Search

Amyl salicylate (AS) is a fragrance massively used as a personal care product and following the discharged in wastewaters may end up in the aquatic environment representing a potential threat for the ecosystem and living organisms. AS was recently detected in water of the Venice Lagoon, a vulnerable area continuously subjected to the income of anthropogenic chemicals. The lagoon is a relevant area for mollusc farming, including the Mediterranean mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) having an important economic and ecological role. Despite high levels of AS occurred in water of the Lagoon of Venice, no studies investigated the possible consequences of AS exposures on species inhabiting this ecosystem to date. For the first time, we applied a multidisciplinary approach to investigate the potential effects of the fragrance AS on Mediterranean mussels. To reach such a goal, bioaccumulation, cellular, biochemical, and molecular analyses (RNA-seq and microbiota characterization) were measured in mussels treated for 7 and 14 days with different AS Venice lagoon environmental levels (0.1 and 0.5 μg L−1). Despite chemical investigations suggested low AS bioaccumulation capability, cellular and molecular analyses highlighted the disruption of several key cellular processes after the prolonged exposures to the high AS concentration. Among them, potential immunotoxicity and changes in transcriptional regulation of pathways involved in energy metabolism, stress response, apoptosis and cell death regulations have been observed. Conversely, exposure to the low AS concentration demonstrated weak transcriptional changes and transient increased representation of opportunistic pathogens, as Arcobacter genus and Vibrio aestuarianus. Summarizing, this study provides the first overview on the effects of AS on one of the most widely farmed mollusk species. [Display omitted] • Amyl salicylate showed low bioaccumulation capability in the total body of mussels. • Amyl salicylate induces transitory immunotoxic effects. • Transcriptional changes were observed in genes involved in different molecular pathways. • Weak changes in microbiota composition were observed following Amyl salicylate exposure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Antivirals direct acting (DAA) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) have brought a revolution in the field of transplantation. It is likely to think that in the future patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation (LT) will no longer be registered for HCV-related cirrhosis but for liver disease from other causes. On the eve of this change, we show a snapshot of the Italian waiting list for LT. Methods From October 1, 2012 to September 30, 2013, we estimated the total number of patients on the liver waiting list as intention to treat (ITT), the number of incident cases, and the delistings, particularly in the HCV positive (HCV+) population. Gender, median age, etiology and prognosis of liver disease, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), reason for delisting, mean waiting time for LT, and rate of death on waiting list were evaluated. Results In the time period, there were 517 new patients who were HCV+ (median age, 53 years): 255 (49.3%) mono-infected with HCV, 236 (45.7%) co-infected with HCV and hepatitis B virus (HBV), 11 (2.1%) co-infected with HCV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and 15 (2.9%) co-infected with HCV, HBV, and HIV. The median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score at listing was 17 and HCC was present in 206 (39.8%) cases. HCV+ patients delisted were 442 (61.9%), 355 (80.3%) for LT. The mean waiting time to transplantation was 1.9 months; the percentage of death was 7.6%. Conclusions This snapshot of the waiting list for LT in the year before the advent of DAA drugs will allow us to assess whether and how they will change the waiting list for LT when we start to look at the impact of new therapies on the waiting list. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The national protocol for the handling of high-urgency (HU) liver organ procurement for transplant is administered by the Italian National Transplant Center. In recent years, we have witnessed a change in requests to access the program. We have therefore evaluated their temporal trend, the need to change the access criteria, the percentage of transplants performed, the time of request satisfaction, and the follow-up. We analyzed all the liver requests for the HU program received during the 4-year period of 2014 to 2017 for adult recipients (≥18 years of age): all the variables linked to the recipient or to the donor and the organ transplants are registered in the Informative Transplant System as established by the law 91/99. In addition, intention to treat (ITT) survival rates were compared among 4 different groups: (1) patients on standard waiting lists vs (2) patients on urgency waiting lists, and (3) patients with a history of transplant in urgency vs (4) patients with a history of transplant not in urgency. Out of the 370 requests included in the study, 291 (78.7%) were satisfied with liver transplantation. Seventy-nine requests (21.3%) have not been processed, but if we consider only the real failures, this percentage falls to 13.1% and the percentage of satisfied requests rises to 86.9%. The average waiting period for liver transplantation (LT) is 1.7 days and most requests (74%) are met in less than 24 hours, if we consider the hours between the registration of the request and the donor reporting. The percentage of late retransplantations is 2.1%. The clinical indication for HU-LT that appears to improve over time is hepatic artery thrombosis (82.5%). The overall 1-year patient survival is 68.3%. The overall 1-year graft survival, performed on all the patients, is 89% and all the indications for HU-LT appear to go well over time with an average survival rate greater than 85%. The indications for HU-LT are changing according to the changes in the hepatologic field in recent years. The centralized management of requests has proven to be successful in optimizing responses. Urgent LT is confirmed to be lifesaving in its timeliness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objectives A prospective cohort study was conducted in Italy in order to describe the microbiologic aspects of colonization/infection by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in donors and recipients of lung and liver transplants and the possible CPE transmission from donors to recipients. Methods Between 15 January 2014 and 14 January 2015, all recipients of solid organ transplants (SOT) at ten lung and eight liver transplantation centres and the corresponding donors were enrolled. Screening cultures to detect CPE were performed in donors, and screening and clinical cultures in recipients with a 28-day microbiologic follow-up after receipt of SOT. Detection of carbapenemase genes by PCR, genotyping by multilocus sequence typing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and whole-genome sequencing were performed. Results Of 588 screened donors, 3.4% were colonized with CPE. Of the liver first transplant recipients (n = 521), 2.5% were colonized before receipt of SOT and 5% acquired CPE during follow-up. CPE colonization was higher in lung first transplant recipients (n = 111, 2.7% before SOT and 14.4% after SOT). CPE infections occurred in 1.9% and 5.3% of liver or lung recipients, respectively. CPE isolates were mostly Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae belonging to CG258. Three events of donor–recipient CPE transmission, confirmed by whole-genome sequencing and/or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, occurred in lung recipients: two involving K. pneumoniae sequence type 512 and one Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM)-producing Enterobacter aerogenes. Conclusions This study showed a low risk of donor–recipient CPE transmission, indicating that donor CPE colonization does not necessarily represent a contraindication for donation unless colonization regards the organ to be transplanted. Donor and recipient screening remains essential to prevent CPE transmission and cross-infection in transplantation centres. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the Italian lung transplant (LTX) allocation system, patients receive national priority (NP) only if on ECMO or mechanical ventilation (MV). We hypothesized that LAS could contribute to identify patients with increased waitlist mortality and who could benefit from NP. We retrospectively reviewed the outcome and calculated the entry list LAS of patients who were listed for LTX in Italy between 2015 and 2021 either with or without NP. Probability of LTX was estimated using a competitive risk survival analysis. Postoperative 1-yr and 3-yr outcome was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier model. 1031 patients listed for LTX in the study period (85.3%) had complete data for analysis. 119 (11.5%) were listed with NP and 912 without. Mean LAS was 38.6 in the standard listing group and 50.1 in the NP group (p=0.0001). After stratifying for the value of LAS at the time of listing, more patients (43%) were listed with NP in the 4thquartile (LAS>50) group. The probability of LTX was lower in patients in the LAS>50 quartile who were not placed on NP. The same group had the highest risk of death on the list (20.73%, p<0.001 compared to all other groups). Post-transplant outcomes were available for 481 patients out of 548 who received LTX in the study period (92.5%). 66 patients (13.7%) were transplanted after being on NP. 1-yr KM survival was less favorable in NP patients compared to non-NP patients, although not reaching statistical significance (p=0.08). In the >50 LAS quartile, 36.7% of patients were transplanted on the NP list, and had a worse KM survival compared to other quartiles (p=0.02). In a non-LAS allocation context, retrospective analysis shows that high-LAS patients (>50) who do not receive NP allocation display high mortality on the waiting list. NP patients (ECMO/MV) have the worse postoperative outcomes. High LAS (>50) may earlier identify patients who are at higher risk of pre-transplant mortality and need NP, preventing the high postoperative mortality of LTX after ECMO/MV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]