Search

Abstract: Peripheral absolute monocyte count (AMC) has been reported to correlate with clinical outcome in different types of cancers. This association may relate to alteration in circulating monocytic subpopulations and tumor infiltrating macrophages. In this study we evaluated the clinical significance of peripheral AMC in 80 treatment naive patients with CLL. Measurement of AMC was based on direct morphological enumeration, due to our findings that complete blood count data may yield incorrect monocytes enumeration values in CLL. The median AMC in patients with CLL was within normal limits, however the AMC range exceeded the values of healthy individuals. The AMC trichotomized patients into 3 distinct sub-groups with different characteristics and outcomes. High AMC patients were younger and had higher absolute lymphocytes count, while patients with low AMC had prominent immune dysregulation (lower serum IgA levels, susceptibility to infections and a tendency for positive direct anti-globulin test). The low and high AMC patients had a shorter time to treatment compared to the intermediates AMC subgroups, whereas low AMC was associated with increased mortality caused by infectious complications. In conclusion, AMC quantification during the disease course classifies CLL patients into subgroups with unique clinical features and outcomes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immunosuppression are at risk of developing lymphoma, particularly primary gastrointestinal (GI) tract non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Primary GI Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in this setting, however, is rare and poorly defined. Here we review the available literature and also report a patient with Crohn’s disease (CD) who developed GI HL. Our search yielded 12 single case studies and 7 case series involving 22 patients published between 1978–2016. Twenty-one (91%) patients had CD, and 2 had ulcerative colitis. The median age at lymphoma diagnosis was 39 years, and 18 (78%) patients were males. HL was diagnosed at a median of 8 years after IBD detection and 2 years after commencing immunosuppression. HL had a predilection (80%) to involve the inflamed GI site and the histological subtype was mixed cellularity in 65% of cases. In-situ hybridization for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded RNA was positive in all documented cases. HL was diagnosed in stages I, II, IV in 35%, 20% and 45% of the patients, respectively. Notably, 66% of patients with advanced disease had liver involvement. Immunosuppression was stopped in most (69%) patients at HL diagnosis. Treatment used was either chemotherapy only, surgery followed by chemotherapy, or surgery alone in 50%, 33% and 16% of cases, respectively. Four patients had an IBD flare during HL remission. Patients with IBD who develop GI HL have distinct characteristics; male sex, predominance of CD, preference to develop in inflamed sites, mixed cellularity histology, EBV positivity, and a unique spread to the liver pattern. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Cefepime is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin with enhanced coverage against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. We did a systematic review of randomised trials that compared cefepime with another β-lactam antibiotic, alone or with the addition of a non-β-lactam antibiotic to both study groups. We searched Central, PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, new US Food and Drug Administration drug applications, conference proceedings, and references of the included studies. Two reviewers independently did the search and data extraction. 57 trials were included. All-cause mortality—the primary outcome—was higher with cefepime than other β-lactams (risk ratio [RR] 1·26 [95% CI 1·08–1·49]). Sensitivity analyses by the trials'' methodological quality revealed higher RRs for trials reporting adequate allocation-sequence generation (1·52 [1·20–1·92]) and allocation concealment (1·36 [1·09–1·70]). Baseline risk factors for mortality were similar. No significant differences between groups in treatment failure, superinfection, or adverse events were found. This Review provides evidence and offers possible explanations for increased mortality among patients treated with cefepime in randomised trials. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]