Search

Highlights • This paper broadens current conceptualizations of energy justice for smart grids. • The study explores values in the public debates on smart grids in two countries. • Value conflicts show the importance of distributive and procedural justice. • It is debated if the systems lead to more equity or reinforce injustices. • Energy justice needs to be broadened to include data privacy and security issues. Abstract Smart grid systems are considered as key enablers in the transition to more sustainable energy systems. However, debates reflect concerns that they affect social and moral values such as privacy and justice. The energy justice framework has been proposed as a lens to evaluate social and moral aspects of changes in energy systems. This paper seeks to investigate this proposition for smart grid systems by exploring the public debates in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Findings show that smart grids have the potential to effectively address justice issues, for example by facilitating small-scale electricity generation and transparent and reliable billing. It is a matter of debate, however, whether current smart grid designs contribute to cost and energy savings, advance a more equitable and democratic energy system, or reinforce distributive and procedural injustices. The increased use of information and communication technology raises value conflicts on privacy and cyber security, which are related to energy justice. This research contributes by conceptualizing energy justice in the context of smart grids for the first time. The energy justice framework is broadened by including values and value conflicts that pertain directly to the increased use of information and communication technology. For policy makers and designers of smart grids, the paper provides guidance for considering interconnected social and moral values in the design of policies and smart grid technologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The challenge of a purposeful design addressed in this article is to align offshore energy systems not only with technical and economic values like efficiency and profitability, but also with moral and social values more generally. We elaborate a theoretical framework that allows us to make a systematic inventory of embedded values of offshore energy systems and relate them to their societal acceptability. By characterizing both objects and subjects of acceptability, we shed light on ways to identify areas of value conflicts that must be addressed in purposeful design. We suggest the capabilities approach as a normative theory to deal with the arising value conflicts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]