the growing season. In addition, cutting rice plants 5 cm off above the floodwater did not increase CH 4 fluxes, indicating that the CH 4 transport through the removed part of rice plant contributed little to the total CH 4 emission. Taken together, our results indicate that differences in CH 4 emissions among rice varieties primarily stem from the differential effects of rice plants on the belowground CH 4 production and oxidation. Aboveground plant traits do not provide reliable predictions of variety effects on CH 4 emissions. Future efforts should be focused on understanding belowground processes and the underlying mechanisms that govern rice variety impacts on the CH 4 emission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]