Search

In areas with shallow saline groundwater, soil salts inevitably accumulate in the root zone during the growth period due to irrigation and upward movement of salts from the groundwater. In Northern China, autumn irrigation (AIR) with large amounts of water is commonly employed post-harvest to mitigate soil salt stress on crop growth in the subsequent year. Optimizing the total irrigation depth during both crop-growth and non-growth periods is challenging because of the movement of soil salts, which is influenced by their two-dimensional distribution around drippers and the impact of the winter freeze-thaw cycles, significantly affecting water flow and solute transport during winter. In this study, the HYDRUS-1D and HYDRUS-2D models were integrated and calibrated using experimental data collected from 2021 to 2023 in China's Ordos south bank irrigation area. This model integration was conducted to assess soil water and salt dynamics during the non-growth and corn-growth periods under different irrigation strategies: a) AIR with high (A H) and low (A L) irrigation depths, and b) drip irrigation (DIR) with high (D H), medium (D M), and low (D L) irrigation depths. The results indicated that HYDRUS effectively modeled the electrical conductivity of the saturation paste extract (EC e) across different irrigation strategies, yielding an average coefficient of determination (R 2) and the root mean square errors (RMSE) of 0.87 and 0.53 dS m−1, respectively. Generally, EC e increased during the growth period with DIR and decreased during the non-growth period with AIR. For the 0–40 cm soil layer, EC e decreased by 5.7 % and 12 % for every 100 mm increase in the AIR and DIR depths, respectively. Compared with the A H D M and A H D L treatments, reducing an AIR depth and increasing a DIR depth resulted in lower EC e in the 0–40 cm layer during the growth period and higher crop yield (CY) and irrigation water productivity (WP I). Specifically, the average EC e in the 0–40 cm layer decreased by 4.8 % during the growth period in the A L D H treatment compared to the A H D M treatment, and CY and WP I increased by 7.2 % and 10.3 %, respectively. Additionally, the irrigation strategy was the most effective in reducing EC e when AIR accounted for 35 % of the total irrigation. This study suggested that combining low AIR and high DIR could enhance water and field productivity. • Drip irrigation (DIR) during growth period and autumn irrigation (AIR) during non-growth period were evaluated. • Salt dynamics were analyzed using HYDRUS model (autumn irrigation, freeze-thaw, and growth periods in a sequence). • Soil water-salt balance and water productivity were analyzed under different irrigation strategies. • The strategy of low AIR and high DIR is recommended when irrigation water is limited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]