Search

Vaginal prolapse is a known complication after radical cystectomy, requiring additional procedures in 10% of the patients. 1 This results from loss of level I and II vaginal support due to the removal of pelvic structures. In addition, a neobladder urinary diversion, with Valsalva voiding, predisposes to vaginal prolapse. A genital-sparing approach with paravaginal repair can help prevent such complications. The genital sparing technique preserves the uterus, fallopian tubes, ovaries, and vagina, while paravaginal repair involves suturing of the lateral vaginal wall to the arcuate fascia located on the medial aspect of the obturator internus muscle. The procedure begins by placing the patient in a lithotomy position, with a steep Trendelenburg. Standard 6 port cystectomy configuration is utilized with an additional 15 mm port for bowel anastomosis. Initially, the ureters and lateral bladder space are mobilized. Posteriorly a dissection plane is developed separating the bladder from the anterior vaginal wall. Distal dissection is carefully performed in that plane to avoid disrupting the urethral-external sphincter complex. Then the bladder is dropped from anterior attachments, the Dorsal venous complex (DVC) and bladder neck are exposed. Urethra is transected distal to the bladder neck, after circumferential mobilization, to complete the cystectomy, again avoiding disruption of the continence mechanism, and opening the endo-pelvic fascia. Cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection are completed in a standard fashion. The arcuate fascia is identified bilaterally for level I paravaginal repair. The lateral aspect of the paravaginal tissue is secured to this ligament, using 3 interrupted Polydioxanone (PDS) sutures, bilaterally. An ileal "Hautman's W pouch" neobladder is constructed using 50 cm of the small intestine, similar to the previously reported technique. 2 Bricker-type uretero-ileal anastomosis is performed over a double J stent. Bowel continuity is restored by a side-to-side anastomosis using endo-GIA (gastrointestinal anastamosis EndoGIATM) staplers. No intra or postoperative complications were noted. Robot dock time was 8 hours and 23 minutes with an EBL of 100 mL. The patient was discharged on post operative day (POD) 6 and Foley catheter with ureteral stents was removed on POD 27 after a cystogram confirmed no leaks. At 6-month follow-up, the patient reported good continence using a single pad, voiding every 3-4 hours. Fluoro-urodynamics demonstrated 651 mL capacity, low-pressure voiding, minimal residual urine, and no reflux. No prolapse was noted on fluoroscopy and pelvic examination with the Valsalva maneuver. The patient reported a good satisfaction level, regarding her urinary symptoms. We report satisfactory short-term outcomes of a feasible technique to prevent postcystectomy prolapse; however, long-term follow-up of a larger cohort can help establish its efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Use of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer is increasing. Structured surgical training and objective assessment are critical for outcomes. Objective To develop and validate a modular training and assessment pathway via Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (HFMEA) for trainees undertaking RARP and evaluate learning curves (LCs) for procedural steps. Design, setting, and participants This multi-institutional (Europe, Australia, and United States) observational prospective study used HFMEA to identify the high-risk steps of RARP. A specialist focus group enabled validation. Fifteen trainees who underwent European Association of Urology robotic surgery curriculum training performed RARP and were assessed by mentors using the tool developed. Results produced LCs for each step. A plateau above score 4 indicated competence. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis We used a modular training and assessment tool (RARP Assessment Score) to evaluate technical skills. LCs were constructed. Multivariable Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U , and κ coefficient analyses were used. Results and limitations Five surgeons were observed for 42 console hours to map steps of RARP. HFMEA identified 84 failure modes and 46 potential causes with a hazard score ≥8. Content validation created the RARP Assessment Score: 17 stages and 41 steps. The RARP Assessment Score was acceptable (56.67%), feasible (96.67%), and had educational impact (100%). Fifteen robotic surgery trainees were assessed for 8 mo. In 426 RARP cases (range: 4–79), all procedural steps were attempted by trainees. Trainees were assessed with the RARP Assessment Score by their expert mentors, and LCs for individual steps were plotted. LCs demonstrated plateaus for anterior bladder neck transection (16 cases), posterior bladder neck transection (18 cases), posterior dissection (9 cases), dissection of prostatic pedicle and seminal vesicles (15 cases), and anastomosis (17 cases). Other steps did not plateau during data collection. Conclusions The RARP Assessment Score based on HFMEA methodology identified critical steps for focused RARP training and assessed surgeons. LCs demonstrate the experience necessary to reach a level of competence in technical skills to protect patients. Patient summary We developed a safety and assessment tool to gauge the technical skills of surgeons performing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Improvement was monitored, and measures of progress can be used in future to guide mentors when training surgeons to operate safely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]