Search

Since 2013, selective dry cow treatment (SDCT) has been the standard approach in the Netherlands where farmers select cows for the use of antimicrobials at drying-off. Shortly after its introduction, antimicrobial usage decreased significantly, and no significant association was found between the level of SDCT and clinical mastitis (CM). Obviously, at that time long-term associations could not be evaluated. This study aimed to provide insight into the methods and level of implementation of SDCT on Dutch dairy farms with a conventional milking system (CMS) or an automatic milking system (AMS) in 2016 and 2017, several years after the implementation of SDCT. Udder health and antimicrobial use were also assessed. For this study, 262 farmers recorded dry cow treatments as well as all CM cases in the period from May 1, 2016, until April 30, 2017. Additionally, somatic cell count (SCC) data on cow and herd level, treatment data on herd level and questionnaire results on udder health management were collected. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with differences between milking systems being evaluated using nonparametric univariable statistics. In the study period, SDCT was applied on almost all (98.8%) of the participating dairy farms. The main reason for applying antimicrobials at drying-off was either the SCC history during the complete previous lactation or the SCC at the last milk recording before drying-off. The median percentage of cows treated with antimicrobials was 48.5%. The average incidence rate of CM was 27.3 cases per 100 cows per year. From all CM cases that were registered per herd, on average 32.8% were scored as mild, 42.2% as moderate, and 25.0% as severe CM. The mean bulk tank SCC of the herds was 168,989 cells/mL. A cow was considered to have subclinical mastitis (SCM) if individual SCC was ≥150,000 cells/mL for primiparous and ≥250,000 cells/mL for multiparous cows. Passing these threshold values after 2 earlier low SCC values was considered a new case of SCM. The mean incidence rate of SCM in these herds was 62.5 cases per 100 cows per year. Bulk tank SCC and the incidence rate of SCM on farms with a CMS were statistically lower than on farms with an AMS, whereas the incidence rate of CM did not significantly differ between both groups of farms. The AMS farms had more cows per herd treated with antimicrobials at drying-off and a larger proportion of severe CM cases than did CMS farms. It is unknown whether the differences are due to the milking system or to other differences between both types of farms. This study showed the level of adoption of SDCT, udder health, and antimicrobial usage parameters several years after the ban on the preventive use of antimicrobials in animal husbandry. It found that udder health parameters did not differ from those found in Dutch studies before and around the time of implementing SDCT, whereas SDCT was widely applied on Dutch dairy farms during the study period. Therefore, it was concluded that Dutch dairy farmers were able to handle the changed policy of antimicrobial use at drying-off while maintaining indicators of a good udder health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The incidence of milk leakage (ML) after dry-off (DO) and related risk factors was studied in 1,175 dairy cows from 41 commercial herds in 8 European countries: Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Spain. Milk leakage was assessed twice for 30 s each during 3 visits at 20 to 24 h, 30 to 34 h, and 48 to 52 h after DO. Information related to dry-cow management and udder health was collected at herd and cow level, including individual somatic cell count (ISCC) from test-day controls and occurrence of clinical mastitis cases from DO until 30 d in lactation. Mixed-effect logistic regression analyses were used to identify possible risk factors for ML and to study the association between ML and new intramammary infections. Intramammary infections were defined as clinical mastitis cases during the dry period and in the first 30 d in lactation or a rise in ISCC from before to after the dry period (threshold: 200,000 cells/mL) or both. Milk leakage was observed in 24.5% of the cows between 20 and 52 h after DO, where the herd incidence varied between 0.0 and 77.8%. The reduction in number of milkings in the weeks before DO had statistically significant effect on the ML incidence. When the milking frequency was reduced from 3 times/d to 2 or maintained at twice a day, cows had 11 (95% CI = 3.43–35.46) or 9 (95% CI = 1.85–48.22) times higher odds of leaking milk, respectively, compared with cows where the milking frequency was reduced from twice to once a day. Also, the milk production 24 h before DO was associated with ML incidence. Hence, cows with a milk production between 13 and 21 L or above 21 L had 2.3 (95% CI = 1.48–3.53) and 3.1 (95% CI = 1.79–5.3) times higher odds of leaking milk, respectively, compared with cows with a milk production below 13 L. A higher ML incidence was present in the group of cows with an average ISCC in the last 3 mo before DO ≥200,000 cells/mL (odds ratio = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.13–2.41) compared with cows with an average ISCC <100,000 cells/mL. Quarters with ML tended to have 2.0 times higher odds of developing clinical mastitis compared with quarters not leaking milk. Cows with ML tended to have 1.5 times higher odds of intramammary infections (i.e., an increase of ISCC or clinical mastitis) compared with cows without ML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since 2012, the Dutch Veterinary Medicine Authority reports antimicrobial usage (AMU) in young calves (<56 d) on dairy farms on an annual basis. The AMU distribution in this age group is skewed, with a low AMU in young calves on the majority of dairy farms and a high AMU in a relatively small number of farms. This results in a notable difference between the mean and median AMU. To further reduce the mean AMU, the AMU on the high-AMU farms must be decreased. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between both young stock management and an indication of the farmers' mindset and AMU in young calves on Dutch dairy farms with a high and low AMU in young calves. This knowledge may be helpful in decreasing AMU in young calves on high-AMU farms. We performed a case-control study in which 200 dairy farms (100 with high AMU and 100 with low AMU in young calves) participated. Case farms were defined as farms with an animal daily-defined dose at the farm level in young calves >28 in 2012 and 2013, based on the 90th percentile of the use of antimicrobials in young calves in 2012. Control farms had an animal daily-defined dose at the farm level in young calves of <0.5 in 2012 and 2013, which was determined to be low use. A questionnaire was conducted about general farm and young stock management, hygiene, housing, vaccination, and calf health. An indication of the farmers' mindset with regard to AMU and treatment of sick calves was determined by including statements (agree/disagree) in the questionnaire. In addition, routinely collected data on herd size, growth in herd size, replacement, and calf mortality were available for analysis. Dairy farmers that immediately started antimicrobial treatment in sick calves had higher odds of being in the high-AMU group than farmers who started treatment of sick calves with supportive nonantimicrobial therapy. Other variables associated with a high AMU in young calves included housing calves on partially slatted floors, a high prevalence of respiratory disease, an unfavorable Salmonella status, and not agreeing with the statement “Young stock need specific management.” Both dairy farm management and opinions of dairy producers regarding AMU, indicative of mindset, are important when distinguishing farms with high and low AMU in young calves. Although the rationale behind mindset warrants more research, likely a change in both aspects seems to be required to reduce the AMU in young calves on dairy farms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]