Search

Background: Reflected arterial waves contribute to left ventricular (LV) afterload. Heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are afterload sensitive and sympathetically activated. We tested the hypothesis that HFrEF patients exhibit a positive relationship between sympathetic vasoconstrictor discharge and aortic wave reflection.Methods: Sixteen treated patients with HFrEF (61 ± 9 years of age, left ventricular ejection fraction 30 ± 7%, 3 women) and 16 similar-aged healthy control subjects (57 ± 7 years of age, 4 women) underwent noninvasive measurements of radial pulse waveforms (applanation tonometry) to calculate central blood pressures and aortic wave reflection characteristics: augmentation pressure (AP), augmentation index (AIx), and AIx corrected to a heart rate of 75 beats/min (AIx@75). Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) burst frequency was recorded from the fibular nerve (microneurography).Results: HFrEF patients had higher AIx (26 ± 9 vs 17 ± 15%; P < .05) and MSNA burst frequency (48 ± 7 vs 39 ± 11 bursts/min; P < .05) and lower central diastolic pressure than control subjects (64 ± 8 vs 70 ± 9 mm Hg; P = 0.05). There were no between-group differences in heart rate, other measures of blood pressure (brachial and central; P > .05), AP (11 ± 5 vs 7 ± 8 mm Hg; P = 0.11), or AIx@75 (19 ± 9 vs 13 ± 11%,-P = 0.14). MSNA correlated positively with AP (r = 0.50; P < .05), AIx (r = 0.51; P < .05), and AIx@75 (r = 0.54; P < .05) in HFrEF patients but not in control subjects (r = 0.002-0.18; P > 0.49).Conclusions: In patients with HFrEF, but not similarly aged healthy subjects, indices of aortic wave reflection correlate positively with MSNA. By increasing LV afterload, such neurovascular coupling could impair LV performance and worsen heart failure symptoms. Therapies that attenuate neurogenic vasoconstriction may benefit HFrEF patients by diminishing arterial wave reflection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prior studies demonstrating clinical significance of noninvasive estimates of central blood pressure (BP) and pulse wave reflection have relied primarily on discrete resting measures. The aim of this study was to compare central BP and pulse wave reflection measures sampled during a single resting laboratory visit against those obtained under ambulatory conditions. The secondary aim was to investigate the reproducibility of ambulatory central BP and pulse wave reflection measurements. Forty healthy participants (21 males; 24 ± 3 years) completed three measurements of brachial artery pulse wave analysis (Oscar 2 with SphygmoCor Inside) in the laboratory followed by 24 hours of ambulatory monitoring. Seventeen participants repeated the 24-hour ambulatory monitoring visit after at least 1 week. Ambulatory measures were divided into daytime (9 AM–9 PM), nighttime (1 AM–6 AM), and 24-hour periods. Compared with laboratory measurements, central systolic BP, augmentation pressure, and augmentation index (with and without heart rate normalization) were higher (all P < .01) during daytime and 24-hour periods but lower during the nighttime period (all P < .001). The drop in nighttime brachial systolic BP was larger than central systolic pressure (Δ −20 ± 6 vs. −15 ± 6 mm Hg; P < .0001). Repeat ambulatory measurements of central BP and pulse wave reflection displayed good-to-excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (r = 0.58–0.86; all P < .01), although measures of pulse wave reflection had higher coefficients of variation (14%–41%). The results highlight absolute differences in central BP and pulse wave reflection between discrete laboratory and ambulatory conditions. The use of ambulatory measures of central BP and pulse wave reflection warrant further investigation for clinical prognostic value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]