Search

This updated report on stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is part of a series of consensus-based white papers previously published addressing patient safety. Since the first white papers were published, SRS and SBRT technology and procedures have progressed significantly such that these procedures are now more commonly used. The complexity and submillimeter accuracy, and delivery of a higher dose per fraction requires an emphasis on best practices for technical, dosimetric, and quality assurance. Therefore, quality and patient safety considerations for these techniques remain an important area of focus. The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to assess the original SRS/SBRT white paper and update content where appropriate. Recommendations were created using a consensus-building methodology and task force members indicated their level of agreement based on a 5-point Likert scale, from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." A prespecified threshold of ≥75% of raters who select "strongly agree" or "agree" indicated consensus. This white paper builds on the previous version and uses of other guidance documents to broadly address SRS and SBRT delivery, primarily focusing on processes related to quality and safety. SRS and SBRT require a team-based approach, staffed by appropriately trained and credentialed specialists as well as significant personnel resources, specialized technology, and implementation time. A thorough feasibility analysis of resources is required to achieve the clinical and technical goals and thoroughly discussed with all personnel before undertaking new disease sites. A comprehensive quality assurance program must be developed, using established treatment guidelines, to ensure SRS and SBRT are performed in a safe and effective manner. Patient safety in SRS/SBRT is everyone's responsibility and professional organizations, regulators, vendors, and end-users must demonstrate a clear commitment to working together to ensure the highest levels of safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• In mouse testes with Leydig cell tumor expression of GPER and PPAR is altered. • Treatment of MA-10 cells with BPA and its derivatives effects on GPER and PPAR expression. • There is a relation between expression of INSL3 and RLN and estrogen level in Leydig cell tumor. • PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway and/or only mTOR is involved in GPER and PPAR interaction. The etiology and molecular characteristics of Leydig cell tumor (LCT) are scarcely known. From the research data stems that estrogen can be implicated in LCT induction and development, however it is not investigated in detail. Considering the above, herein we analyzed the relation between G-protein coupled membrane estrogen receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor and insulin-like family peptides (insulin-like 3 peptide; INSL3 and relaxin; RLN) expressions as well as estrogen level with impact of xenoestrogen (bisphenol A; BPA, tetrabromobisphenol A; TBBPA, and tetrachlorobisphenol A; TCBPA). While in our previous studies altered GPER-PPAR partnership was found in human LCT being a possible cause and/or additionally effecting on LCT development, here mouse testes with experimentally induced LCT and mouse tumor Leydig cell (MA-10) treated with BPA chemicals were examined. We revealed either diverse changes in expression or co-expression of GPER and PPAR in mouse LCT as well as in MA-10 cells after BPA analogues when compared to human LCT. Relationships between expression of INSL3, RLN, including co-expression, and estrogen level in human LCT, mouse LCT and MA-10 cells xenoestrogen-treated were found. Moreover, involvement of PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway or only mTOR in the interactions of examined receptors and hormones was showed. Taken together, species, cell of origin, experimental system used and type of used chemical differences may result in diverse molecular characteristics of LCT. Estrogen/xenoestrogen may play a role in tumor Leydig cell proliferation and biochemical nature but this issue requires further studies. Experimentally-induced LCT in mouse testis and MA-10 cells after BPA exposure seem to be additional models for understanding some aspects of human LCT biology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) has received requests for a standard list of data elements from other societies, database architects, Electronic Health Record vendors and, most recently, the pharmaceutical industry. These requests point to a growing interest in capturing radiation oncology data within registries and for quality measurement, interoperability initiatives, and research. Identifying a short and consistent list will lead to improved care coordination, a reduction in data entry by practice staff, and a more complete view of the holistic approach required for cancer treatment. The task force formulated recommendations based on analysis from radiation specific data elements currently in use in registries, accreditation programs, incident learning systems, and electronic health records. The draft manuscript was peer reviewed by 8 reviewers and ASTRO legal counsel and was revised accordingly and posted on the ASTRO website for public comment in April 2019 for 2 weeks. The final document was approved by the ASTRO Board of Directors in June 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This review will discuss the (perhaps biased) way in which smart oncologists think, biases they can identify, and potential strategies to minimize the impact of bias. It is critical to understand cognitive bias as a significant risk (recognized by the Joint Commission) associated with patient safety, and cognitive bias has been implicated in major radiotherapy incidents. The way in which we think are reviewed, covering both System 1 and system 2 processes of thinking, as well as behavioral economics concepts (prospect theory, expected utility theory). Predisposing factors to cognitive error are explained, with exploration of the groupings of person factors, patient factors, and system factors which can influence the quality of our decision-making. Other factors found to influence decision making are also discussed (rudeness, repeated decision making, hunger, personal attitudes). The review goes on to discuss cognitive bias in the clinic and in workplace interactions (including recruitment), with practical examples provided of each bias. Finally, the review covers strategies to combat cognitive bias, including summarize aloud, crowd wisdom, prospective hindsight, and joint evaluation. More definitive ways to mitigate bias are desirable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Optical surface imaging is a nonradiographic, noninvasive technology for continuous localization of patients during radiation therapy. Surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) has been applied to many treatment sites including breast, intracranial, head and neck, and extremities. SGRT enables a reduction of initial setup variability, provides verification of immobilization continuously during treatment including at noncoplanar linac gantry angles, and provides dynamic surface information for use in gated and breath-hold treatment techniques, all of which can permit reductions in the margins required to account for target localization uncertainty. Ancillary benefits from surface imaging include the ability to use immobilization techniques that confer greater comfort to patients, a reduction in imaging dose through reduced radiographic localization requirements, and improvements to the speed, efficiency, and safety of clinical workflows. This review will describe the objectives of SGRT, review the commercially available surface imaging systems, and provide an overview of SGRT applications by treatment site. Limitations and future applications of surfacing imaging systems are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Optical surface imaging is a nonradiographic, noninvasive technology for continuous localization of patients during radiation therapy. Surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) has been applied to many treatment sites including breast, intracranial, head and neck, and extremities. SGRT enables a reduction of initial setup variability, provides verification of immobilization continuously during treatment including at noncoplanar linac gantry angles, and provides dynamic surface information for use in gated and breath-hold treatment techniques, all of which can permit reductions in the margins required to account for target localization uncertainty. Ancillary benefits from surface imaging include the ability to use immobilization techniques that confer greater comfort to patients, a reduction in imaging dose through reduced radiographic localization requirements, and improvements to the speed, efficiency, and safety of clinical workflows. This review will describe the objectives of SGRT, review the commercially available surface imaging systems, and provide an overview of SGRT applications by treatment site. Limitations and future applications of surfacing imaging systems are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study, we demonstrate, for the first time, estrogen-related receptor (ERR) regulation of the physiological and biochemical status of testicular tumor Leydig cells. In a mouse tumor Leydig cells, ERRs (α, β, and γ) were silenced via siRNA. Cell morphology and cell physiology (proliferation and observation of monolayer formation) were performed by inverted phase-contrast microscope. Leydig cell functional markers (steroid receptors and signaling molecules) were examined by immunofluorescence and Western blotting. Additionally, progesterone secretion was assessed. Mitochondrial mass and membrane potential were analyzed by flow-cytometry while cGMP and Ca2+ concentrations were analyzed using immunoenzymatic and colorimetric assays, respectively. These results revealed, ERRs indirectly regulate Leydig cell proliferation while ERRα and β affect cell monolayer formation. ERRs interact with canonical and membrane estrogen receptors (ERα, ERβ, and GPER), androgen receptor, metalloproteinase (MMP 9), protein kinase A (PKA), extracellular-regulated kinase (ERK), and neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 2 (Notch2). Depending on the type of ERR knocked down, coupled with estradiol treatment, changes in progesterone concentration and cGMP and Ca2+ concentrations constitute a microenvironment that may effect tumor Leydig cell characteristics. ERRs should be considered important factors in developing of innovating approaches that target pathological processes of testicular Leydig cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An evolving paradigm in global outreach in radiation oncology has been the implementation of a more region-specific, needs-based approach to help close the gap in radiation services to low- and middle-income countries through the use of innovative tools in information and communication technology. This report highlights 4 information and communication technology tools in action today: (1) the NCCN Framework for Resource Stratification of NCCN guidelines, (2) ASTRO e-Contouring, (3) i.treatsafely.org, and (4) ChartRounds.com. We also render special consideration to matters related to global outreach that we believe require distinct attention to help us meet the goals established by the 2011 United Nations׳ Declaration on noncommunicable diseases: (1) trainee advancement toward careers in global health, (2) ethical challenges of international outreach, (3) critical importance of political advocacy, and (4) collaboration with Industry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Intraluminal thrombus (ILT) formation plays a significant role in the progression of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Potentially, as ILT thickness increases the availability of trace elements in the aneurysm wall could decrease thereby leading to oxidative stress and intensifying pro-inflammatory cytokine generation. Aim: To determine if thrombus thickness is related to the concentration of trace elements in the wall of infrarenal AAA. Patients and methods: The concentrations of trace elements in the wall of the aneurysm sack and ILT obtained from 19 consecutive patients during surgery for infrarenal AAA were determined using emission spectrometry. Results: The concentrations of magnesium, zinc, manganese, and lead in the wall of AAA were significantly greater than in the ILT. Only the concentration of copper was lower in the AAA wall compared with the thrombus. The concentration of calcium, phosphorus, zinc, lead, copper, and magnesium increased with ILT thickness. The concentrations of no other trace elements in the wall of AAA were found to be related to the ILT thickness. Conclusions: Intraluminal thrombus thickness is not associated with a lower concentration of trace elements in the wall of the infrarenal AAA. Thus, the intraluminal thrombus participates in the progression of AAA by mechanisms independent of trace element supply to the wall of the aneurysm sack. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: This report is part of a series of white papers commissioned for the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Board of Directors as part of ASTRO's Target Safely Campaign, focusing on the role of peer review as an important component of a broad safety/quality assurance (QA) program. Peer review is one of the most effective means for assuring the quality of qualitative, and potentially controversial, patient-specific decisions in radiation oncology. This report summarizes many of the areas throughout radiation therapy that may benefit from the application of peer review. Each radiation oncology facility should evaluate the issues raised and develop improved ways to apply the concept of peer review to its individual process and workflow. This might consist of a daily multidisciplinary (eg, physicians, dosimetrists, physicists, therapists) meeting to review patients being considered for, or undergoing planning for, radiation therapy (eg, intention to treat and target delineation), as well as meetings to review patients already under treatment (eg, adequacy of image guidance). This report is intended to clarify and broaden the understanding of radiation oncology professionals regarding the meaning, roles, benefits, and targets for peer review as a routine quality assurance tool. It is hoped that this work will be a catalyst for further investigation, development, and study of the efficacy of peer review techniques and how these efforts can help improve the safety and quality of our treatments. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

There has been growing emphasis on quality measures and process analysis techniques that may be implemented in the daily practice of radiation oncology to improve the overall quality of patient care. In this work, quality measures are a form of monitoring that should be actionable and specific to guide process improvement efforts. They are most effective when used to determine the level of execution proficiency against a standard. Control charts are an effective way to separate a change in the process from process noise such that the user can focus on issues that are more likely to improve quality. The field of radiotherapy would benefit from a common dashboard of quality measures for the different processes in radiation oncology clinics, and some suggestions are provided. The dashboard would be used to provide continuous feedback on a clinic''s capability to maintain or exceed standards. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the initial clinical experience with a frameless and maskless technique for stereotactic radiosurgery using minimal patient immobilization and real-time patient motion monitoring during treatment. We focus on the evaluation of the patient treatment process. Methods and Materials: The study considered the first 23 patients treated with this technique. Head positioning was achieved with a patient-specific head mold made out of expandable foam that conforms to the patient''s head. The face of the patient is left open for maximal comfort and so that motion of a region of interest consisting of the forehead, nose, eyes, and temporal bones can be monitored during treatment using a video surface imaging system (VisionRT Inc, London, UK). Initial setup of the patient was performed with the surface imaging system using the surface of the patient obtained from the treatment planning computed tomographic (CT) scan. The initial setup was confirmed and finalized with cone-beam CT (CBCT) prior to treatment. The shifts for final setup based on the CBCT and the duration of all the steps in the treatment process were recorded. Patients were monitored during treatment with surface imaging, and a beam hold-off was initiated when the patient''s motion exceeded a prespecified tolerance. Results: The average total setup time including surface imaging and CBCT was 26 minutes, while the portion corresponding to surface imaging was 14 minutes. The average treatment time from when the patient was placed on the treatment table until the last treatment beam was 40 minutes. Eight (35%) patients needed repositioning during the treatment. The average shifts identified from CBCT after initial setup with surface imaging were 1.85 mm in the anterior-posterior direction, and less than 1.0 mm in the lateral and superior-inferior directions. The longest treatment times (including beam hold-offs) happened for patients who fell asleep on the treatment table and were moving involuntarily. Conclusions: The frameless and maskless treatment using minimal immobilization and surface imaging has proven to be reasonably fast for routine clinical use. We observed that patient compliance is important. An additional degree of semi-rigid immobilization would be helpful for patients who fall asleep and involuntarily move during the procedure. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Purpose: To analyze the implementation of a passive radiofrequency identification (RFID) clinical system and to evaluate the clinical workflow on 2 linear accelerators using the RFID technology. Methods and Materials: The clinical area of a typical radiation therapy center was equipped with RFID readers and antennae, which included linear accelerator (linac) treatment vaults. Both were dual energy linacs (6 and 15 MV). One linac was an iX with RapidArc (Varian Medical Systems, Inc, Palo Alto, CA) and the other was a TrueBeam (Varian Medical Systems, Inc, Palo Alto, CA). Patients were given an RFID transponder card on their first day of treatment. Location timestamps were collected when the patients entered and exited the linac vaults. Each fraction was categorized by treatment machine, treatment site (brain, head and neck, prostate, and other), and treatment type (static field intensity modulated radiation therapy [IMRT], RapidArc, and 3-dimensional [3D]). The Mann-Whitney nonparametric test was used to determine statistical significance between median times in the linac vault. Results: A total of 4302 fractions from 144 patients were analyzed over a 10-month period. With minimal staff training, an approximately 70% read reliability was achieved. The median treatment time for all treatment fractions on the TrueBeam linac was 11.0 minutes (n = 1425) while the median time was 11.9 minutes (n = 1576) on the iX linac (P < .0001). Median times for the RapidArc cases was 10.9 minutes (n = 610) and 12.0 minutes (n = 1729) for IMRT cases (P < .0001). Median values for 3D delivery versus modulated delivery (RapidArc and IMRT) were 9.8 minutes (n = 315) and 11.7 minutes (n = 2339), P < .0001. Conclusions: Automatic remote reading of passive transponder cards is not without its challenges. However, with little or no clinical introduction, we experienced a read reliability that warrants further development. Our initial use of the system indicates that continual collection and analysis of workflow data may allow clinics to improve efficiency and safety. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]