Search

Carriers of multidrug-resistant bacteria are at risk of infections with these bacteria; the precise size of this risk is unclear. We aimed to quantify the effect of gut colonisation on subsequent risk of infection with multidrug-resistant bacteria. We performed a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar for follow-up studies published from Jan 1, 1995, to March 17, 2022, that measured the incidence of infections with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) and from Jan 1, 1995, to March 15, 2022, that measured the incidence of infections with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). We included original cohort studies and case-control studies that used incidence-density sampling, included 50 or more patients with enteric colonisation or positive urinary samples as a surrogate marker of colonisation, or both, and analysed infections clearly preceded by colonisation. We did not use any language restrictions. We excluded studies not reporting length of follow-up. Summary data were extracted and independently cross-verified by two authors. Carriage was defined as MDR-GNB or VRE, detected in faecal or urinary cultures. Our primary outcomes were cumulative incidence and incidence density of infection in patients colonised by multidrug-resistant bacteria. To estimate pooled incidences, general linearised mixed-effects meta-regressions were used, adjusting for varying follow-up durations. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020222415. Of the 301 studies identified, 44 studies (26 on MDR-GNB, 14 on VRE, and four on both MDR-GNB and VRE) from 14 countries were retained for qualitative synthesis, 40 of which were analysed with meta-regression, comprising data for 14 049 patients colonised with multidrug-resistant bacteria. The pooled cumulative incidence of infection was 14% (95% CI 10–18; p<0·0001) at a median follow-up time of 30 days for MDR-GNB (845 cases of infection in 9034 patients colonised) and 8% (5–13; p<0·0001) at 30 days for VRE (229 cases of infection in 4747 patients colonised). Infection incidence density (4·26 infections per 1000 patient-days; 95% CI 1·69–6·82) and cumulative incidence of infection (19%, 95% CI 15–25; p<0·0001; 602 cases of infection in 4547 patients colonised) were highest for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria at 30 days. Risk of bias was rated low to moderate. The risk of infection was substantial, with the highest risk for patients colonised with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and the lowest in patients with VRE. These data might help to guide prophylactic and treatment decisions and form a valuable resource for planning clinical trials on targeted prevention. The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Vaccination >16 weeks of gestation provides antibodies for both the mother and the neonate. • Antibodies in human milk after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy. • High virus neutralization observed in mother-infant dyads. Preventive measures against COVID-19 are essential for pregnant women. Pregnant women are particularly vulnerable to emerging infectious pathogens due to alterations in their physiology. We aimed to determine the optimum timing of vaccination to protect pregnant women and their neonates from COVID-19. A prospective observational longitudinal cohort study in pregnant women who received COVID-19 vaccination. We collected blood samples to evaluate levels of antispike, receptor binding domain and nucleocapsid antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 before vaccination and 15 days after the first and second vaccination. We determined the neutralizing antibodies from mother-infant dyads in maternal and umbilical cord blood at birth. If available, immunoglobulin A was measured in human milk. We included 178 pregnant women. Median antispike immunoglobulin G levels increased significantly from 1.8 to 5431 binding antibody units/ml and receptor binding domain from 6 to 4466 binding antibody units/ml. Virus neutralization showed similar results between different weeks of gestation at vaccination (P >0.3). We advise vaccination in the early second trimester of pregnancy for the optimum balance between the maternal antibody response and placental antibody transfer to the neonate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• 18F-afatinib PET/CT is a safe tool to quantify 18F-afatinib uptake in NSCLC tumors. • Tumor uptake of 18F-afatinib is higher in EGFR mutated NSCLC versus wild type EGFR. • There is no difference in tracer uptake between EGFR common and uncommon mutations. • A TBR_WB 60−90 value of ≥6 is predictive of response to treatment using afatinib. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors harboring common (exon19del, L858R) and uncommon (e.g. G719X, L861Q) activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are best treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) such as the first-generation EGFR TKI erlotinib, second-generation afatinib or third-generation osimertinib. However, identifying these patients through biopsy is not always possible. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate whether 18F-afatinib PET/CT could identify patients with common and uncommon EGFR mutations. Furthermore, we evaluated the relation between tumor 18F-afatinib uptake and response to afatinib therapy. 18F-afatinib PET/CT was performed in 12 patients: 6 EGFR wild type (WT), 3 EGFR common and 3 EGFR uncommon mutations. Tumor uptake of 18F-afatinib was quantified using TBR_WB 60−90 (tumor-to-whole blood activity ratio 60−90 min post-injection) for each tumor. Response was quantified per lesion using percentage of change (PC): [(response measurement (RM)–baseline measurement (BM))/BM]×100. Statistical analyses were performed using t-tests, correlation plots and sensitivity/specificity analysis. Twenty-one tumors were identified. Injected dose was 348 ± 31 MBq. Group differences were significant between WT versus EGFR (common and uncommon) activating mutations (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference between EGFR common versus uncommon mutations (p = 0.94). A TBR_WB 60−90 cut-off value of 6 showed the best relationship with response with a sensitivity of 70 %, a specificity of 100 % and a positive predictive value of 100 %. 18F-afatinib uptake was higher in tumors with EGFR mutations (common and uncommon) compared to WT. Furthermore, a TBR_WB 60−90 cut-off of 6 was found to best predict response to therapy. 18F-afatinib PET/CT could provide a means to identify EGFR mutation positive patients who benefit from afatinib therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]