Search

There are few data favoring the need for septotomy at the time of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) or if POEM alone is sufficient. Our aim was to compare POEM outcomes with and without septotomy (POEM+S or POEM-S) in patients with symptomatic epiphrenic diverticula (ED) and an underlying motility disorder. This was an international, multicenter retrospective study involving 21 centers between January 2014 and January 2023. Patients with ED and an underlying motility disorder who underwent POEM were included. The primary outcome was clinical success (Eckardt score [ES] ≤3 or a 1-point drop in ES for patients with baseline ES <3) without the need for repeat surgical/endoscopic interventions during follow-up. A total of 85 patients (mean age, 64.29 ± 17.1 years; 32 [37.6%] female) with ED and underlying motility disorder underwent POEM+S (n = 47) or POEM–S (n = 38). Patients in the POEM+S group had a significantly higher mean pre-POEM ES (7.3 ± 2.1 vs 5.8 ± 2; P =.002). The most common indication for POEM was achalasia (51% in the POEM+S cohort and 51.8% in the POEM–S cohort; P =.7). A posterior approach was favored in the POEM+S group (76.6% vs 52.6%; P =.02). A similar rate of technical success was seen in both groups (97.9% vs 100%; P =.1). The rate of adverse events was similar between the 2 cohorts (4.2% vs 8.1%; P =.6). The median length of hospital stay after POEM–S was significantly longer compared with POEM+S (2 days [interquartile range (IQR), 1-4 days] vs 1 day [IQR, 1-2 days]; P =.005). Clinical success was equivalent between the 2 groups (83% vs 86.8%; P =.6) at a median follow-up duration of 8 months (IQR, 3-19 months). In patients with ED and an underlying motility disorder, both POEM+S and POEM–S are equally safe and effective, with similar procedure duration and a low recurrence rate at short-term follow-up. Future comparative prospective studies with long-term follow-up are required to validate these findings. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a safe and effective endoscopic treatment for achalasia and other esophageal motility disorders, and a versatile knife (TriangleTipKnife J [TTJ]; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) is currently widely used in POEM. Recently, we reported a novel modification of TTJ, which was adjusted to a knife length of 2 mm by attaching a disposable clip (QuickClip Pro; Olympus) sheath to the tip as a hood attachment. This study compares the safety and effectiveness of TTJ and TTJ with a hood attachment (TTJ-H) in POEM. This 1:1 propensity score–matched retrospective cohort study compared the procedure time, myotomy efficiency, number of coagulation forceps usage, adverse events, length of hospital stay after POEM, procedural success, and clinical success between the TTJ and TTJ-H groups. A total of 682 consecutive patients who underwent POEM between January 2021 and June 2023 were examined. We excluded 134 patients who had already undergone POEM or laparoscopic Heller myotomy as prior myotomy. Finally, 98 propensity score–matched pairs (n = 196) were identified. The mean procedure time was shortened from 93.5 minutes to 80.2 minutes (14% reduction, P =.012) when comparing the TTJ-H group versus the TTJ group. The mean myotomy efficiency was improved from 2.76 min/cm to 2.32 min/cm (16% improvement, P ≤.001), and usage of coagulation forceps for hemostasis was decreased from 3.87 to.55 (86% reduction, P ≤.001). This study showed that use of TTJ-H could reduce total procedure time, improve myotomy efficiency, and reduce costs compared with TTJ. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) who are receiving antithrombotic therapy is unknown. Our primary aim was to assess the safety of POEM in this patient subset. Secondary outcomes were rates of clinical success, GERD, and procedure-related outcomes. This was an international, 1:1, case-control study performed at 10 centers using prospectively maintained databases. All consecutive patients who underwent POEM before November 2019 were considered for inclusion. Cases were patients on antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy. Controls not receiving antithrombotics were matched for age and esophageal motility disorder. Primary outcomes were major bleeding and thromboembolic events on postprocedural day 30. Of 2895 patients who underwent POEM, 126 cases (103 on antiplatelets, 35 anticoagulants, 12 both) and 126 controls were enrolled. The rate of major bleeding was higher for the antithrombotics users (5.6% vs 0.8%, P =.03). Anticoagulants and clopidogrel were temporarily interrupted in all cases. Aspirin was continued in 40.5% of users without increasing the bleeding risk. One thromboembolic event occurred in each group (0.79%; P = 1.00). No POEM-related deaths were noted. Rates of clinical success (91.7% vs 96% in controls, P =.20), postprocedural GERD, and technical-related outcomes were similar in both groups. Antithrombotic management was heterogeneous, and guidelines were not adhered to in 23.8% of cases. POEM is safe and effective in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy although it is associated with a greater risk of major bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims Eight years have passed since the introduction of the per-oral endoscopy myotomy (POEM) procedure. POEM was initially received as an investigational procedure, but since the revelation of promising safety and efficacy data, it is becoming the preferred treatment for achalasia. With the recent completion of our 1000th POEM procedure, we share our experience and knowledge through the discussion of clinical pearls, pitfalls, and practical considerations. Methods The various aspects of the procedure and conditions that warrant special attention are discussed from our perspective, with a focus on areas in which there is currently limited evidence. Results The key points on patient position, submucosal tunneling, myotomy, closure, intraprocedural bleeding, and advanced sigmoid achalasia are presented. Conclusions The dissemination of this information serves as a foundation for new POEM operators and as a catalyst for more-experienced operators to further refine and advance their POEM skills and stimulate international discourse and collaboration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia with esophagocardiomyotomy in the lesser curvature (LC myotomy) is now established and accepted widely. However, in some cases LC myotomy is precluded by previous procedures, such as Heller myotomy, or by other anatomic considerations that obscure the normal dissection planes. It may also be difficult to identify the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), which can result in an incomplete gastric myotomy and poor rates of symptom relief. On the other hand, the angle of His is always located in the greater curvature of the stomach and serves as a consistent, definite landmark of the gastric side. Objective To evaluate esophagocardiomyotomy in the greater curvature (GC myotomy) as an alternative POEM technique in cases where a prior LC myotomy or supervening anatomic constraints make identification of the EGJ technically challenging. Design Prospective. Setting Single-center study. Patients Twenty-one achalasia patients who received POEM with GC myotomy. Interventions POEM. Main Outcome Measurements Efficacy and safety of GC myotomy measured in terms of reduction in lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressures, improvement in Eckardt scores, and development of intraoperative or postoperative adverse events. Results Identification of the EGJ was achieved in all cases, resulting in a mean gastric myotomy length of 2.6 ± 1.1 cm. Mean LES pressure and Eckardt symptom scores decreased significantly (21.2 ± 7.3 vs 10.5 ± 2.7 mm Hg, 5 [2-8] vs 1 [0-5], respectively) ( P < .01). Endoscopic evidence of gastroesophageal reflux was identified in 52% of patients (11/21) postmyotomy; however, only 9.5% (2/11) were symptomatic, and these patients were successfully controlled with proton pump inhibitors. No severe adverse events were encountered. Limitations Single center. Conclusions GC myotomy is a promising, safe modification of the POEM technique and may be especially useful in cases of redo POEM, POEM post-Heller myotomy, or when the EGJ is difficult to recognize because of supervening anatomic constraints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Limited data exist on the use of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for therapy of spastic esophageal disorders (SEDs). Objective To study the efficacy and safety of POEM for the treatment of patients with diffuse esophageal spasm, jackhammer esophagus, or type III (spastic) achalasia. Design Retrospective study. Setting International, multicenter, academic institutions. Patients All patients who underwent POEM for treatment of SEDs refractory to medical therapy at 11 centers were included. Interventions POEM. Main Outcome Measurements Eckardt score and adverse events. Results A total of 73 patients underwent POEM for treatment of SEDs (diffuse esophageal spasm 9, jackhammer esophagus 10, spastic achalasia 54). POEM was successfully completed in all patients, with a mean procedural time of 118 minutes. The mean length of the submucosal tunnel was 19 cm, and the mean myotomy length was 16 cm. A total of 8 adverse events (11%) occurred, with 5 rated as mild, 3 moderate, and 0 severe. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.4 days. There was a significant decrease in Eckardt scores after POEM (6.71 vs 1.13; P = .0001). Overall, clinical response was observed in 93% of patients during a mean follow-up of 234 days. Chest pain significantly improved in 87% of patients who reported chest pain before POEM. Repeat manometry after POEM was available in 44 patients and showed resolution of initial manometric abnormalities in all cases. Limitations Retrospective design and selection bias. Conclusion POEM offers a logical therapeutic modality for patients with SEDs refractory to medical therapy. Results from this international study suggest POEM as an effective and safe platform for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Laser-mediated surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) has industrial and biological applications. We have developed a rapid and simple method for generating silver nanoscale hexagonal columns (NHCs) on the surface of a phosphor bronze chip for measurement of SERS spectra. This was used to detect SERS spectra from blood samples obtained from patients with gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, or benign diseases (n=12 each) using a low intensity helium-neon red laser beam with a 632.8-nm wavelength; the intensity of the SERS spectra was compared among the patient groups. The peak heights of SERS spectra from patients with benign diseases were significantly lower than those from patients with gastric or colorectal cancer, whereas those from patients with gastric cancer and colorectal cancer did not differ significantly. Thus, SERS using NHC chips holds promise for the easier and faster detection of cancer-related serum-constituents as biomarkers. From the Clinical Editor: In this study, laser-mediated surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) was utilized as a sensitive detection method of cancer-related serum-constituents in gastric and colorectal cancer, via the use of silver nanoscale hexagonal columns on the surface of a phosphor bronze chip for measurement of SERS spectra, paving the way to the development of a rapid and high throughput tool for cancer screening and therapy monitoring. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Surgical Heller myotomy has high rates of successful long-term results, but failed cases still remain. Moreover, the treatment strategy in patients with surgical myotomy failure is controversial. Recently, peroral endscopic myotomy (POEM) was reported to be efficient and safe in primary treatment of achalasia. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of POEM for surgical myotomy failure as a rescue second-line treatment, and we discuss the treatment options adapted in achalasia recurrence. Study Design: A total of 315 consecutive achalasia patients received POEM from September 2008 to December 2012 in our hospital. Eleven (3.5%) patients who had persistent or recurrent achalasia and had received surgical myotomy as a first-line treatment from other hospitals were included in this study. Patient background, barium swallow studies, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), manometry, and symptom scores were prospectively evaluated. In principle, all patients in whom surgical myotomy failed received pneumatic balloon dilatation (PBD) as the first line “rescue” treatment, and only if PBD failed were patients considered for rescue POEM. Results: The PBD alone was effective in 1 patient, and in the remaining 10 patients, rescue POEM was performed successfully without complications. Three months after rescue POEM, significant reduction in lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressures (22.1 ± 6.6 mmHg vs 10.9 ± 4.5 mmHg, p < 0.01) and Eckardt symptom scores (6.5 ± 1.3 vs 1.1 ± 1.3, p < 0.001) were observed. Conclusions: Short-term results of POEM for failed surgical myotomy were excellent. Long-term results are awaited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recent technological advances have allowed superficially spreading intramucosal carcinomas of the esophagus to be successfully resected by circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection (cESD). After this procedure, esophageal strictures develop in most patients and are mainly treated by endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD). Objective: To compare oral steroids plus EBD with EBD alone for the management of benign esophageal strictures after cESD. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary-care referral center. Patients: We studied 23 consecutive patients who underwent complete cESD for superficial esophageal carcinoma (22 squamous cell carcinomas and 1 adenocarcinoma associated with Barrett's esophagus). Intervention: After cESD, patients were managed with EBD alone (EBD, n = 13) or with EBD and oral prednisolone (steroid + EBD, n = 10), 30 mg daily, started 2 days after cESD and gradually tapered and discontinued after 8 weeks. Main Outcome Measurements: Total number of EBD sessions and total EBD period (months). Results: Steroid + EBD patients required fewer sessions (13-8 ± 6.9 vs 33.5 ± 22.9; P < .001) and a shorter management period (4.8 ± 2.3 vs 14.2 ± 17.5 months, P = .005) compared with the EBD group. An additional 3 patients received oral steroids a mean interval of 158 days after cESD. These patients required more EBD sessions (46.3 ± 30.0; P = .002), and the EBD period was significantly longer (17.5 ± 13-0 months; P = .005) than in the early steroid + EBD group. Limitations: Nonrandomized study; retrospective analysis. Conclusion: After cESD, oral steroid therapy dramatically reduced the need for EBD. We conclude that oral steroid therapy after EBD is an effective strategy for the management of esophageal strictures after complete cESD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: To overcome the limited clinical efficacy of conditionally replicative adenoviruses (CRAds), we investigated the effects of combination therapy with gemcitabine (GEM) and the hTERT-promoter-dependent CRAd (hTERT-CRAd), Ad5/3hTERTE1. This combination therapy exhibited enhanced cytotoxic effects on pancreatic cancer both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, we revealed that this enhancement effect was due to the multiple bidirectional interactions between hTERT-CRAd and GEM. The GEM-sensitizing effect of E1 expression derived from hTERT-CRAd, and the enhancement effect by GEM on hTERT promoter activity which led to the increase of adenovirus E1 and viral infectivity. This combination therapy may be a promising therapeutic approach for pancreatic cancer. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an available treatment modalities for achalasia. The reported efficacy of POEM in the only prospective multicenter study was 82%; however, a retrospective multicenter study in Japan reported a higher efficacy rate of 95%. The aim of this study was to prospectively verify treatment outcomes after POEM at multiple facilities in Japan. This was a prospective single-arm trial of POEM for achalasia at 8 facilities in Japan between April 2016 and March 2018 to evaluate its safety and efficacy. Patients were re-evaluated at 3 months and up to 1 year after POEM. Among the 233 patients with achalasia who underwent POEM, procedure-related adverse events occurred in 24 patients (10.3%), none of whom required surgical intervention. In the 207 patients satisfying the inclusion criteria, the efficacy rate of POEM, defined by an Eckardt score ≤3 at 1 year, was 97.4% (95% CI, 95.3%-99.7%). The Eckardt score decreased significantly from 6.6 ± 2.0 preoperatively to 1.1 ± 1.1, 1 year after POEM. Postoperative reflux esophagitis, severe reflux esophagitis, and symptomatic GERD were reported in 54.2%, 5.6%, and 14.7%, respectively, and proton pump inhibitors were administered in 21.1%. Our prospective multicenter study in Japan showed greater efficacy of POEM for achalasia compared with the results of a previous prospective multicenter study. POEM is safe and highly effective for at least 1 year. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN 000021550.) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims In patients with persistent symptoms after Heller myotomy (HM), treatment options include repeat HM, pneumatic dilation, or peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of POEM in patients with achalasia with prior HM vs without prior HM. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 180 patients with achalasia who underwent POEM at 13 tertiary centers worldwide, from December 2009 through September 2015. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with prior HM (HM group, exposure; n = 90) and those without prior HM (non-HM group; n = 90). Clinical response was defined by a decrease in Eckardt scores to 3 or less. Adverse events were graded according to criteria set by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Technical success, clinical success, and rates of adverse events were compared between groups. Patients were followed up for a median of 8.5 months. Results POEM was technically successful in 98% of patients in the HM group and in 100% of patients in the non-HM group ( P = .49). A significantly lower proportion of patients in the HM group had a clinical response to POEM (81%) than in the non-HM group (94%; P = .01). There were no significant differences in rates of adverse events between the groups (8% in the HM group vs 13% in the non-HM group; P = .23). Symptomatic reflux and reflux esophagitis after POEM were comparable between groups. Conclusions POEM is safe and effective for patients with achalasia who were not treated successfully by prior HM. Although the rate of clinical success in patients with prior HM is lower than in those without prior HM, the safety profile of POEM is comparable between groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background After the first case of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) at our institution in 2008, the procedure was quickly accepted as an alternative to surgical myotomy and is now established as an excellent treatment option for achalasia. This study aimed to examine the safety and outcomes of POEM at our institution. Study Design Per-oral endoscopic myotomy was performed on 500 consecutive achalasia patients at our institution between September 2008 and November 2013. A review of prospectively collected data was conducted, including procedure time, myotomy location and length, adverse events, and patient data with short- (2 months) and long-term (1 and 3 years) follow-up. Results Per-oral endoscopic myotomy was successfully completed in all patients, with adverse events observed in 3.2%. Two months post-POEM, significant reductions in symptom scores (Eckardt score 6.0 ± 3.0 vs 1.0 ± 2.0, p < 0.0001) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressures (25.4 ± 17.1 vs 13.4 ± 5.9 mmHg, p < 0.0001) were achieved, and this persisted at 3 years post-POEM. Gastroesophageal reflux was seen in 16.8% of patients at 2 months and 21.3% at 3-year follow-up. Conclusions Per-oral endoscopic myotomy was successfully completed in all cases, even when extended indications (extremes of age, previous interventions, or sigmoid esophagus) were used. Adverse events were rare (3.2%), and there were no mortalities. Significant improvements in Eckardt scores and LES pressures were seen at 2 months, 1 year, and 3 years post-POEM. Based on our large series, POEM is a safe and effective treatment for achalasia; there are relatively few contraindications, and the procedure may be used as either first- or second-line therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]