Search

Abstract: Background: Renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are rarely described in transplanted kidneys. Available therapeutic strategies range from allograft nephrectomy to nephron-sparing procedures such as partial nephrectomy or image-guided thermal ablation. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive technique which provides promising oncologic outcomes in small allograft RCCs while preserving allograft function. So far, only a few cases have been reported in the transplant setting. We describe a renal transplant RCC successfully approached by ultrasound-guided RFA. Methods: A 42-year-old renal transplant recipient developed a small subcapsular allograft RCC at 11 years after transplantation. The decline in glomerular filtration rare prompted us to preserve as much parenchyma as possible. Ultrasound-guided RFA was performed under light sedation and local analgesia in a single session with a Starbust Talon needle. Results: Postablation contrast-enhanced ultrasound displayed a 25×23 mm avascular area of complete necrosis. After 3 months gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the absence of viable tumor tissue and while the patient did not experience any graft function reduction (serum creatinine 2.6 mg/dL). Conclusions: Image-guided RFA represents a promising therapeutic modality for small allograft RCCs in recipients with mild graft dysfunction and/or elevated surgical risk. It is associated with low morbidity and parenchymal preservation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Stage I was performed laparoscopically, right portal vein was secured by locking clips and liver partition was obtained by radiofrequency. CT volumetry was performed on day 8 and 15 after stage I. FLR/ETLV increased to 24%, FLR/BW to 0.52. CT volumetry after 10 days showed FLR/ETLV and FLR/BW of 39% and 0.63. [Extracted from the article]

Resection of pNET is often carried out in young patients, hence, a mini-invasive approach is desirable to limit perioperative morbidities, while spleen preservation avoids lifelong risk of severe infections and overwhelming post-splenectomy sepsis. This video describes our laparoscopic technique for limited pancreatic tail resection with preservation of splenic vessels(LTPSP). B Conclusion: b Mini-invasive parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy appears a safe alternative to more extensive resections for benign and low-grade malignancies of the tail. [Extracted from the article]

Surgical site infections (SSIs) and early urinary tract infections (UTIs) are well recognized postoperative kidney transplant complications. These complications seldom lead to graft loss, although they may result in significant morbidity with prolonged hospitalization. Thus, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) has traditionally been used in this setting. Between April 1988 and December 2012, we identified 1000 kidney transplant recipients (33 from living donors) who underwent prophylaxis with ceftriaxone before the surgical procedure. A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate both the incidence rate and outcome of SSIs and UTIs. Recipients who developed SSIs were also assessed to identify risk factors and potential correlations with different immunosuppressive regimens. A total of 20 SSIs (2%) and 93 UTIs (9.3%) were observed. The most significant risk factor for SSIs was urine leak (15.38%; odds ratio [OR], 12.3; P < .0001) followed by sirolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression therapy (5%; OR, 2.97; P = .04) and induction therapy with either antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab (3.18%; OR, 3.45; P = .01). Sex was identified as the only risk factor for UTI (female vs male, 17.1% vs 4.6%; P < .0001). We believe universal ceftriaxone-based prophylaxis is useful for preventing SSIs and UTIs, considering its effectiveness and safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Vascular complications remain a major cause of graft loss after pancreatic transplantation. They include vascular thrombosis, pseudoaneurysm, and arteriovenous fistula (AVF). We report a case of an AVF that appeared 3 months after a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT). Doppler ultrasonography followed by magnetic resonance angiography and later angiography provided a definitive diagnosis of a mesenteric AVF. An endovascular approach is becoming the treatment of choice owing to the high risk of graft loss associated with open surgical correction. Microcoils alone, or in conjunction with detachable balloons, are frequently used; still, a new generation of vascular plugs seem to offer a therapeutic option for AVF closure, because it is a “1 shot” procedure that avoids the risk of accidental coil migration. A new-generation Amplatzer Vascular Plug 4 was deployed over the distal arterial branch of the superior mesenteric artery stump, leading to complete exclusion of the AVF and restoring normal vascular flow. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Cirrhosis secondary to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common indication for liver transplantation. Recurrence of HCV infection in the liver allograft occurs at a high rate. The differentiation of recurrent HCV infection from acute cellular rejection (ACR) represents a difficult challenge in transplantation pathology. The c-Kit receptor is a tyrosine kinase membrane protein encoded by the c-Kit proto-oncogene, which is expressed on mast cells and on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Mast cells are important effector cells of a broad range of immune responses. Recently, c-Kit+ mast cells were shown to form part of the inflammatory infiltrate in acute liver allograft rejection. A strong relationship was found between c-Kit+ cell densities and increasingly severe rejection. The present study sought to determine whether the presence of c-Kit+ cells could be used to distinguish between ACR and recurrent HCV in liver allografts. Immunohistochemical staining for c-Kit was performed on 20 transplant biopsy specimens from 10 patients with mild to moderate ACR and 10 other patients with recurrent hepatitis C. The number of c-Kit+ cells per portal tract varied with the density of the overall inflammatory infiltrate. There was no significant difference between the number of c-Kit+ cells in the biopsy specimens that carried a diagnosis of ACR and those from patients who had been diagnosed as having recurrent HCV. It was concluded that immunohistochemical staining for the presence of c-Kit+ mast cells cannot be used to differentiate between ACR and recurrent HCV infection in liver allograft biopsy specimens. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The presence of B-cell nodules in kidney biopsies of patients undergoing acute renal allograft rejection has been reported to be associated with glucocorticoid resistance and a high risk of graft failure. In an attempt to corroborate this observation, biopsies of renal transplants that evidenced Banff grade I A acute rejection were examined for the presence of B- or T-cell nodules, the detection of which was correlated with the therapeutic response. Biopsies from 14 consecutive renal transplant recipients with a diagnosis of acute cellular rejection were examined for the presence of T (CD3-positive) or B (CD20-positive) cells by immunohistochemistry. All patients were biopsied because of a rise in serum creatinine. No biopsy showed evidence of acute humoral rejection. Immunofluorescence microscopy was negative for C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries. There were no neutrophils in the peritubular or glomerular capillaries. Five patients had T-cell nodules; four had B-cell nodules; three had both T- and B-cell nodules; two had no nodules. All biopsies contained CD3-positive cells in the tubules and in the interstitium. In all but one of the patients, episodes of acute rejection were treated with steroids (one received thymoglobulin). Furthermore two patients received mycophenolate mofetil and one, sirolimus. There were no significant differences among the groups in either the initial creatinine or the creatinine after therapy. The presence of B-cell nodules in renal allograft biopsies of patients experiencing acute cellular rejection did not portend a less favorable outcome. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Induction with the use of interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies may avoid many of the adverse events associated with polyclonal antibodies and significantly impact on rejection-free long-term survival in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx). We describe our experience with the use of basiliximab induction therapy in adult OLTx recipients on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Forty-six consecutive deceased donor primary OLTx were analyzed. All patients received standard doses of basiliximab, tacrolimus, and steroids. Mycophenolate mofetil was also used as indicated. The mean follow-up period was 17.9 months. Forty-three patients remained rejection-free during follow-up. The actuarial patient and graft survival rate at 2 years was 93%. The rate of histology-proven hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence was 24%, with two progressing to severe cholestatic recurrent HCV. None of the study patients developed (cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection or posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). Results were compared to a historical group of 46 OLTx recipients on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression without basiliximab induction. The historical group had a rejection rate of 34% with lower patient and graft survival rates of 71.74% and 69.5%, respectively, at 24 months as well as a higher histological HCV recurrence rate of 77% (17/22), with three patients progressing to graft failure within 2 years. CMV infection and disease developed in 4.5% of the patients. Although PTLD was not observed, three recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) developed and died of metastatic HCC. Induction with basiliximab in combination with tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen reduces the incidence of rejection and improves rejection-free survival rate after OLTx without increasing the incidence of CMV, PTLD, or HCV recurrence. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]