Search

While immigrants tend to be healthier especially when they first arrived, this healthy immigrant effect may not apply to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPD) especially among immigrants from countries without vaccination programs. There is therefore an important information gap regarding differential health outcome and hospitalization usage by immigrant status, landing cohort, world region and immigrant category. This study focused on acute-care hospitalization, and used two recently linked population-based databases in Canada, namely, the 2006 Census linked to the Hospital Discharge Abstract (DAD), and the Immigrant Landing File linked to the DAD (ILF-DAD) to estimate crude and age-standardized VPD-related hospitalization rates (ASHR) by the above-mentioned immigrant characteristics to be compared with that for overall Canadian-born reference population. Based on the 2006 Census-DAD linked database, VPD-specific ASHR for overall immigrants was significantly higher than that for the Canadian-born population (1.6, 95% CI, 1.5, 1.6 vs 1.2, 95% CI, 1.1, 1.2, respectively). VPD-specific ASHRs by landing cohorts also increased with years in Canada (e.g. 1.4, 95% CI, 1.3, 1.5 for the 1990–2006 cohort, and 1.6, 95% CI, 1.5, 1.7 for the pre-1980 cohort). Based on the 1980–2006 ILF-DAD, the VPD-specific ASHRs were highest among Southeast and East Asians (e.g. 2.1, 95% CI, 1.9, 2.3 for East Asia). Compared with the Canadian-born, economic class immigrants overall had significantly lower ASHR (1.4, 95% CI 1.2, 1.6), but the low rate was mainly due to the dependants (spouse or children) within this class (0.8, 95% CI 0.6, 1.1). Both family and refugee categories had significantly higher ASHRs (1.3, 95% CI, 1.2, 1.5 and 1.7, 95% CI, 1.4, 2.1, respectively), especially among those refugees assisted by government (2.0, 95% CI, 1.4, 2.6). With increasing immigration, changing source countries and emerging needs for refugee settlements in Canada, these newly linked datasets help to monitor VPD-related hospitalization pattern among Canadian immigrants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Hospitals tend to be among the destinations that make densely populated, well-connected neighbourhoods more conducive to active living. In this study, we determined whether living near a hospital distorts the association between living in favourable ALEs and hospitalization for physical inactivity-related cardiometabolic diseases. We used a record linkage of 442,345 respondents of the Canadian Community Health Survey and their hospitalization records for cardiometabolic disease. We then assessed respondents' neighbourhoods using the Canadian Active Living Environments measure (Can-ALE), a measure based on ≥3-way intersection density, residential density, and points of interest. We then calculated the distance in kilometers between the centroids of respondents' assigned dissemination areas and the nearest user-contributed location for hospitals from OpenStreetMap. We monitored changes in estimates for the association between ALEs and odds of cardiometabolic disease hospitalization using a series of logistic regressions with indicator variables for distances to hospital of 500 meters to 10 kilometers. We found that living between 500 meters and six kilometers of a hospital and was associated with modestly higher odds of cardiometabolic hospitalization (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.18 for 500 meters; OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09 for six kilometers). Living in more favourable ALEs was associated with lower odds of hospitalization (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.91; comparing the most favourable to least favourable ALEs). Effect estimates between more favourable ALEs and lower odds of hospitalization were marginally strengthened when living within 2-6 kilometers to a hospital was accounted for. This study demonstrates the importance of disentangling interrelated geographic factors and underlines the potential for built environments to elicit reductions in health care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]