Search

To compare the doses calculated by the Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA), Acuros dose-to-medium, and Acuros dose-to-water for the patients with lung cancer treated at our institution and show that further investigation and clarification are needed about what dose specifications should be used for NRG clinical trials. Twenty-one patients with lung cancer who previously received intensity modulated radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy–based treatments at our institution were analyzed by recalculating their plans for each one with the AAA algorithm (reviewed and approved by our radiation oncologists) and with both reporting modes of the Acuros algorithm. All plans used the same monitor units as the original approved plan and a 2.5-mm grid size. For each patient, D 100 of clinical target volume (CTV) and CTV coverage ratios in each plan were compared, and dose distributions and dose-volume histograms calculated by AAA, Acuros dose-to-water (D w,m), and Acuros dose-to-medium (D m,m) were compared as well. Differences between CTV D 100 calculated by AAA and Acuros D m,m were larger than the differences between AAA and Acuros XB D w,m for all patients. When D 100 of CTV was evaluated, the largest difference between AAA and Acuros D m,m was 14.12% and between AAA and Acuros XB D w,m was 3.68%. The average differences between the CTV D 100 calculated by AAA and Acuros D m,m was 5.39%. Coverage ratio between Acuros D m,m and AAA ranges from 51.08% to 100% with an average of 91.32%; coverage ratio between Acuros D w,m and AAA ranges from 87.2% to 100.41% with average of 98.94%; coverage ratio between Acuros D m,m and Acuros D w,m ranges from 58.58% to 100% with an average of 92.03%. The present study shows large and systematic differences in doses calculated by AAA and Acuros D m,m. Therefore, further investigation and clarification are needed about which dose reporting mode should be used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine the feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for isolated nodal recurrences of gynecologic malignancies within a previously irradiated area. A retrospective review was performed on 20 patients who underwent 21 curative-intent reirradiation SBRT treatments for locoregional recurrences of gynecologic malignancies. Disease control and survival outcomes were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Treatment toxicities were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. All patients had an isolated pelvic, paraortic, or intra-abdominal nodal recurrence, with the exception of 1 patient who had a concurrent paraortic and right acetabulum metastasis, both of which were irradiated with SBRT. Primary sites included cervix (30.0%), uterus (55.0%), vulva (5.0%), vagina (5.0%), and ovary (5.0%). Median prior external beam radiation therapy dose was 45 Gy. Recurrences were in field in 14 (66.7%) and marginal in 7 (33.3%). SBRT was directed to the pelvis in 13 cases (61.9%) and to paraortic or celiac nodes in 8 (38.1%). The most common SBRT regimen was 40 to 45 Gy in 5 fractions (n = 12). At a median follow-up of 31.2 months, 3-year actuarial in-field local control, distant progression-free survival, and overall survival were 61.4%, 44.0%, and 51.9%, respectively. At the time of last follow-up, 9 (45.0%) patients remained alive without evidence of disease. Actuarial 3-year risk of grade ≥2 and grade ≥3 late toxicities was 38.1% and 14.3%, respectively. SBRT for isolated pelvic or intra-abdominal recurrences of gynecologic malignancies within a previously irradiated field is feasible with an acceptable toxicity rate. With this approach, about half of patients achieved durable disease-free survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy’s (SABR’s) great conformity and short duration has become an attractive treatment modality. We report a phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by SABR in patient with borderline resectable (BR) and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods and materials Patients with biopsy-proven BR or LA PDAC were treated with four 21-day cycles of intravenous gemcitabine and oral capecitabine. Patients were restaged within 4 weeks after ICT by computed tomography and treated by 3-fraction SABR if no metastasis or progressive disease was identified. Patients were restaged 4 weeks following SABR to determine resectability. Tumor response was assessed with carbohydrate antigen 19-9. Results Thirty-five patients (19 BR/16 LA) were enrolled. The median age was 71.8 years (range, 50.6-81.1). ICT was completed in 91.4% (n = 32) of patients. All patients who completed ICT completed SABR. Of those 32 patients, 34.3% (n = 12: 10 BR, 2 LA) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and 11 of 12 (91.7%) received R0 resection. Median overall survival was 18.8, 28.3, and 14.3 months for the entire cohort, BR, and LA, respectively. The 2-year local progression-free survival (LPFS) was 44.9%, 40%, and 52% for the entire cohort, BR, and LA, respectively. For BR patients, multivariate analysis showed surgery was associated with better overall survival and LPFS. One-year LPFS for patients with surgery was 80% and 44% without surgery. Within the 15.4-month follow-up, no grade 3+ toxicity from SABR was observed. No significant quality of life change was observed before and after ICT, SABR, or surgery for BR or LA patients. Conclusions This is the first prospective phase 2 study to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of a 12-week gemcitabine/capecitabine ICT followed by SABR for BR or LA PDAC. The results suggest excellent tolerability, high R0 resection rates, and acceptable posttreatment complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Studies demonstrate safety of omitting axillary nodal dissection for early-stage breast cancer with positive sentinel lymph node (+SLN) biopsy, although trial designs differed in radiation therapy (RT) fields. Regional nodal irradiation was separately shown to improve outcomes in high-risk patients. This led to lack of consensus in RT volumes. Clinical pathways (CPs) standardize care where practice varies unnecessarily. We evaluated the impact of changes to a CP guiding postoperative RT in women with +SLNs on practice patterns throughout a network. Methods and materials We implemented a CP for management of breast cancer with postoperative RT designed to promote uniform nodal treatment. The CP recommended modified tangents (MTs) including level I/II nodes for women with micrometastases (pN1mi). For women with macrometastases (pN1a), CPs recommended including level I/II LN in MT and a third supraclavicular node (SCN) LN ± internal mammary nodes for women with adverse factors present. Results RT fields of 233 women undergoing breast-conserving surgery with +SLN but not axillary nodal dissection were retrospectively reviewed: 25% had pN1mi disease and 75% pN1a. Of 127 women treated before CP changes, 35% with pN1mi and 22% with pN1a were treated with whole-breast irradiation alone. Following CP changes, 106 women were treated: 5% with whole-breast irradiation alone, 58% with MT, and 38% with MT + SCN field. Utilization of MT was associated with CP changes. Utilization of a third SCN field was associated with CP changes, pN stage, extracapsular extension, and total number of adverse factors. Conclusions CPs translate published data and institutional experience into management plans that promote evidence-based care and eliminate unnecessary practice variations. Recognizing that postoperative RT treatment volumes were heterogeneous, we modified the CP based upon the latest evidence for regional nodal irradiation, after which we found increased compliance and consistency with quality guidelines, which will also aid in tracking outcomes in future investigations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Clinical pathways are patient management plans that standardize evidence-based practices to ensure high-quality and cost-effective medical care. Implementation of a pathway is a collaborative process in our network, requiring the active involvement of physicians. This approach promotes acceptance of pathway recommendations, although a peer review process is necessary to ensure compliance and to capture and approve off-pathway selections. We investigated the peer review process and factors associated with time to completion of peer review. Methods and materials Our cancer center implemented radiation oncology pathways for every disease site throughout a large, integrated network. Recommendations are written based upon national guidelines, published literature, and institutional experience with evidence evaluated hierarchically in order of efficacy, toxicity, and then cost. Physicians enter decisions into an online, menu-driven decision support tool that integrates with medical records. Data were collected from the support tool and included the rate of on- and off-pathway selections, peer review decisions performed by disease site directors, and time to complete peer review. Results A total of 6965 treatment decisions were entered in 2015, and 605 (8.7%) were made off-pathway and were subject to peer review. The median time to peer review decision was 2 days (interquartile range, 0.2-6.8). Factors associated with time to peer review decision >48 hours on univariate analysis include disease site ( P < .0001) with a trend toward significance ( P = .066) for radiation therapy modality. There was no difference between recurrent and non-recurrent disease ( P = .267). Multivariable analysis revealed disease site was associated with time to peer review ( P < .001), with lymphoma and skin/sarcoma most strongly influencing decision time >48 hours. Conclusions Clinical pathways are an integral tool for standardizing evidence-based care throughout our large, integrated network, with 91.3% of all treatment decisions being made as per pathway. The peer review process was feasible, with <1% selections ultimately rejected, suggesting that awareness of peer review of treatment decisions encourages compliance with clinical pathway recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose The Google search engine is a resource commonly used by patients to access health-related patient education information. The American Medical Association and National Institutes of Health recommend that patient education resources be written at a level between the third and seventh grade reading levels. We assessed the readability levels of online palliative care patient education resources using 10 readability algorithms widely accepted in the medical literature. Methods and materials In October 2016, searches were conducted for 10 individual terms pertaining to palliative care and oncology using the Google search engine; the first 10 articles written for the public for each term were downloaded for a total of 100 articles. The terms included palliative care, hospice, advance directive, cancer pain management, treatment of metastatic disease, treatment of brain metastasis, treatment of bone metastasis, palliative radiation therapy, palliative chemotherapy, and end-of-life care. We determined the average reading level of the articles by readability scale and Web site domain. Results Nine readability assessments with scores equivalent to academic grade level found that the 100 palliative care education articles were collectively written at a 12.1 reading level (standard deviation, 2.1; range, 7.6-17.3). Zero articles were written below a seventh grade level. Forty-nine (49%) articles were written above a high school graduate reading level. The Flesch Reading Ease scale classified the articles as “difficult” to read with a score of 45.6 of 100. The articles were collected from 62 Web site domains. Seven domains were accessed 3 or more times; among these, www.mskcc.org had the highest average reading level at a 14.5 grade level (standard deviation, 1.4; range, 13.4-16.1). Conclusions Most palliative care education articles readily available on Google are written above national health literacy recommendations. There is need to revise these resources to allow patients and their families to derive the most benefit from these materials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose We evaluated the long-term outcome and toxicity of adjuvant intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for high-risk endometrial carcinoma via a retrospective institutional review of patients treated in this setting with extended follow-up. Methods and materials Patients with endometrial cancer who underwent comprehensive surgical staging followed by adjuvant IMRT with or without sequential chemotherapy between 1999 and 2010 were reviewed. Median doses delivered with IMRT and brachytherapy were 45 Gy in 25 fractions and 10 Gy in 2 fractions; 10.2% received extended field and 94.5% received vaginal brachytherapy. Kaplan-Meier estimates are provided for rates of locoregional (in-field) relapse, distant metastasis, and disease-free survival, and overall survival. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity reported were graded with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. Results A total of 128 patients were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 64 years. Most patients (82.8%) had endometrioid adenocarcinoma followed by papillary serous (10.2%), clear cell (4.7%), and carcinosarcoma (2.3%). International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging distribution was as follows: IA, 13.3%; IB, 32.8%; II, 30.4%; IIIA, 5.5%; IIIC1, 9.4%; and IIIC2, 8.6%. Most (85.9%) underwent nodal dissections (28.1% pelvic only and 57.8% pelvic and para-aortic). Two patients (1.6%) experienced acute grade 3 GI toxicity; no other acute grade ≥3 GI/GU toxicities were noted. With a median follow-up of 57.0 months, 5-year locoregional relapse was 2.5%: vagina (n = 3), parametrium (n = 1), pelvic node (n = 1). Five-year estimates of distant metastasis, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 16.5%, 73.4%, and 77.4%, respectively. Five-year actuarial rates of late grade 3 GI and GU toxicities were 3.2% and 0.0%. The 5-year rate of symptomatic pelvic insufficiency fracture was 4.4%. Conclusions This study represents the largest cohort of endometrial cancer patients with extended follow-up receiving adjuvant IMRT. High rates of pelvic disease control and limited late toxicities demonstrate safety and efficacy of this approach in the setting of extended follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Sublobar resection (SR) in high-risk operable patients may result in a long-term decrease in pulmonary function. We previously reported 3-month pulmonary function outcomes from a randomized phase III study of SR alone compared with SR with brachytherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. We now report long-term pulmonary function after SR. Methods Pulmonary function was measured at baseline and at 3, 12, and 24 months. A decline of 10% or more from baseline in the percentage predicted forced expiratory volume of 1 percentage or in the diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was considered clinically meaningful. The effect of study arm, tumor location, size, approach (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs thoracotomy), and SR type (wedge vs segmentectomy) on pulmonary function was assessed using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. A generalized estimating equation model was used to assess the effect of each factor on longitudinal data, including all four time points. Results Complete pulmonary function data at all time points was available in 69 patients. No significant differences were observed in pulmonary function between SR and SR with brachytherapy, thus the study arms were combined for all analyses. A decline of 10% or more ( p = 0.02) in the percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second was demonstrated for lower-lobe resections at 3 months but was not at 12 or 24 months. A decline of 10% or more ( p = 0.05) in the percentage predicted diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was seen for thoracotomy at 3 months but was not at 12 or 24 months. Conclusions Clinically meaningful declines in pulmonary function occurred after lower lobe resection and after thoracotomy at 3 months but subsequently recovered. This study suggests that SR does not result in sustained decreased pulmonary function in high-risk operable patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Individualized prediction of outcomes may help with therapy decisions for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. We developed a nomogram by analyzing 17 clinical factors and outcomes from a randomized study of sublobar resection for non-small cell lung cancer in high-risk operable patients. The study compared sublobar resection alone with sublobar resection with brachytherapy. There were no differences in primary and secondary outcomes between the study arms, and they were therefore combined for this analysis. Methods The clinical factors of interest (considered as continuous variables) were assessed in a univariate Cox proportional hazards model for significance at the 0.10 level for their impact on overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and any recurrence-free survival (RFS). The final multivariable model was developed using a stepwise model selection. Results Of 212 patients, 173 had complete data on all 17 risk factors. Median follow-up was 4.94 years (range, 0.04 to 6.22). The 5-year OS, LRFS, and RFS were 58.4%, 53.2%, and 47.4%, respectively. Age, baseline percent diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide, and maximum tumor diameter were significant predictors for OS, LRFS, and RFS in the multivariable model. Nomograms were subsequently developed for predicting 5-year OS, LRFS, and RFS. Conclusions Age, baseline percent diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide, and maximum tumor diameter significantly predicted outcomes after sublobar resection. Such nomograms may be helpful for treatment planning in early stage non-small cell lung cancer and to guide future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with concomitant cetuximab is an effective treatment option for previously irradiated, locally recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Its local control and overall survival are similar to those of other available treatment options. Each retreatment depends heavily on the prior treatment and every patient is a special case. Based on the experience of our institution and previously published studies, for patients who receive concomitant cetuximab with a median prior radiation therapy dose of 70 Gy, we recommend a total dose of 40-44 Gy delivered in 5 fractions on alternating days over 1-2 weeks. However, Grade 2 or 3 toxicities are not uncommon. Therefore, in this review, we also report a pilot study that applies a normal tissue complication probability dose-response model to estimate the probability of toxicities in locally recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck reirradiated with SABR. Although this dose-response model includes concurrent targeted therapy and no comparable model yet exists for SABR without it, complication rates without concurrent biological therapy or chemotherapy should be no higher than those described here. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background A significant number of patients have recurrent or persistent lung cancer despite complete resection or treatment with definitive chemoradiation. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/stereotactic body radiation therapy is emerging as an important modality for the treatment of early-stage lung neoplasm; SRS may also offer an alternative treatment option for patients with recurrent lung disease. We evaluated outcomes after treatment with SRS for recurrent lung neoplasm in a large series of patients. Methods Selected patients with limited recurrent, persistent, or progressive disease after one or more prior treatments for lung cancer were offered SRS. Thoracic surgeons evaluated all patients, placed fiducials when needed, and planned treatment in close collaboration with radiation oncologists and medical physicists. In our early experience, a single fraction of 20 Gy radiation was prescribed and was subsequently increased to 45 to 60 Gy in three to five fractions. The primary endpoint evaluated was overall survival. Results We treated 100 patients with recurrent lung cancer (median age 72 years) with SRS. The postprocedure 30-day mortality rate was 0%; median follow-up was 51 months (range, 5 to 123). The median overall survival for the entire group was 23 months (95% confidence interval: 19 to 41). The probability of 2-year and 5-year overall survival was 49% (95% confidence interval: 40% to 60%) and 31% (95% confidence interval: 23% to 43%), respectively. Conclusions Our experience indicates that SRS is safe, and offers an alternative modality for selected patients with recurrent oligometastatic or persistent lung cancer. Thoracic surgeons should actively participate in SRS and continue to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Studies suggest equivalent pain relief from bone metastases after radiation therapy with > 10-fraction regimens and shorter courses. Although American Society for Radiation Oncology evidence-based guidelines and the Choosing Wisely campaign endorse single-fraction treatments and caution against the use of extended courses, publications report single-fraction utilization rates below 5%. We evaluated the impact of our bone metastasis clinical pathway on the adoption of short-course palliative radiation in a large, integrated radiation oncology network. Methods and materials We implemented a clinical pathway for the management of bone metastases in 2003 that required the entry of management decisions into an online tool that subjected off-pathway choices to peer review beginning in 2009. In 2014, the pathway was modified to encourage single-fraction treatments, and the use of > 10 fractions was considered off pathway. Data were obtained from 16 integrated sites (4 academic, 12 community) from 2003 through 2014. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to establish factors associated with treatment with a single fraction and with > 10 fractions. Results In this study, 12,678 unique courses were delivered. From 2003 to 2008, the single-fraction utilization rate was 7.6%. This increased to 10.9% from 2009 to 2013 and to 15.8% in 2014. The odds ratios for single-fraction use were 1.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-1.81) and 2.58 (95% CI, 2.11-3.15) for 2009-2013 and 2014, respectively. Academic physicians were more likely to treat with a single fraction (odds ratio, 5.00; 95% CI, 4.38-5.71). Use of > 10-fraction regimens significantly decreased from 18.6% in 2003-2008 to 15.2% in 2009-2013 and 9.7% in 2014. Conclusions Although our single-fraction utilization rate was initially in line with national rates (7.6%), the adoption rate increased to > 15%. The use of > 10-fraction regimens decreased significantly, predominantly among community practices. By 2014, > 90% of courses were delivered with < 10 fractions. This study demonstrates that provider-driven clinical pathways are able to standardize practice patterns and promote change consistent with evidence-based guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Prior studies have suggested that low baseline quality-of-life (QOL) scores predict worse survival in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. However, these studies involved average-risk patients undergoing lobectomy. We report QOL results from a multicenter trial, American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z4032, which randomized high-risk operable patients to sublobar resection (SR), or SR with brachytherapy, and included longitudinal QOL assessments. Methods Global QOL, using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF36), and the dyspnea score from the University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ) scale, was measured at baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months. SF36 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores were standardized and adjusted for age and gender normals, with scores <50 indicating below-average health status. SOBQ scores were transformed to a 0-100 (poor-excellent) scale. Aims were to: (1) determine the impact of baseline scores on recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and 30-day adverse events (AEs); and (2) identify subgroups (surgical approach, resection type. tumor location, tumor size, respiratory function) with a ≥10-point decline or improvement in QOL after SR. Results Two hundred twelve eligible patients were included. There were no significant differences in baseline QOL scores between arms. Median baseline PCS, MCS, and SOBQ scores were 42.7, 51.1, and 70.8, respectively. There were no differences in grade-3+ AEs, overall survival, or recurrence-free survival in patients with baseline scores ≤median versus >median values, except for a significantly worse overall survival for patients with baseline SOBQ scores ≤median value. There were no significant differences between the study arms in percentage change of QOL scores from baseline to 3, 12, or 24 months. Further comparison combining the 2 arms demonstrated a higher percentage of patients with a ≥10-point decline in SOBQ scores with segmentectomy compared with wedge resection (40.5% vs 21.9%, P = .03) at 12 months, with thoracotomy versus video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) (38.8% vs 20.4%, P = .03) at 12 months, and T1b versus T1a tumors (46.9% vs 23.5%, P = .020) at 24 months. A ≥10-point improvement in PCS score was seen at 3 months with VATS versus thoracotomy (16.5% vs 3.6%, P = .02). Conclusions In high-risk operable patients, poor baseline QOL scores were not predictive for worse overall or recurrence-free survival, or for higher risk for AEs following SR. VATS was associated with improvement in physical function at 3 months, and improved dyspnea scores at 12 months, lending support for the preferential use of VATS when SR is undertaken. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HF-WBI) following breast conserving surgery has produced excellent outcomes, but utilization remains limited. We evaluated the impact of a clinical pathway in the adoption of HF-WBI in a large, integrated radiation oncology network. Methods and materials We identified patients aged ≥ 70 years treated for breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ. Patients treated with palliative intent, accelerated partial breast radiation, following mastectomy, or with axillary nodal, supraclavicular, or internal mammary fields were excluded. HF-WBI was defined as ≤ 20 fractions with a dose/fraction ≥ 2.5 Gy. Multivariate analysis identified variables associated with increased HF-WBI utilization. Results We identified 2426 patients meeting inclusion criteria. HF-WBI utilization increased significantly from 6.5% (22.0% academic, 2.0% community) before pathway modification to 33.8% afterwards (68.5% academic, 25.3% community, P < .001). For academic physicians, the relative risk of HF-WBI utilization was 3.8 following publication of the seminal HF-WBI trial and 10.6 following pathway modification ( P < .001). For community physicians, the relative risk of HF-WBI utilization did not significantly change following publication but was 21.0 following pathway modification ( P < .001). The increased adoption of HF-WBI saved an estimated $154,000 annually in our network. Conclusions We found that our implementation of clinical pathways substantially increased adoption of HF-WBI for breast cancer. We found no significant change in utilization of HF-WBI among community physicians following publication of a seminal trial for HF-WBI until after clinical pathway implementation, which increased the use of HF-WBI by 20-fold. Clinical pathways may be effective in changing practice patterns, disseminating evidence, and realizing health care savings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Few guidelines exist on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning for recurrent head and neck cancer. We assessed the impact of retrospectively adding margins/automated PET volumes to the gross tumor volume (GTV) in patients with post-SBRT recurrences. Materials and methods: We reviewed 89 patients with recurrent head and neck cancer treated with SBRT using no margin around the GTV. GTVs were recontoured with 1–5mm margins. PET-CT planned GTVs were also recontoured by adding PET-standardized uptake value (SUV)3.5, SUV4.5, SUV40% max, and signal/background ratio (SBR) to the original GTV. We deformably registered recontoured GTVs to post-SBRT scans and assessed fraction of recurrence volume (RV) falling within the GTV, the “RV-GTV overlap.” Results: With non-PET-CT planning, median RV-GTV overlap increased from 11.7% to 48.2% using 5mm margins, and median GTV size increased by 41.8cc (156%). With PET-CT planning, RV-GTV overlap increased from 45% to 93.6% using 5mm margins, and GTV size increased by 34.8cc (140%). Adding SUV3.5 and SBR increased RV-GTV overlap from 45% to 73.3% and 73.6%, with GTV size increases of 0.8 (3%) and 3.1cc (11%), respectively. Conclusions: Recontouring increased recurrence coverage and also GTV size. Margins up to 5mm may reduce failures but could possibly increase toxicities. Automated PET contours may reduce near-miss failures with smaller increases in GTV size. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Purpose: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising salvage strategy for unresectable, previously-irradiated recurrent squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (rSCCHN). Here-in, we report the first prospective evaluation of patient-reported quality-of-life (PR-QoL) following re-irradiation with SBRT±cetuximab for rSCCHN. Materials and methods: From November 2004 to May 2011, 150 patients with unresectable, rSCCHN in a previously-irradiated field receiving >40Gy were treated with SBRT to 40–50Gy in 5 fractions±concurrent cetuximab. PR-QoL was prospectively acquired using the University of Washington Quality-of-Life Revised (UW-QoL-R). Results: Overall PR-QoL, health-related PR-QoL, and select domains commonly affected by re-irradiation progressively increase following an initial 1-month decline with statistically significant improvements noted in swallowing (p =0.025), speech (p =0.017), saliva (p =0.041), activity (p =0.032) and recreation (p =0.039). Conclusions: Especially for patients surviving >1-year, improved tumor control associated with SBRT re-irradiation may ameliorate decreased PR-QoL resulting from rSCCHN. These improvements in PR-QoL transcend all measured domains in a validated PR-QoL assessment tool independent of age, use of cetuximab, tumor volume, and interval since prior irradiation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: Sublobar resection (SR) is commonly used for patients considered high risk for lobectomy. Nonoperative therapies are increasingly being reported for patients with similar risk because of perceived lower morbidity. We report 30- and 90-day adverse events (AEs) from American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z4032, a multicenter phase III study for high-risk patients with stage I non–small cell lung cancer. Methods: Data from 222 evaluable patients randomized to SR (n = 114) or SR with brachytherapy (n = 108) are reported. AEs were recorded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0, at 30 and 90 days after surgery. Risk factors (age, percent baseline carbon monoxide diffusion in the lung [DLCO%], percent forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1%], upper lobe vs lower lobe resections, performance status, surgery approach, video-assisted thoracic surgery vs open and extent, and wedge vs segmentectomy) were analyzed using a multivariable logistic model for their impact on the incidence of grade 3 or higher (G3+) AEs. Respiratory AEs were also specifically analyzed. Results: Median age, FEV1%, and DLCO% were similar in the 2 treatment groups. There was no difference in the location of resection (upper vs lower lobe) or the use of segmental or wedge resections. There were no differences between the groups with respect to “respiratory” G3+ AEs (30 days: 14.9% vs 19.4%, P = .35; 0–90 days: 19.3% vs 25%, P = .31) and “any” G3+ AEs (30 days: 25.4% vs 30.6%, P = .37; 0–90 days: 29.8% vs 37%, P = .25). Further analysis combined the 2 groups. Mortality occurred in 3 patients (1.4%) by 30 days and in 6 patients (2.7%) by 90 days. Four of the 6 deaths were thought to be due to surgery. When considered as continuous variables, FEV1% was associated with “any” G3+ AE at days 0 to 30 (P = .03; odds ratio [OR] = 0.98) and days 0 to 90 (P = .05; OR = 0.98), and DLCO% was associated with “respiratory” G3+ AE at days 0 to 30 (P = .03; OR = 0.97) and days 0 to 90 (P = .05; OR = 0.98). Segmental resection was associated with a higher incidence of any G3+ AE compared with wedge resection at days 0 to 30 (40.3% vs 22.7%; OR = 2.56; P < .01) and days 0 to 90 (41.5% vs 29.7%; OR = 1.96; P = .04). The median FEV1% was 50%, and the median DLCO% was 46%. By using these median values as potential cutpoints, only a DLCO% of less than 46% was significantly associated with an increased risk of “respiratory” and “any” G3+ AE for days 0 to 30 and 0 to 90. Conclusions: In a multicenter setting, SR with brachytherapy was not associated with increased morbidity compared with SR alone. SR/SR with brachytherapy can be performed safely in high-risk patients with non–small cell lung cancer with low 30- and 90-day mortality and acceptable morbidity. Segmental resection was associated with increased “any” G3+ AE, and DLCO% less than 46% was associated with “any” G3+ AE and “respiratory” G3+ AE at both 30 and 90 days. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in previously irradiated patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients and Methods: In this Phase I dose-escalation clinical trial, 25 patients were treated in five dose tiers up to 44 Gy, administered in 5 fractions over a 2-week course. Response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose standardized uptake value change on positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT). Results: No Grade 3/4 or dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Four patients had Grade 1/2 acute toxicities. Four objective responses were observed, for a response rate of 17% (95% confidence interval 2%–33%). The maximum duration of response was 4 months. Twelve patients had stable disease. Median time to disease progression was 4 months, and median overall survival was 6 months. Self-reported quality of life was not significantly affected by treatment. Fluorodeoxyglucose PET was a more sensitive early-measure response to treatment than CT volume changes. Conclusion: Reirradiation up to 44 Gy using SBRT is well tolerated in the acute setting and warrants further evaluation in combination with conventional and targeted therapies. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Surgical resection is the standard of care for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer or selected patients with pulmonary metastases. Stereotactic radiosurgery may offer an alternative option for high-risk patients who are not surgical candidates. We report our initial experience with stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of lung neoplasm in 100 consecutive patients. Methods: Patients who were medically inoperable were offered stereotactic radiosurgery. Thoracic surgeons evaluated all patients, placed fiducials, and performed treatment planning in collaboration with radiation oncologists. Initially, a median dose of 20 Gy prescribed to the 80% isodose line was administered in a single fraction, and this was subsequently increased to a total of 60 Gy in three fractions. The primary end point evaluated was overall survival. Results: We treated 100 patients (median age, 70 years; 51 men, 49 women) with stereotactic radiosurgery: 46 (46%) with primary lung neoplasm, 35 (35%) with recurrent cancer, and 19 (19%) with pulmonary metastases. The median follow-up was 20 months. The median overall survival was 24 months. Local recurrence occurred in 25 patients. The probability of 2-year overall survival was 50% for the entire group, 44% for primary lung cancer, 41% for recurrent cancer, and 84% for metastatic cancer. Conclusions: Our initial experience indicates that stereotactic radiosurgery has reasonable results in these high-risk patients. Resection continues to remain the standard treatment; however, stereotactic radiosurgery may offer an alternative in high-risk patients. Further prospective studies with different dose schema are needed to evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: Surgical resection is the standard of care for patients with stage I non–small cell lung cancer. For high-risk patients, however, stereotactic radiosurgery may offer an alternative. We report our initial experience with stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of stage I non–small cell lung cancer by a team of thoracic surgeons and radiation oncologists. Methods: Patients medically ineligible for operation were offered stereotactic radiosurgery. Thoracic surgeons evaluated all patients, placed fiducials, and performed treatment planning in collaboration with radiation oncologists. Median dose of 20 Gy to 80% isodose line was administered as single fraction (range 20–60 Gy,1–3 fractions). Initial response rate, progression, and survival were monitored. Results: Twenty-one patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery in 3 years. Fiducial placement resulted in pneumothorax requiring a pigtail catheter in 10 of 21 patients (47%). Disease showed initial response in 12 of 21 patients (57%), was stable in 5 (24%), progressed in 3 (14%), and was not evaluable in 1 (5%). Procedure-related mortality was zero. With mean 24-month follow-up, estimated 1-year survival probability was 81% (68% confidence interval 0.73–0.90). Median survival was 26.4 months (confidence interval 19.6 months–not reached). Local progression occurred in 9 patients (42%). Median time to local progression was 12.3 months (confidence interval 12 months–not reached). Conclusion: Preliminary experience indicates that stereotactic radiosurgery (median dose 20 Gy) is safe in this high-risk group; however, it was associated with significant local progression. Further prospective studies with multiple fractions are needed to evaluate its efficacy in this population. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Surgical resection is the standard of care for patients with resectable non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) or limited pulmonary metastases. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may offer an alternative option for high-risk patients who are not surgical candidates. We report our initial experience with SRS in the treatment of lung neoplasm. Methods: Patients who were medically inoperable were offered SRS. Thoracic surgeons evaluated all patients, placed fiducials, and planned treatment in collaboration with radiation oncologists. A median dose of 20 Gy prescribed to the 80% isodose line was administered in a single fraction. The initial response rate, time to progression, and overall survival were evaluated. Results: During a 2-year period, 32 patients, 27 with NSCLC and 5 with pulmonary metastases, underwent SRS. Fiducial placement resulted in a pneumothorax requiring a pigtail catheter in 9 patients (28%). An initial complete response was observed in 7 patients (22%) and partial response in 10 (31%). Disease was stable in 9 (28%) and progression occurred in 5 patients (16%), with a median time to local progression of 11 months. The median overall survival was 26 months. The probability of 1-year overall survival was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65% to 94%) for the entire group and 91% (95% CI, 75% to 100%) for stage I patients. Conclusions: Our preliminary experience indicates that SRS has reasonable results in this high-risk group of patients, with pneumothorax being a significant morbidity. Surgery continues to offer the best chance of cure for resectable patients; however, SRS offers an alternative to high-risk patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: The goal of this study was to evaluate coregistered [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for the detection of persistent disease after definitive radiation therapy in head and neck cancer. Methods and Materials: Posttreatment FDG-PET/CT was performed in 28 patients on average 8 weeks (range, 4 to 15.7 weeks) after completing definitive radiation therapy. FDG-PET/CT was visually analyzed for the entire patient group and at two time points (4-8 and >8 weeks) after treatment. The contrast-enhanced CT portion of PET/CT was separately analyzed blinded to the results of coregistered FDG-PET/CT and classified as negative or positive for residual locoregional disease. Pathologic findings and clinical follow-up served as the reference standard. Results: Follow-up data were available for all 28 patients (median, 17.6 months). Regarding the detection of residual disease, the overall sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET/CT was 76.9% and 93.3%, respectively, compared with 92.3% and 46.7% for contrast-enhanced CT. The accuracy of FDG-PET/CT was 85.7%, compared with 67.9% for CT alone. All false-negative (n = 3) and false-positive (n = 1) FDG-PET/CT results occurred between 4 and 8 weeks after treatment. At 8 weeks or later after treatment, the specificity of CT was 28%, compared with 100% for FDG-PET/CT. Conclusions: The metabolic-anatomic information from coregistered FDG-PET/CT provided the most accurate assessment for treatment response when performed later than 8 weeks after the conclusion of radiation therapy. FDG-PET/CT excelled by a higher specificity and overall diagnostic performance than CT imaging alone. These results support a potential clinical role of FDG-PET/CT in the early assessment of therapy response after definitive radiation therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess early clinical outcome of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of vulvar cancer and compare dosimetric parameters with 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT). Methods: Fifteen patients with vulvar cancer were treated with IMRT. Seven patients were treated with preoperative chemoradiation, and 8 patients were treated with adjuvant postoperative radiation therapy. Median dose was 46 Gy in the preoperative and 50.4 Gy in the postoperative group. Results: The mean volume of small bowel, rectum, and bladder that received doses in excess of 30 Gy with IMRT was reduced when compared with 3D CRT. Treatment was well tolerated, and only 1 patient had acute Grade 3 small-bowel toxicity. Median follow-up was 12 months. In the preoperative group, 5 patients (71%) had clinical complete response and 3 patients (42.8%) had pathologic complete response. In the adjuvant group, 2 patients had recurrences in the treatment field. No patients had late Grade 3 toxicity. The 2-year actuarial disease-specific survival was 100%. Conclusions: Intensity-modulated RT appears to offer advantages over 3D CRT treatment of vulvar cancer by elimination of dose modulation across overlapping regions and reduction of unnecessary dose to the bladder, rectum, and small bowel. Early results with a small number of patients show promising results, with a low incidence of severe toxicity. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: In the era of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), the greatest challenge remains target delineation, as the opportunity to maximize cures while simultaneously decreasing radiation dose to the surrounding normal tissues is to be realized. Over the last 2 decades, technological advances in radiographic imaging, biochemistry, and molecular biology have played an increasing role in radiation treatment planning, delivery, and evaluation of response. Previously, fluoroscopy formed the basis of radiation treatment planning. Beginning in the late 1980s, computed tomography (CT) has become the basis for modern radiation treatment planning and delivery, coincident with the rise of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT). Additionally, multi-modality anatomic imaging registration was the solution pursued to augment delineation of tumors and surrounding structures on CT-based treatment planning. Although these imaging modalities provide the customary anatomic details necessary for radiation treatment planning, they have limitations, including difficulty with identification of small tumor deposits, tumor extension, and distinction from scar tissues. To overcome these limitations, PET and, more recently, PET-CT have been innovative regarding the extent of disease appraisal, target delineation in the treatment planning, and assessment of therapy response. We review the role of functional imaging in IGRT as it reassures transformations on the field of radiation oncology. As we move toward the era of IGRT, the use of multi-modality imaging fusion, and the introduction of more sensitive and specific PET-CT tracers may further assist target definition. Furthermore, the potential to predict early outcome or even detect early recurrence of tumor, may allow for the tailoring of intervention in cancer patients. The convergence of a biological target volume, and perhaps multi-tracer tumor, molecular, and genetic profile tumors will probably be vital in cancer treatment selection. Nevertheless, prospective clinical experience with outcome is encouraged and needs to be expanded to entirely exploit the benefits of the IGRT. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Purpose: To assess the feasibility and outcomes of 125I Vicryl mesh brachytherapy after sublobar resection in stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with poor pulmonary function. Methods and materials: Between January 1997 and July 2004, patients with poor cardiopulmonary reserve who had stage IA and IB (T1-2 N0 M0) NSCLC and a forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) of ≥0.6L were considered for limited surgical resection either by an open or video-assisted thoracoscopic procedure and for a subsequent 125I Vicryl mesh brachytherapy implant. Mediastinal and hilar lymph node staging was performed routinely in all patients. After clear margins were obtained grossly and on frozen section, a single-plane 125I implant was designed to encompass a plane consisting of the staple line and a 2-cm margin of surrounding visceral pleura. The implant was introduced through the surgical incision and sutured to the visceral pleura. A prescribed dose of 100–120Gy was delivered to a volume within 0.5cm from the plane of the implant. Follow-up orthogonal films or CTs were obtained for dosimetric analysis. Kaplan–Meier analyses were used to estimate the local control, locoregional control, and overall survival rates. Results: Of the 110 patients, 65 had stage IA and 45 had stage IB NSCLC. The mean preoperative FEV1 was 47% of the predicted volume. With a median follow-up of 11 months (range 1–68 months), there were four recurrences within the radiation volume. The estimated 5-year local (in-field) control, locoregional control, and overall survival rates were 90%, 61%, and 18%, respectively. Conclusion: Vicryl mesh brachytherapy after sublobar resection for high-risk stage I NSCLC patients is a feasible procedure, which results in an excellent local (in-field) control rate. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To prospectively study the impact on tumor and normal tissue delineation for RT planning by use of hybrid PET-CT simulation for patients with head-and-neck cancer. Methods and Materials: Twenty-one patients were simulated in treatment position on a hybrid PET-CT scanner. Images were transferred to the Varian Eclipse planning system. Abnormal areas of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake were contoured on PET for the gross tumor volume of primaries (GTVp) and abnormal nodal region of primaries (ABNp) then compared with the same CT gross tumor volumes (GTVc) and abnormal nodal region (ABNc). A statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation of PET and CT volumes. Results: Positron emission tomography demonstrated the primary in all cases, whereas CT did not find the primary in 3 cases. In 8 patients, additional areas of disease were seen only in PET. The average ratio of GTVc/GTVp was 3.1 (range, 0.3-23.6), whereas for ABNc/ABNp was 0.7 (range, 0-4). Volumes for the primaries were significantly larger on CT than on PET (p = 0.002) but not for nodal regions (p = 0.5). Conclusions: Hybrid PET-CT simulation is feasible and provides valuable information that results in greater delineation of normal tissues from tumor bearing areas at high risk for recurrence. This finding may further improve therapeutic window for IMRT for head-and-neck cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To identify and evaluate the pretreatment and patient factors that would predict for complications after repeat radiosurgery.Methods and Materials: The data from 26 patients who underwent reirradiation with Gamma Knife surgery after a previous procedure in the same or subjacent location were available for evaluation. The range of follow-up was 1–45 months (mean 10). The mean minimal and maximal initial dose and volume for all 26 patients was 16.2 Gy (range 12–22), 31.0 Gy (range 22.2–40.0), and 12.4 cm3 (range 1.20–70.84), respectively. The mean marginal and maximal repeated radiosurgery dose and volume for all 26 patients was 14.9 Gy (range 12–22.5), 29.7 Gy (range 18.0–45.0) and 12.8 cm3 (range 1.10–39.20), respectively.Results: Tumor control was significantly better statistically (p = 0.0129) for benign tumors (6 of 6, 100% actuarial rate at 4 years) compared with malignant tumors (7 of 20, 35% actuarial rate at 3 years, 3 of 4 metastatic tumors and 2 of 10 primary malignant gliomas). The retreatment volume for radiosurgery correlated significantly with the probability of neurologic decline (any cause) (p = 0.0181).Conclusion: Repeat radiosurgery can be performed for recurrent tumors with minimal central nervous system toxicity, especially for benign tumors, with reasonable tumor control. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose Local failure following concurrent chemoradiation and in-lobe failures following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are common. We evaluated our institutional experience using SBRT as salvage in this setting. Methods and materials Seventy-two patients were reirradiated with SBRT for residual, locally recurrent, or new primary non-small cell lung cancer within or adjacent to a high-dose external beam radiation therapy or SBRT field. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test were used to estimate endpoints and differentiate cohorts. Results Median follow-up was 17.9 months. Patients had residual or recurrent disease (54.2%); 45.8% had new lung primaries. Median reirradiated T size was 2.5 cm (range, 0.8-7.8 cm). Median pre-retreatment maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max ) was 7.15 (range, 1.2-37.6). The most common SBRT reirradiation regimen was 48 Gy in 4 fractions (range, 17-60 Gy in 1-5 fractions). Median progression-free survival was 15.2 months, and median overall survival was 20.8 months. Two-year local failure was 21.6%. Patients with SUV max at reirradiation <7.0 had a 2-year local control of 93.1% versus 61.1% above the median ( P < .001). The 2-year rate of distant metastases was 10.4% versus 54.1% in patients treated for a new primary versus residual or recurrent disease ( P < .001). Median progression-free survival was 31.9 months versus 8.4 months, respectively ( P = .037). Median survival of patients treated for new primary was 25.2 months versus 16.2 months with residual or recurrent disease ( P = .049), and median survival for patients with reirradiation SUV max below the median was 42.0 months versus 9.8 months above the median ( P < .001). Acute any-grade toxicity was seen in 29.2% of patients, acute grade 3 toxicity in 11.1%, and late grade 3 toxicity in 1.4% with no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions SBRT appears to be a safe and effective means of salvaging recurrent, residual, or new primary NSCLC in or adjacent to a previous high-dose radiation field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose The results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0617, which randomized patients with stages IIIA/IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to definitive chemoradiation therapy to 60 Gy versus 74 Gy, demonstrated a detrimental survival impact with high-dose radiation therapy. We evaluated the impact of changes to a provider-driven clinical pathway (CP) guiding management of NSCLC on practice throughout our cancer center network. Methods and materials In 2001, we implemented a CP for management of stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC with definitive chemoradiation therapy. In 2013, the CP for NSCLC was amended (amendment 1) to allow a dose range of 60 to 74 Gy. The CP was amended (amendment 2) in January 2016 to specify a dose range of 60 to 70 Gy. Higher doses were considered off-pathway and subject to peer review. Data from decisions entered from 2012 to 2016 were obtained. Results From 2012 until publication of RTOG 0617 in February 2015, the median prescription dose was 66 Gy delivered in 1.8 to 2.1 Gy fractions. Doses ≤66 Gy were prescribed for 52% of patients. From February 2015 to September 2016, the median prescription dose was 60 Gy, and 91% of prescription doses were ≤66 Gy. After amendment 2, 99% of decisions were ≤66 Gy. Dose ≤66 Gy was associated with treatment following publication of 0617 ( P < .001) and treatment after amendment 2 ( P < .001). On multivariable analysis, treatment after amendment 2 was associated with dose ≤66 Gy (odds ratio, 9.9; 95% confidence interval, 5.2-19.0; P < .001). The percentage of lung receiving 20 Gy was lower following publication of 0617 ( P < .001). There was no difference in the percentage of heart receiving 40 Gy. Conclusions CPs eliminate variations in practice that lead to inferior outcomes. Recognizing that our CP for definitive treatment of patients with locally advanced NSCLC allowed heterogeneous dose prescriptions, we modified the CP based on the publication of RTOG 0617. We found that the CP was a tool to ensure patients receive evidence-based care across a large cancer center network. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We evaluated daily setup reproducibility of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) using mega voltage (MV) imaging for left breast cancer radiation therapy. Analysis of 109 left breast cancer patients across UPMC Hillman Cancer Center network treated using DIBH technique with daily MV imaging was done. Patient characteristics, MV imaging procedure used and inter-fraction directional shifts were collected. For the statistical analyses, we separated all patients into 2 groups in each of the following 3 categories; (1) obese (BMI ≥ 30) vs nonobese, (2) mastectomy vs lumpectomy, (3) internal mammary node (IMN) treatment vs no IMN treatment. The group mean inter-fraction directional shifts were as following: (1) 0.7 mm (superior), 0.8 mm (inferior); (2) 0.65 mm (left), 0.64 mm (right); (3) 0.89 mm (anterior), 0.83 mm (posterior). Also, any directional shift ≥ 2 mm, ≥ 3 mm, ≥ 4 mm, ≥ 5 mm, ≥ 10 mm was found to be 52.9%, 37.6%, 30.9%, 21.9%, 3.7% of total fractions, respectively. In the stratified analysis, obese patients had larger directional shifts (p < 0.05) and highly associated with number of fractions for ≥ 5 mm in any directional shift compared to nonobese patients (29% vs 17%; p = 0.04). DIBH setup for left breast cancer treatment at our large cancer center network was reproducible with any mean directional shifts less than 1.0 mm using MV imaging. Daily imaging would be more beneficial for obese patients compared to nonobese patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to study the correlation between intraoperative and postimplant dosimetry. We investigated the correlation between prostate (V 150) and urethra (D 30 , D 5) dose limits, and whether it is possible to increase prostate D 90 and V 100 in intraoperative planning without violating postimplant urethra and rectum dose limits. Seventy-nine patients who underwent real-time ultrasound-guided prostate implants using intraoperative planning from 2013 to 2017 were analyzed. Forty-one of the 79 implants were 125I as monotherapy and the remainder was 103Pd as boost to external beam radiation therapy or external beam radiation therapy plus androgen deprivation therapy. Prescriptions followed the guidelines of AAPM TG-137. The urethra was catheterized during intraoperative implantation and postimplant imaging to facilitate the urethra identification. T2-cubed MRI and CT were acquired on the same day and about 1 month after the low-dose-rate procedure, and MRI was later fused with the CT scan for accurate delineation of the prostate and postimplant dosimetry evaluation. An institutionally based peer-review process and document procedure were established based on national recommendations. Correlation of dose parameters: D 90 , V 150 , V 100 of prostate, D 30 , D 5 of urethra, and V 100 of rectum between intraoperative and postimplant plans were evaluated. D 90 and V 100 declined for all implants between intraoperative and postimplant dosimetry. On average, D 90 declined by 17.5% and 21.7% for 125I and 103Pb implants, respectively. V 100 declined for all implants between intraoperative and postimplant dosimetry but less pronounced. Prostate V 150 and urethra D 30 and D 5 also showed different tendency of decline. Of the 79 implants, 60 did not meet the postimplant dosimetry target for prostate (V 150 ≤ 50%), and 46 of the 60 implants met the optimal dosimetry targets for both D 30 (<125%) and D 5 (<150%), and the other 14 of the 60 implants failed to meet either the D 30 or the D 5 limits. All the implants met the postimplant target dose for rectum: V 100 ≤ 1.3 cc. Intraoperative implant dosimetry could not accurately predict postimplant dosimetry; however, to avoid underdosage of prostate, intraoperative D 90 should be close to 120% of prescribed dose and V 100 needs to be close to 100% of prescribed dose. Prostate V 150 > 50% does not necessarily indicate the violation of urethra D 30 and D 5 dose limits. For most of the implants, target intraoperative D 90 and V 100 could be raised without violating urethra D 30 and D 5 limits recommended by American Brachytherapy Society in postimplant evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose For well-selected elderly women who undergo segmental mastectomy for early-stage, estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer, hormonal therapy alone is emerging as an acceptable adjuvant therapy option since the initial publication of Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9343 study in 2004 and update in 2013. The rate of adoption of adjuvant hormonal therapy alone in lieu of radiation therapy (RT) and its associated patterns of care is not known in the United States and was the subject of this study. Methods and materials We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify women aged ≥ 70 diagnosed with T1N0/T1Nx invasive breast cancer who underwent segmental mastectomy between 1998 and 2011. Because hormone receptor status was not specifically and reliably coded, only those who received hormonal therapy were included in this analysis. Univariate and multivariable exploratory analyses of factors associated with the use of RT were performed using SPSS, version 17.0. Results Of the 182,115 patients who met inclusion criteria, 97,530 (53.6%) patients underwent hormonal therapy and were included in the analysis. The RT utilization rate in this subset decreased with time from 84.9% in 1998 to 75.1% in 2011 ( P < .001). Multivariable analysis revealed that the factors associated with decreased use of RT include (in order of association): older age, later year of diagnosis, greater comorbidity score, low grade, lack of insurance, treatment at academic facility, race, rural location, lower median income, and distance from facility. Conclusions This study assesses the patterns of care associated with the omission of RT in elderly women with early-stage breast cancer who received adjuvant hormonal therapy. Since the publication of major clinical trials, this strategy has been increasingly adopted. The strongest predictors of using this strategy included advanced patient age, high comorbidity score, and low-grade disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Purpose Twitter may reflect attitudes underrepresented in traditional surveys. This study aimed to understand professionals' and patients' thoughts regarding brachytherapy on Twitter. Methods and Materials Twitter was queried with "brachytherapy" to identify all tweets about patients' experiences from January 2012 to May 2017. A random sample of tweets by health care professionals containing "brachytherapy" was obtained using the first weekly tweet in the same interval. Consensus coding was used to categorize tweets as "patient" or "professional" based on content about receiving brachytherapy or self-identification as a health care professional. Tweets were analyzed for positive, neutral, or negative sentiment and recurrent themes using manual, iterative coding. Patient tweets were analyzed for whether they were shared before or after treatment and whether the patient, friends, or family had posted them. Professional tweets were analyzed to identify temporal theme changes. Results One hundred sixty-two patient tweets and 260 professional tweets were obtained from January 2012 to May 2017. On average, 2.5 patient tweets were shared monthly compared to 69 for providers. Among tweets by patients and professionals, 57% vs. 12% expressed positive sentiment, 21% vs. 3% negative sentiment, and 22% vs. 85% neutral sentiment, respectively. The most common patient and professional codes were "general sharing of experience/casual conversation" (32%) and "science" (21%), respectively. Conclusions Patients tweeted less about brachytherapy than professionals and generally expressed favorable and negative sentiments regarding their radiation treatment experiences. Professionals tended to express neutral sentiment and focus on research. Opportunities exist for greater radiation oncologist engagement in this medium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) remains underutilized in the United States despite support by multiple clinical trials. We evaluated the success of iterative modifications of our breast cancer clinical pathway on the adoption of HF-WBI in a large, integrated radiation oncology network. Methods and Materials: The breast clinical pathway was modified in January 2011 (Amendment 1) to recommend HF-WBI as the first option for women ≥70 of age with stages 0 to IIA, while maintaining conventional fractionation (CF) as a pathway-concordant secondary option. In January 2013 (Amendment 2), the pathway's HF-WBI recommendation was extended to women ≥50 years of age. In January 2014 (Amendment 3), the pathway mandated HF-WBI as the only pathway-concordant option in women ≥50 years of age, and all pathway-discordant plans were subject to peer review and justification. Women ≥50 years of age with ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer who underwent breast conserving surgery and adjuvant WBI were included in this analysis. Results: We identified 5112 patients from 2009 to 2014 who met inclusion criteria. From 2009 to 2012, the overall HF-WBI use rate was 8.3%. Following Amendments 2 and 3 (2013 and 2014, respectively), HF-WBI use significantly increased to 21.8% (17.3% in the community, 39.7% at academic sites) and 76.7% (75.5% in the community, 81.4% at academic sites), respectively (P<.001). Compared to 2009 to 2012, the relative risk of using HF-WBI was 7.9 (95% confidence interval: 7.1-8.6, P<.001) and 10.7 (95% CI: 10.3-11.0, P<.001), respectively, after Amendments 2 and 3, respectively. Age ≥70 and treatment at an academic site increased the likelihood of receiving HF-WBI in 2009 to 2012 and following Amendment 2 (P<.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the transformative effect of a clinical pathway on patterns of care for breast radiation therapy. Although our initial HF-WBI use rate was low (8%-22%) and consistent with national rates, the clinical pathway approach dramatically increased adoption rate to >75%. In contrast to passive guidelines, clinical pathways serve as active tools to promote current best practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat a variety of head and neck tumors as a result of its highly conformal dose distributions and stereotactic spatial accuracy in delivery. Our experience and other previous reports have shown that SBRT is technically feasible, well-tolerated and compares favorably to other alternatives of salvage therapy in the management of patients with recurrent and/or previously irradiated head and neck cancers. Furthermore, it has the advantage of a shorter treatment schedule, greater compliance, and safe delivery in the outpatient setting. This affords an opportunity to introduce SBRT as a definitive treatment in select patients. This review presents an overview of the use of SBRT for managing head and neck tumors by highlighting the existing indications and the expanding role of SBRT in managing these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Glomus jugulare tumors are rare, typically benign, tumors that arise from the neural crest cells that are associated with the autonomic ganglia in and around the jugular bulb. Treatment options for glomus jugulare tumors include embolization followed by resection, fractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and/or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Materials and methods: 18 patients were treated with linear-accelerator based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) between May 2002 and November 2008. Fifteen patients (83%) had single glomus jugulare tumors and 3 patients had bilateral glomus jugulare tumors (although each of these patients had a single tumor targeted). The median tumor volume was 5.83cm3 (range, 0.32–35.47cm3). Ten tumors (56%) were previously untreated, and 8 (44%) tumors were persistent after previous surgical resection. One patient had undergone previous EBRT and 2 patients were previously treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery to the intracranial portion of their tumor, with planned SBRT to the extracranial portion 2–4months later at our institution. The median prescribed dose was 20Gy in 3 fractions (range: 16–25Gy in 1–5 fx) to the 80% isodose line. The median prescription coverage of the tumor was 93.6% (range: 83–98.72%). Results: Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 22months. All the patients were alive at the time of the last follow-up with imaging available for review. The tumor was stable in 17 patients and decreased in size in one patient – yielding a local control rate of 100%. No patients experienced any new or worsening treatment-related neurologic deficits. Conclusions: SBRT is a safe and efficacious treatment modality for glomus jugulare tumors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Purpose: With the increasing elderly population, more women with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer may not be surgical candidates due to medical comorbidities. Definitive radiation therapy with external beam radiation (EBRT) and/or brachytherapy is a reasonable primary treatment for endometrial cancer in patients who cannot undergo surgery. Methods: A retrospective review identified 26 women 75 years and older with endometrial cancer who were not operative candidates due to comorbidities and received definitive radiation. Results: The median age of the treated patients was 83, all of whom had significant medical comorbidities precluding surgical treatment. Seventy-three percent of the patients had stage T1 disease, 19% were stage T2, and 8% were stage T3. Seventy-three percent of patients received EBRT before brachytherapy (median dose: 45 Gy). The median brachytherapy dose was 20 Gy in 5 fractions. The types of brachytherapy used were Rotte Y applicator (42%), tandem and cylinder (42%), and ring and tandem (16%). Median followup was 12 months (1–60 months). No treatment breaks were required for the entire group and only 2 patients (8%) developed late toxicity. The overall survival for all patients was 89% and 28% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Disease-specific survival for all patients was 93% at 1 year and 73% at 3 years. Conclusions: The results in this study indicate that definitive radiation with EBRT and/or brachytherapy for endometrial cancer is feasible and well tolerated in an elderly population. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]