Search

In the Greater Serengeti-Mara ecosystem, with the Serengeti National Park (SNP) at its core, people and wildlife are strongly dependent on water supply that has a strong seasonal and inter-annual variability. The Mara River, the only perennial river in SNP, and a number of small streams originate from outside SNP before flowing through it. In those watersheds increasing grazing pressure from livestock, deforestation, irrigation and other land uses affect river flows in SNP that subsequently have impacts on wildlife. We quantified the changes since the 1970s of river discharge dynamics. We found that the baseflow recession period for the Mbalageti River has remained unchanged at 70 days, which is a natural system inside SNP. By contrast it has decreased from 100 days in the 1970s to 16 days at present for the Mara River, coinciding with increased commercial-scale irrigation in Kenya that extract Mara River water before it reaches SNP. This irrigation will result in zero flow in the river in SNP if the proposed dams in the river in Kenya are built. We observed high flash floods and prolonged periods of zero flows in streams draining livestock grazed watersheds, where severe major erosion prevails that results in gully formation. This eroded sediment is expected to silt and dry out the scattered dry season water holes in SNP, which are an important source of drinkable water for wildlife during the dry season. It appears likely that the future water supply of SNP is at risk, and this has major consequences for its people and wildlife. Ecohydrology-based solutions at the catchment scale are urgently needed to reduce catchment degradation while ensuring sustainable water provision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Barrier islands occur in north-western Europe between the North Sea and the Wadden Sea along the coast of Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands. Geomorphological units such as dunes and salt marshes are built by wind, water and sediment. The biota also feed back to the units by trapping sand and silt, transported by water and wind thus (de)stabilizing the local substrate and are able to modify their own abiotic environment. Hence, we refer to them as biogeomorphological units, thus including the role of engineering biota. We consider seven units: tidal basin, island head, intertidal flats, dune arc complex, wash-over complex, island tail with salt marsh, and green beach. We focus on the well-studied West-Frisian island of Schiermonnikoog, the Netherlands, from which we integrated published data. The biogeomorphological units are built with bioengineering species, and in turn provide habitats for plant- and animal species. These communities are subject to succession until climax stages with various timescales. These temporal aspects are derived from long-term measurements in the field, including the study of chronosequences. Biogeomorphological units also affect each other, including feed-backs from animals, plants and micro-organisms. Based on that we present a conceptual model of this particular barrier island. Knowledge gaps that can be identified include 1) interactions among geomorphological units, 2) interactions among these units and bio-engineers to come to biogeomorphological units, and 3) multiple spatial-temporal scales. Human interference such as A atmospheric deposition applies to all islands and is difficult to manage. Other human interferences may, however, differ among individual islands and their surroundings. They can be managed such as various intensities of fisheries, sand suppletion, extraction of groundwater, the attitude of local people towards artificial sand-drift dikes and livestock grazing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Basic & Applied Ecology is the property of Urban & Fischer Verlag and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Basic & Applied Ecology is the property of Urban & Fischer Verlag and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In conservation strategies of marine ecosystems, priority is given to habitat-structuring foundation species (e.g. seagrasses, mangroves and reef-building corals, shellfish) with the implicit goal to protect or restore associated communities and their interactions. However, the number and accuracy of community level metrics to measure the success of these strategies are limited. Using intertidal shellfish reefs as a model, we tested to what extent foundation species alter community and food web structure, and explored whether basic metrics of food web structure are useful indicators of ecosystem complexity compared to other often-used indices. We found that shellfish reefs strongly modified community and food web structure by modifying habitat conditions (e.g. hydrodynamics, sediment grain size). Stable isotope-based food web reconstruction captured important differences between communities from bare mudflat and shellfish reefs that did not emerge from classic abundance or diversity measures. On shellfish reefs, link density and the number of top predators were consistently higher, while both connectance and the richness of intermediate species was lower. Species richness (+ 42%), species density (+ 79%) and total biomass of benthos, fish and birds (+ 41%) was also higher on shellfish reefs, but this did not affect the Shannon diversity or Evenness. Hence, our results showed that basic food web metrics such as link density and number of top consumers and intermediate species combined with traditional measures of species richness can provide a robust tool to measure conservation and restoration success. We therefore suggest that these metrics are included as Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBV), and implemented as ecosystem health indicators in legislative frameworks such as the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]