Search

In deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor, the primary target ventrointermedius (VIM) nucleus cannot be clearly visualized with structural imaging. As such, there has been much interest in the dentatorubrothalamic tract (DRTT) for target localization, but evidence for the DRTT as a putative stimulation target in tremor suppression is lacking. We evaluated proximity of the DRTT in relation to DBS stimulation parameters. This is a retrospective analysis of 26 consecutive patients who underwent DBS with microelectrode recordings (46 leads). Fiber tracking was performed with a published deterministic technique. Clinically optimized stimulation parameters were obtained in all patients at the time of most recent follow-up (6.2 months). Volume of tissue activated (VTA) around contacts was calculated from a published model. Tremor severity was reduced in all treated hemispheres, with 70% improvement in the treated hand score of the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor. At the level of the active contact (2.9 ± 2.0 mm superior to the commissural plane), the center of the DRTT was lateral to the contacts (5.1 ± 2.1 mm). The nearest fibers of the DRTT were 2.4 ± 1.7 mm from the contacts, whereas the radius of the VTA was 2.9 ± 0.7 mm. The VTA overlapped with the DRTT in 77% of active contacts. The distance from active contact to the DRTT was positively correlated with stimulation voltage requirements (Kendall τ = 0.33, P = 0.006), whereas distance to the atlas-based VIM coordinates was not. Active contacts in proximity to the DRTT had lower voltage requirements. Data from a large cohort provide support for the DRTT as an effective stimulation target for tremor control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies are routinely ordered for trigeminal neuralgia (TN), though with contested reliability in contemporary literature. A potential reason for this disagreement is inconsistency in MRI reading methodologies. Here, we compare the rate of reported neurovascular compression on preoperative MRI by radiologists employed in community or private practice settings and academic neuroradiologists. A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent endoscopic microvascular decompression for TN with intraoperatively visualized neurovascular compression and primary read by a non-academic or community radiologist. Patient imaging was then re-read by a board-certified neuroradiologist practicing in an academic setting, who was blinded to the initial read and the side of TN symptoms. Non-academic radiologists reported vascular compression in 26.0% (20/77) of all patients, and mention was rarely made of the non-pathological side (sensitivity = 26.0%). On academic neuroradiologist re-reads, vascular compression was noted in 87.0% (67/77) of patients on the pathological side and in 57.1% (44/77) on the non-pathological side (sensitivity = 87.0%, specificity = 42.9%). Isotropic/near isotropic 3-dimensional steady state or heavily T2-weighted sequences were read with 92.3% sensitivity and 36.9% specificity, compared to 58.3% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity using routine T2 weighted sequences. The frequency of vascular compression reported by non-academic radiologists is much lower than what is reported by academic neuroradiologists reading the same MRI scans. These results highlight the effect of practice setting on the predictive power of neuroimaging. Future studies are indicated to further investigate these relationships, as well as to trial newer imaging modalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]