Search

Background: Paradoxical anterior translation in midflexion is reduced in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) with a gradually reducing femoral radius, when compared to a 2-radii design. This reduction has been shown in finite element model simulations, in vitro tests, intraoperatively, and recently also in vivo during a lunge and unloaded flexion-extension. However, TKA kinematics are task dependent and this reduction has not been tested for gait activities.Methods: Thirty good outcome subjects (≥1 year postoperatively) with a unilateral cruciate-retaining TKA with a gradually reducing (n = 15) or dual (n = 15) femoral radius design were assessed during 5 complete cycles of level walking, stair descent (0.18-m steps), deep knee bend, and sitting down onto and standing up from a chair, using a moving fluoroscope (25 Hz, 1 ms shutter time). Kinematic data were extracted by 2D/3D image registration.Results: Tibiofemoral ranges of motion for flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, internal-external rotation, and anteroposterior (AP) translation were similar for both groups, whereas the pattern of AP translation-flexion-coupling differed. The subjects with the dual-radii design showed a sudden change in direction of AP translation around 30° of flexion, which was not present in the subjects with the gradually reducing femoral radius design.Conclusion: Through the unique ability of moving fluoroscopy, the present study confirmed that the gradually reducing femoral radii eliminated the paradoxical sudden anterior translation at 30° present in the dual-radii design in vivo during daily activities, including gait and stair descent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• New algorithm was able to register with an accuracy of <1 mm (in-plane) and <2°. • The algorithm could not register all images successfully. • Semi-automatic or manual registration is still required to obtain good results. The accurate quantification of in-vivo tibio-femoral kinematics is essential for understanding joint functionality, but determination of the 3D pose of bones from 2D single-plane fluoroscopic images remains challenging. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy, reliability and repeatability of an intensity-based 2D/3D registration algorithm. The accuracy was evaluated using fluoroscopic images of 2 radiopaque bones in 18 different poses, compared against a gold-standard fiducial calibration device. In addition, 3 natural femora and 3 natural tibiae were used to examine registration reliability and repeatability. Both manual fitting and intensity-based registration exhibited a mean absolute error of <1 mm in-plane. Overall, intensity-based registration of the femoral bone model revealed significantly higher translational and rotational errors than manual fitting, while no statistical differences (except for y-axis translation) were found for the tibial bone model. The repeatability of 108 intensity-based registrations showed mean in-plane standard deviations of 0.23–0.56 mm, but out-of-plane position repeatability was lower (mean SD: femur 7.98 mm, tibia 6.96 mm). SDs for rotations averaged 0.77–2.52°. While the algorithm registered some images extremely well, other images clearly required manual intervention. When the algorithm registered the bones repeatably, it was also accurate, suggesting an approach that includes manual intervention could become practical for efficient and accurate registration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Force plates are common assessment tools used in biomechanics to measure ground reaction forces during motion capture or strength exercises. While the accuracy of the resulting kinetic data is critical for accurate gait analysis, factors such as plate mounting are thought to influence the measured point of force application (PFA) of the ground reaction forces. The aim of this study was therefore to present an accurate in-situ PFA calibration method. In addition, the approach was evaluated by examining the required PFA corrections over a period of ten years, which included plate remounting and a change of foundation. The in-situ PFA calibration was performed on six plates by assessing the locations of up to 98 points of force application per plate using an instrumented pole. Application of the in-situ PFA calibration approach reduced the root mean square errors by up to approximately 60% compared to the manufacturers calculation. Correction coefficients were strongly dependent on the individual platform as well as the location of the applied force on the plate. Remounting of the plates altered the plate coefficient corrections considerably, while changes over time were notable but not as extensive. We therefore recommend that plates should be recalibrated after remounting, but also at least every 5 years, in order to ensure the preservation of an accurate PFA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Gait analysis is an important instrument in clinical research and results should be objective. The purpose of this study was to quantify clinical outcomes of two biomechanical models with different anatomical coordinate systems and angle decomposition strategies for knee joint kinematics. Methods: The study was designed to compare a functional approach and a predictive approach with a single comprehensive marker set. 10 healthy subjects and 12 subjects with knee osteoarthritis were analysed. Distinctive gait variables were averaged across five trials. Agreement between methods was illustrated with the so-called levels of agreement. Differences between models were quantified using a paired t-test or Wilcoxon-Signed Rank test in case of non-normality (Shapiro–Wilk test). Unpaired t-tests/Wilcoxon tests were used to compare gait variables between healthy subjects and subjects with knee osteoarthritis, and to examine whether statistical analysis of this comparison would yield different data interpretations when using different models. Findings: Outcome variables differed between the functional and predictive approaches in the sagittal plane (0.1–3.1°), and transverse plane (1.0–3.7°). With respect to the range of motion in the given movement plane, variables in the sagittal plane of the knee were more consistent between methods. The functional approach was more sensitive for detecting differences between groups for sagittal plane kinematics. Statistical analysis for transverse plane kinematics differed substantially between models. Interpretation: Sensitivity to detect differences of kinematic data between population groups can vary between biomechanical models. Rotational gait variables are inconsistent between models and should not be used as clinical outcome variables in daily routine. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to quantify kinetic and kinematic effects during the stance phase of walking using three different foot orthoses. All test subjects were measured under five test conditions with 10 repetitions each. The test conditions included: neutral orthosis (tested twice) and three different orthoses (posting, molding and posting combined, proprioceptive). Whereas most previous studies rely on healthy subjects to describe effects of orthoses during gait, the present study used eight patients (all pes valgus). Standard gait analysis was used with force plates (KISTLER) and an optoelectric measuring system (VICON). The results show that the combined molding and posting foot orthosis significantly reduced eversion and eversion moments during walking compared to a posting type and a proprioceptive orthosis in several test parameters. EMG measurements with fine wire electrodes on three of the test subjects revealed that the activity pattern of the tibialis posterior muscle can considerably change between subjects but may not be used to explain apparent individual effects. The results suggest that for subjects with pes valgus a combined molding and posting orthoses reduces eversion best and that individual variations may be due to subject dependent proprioception, internal foot mechanics and/or a combination of both. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Instrumented treadmills are potentially useful tools for the assessment of gait parameters in orthopaedic clinical settings, but their measurement properties remain uncertain.Research Question: What is the discriminant validity and reproducibility of spatiotemporal and kinetic gait parameters measured by a pressure-instrumented treadmill at different speeds and inclinations in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA)?Methods: A total of 54 patients with unilateral KOA and 23 healthy controls took part in the study. Step length, single-limb support duration and ground reaction force were recorded during level and uphill walking at 3 and 4 km/h using a commercially-available treadmill instrumented with an integrated pressure platform. We examined discriminant validity (difference between involved and uninvolved side as well as against healthy controls) and test-retest reproducibility (reliability and agreement).Results: Significant side differences were observed for single-limb support duration and ground reaction force at touchdown in all conditions (P < 0.05). All the investigated gait parameters showed acceptable reliability and agreement, except step length at 4 km/h uphill.Significance: We conclude that the pressure-instrumented treadmill used in this study may have good clinical utility for quantitative gait analysis in patients with KOA under different experimental conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A comparison of natural versus replaced tibio-femoral kinematics in vivo during challenging activities of daily living can help provide a detailed understanding of the mechanisms leading to unsatisfactory results and lay the foundations for personalised implant selection and surgical implantation, but also enhance further development of implant designs towards restoring physiological knee function. The aim of this study was to directly compare in vivo tibio-femoral kinematics in natural versus replaced knees throughout complete cycles of different gait activities using dynamic videofluoroscopy. Twenty-seven healthy and 30 total knee replacement subjects (GMK Sphere, GMK PS, GMK UC) were assessed during multiple complete gait cycles of level walking, downhill walking, and stair descent using dynamic videofluoroscopy. Following 2D/3D registration, tibio-femoral rotations, condylar antero-posterior translations, and the location of the centre of rotation were compared. The total knee replacement groups predominantly experienced reduced tibial internal/external rotation and altered medial and lateral condylar antero-posterior translations compared to natural knees. An average medial centre of rotation was found for the natural and GMK sphere groups in all three activities, whereas the GMK PS and UC groups experienced a more central to lateral centre of rotation. Each total knee replacement design exhibited characteristic motion patterns, with the GMK Sphere most closely replicating the medial centre of rotation found for natural knees. Despite substantial similarities between the subject groups, none of the implant geometries was able to replicate all aspects of natural tibio-femoral kinematics, indicating that different implant geometries might best address individual functional needs. • Each total knee replacement design exhibited characteristic motion patterns. • GMK Sphere closest replicated the medial centre of rotation found in natural knees. • No implant was able to replicate all aspects of natural tibio-femoral kinematics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis increases because life expectancy continues to rise with an active patient population. Hence, the concept of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has regained popularity as a treatment option for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency is widely considered as a contraindication for UKA, however, there are conflicting reports. If otherwise indicated, some surgeons consider UKA for ACL-deficient patients using a modified surgical technique, with a reduction of posterior tibial slope.Research Question: The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in UKA patients with ACL deficiency in comparison to a conventional UKA group (intact ACL) by the measurement of knee kinematics and kinetics.Methods: Ten patients with conventional UKA and an intact ACL and eight patients with an ACL-deficient UKA and a reduced posterior tibial slope relative to the native knee were recruited. Three-dimensional joint kinematics of the knee were measured, using skin markers and an infrared optical motion capture system. Ground reaction forces (GRF) were measured with force plates in all three directions. Level walking, ramp descent and stair descent were analyzed, comparing implanted and contralateral native knees and the two UKA groups.Results: No significant differences in kinetics and kinematics were observed between conventional UKA and ACL-deficient UKA groups for any of the activities. However, some asymmetries in GRF between the implanted and contralateral side were present for the ACL-deficient group, during level walking (unloading rate) and stair descent (stance time).Significance: Promising outcomes of the ACL-deficient UKA group suggest that ACL deficiency may not always be a contraindication. Therefore, ACL-deficient UKA could be an alternative treatment option to total knee arthroplasty for an appropriate surgeon selected patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Regular infant carrying might be a contributing factor for the development and progression of low back and pelvic girdle pain in mothers after childbirth. However, the neuromechanical adaptations of the spine due to different sling-based carrying techniques are not sufficiently well understood in order to provide evidence-based carrying recommendations.Research Question: What are the immediate effects of different sling-based infant carrying techniques on trunk neuromechanics?Methods: Using a Vicon motion capture and a wireless surface electromyography system, three-dimensional pelvis and spinal kinematics as well as activation patterns of eight trunk muscles were derived from fifteen healthy young women during upright standing and level walking without carrying a load and while carrying a 6 kg-dummy with a sling in front and on either side. Data were analyzed using Statistical Parametric Mapping, allowing group comparisons of discrete parameters (standing) as well as continuous data (walking). To distinguish between clinically relevant and clinically not relevant kinematic findings, statistically significant differences were only considered in case of ≥5°.Results: Compared to unloaded walking, carrying the dummy in front was mainly associated with increased lumbar lordosis (standing: (Δ8.8°, p = 0.006; walking: (Δ ≥ 8.2°, 1-100% of gait cycle [%GC], p < 0.001). When carrying the dummy on the preferred side, increased thoracic kyphosis (standing: ≥6.4°, p ≤ 0.003; walking: Δ ≥ 5.6°, 1-100%GC, p < 0.001) and axial rotation towards the ipsilateral side (standing: Δ5.3°, p = 0.003; walking: Δ ≥ 5.0°, 46-58%GC, p = 0.002) were observed. All three conditions entailed increased paraspinal muscle activity during walking, although only unilaterally in side carrying (lumbar, preferred condition: Δ ≥ 13.2%maxMVIC, 49-57%GC, p < 0.001; thoracic, non-preferred condition: Δ ≥ 5.3%maxMVIC, 47-58%GC, p < 0.001).Significance: Carrying an infant alternating on both sides using a sling could be advantageous for preventing musculoskeletal pain resulting from excessive lumbar hyperextension and paraspinal muscle hyperactivation in women after childbirth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • An average joint contact force prediction error of less than 20% was achieved at 25°–60° knee flexion during squats. • The average JCF error behaved almost linearly with knee flexion angle. • At deep flexion, an overestimation of approximately 60% JCF was observed. • Our data indicate that loading estimations from early musculoskeletal gait models at both high and low knee joint flexion angles should be interpreted carefully. • Validation of models was performed against state-of-the-art CAMS-Knee datasets. Abstract Standard musculoskeletal simulation tools now offer widespread access to internal loading conditions for use in improving rehabilitation concepts or training programmes. However, despite broad reliance on their outcome, the accuracy of such loading estimations, specifically in deep knee flexion, remains generally unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the error of tibio-femoral joint contact force (JCF) calculations using musculoskeletal simulation compared to in vivo measured JCFs in subjects with instrumented total knee endoprostheses during squat exercises. Using the early but common "Gait2392_simbody" (OpenSim) scaled musculoskeletal models, tibio-femoral JCFs were calculated in 6 subjects for 5 repetitions of squats. Tibio-femoral JCFs of 0.8–3.2 times bodyweight (BW) were measured. While the musculoskeletal simulations underestimated the measured knee JCFs at low flexion angles, an average error of less than 20% was achieved between approximately 25°–60° knee flexion. With an average error that behaved almost linearly with knee flexion angle, an overestimation of approximately 60% was observed at deep flexion (ca. 80°), with an absolute maximum error of ca. 1.9BW. Our data indicate that loading estimations from early musculoskeletal gait models at both high and low knee joint flexion angles should be interpreted carefully. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Combined knowledge of the functional kinematics and kinetics of the human body is critical for understanding a wide range of biomechanical processes including musculoskeletal adaptation, injury mechanics, and orthopaedic treatment outcome, but also for validation of musculoskeletal models. Until now, however, no datasets that include internal loading conditions (kinetics), synchronized with advanced kinematic analyses in multiple subjects have been available. Our goal was to provide such datasets and thereby foster a new understanding of how in vivo knee joint movement and contact forces are interlinked – and thereby impact biomechanical interpretation of any new knee replacement design. In this collaborative study, we have created unique kinematic and kinetic datasets of the lower limb musculoskeletal system for worldwide dissemination by assessing a unique cohort of 6 subjects with instrumented knee implants (Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin) synchronized with a moving fluoroscope (ETH Zürich) and other measurement techniques (including whole body kinematics, ground reaction forces, video data, and electromyography data) for multiple complete cycles of 5 activities of daily living. Maximal tibio-femoral joint contact forces during walking (mean peak 2.74 BW), sit-to-stand (2.73 BW), stand-to-sit (2.57 BW), squats (2.64 BW), stair descent (3.38 BW), and ramp descent (3.39 BW) were observed. Internal rotation of the tibia ranged from 3° external to 9.3° internal. The greatest range of anterio-posterior translation was measured during stair descent (medial 9.3 ± 1.0 mm, lateral 7.5 ± 1.6 mm), and the lowest during stand-to-sit (medial 4.5 ± 1.1 mm, lateral 3.7 ± 1.4 mm). The complete and comprehensive datasets will soon be made available online for public use in biomechanical and orthopaedic research and development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While there is general agreement on the transverse plane knee joint motion for loaded flexion activities, its kinematics during functional movements such as level walking are discussed more controversially. One possible cause of this controversy could originate from the interpretation of kinematics based on different analysis approaches. In order to understand the impact of these approaches on the interpretation of tibio-femoral motion, a set of dynamic videofluoroscopy data presenting continuous knee bending and complete cycles of walking in ten subjects was analysed using six different kinematic analysis approaches. Use of a functional flexion axis resulted in significantly smaller ranges of condylar translation compared to anatomical axes and contact approaches. All contact points were located significantly more anteriorly than the femur fixed axes after 70° of flexion, but also during the early/mid stance and late swing phases of walking. Overall, a central to medial transverse plane centre of rotation was found for both activities using all six kinematic analysis approaches, although individual subjects exhibited lateral centres of rotation using certain approaches. The results of this study clearly show that deviations from the true functional axis of rotation result in kinematic crosstalk, suggesting that functional axes should be reported in preference to anatomical axes. Contact approaches, on the other hand, can present additional information on the local tibio-femoral contact conditions. To allow a more standardised comparison and interpretation of tibio-femoral kinematics, results should therefore be reported using at least a functionally determined axis and possibly also a contact point approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accurate assessment of 3D tibio-femoral kinematics is essential for understanding knee joint functionality, but also provides a basis for assessing joint pathologies and the efficacy of musculoskeletal interventions. Until now, however, the assessment of functional kinematics in healthy knees has been mostly restricted to the loaded stance phase of gait, and level walking only, but the most critical conditions for the surrounding soft tissues are known to occur during high-flexion activities. This study aimed to determine the ranges of tibio-femoral rotation and condylar translation as well as provide evidence on the location of the centre of rotation during multiple complete cycles of different gait activities. Based on radiographic images captured using moving fluoroscopy in ten healthy subjects during multiple cycles of level walking, downhill walking and stair descent, 3D femoral and tibial poses were reconstructed to provide a comprehensive description of tibio-femoral kinematics. Despite a significant increase in joint flexion, the condylar antero-posterior range of motion remained comparable across all activities, with mean translations of 6.3–8.3 mm and 7.3–9.3 mm for the medial and lateral condyles respectively. Only the swing phase of level walking and stair descent exhibited a significantly greater range of motion for the lateral over the medial compartment. Although intra-subject variability was low, considerable differences in joint kinematics were observed between subjects. The observed subject-specific movement patterns indicate that accurate assessment of individual pre-operative kinematics together with individual implant selection and/or surgical implantation decisions might be necessary before further improvement to joint replacement outcome can be achieved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]