Search

It is unclear whether global use of medications for secondary cardiovascular (CVD) prevention is improving over time. This study across 17 high-, middle- and low-income countries described variations in secondary CVD prevention medication use over a median follow-up of 12 years. In the multinational PURE (Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology) cohort study, we conducted a repeated cross-sectional analysis to examine temporal variations in the use of secondary prevention medications in participants with CVD. In participants with coronary artery disease, we focused on antiplatelet agents, statins, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, and β-blockers. In participants with stroke, we focused on antiplatelet agents, statins, RAS inhibitors, and other blood pressure–lowering drugs. Medications were collected at baseline and on 4 subsequent follow-up visits. The analysis included 7,409 participants with a diagnosis of CVD at the baseline visit, 8,792 at the second visit, 9,236 at the third visit, 11,082 at the fourth visit, and 11,677 at the last visit. The median age at baseline was 58.0 years, and 52.9% of the participants were female. The median follow-up was 12 years, with the median year of the baseline visit in 2007 and the fifth visit in 2019. Over this period, use of 1 or more classes of medications for secondary CVD prevention was 41.3% (95% CI: 40.2%-42.4%) at baseline, peaked at 43.1% (95% CI: 42.0%-44.1%), and then decreased to 31.3% (95% CI: 30.4%-32.1%) by the last study visit. In high-income countries, this use decreased from 88.8% (95% CI: 86.6%-91.0%) to 77.3% (95% CI: 74.9%-79.6%). In upper-middle-income countries, this use increased from 55.0% (95% CI: 52.8%-57.3%) to 61.1% (95% CI: 59.1%-63.1%). In lower-middle-income countries, use of at least 1 class of medications was 29.5% (95% CI: 28.1%-30.9%) at baseline, peaked at 31.7% (95% CI: 30.4%-33.1%), and then decreased to 13.4% (95% CI: 12.5%-14.2%) by the last visit. In low-income countries, use of at least 1 class of medications was 20.8% (95% CI: 18.1%-23.5%) at baseline, peaked at 47.3% (95% CI: 44.8%-49.9%), and then decreased to 27.5% (95% CI: 25.2%-29.9%) by the last study visit. Globally and in most country income-level groups, the use of medications for secondary CVD prevention has been low, with little improvement over time. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In 2020, the WHO reported a European prevalence of 9.6 % of sexual abuse among children, and called on every country to improve prevention of such violence. To explore the understanding of an intersectional sample of professionals of their role and that of the general practitioner (GP) in the primary and secondary prevention of sexual violence against children (SVAC). This qualitative, exploratory study was conducted in France. It followed COREQ criteria and ethical approval was obtained. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between February and October 2022 with intersectoral professionals involved in the identification and management of SVAC. The analysis was inspired by grounded theory. Thirteen professionals (from the media, healthcare, justice, police, education and social welfare sectors) shared their views regarding SVAC prevention. The notion that SVAC is a societal taboo recurred throughout the study. The content of participants' discussions about prevention could be divided into four categories: (1) Intersectoral professionals' understanding of prevention, prevention means talking about it; (2) Two, contrasting understandings of prevention and roles; (3) Putting primary and secondary SVAC prevention into practice; (4) The GP's role in SVAC prevention. The GP's role in SVAC prevention was perceived to, above all, involve screening and reporting. Primary prevention measures by GPs appeared to be less obvious. Our study reinforces the need and usefulness of intersectoral collaboration to improve SVAC prevention. It is in the interests of every professional to be appropriately trained, and to understand the roles of the various stakeholders, in order to work together. While the WHO has called upon the healthcare sector to coordinate intersectoral collaboration for the prevention of SVAC, professionals, (including GPs) must be supported in order to systematically integrate prevention into the monitoring of children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Española de Cardiología (18855857) is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are novel medications for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. In 2020, the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) began subsidising PCSK9 inhibitors for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with LDL-C >2.6 mmol/L despite statin and ezetimibe therapy. This criterion was expanded to LDL-C >1.8 mmol/L in 2022. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients admitted to a quaternary hospital with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) between 2020–2022. PCSK9 inhibitor eligibility and prescribing patterns were compared between recurrent ACS patients (≥2 events within 5 years) and first-presentation ACS patients. Australian PBS 2020 and 2022 criteria were applied to assess eligibility. Of 817 ACS patients with LDL-C >1.8 mmol/L, 118 (14.4%) were categorised as recurrent ACS (33.9% female, mean age 67 years, LDL-C 2.9 mmol/L). When compared with first-presentation ACS patients (n=699), recurrent ACS patients had significantly higher proportions already on statin therapy (49.2% vs 6.0%, p<0.001) and ezetimibe (20.3% vs 2.4%, p<0.001). Recurrent ACS patients had significantly higher proportions of 2020 PBS-eligible patients (11.0% vs 1.3%, p<0.001) and 2022 PBS-eligible patients (20.3% vs 2.2%, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in PCSK9 inhibitor prescription rates among eligible patients (four of 13, 30.8% vs four of nine, 44.4%, p=0.51). Univariate binary logistic regression demonstrated that statin intolerance was significantly associated with PCSK9 inhibitor prescription (odds ratio 10; 95% confidence interval 1.3–79.3; p=0.029). Despite significantly higher eligibility rates, PCSK9 inhibitor uptake remains low in recurrent ACS patients, demonstrating the need to raise further awareness about eligibility criteria and encourage proactive prescription to prevent recurrent cardiovascular events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Dual staining p16/Ki67 (DS) cytology is an alternative triage method of HPV+women. • This is a retrospective analysis of real-world experience with DS. • DS provided a better risk stratification than conventional PAP cytology. • DS positivity as referral criterion for colposcopy reduces of the referrals. • DS cytology may support the extension of the follow-up interval. Organized cervical cancer (CxCa) screening is the most effective secondary prevention method to decrease the disease incidence and mortality. Screening for infection with 14 high-risk HPV genotypes (hrHPV) is recommended as primary screening test. Since only ca. 6 % of HPV-positive (HPV+) women will develop a high-grade lesion in 5 years, triage is critical for risk stratification and management of colposcopy resources. Dual staining (DS) p16/Ki67 cytology is an alternative to Papanicolau cytology (PAP) for triage of HPV+women, with potential improvements in sensitivity and specificity, and optimization of colposcopy referrals. To compare PAP vs DS cytology in terms of (i) optimization of referrals for colposcopy and (ii) risk stratification to better define the follow-up interval. Retrospective analysis of the CxCa screening database of Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), one of the centralized diagnostic laboratories for the CxCa screening program of the central region of Portugal, between July 2019 and May 2023. At CHUC, since July 2019, all samples from hrHPV+women have been triaged with liquid PAP and tested with DS cytology. At baseline (1032 HPV+women), 1028 women were tested with DS: 739 women were DS negative (DS-) [70.7 % with normal PAP cytology (NILM) and 29.3 % with abnormal PAP cytology (ASC-US+)], and 289 were DS positive (DS+) (1.1 % NILM and 98.6 % ASC-US+). DS positivity as referral criterion for colposcopy instead of ASC-US+would have reduced the number of colposcopies by 39.4 % overall and by 48.3 % for other 12 hrHPV, while improving the number of colposcopies per HSIL (3.9 vs. 2.4 overall and 4.9 vs. 2.9 for other 12 hrHPV). In this cohort, if the follow-up interval for women positive for other 12 hrHPV+and DS- would have been extended from 1 to 3 years, 799 follow-up consultations, 799 HPV re-tests, and 277 colposcopies (−64.7 %) would have been avoided, with an overall risk of missed HSIL lesions of 2.2 %. Triage with DS allows the optimization of colposcopy referrals and a safe extension of the follow-up interval to 3 years for other 12 hrHPV+/DS- women, eliminating the need for annual re-testing for many women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical guidelines recommend secondary prevention medications following myocardial infarction (MI) regardless of revascularisation strategy. Studies suggest that there is variation in post-MI medication use following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG). We investigated initial dispensing and 12-month patterns of medication use according to revascularisation strategy following non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI). We included all public and private hospital admissions for NSTEMI for patients aged ≥30 years in Victoria, Australia, between July 2012 and June 2017. We investigated initial dispensing of P2Y 12 inhibitors (P2Y 12 i), statins (total and high intensity), angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), and beta blockers within 60 days after discharge. Twelve-month post-MI medication use was estimated as the proportion of days covered (PDC) over a 12-month period from the date of hospital discharge. Analyses were performed using adjusted regression models, stratified by revascularisation strategy. There were 15,399 admissions for NSTEMI: 11,754 with PCI and 3,645 with CABG. Following adjustments, predicted probability of initial dispensing in the PCI and CABG groups, respectively, was 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.93–0.95) vs 0.17 (0.13–0.21) for P2Y 12 i; 0.69 (0.66–0.71) vs 0.42 (0.37–0.48) for ACEi/ARB; 0.59 (0.57–0.62) vs 0.69 (0.64–0.74) for beta blockers; 0.89 (0.87–0.91) vs 0.89 (0.85–0.92) for statins; and 0.60 (0.57–0.62) vs 0.69 (0.63–0.73) for high intensity statins. The 12-month PDC in the PCI and CABG groups, respectively, was 0.82 (0.80–0.83) vs 0.12 (0.09–0.15) for P2Y 12 i; 0.62 (0.60–0.65) vs 0.43 (0.39–0.48) for ACEi/ARB; 0.53 (0.51–0.55) vs 0.632 (0.58–0.66) for beta blockers; 0.79 (0.78–0.81) vs 0.78 (0.74–0.81) for statins; and 0.49 (0.47–0.51) vs 0.55 (0.50–0.59) for high intensity statins. Post-discharge dispensing of secondary prevention medications differed with respect to revascularisation strategy from 2012 to 2017, despite clear evidence of benefit during this period. Interventions may be needed to address possible clinician and patient uncertainty about the benefits of secondary prevention medications, regardless of revascularisation strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Discrimination and structural factors that promote discrimination and sociocultural inequities are social determinants of health that contribute to poorer health outcomes among minoritized youth. Discrimination consists of institutional or individual-level biases leading to disparate and unequitable access to resources. If individuals are aware of these experiences and their impact on one's own ability to access resources or opportunities, individuals may self-report these occurrences. Experiences of discrimination, and one's personal experience of discrimination at individual, social, and/or institutional levels have been shown to contribute to worse psychiatric outcomes through the emergence of and increased severity of psychopathology, reduced access to treatment, decreased likelihood of active treatment seeking, and poorer treatment retention.1,2 For youth, early and repeated exposures to discrimination, and perception of discrimination, may contribute to health disparities in psychopathology in adolescence, young adulthood, and beyond. Our understanding of protective factors and primary and secondary prevention strategies is limited, given the lack of systematic research on early and persistent exposure to discrimination on developmental outcomes in minoritized youth. Large longitudinal research studies with representative heterogeneous samples may allow for the study of these relationships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Wheezing infants are an important global public health issue in LIMC. • Determining whether wheezing is the correct definition is critical. • A differential diagnosis of the causes of wheezing and other sounds should be made. • Recurrent wheezing [RW] in infants may warrant a therapeutic trial with inhaled steroids. • In LMICS, RW may be prevented by reducing environmental factors such as smoking. • Early exposure to viral infection is a preventable cause of RW. To review the recent evidence in the literature of various aspects of recurrent/severe wheezing in children under 3 in low-middle income countries [LMICS]. A non-systematic review including articles in English. We mainly selected publications from the last 5 years. Studies on epidemiology, aetiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention were included in the search. We reviewed differential diagnoses of wheezing that focused on LMICS. We also reviewed aspects of prevention. Many epidemiological studies have shown a variable but significant number of wheezy infants [WI] cases in LMICS when compared to other countries. The differential diagnosis of causes of wheezing in this age group is mandatory, taking into account local facilities. Few treatment options have been well studied for this age group. In LMICS, a pragmatic approach could be considered, as described in the article. It is difficult to study primary prevention for WI and secondary prevention (mainly environmental) may have some impact. A schematic approach for recurrent wheezers is presented, which takes into account settings with limited resources. Severely or recurrently wheezy children under 3 is a common clinical issue in LMICS. Studies on this age group are needed to reduce the significant morbidity. It may be possible to lower the high burden of wheezing in this age group by selecting the phenotype which may respond to inhaled steroids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report a case of an active-duty diver who developed severe decompression sickness with concomitant patent foramen ovale that was successfully closed contrary to standard guideline recommendations. This case should prompt evaluation of the role of cardiac screening in occupational divers, including tactical athletes, relative to recreational divers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Status epilepticus (SE) is potentially life-threatening, however, it is unclear which antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) should be used as second-line AEDs. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing multiple second-line AEDs for SE to investigate the efficacy of AEDs. We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov , and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal and included RCTs for patients aged ≥15 years with SE on December 31, 2023. We compared multiple second-line AEDs for SE including fosphenytoin (fPHT), lacosamide (LCM), levetiracetam (LEV), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PHB), and valproate (VPA). The primary and secondly outcomes were termination of seizures integrating the absence of seizure recurrence at 30 min and 60 min, and adverse events associated with AEDs, respectively, with expressing as relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We conducted a NMA using frequentist-based approach with multivariate random effects, and assessed the certainty based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework. Seven RCTs (n = 780) were included, and statistically significant difference was detected between VPA vs. PHB (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53–0.85; very low certainty), fPHT vs. PHB (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48–0.90; very low certainty), LCM vs. PHB (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41–0.93; very low certainty), and LEV vs. PHB (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51–0.94; very low certainty). Moreover, PHB was the highest in the ranking for termination of seizures. For adverse events, no significant reduction was observed owing to the selection of AEDs, although the ranking of PHB was the lowest. PHB may have been the most effective for seizure termination as second-line AEDs in adult patients with SE. However, the certainty of almost all comparisons was "very low", and careful interpretation is essential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Inflammation plays a key role in the development coronary artery disease (CAD). • The ancient drug colchicine targets inflammation through multiple pathways. • Recent trials indicated that colchicine reduces the risk for ischemic events in CAD. • Albeit colchicine is safe, it may be underused for secondary prevention in CAD. • More data is needed to define the optimal duration of colchicine therapy in CAD. Inflammation plays a central role in coronary artery disease (CAD), and recent data have shown that anti-inflammatory drugs have the potential to reduce ischemic events in CAD patients. Colchicine is an ancient anti-inflammatory drug that targets neutrophil and inflammasome activities. It has been prescribed for decades for different rheumatological conditions. Given the important role of inflammation in the development of cardiovascular disease, there has been considerable interest in studying colchicine's potential to limit the progression of atherosclerosis among afflicted patients. In fact, there is a growing body of randomized data suggesting that use of low-dose colchicine reduces the risk of ischemic events in patients with CAD, particularly repeated revascularizations, new myocardial infarctions and strokes. This review article summarizes background information—including possible side effects and contraindications—as well as the current evidence backing up the use of colchicine in patients with established CAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the most common cause of death in Europe. Although the 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias claim a target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) value of <55 mg/dL for very high-risk patients by use of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and lifestyle adaptations, the target level achievement is not satisfactory. We examined LLT use in ASCVD patients exceeding LDL-C target levels at admission and its adaptations at discharge. Between January 2017 and February 2020, 1091 patients with LDL-C >100 mg/dL and ASCVD defined as diagnosis of angina pectoris (AP, n = 179), acute myocardial infarction (AMI, n = 317), chronic ischemic heart disease (CHD, n = 195), or peripheral artery disease (PAD, n = 400) were extracted from hospital records. LLT use on admission and discharge as well as recommendations on lifestyle and nutrition were analysed. On admission, 51% of the patients were not taking LLT. At discharge, 91% were prescribed statins and 87% were advised on lifestyle adaptation and/or pharmacological treatment. High-intensity statin use at discharge was present in 63% of the AP-group, 92% of the AMI-group, 62% of the CHD-group and 71% of the PAD-group. Ezetimibe was present in 16% and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) in 1%. However, of those on high-intensity statin, 25% remained on insufficient statin dosage. Switch to high-intensity statins and use of ezetimibe and PCSK9i was low in chronic ASCVD patients. Even though statin intake was high in high-risk patients, target levels were still not reached. • Missing intensity- and dose-titration in statins. • Underuse of add-on lipid therapy for target level achievement. • Insufficient recommendation on lifestyle adaptations as for secondary prevention. • Underwhelming advice on nutrition in ASCVD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adherence to antiplatelet therapy is recommended but unexplored in patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Therefore, this study aimed to determine adherence and persistence to antiplatelet therapy in patients with PAD, defined as intermittent claudication and chronic limb threatening ischaemia. Population based nationwide cohort study. This study included all Danish citizens aged ≥ 40 years with a first inpatient or outpatient diagnosis of symptomatic PAD between 2010 – 2017, and who had at least one prescription claim for aspirin and/or clopidogrel within 90 days after diagnosis. Adherence was determined by the proportion of days covered (PDC) during the first year after diagnosis. Persistence was defined as no treatment gap ≥ 30 days between prescription renewals over three year follow up. A total of 39 687 patients were eligible for inclusion, of whom 23 279 (58.7%) claimed a prescription for aspirin and/or clopidogrel within 90 days of diagnosis. Among these, 12 898 (55.4%) were prevalent users , while the remainder comprised new users who initiated the therapy after the index PAD diagnosis. The mean PDC was 74.5% (SD 35.0%) for prevalent users and 60.5% (SD 30.5%) for new users. Adherence increased with age and number of concomitant drugs. The overall one year cumulative incidence treatment discontinuation was 13.0% (95% CI 12.5 – 13.4%) overall, 17.2% (CI 16.6 – 17.9%) for prevalent users, and 7.9% (CI 7.4 – 8.4%) for new users. At three year follow up, the cumulative incidence of discontinuation was 31.5% (CI 30.9 – 32.2%) overall, 44.6% (CI 43.7 – 45.4%) for prevalent users, and 14.6% (CI 13.9 – 15.3) for new users. Less than 60% of patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic PAD claimed a prescription for antiplatelet therapy within 90 days of diagnosis, and both adherence and persistence were moderate during the first year after diagnosis. These findings underscore the importance of efforts to improve the initiation and continuation of antiplatelet therapy in patients with PAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among cancer survivors. Mental health is considered an important risk factor affecting the treatment of cardiovascular disease. However, little is known about the use of secondary prevention strategies for CVD in patients with both cancer and CVD. This study aimed to compare the utilisation of primary care chronic disease management plans, mental health care and guideline-indicated cardioprotective medications among CVD patients with and without cancer. Retrospective cross-sectional study utilising clinical data of patients with CVD from 50 Australian primary care practices. Outcomes included the use of chronic disease management plans, mental health care, guideline-indicated cardioprotective medications and influenza vaccination. Logistic regression, accounting for demographic and clinical covariates and clustering effects by practices, was used to compare the two groups. Of the 15,040 patients with CVD, 1,486 patients (9.9%) concurrently had cancer. Patients with cancer, compared to those without, were older (77.6 vs 71.8 years, p<0.001), more likely to drink alcohol (62.6% vs 55.7%, p<0.001), have lower systolic (130.3±17.8 vs 132.5±21.1 mmHg, p<0.001) and diastolic (72.2±11 vs 75.3±34 mmHg, p<0.001) blood pressure. Although suboptimal for both groups, patients with cancer were significantly more likely to have general practice management plans (GPMPs) (51.4% vs 43.2%, p<0.001), coordination of team care arrangements (TCAs) (46.2% vs 37.0%, p<0.001), have a review of either GPMP or TCA (42.8% vs 34.7%, p<0.001), have a mental health treatment consultation (15.4% vs 10.5%, p=0.004) and be prescribed blood pressure-lowering medications (70.1% vs 66.0%, p=0.002). However, there were no statistical differences in the prescription of lipid-lowering or antiplatelet medications. After adjustments for covariates and multiple testing, patients with cancer did not show a difference in GPMPs, TCAs, and a review of either, but were more likely to receive mental health treatment consultations than those without cancer (odds ratio 1.76; 95% confidence interval 1.42–2.19). Less than half of patients with CVD had a GPMP, TCA or review of either. Although those patients with cancer were more likely to receive these interventions, still around half the patients did not. Medicare-funded GPMPs, TCAs and a review of either GPMP or TCA were underutilised, and future studies should seek to identify ways of improving access to these services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Increased cardiovascular events are common in cancer survivors and contribute to an emerging cardio-oncology patient group requiring secondary prevention strategies including cardiac rehabilitation (CR). This study aimed to compare characteristics and outcomes for patients participating in CR with and without an existing cancer diagnosis. Observational cohort study including consecutive patients enrolled in a single-centre outpatient CR program in Western Sydney between 2018–2022. Clinical history, demographics and CR outcome data were collected as part of standard care at program enrolment and completion. Patients with and without a cancer diagnosis were compared at enrolment and outcomes were analysed in both groups. A total of 1,792 patients enrolled in CR, 191 (11%) had a documented history of cancer; prostate (18%), skin (12%), colon (9%) and breast (8%) malignancies were most prevalent. The most common treatments were surgical resection (80%) and chemotherapy or radiotherapy (37%). Cardio-oncology patients were older (68.8±10.6 vs 59.8±13.7yrs, p<0.001), more likely female (33% vs 21%, p<0.001), born in Australia (46% vs 35%, p=0.004), non-partnered (34% vs 25%, p=0.002) and had a prior history of hypertension (65% vs 56%, p=0.010) or stroke (8% vs 5%, p=0.045). After adjusting for age and sex, the overall cohort improved their mean peak exercise capacity and waist circumference after CR, however there were no differences between groups. There were also no between-group differences for adherence and completion of CR program or any other cardiovascular risk factors. Sub-analyses revealed a clinically meaningful improvement in waist circumference for cancer patients with a history of radiation therapy and a blunted peak exercise capacity adaptation for those with a history of chemotherapy treatment. Despite differences in demographic and clinical characteristics of CR patients with and without cancer, all patients showed significant and clinically relevant improvements in peak exercise capacity and waist circumference after CR. Results also highlighted potential associations between specific cancer treatments and changes in fitness outcomes, which warrants further evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the most common type of stroke and requires immediate reperfusion. Current acute reperfusion therapies comprise the administration of intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular thrombectomy. Although these acute reperfusion therapies are increasingly successful, optimized secondary antithrombotic treatment remains warranted, specifically to reduce the risk of major bleeding complications. In the development of AIS, coagulation and platelet activation play crucial roles by driving occlusive clot formation. Recent studies implicated that the intrinsic route of coagulation plays a more prominent role in this development, however, this is not fully understood yet. Next to the acute treatments, antithrombotic therapy, consisting of anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet therapy, is successfully used for primary and secondary prevention of AIS but at the cost of increased bleeding complications. Therefore, better understanding the interplay between the different pathways involved in the pathophysiology of AIS might provide new insights that could lead to novel treatment strategies. This narrative review focuses on the processes of platelet activation and coagulation in AIS, and the most common antithrombotic agents in primary and secondary prevention of AIS. Furthermore, we provide an overview of promising novel antithrombotic agents that could be used to improve in both acute treatment and stroke prevention. • Intrinsic activation is suggested to have a prevalent role in acute ischemic stroke. • Current anticoagulant therapies are associated with up to 10 % of major bleedings. • Current anticoagulant therapies are associated with up to 2 % of hemorrhagic strokes. • New antithrombotic therapies are needed for primary and secondary prevention of AIS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common cardiac arrhythmias and is a major cause of ischaemic stroke. Recent findings indicate the importance of atrial fibrillation burden (device-detected, subclinical, or paroxysmal and persistent or permanent) and whether atrial fibrillation was known before stroke onset or diagnosed after stroke for the risk of recurrence. Secondary prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and stroke aims to reduce the risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke. Findings from randomised controlled trials assessing the optimal timing to introduce direct oral anticoagulant therapy after a stroke show that early start (ie, within 48 h for minor to moderate strokes and within 4–5 days for large strokes) seems safe and could reduce the risk of early recurrence. Other promising developments regarding early rhythm control, left atrial appendage occlusion, and novel factor XI inhibitor oral anticoagulants suggest that these therapies have the potential to further reduce the risk of stroke. Secondary prevention strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation who have a stroke despite oral anticoagulation therapy is an unmet medical need. Research advances suggest a heterogeneous spectrum of causes, and ongoing trials are investigating new approaches for secondary prevention in this vulnerable patient group. In patients with atrial fibrillation and a history of intracerebral haemorrhage, the latest data from randomised controlled trials on stroke prevention shows that oral anticoagulation reduces the risk of ischaemic stroke but more data are needed to define the safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The appropriate use criteria (AUCs) are a diverse group of indications aimed to better evaluate the benefits of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy. The purpose of this study was to quantify the proportion of ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) implants as appropriate, may be appropriate (MA), or rarely appropriate (RA) on the basis of the AUC guidelines. This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients within the National Cardiovascular Data Registry undergoing ICD implantation between April 2018 and March 2019 at >1500 US hospitals. The appropriateness of ICD implants was adjudicated using the AUC. Of 309,318 ICDs, 241,438 were primary prevention implants (78.1%) and 67,880 secondary prevention implants (21.9%); 243,532 (79%) were mappable to the AUC. For primary prevention, 185,431 ICDs (96.4%) were appropriate, 5660 (2.9%) MA, and 1205 (0.6%) RA. For secondary prevention, 47,498 ICDs (92.7%) were appropriate, 2581 (5%) MA, and 1157 (2.3%) RA. A significant number of RA devices were implanted in patients with New York Heart Association class IV heart failure who were ineligible for advanced therapies (53.9%) and those with myocardial infarction within 40 days (18.1%). The appropriateness of the pacing lead was more variable, with 48,470 dual-chamber ICD implants (62%) being classified as appropriate, 29,209 (37.4%) MA, and 448 (0.6%) RA. Among CRT-D implants, 63,848 (82.2%) were appropriate, 9900 (12.7%) MA, and 3940 (5.1%) RA for left ventricular pacing. A total of 99,754 implants were deemed appropriate but excluded from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services National Coverage Determination. More than 92% of hospitals had an RA implant rate of <4%. In this large national registry, 95% of mappable ICD and CRT-D implants were considered appropriate, with <2% of RA implants. Nearly 100,000 appropriate implants are excluded by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services National Coverage Determination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend distinct risk classification systems for primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention. However, both systems rely on similar predictors (eg, age and diabetes), indicating the possibility of a universal risk prediction approach for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). The authors examined the performance of predictors in persons with and without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and developed and validated a universal risk prediction model. Among 9,138 ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) participants with (n = 609) and without (n = 8,529) ASCVD at baseline (1996-1998), we examined established predictors in the risk classification systems and other predictors, such as body mass index and cardiac biomarkers (troponin and natriuretic peptide), using Cox models with MACEs (myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure). We also evaluated model performance. Over a follow-up of approximately 20 years, there were 3,209 MACEs (2,797 for no prior ASCVD). Most predictors showed similar associations with MACE regardless of baseline ASCVD status. A universal risk prediction model with the predictors (eg, established predictors, cardiac biomarkers) identified by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and bootstrapping showed good discrimination for both groups (c-statistics of 0.747 and 0.691, respectively), and risk classification and showed excellent calibration, irrespective of ASCVD status. This universal prediction approach identified individuals without ASCVD who had a higher risk than some individuals with ASCVD and was validated externally in 5,322 participants in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). A universal risk prediction approach performed well in persons with and without ASCVD. This approach could facilitate the transition from primary to secondary prevention by streamlining risk classification and discussion between clinicians and patients. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to explore socio-economic factors and medical conditions that affect regular stomach cancer (SC) screening among Korean adults. This was a retrospective observational study. Study subjects were 5545 adults aged ≥40 years who participated in the 2007–2012 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and were followed up to year 2017 based on data linking to the Korean National Health Insurance Service and Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment. Socio-economic factors included sex, age, residential area, education, occupation, marital status, disability, public and private health insurance, service through local public health organizations, history of cancer except for SC, and family history of SC. Medical factors included six gastric lesions with the possibility of facilitating SC screening, including benign gastric neoplasm, chronic atrophic gastritis, gastric polyp, Helicobacter pylori infection, intestinal metaplasia, and peptic ulcers. The outcome was adherence to SC screening, which was divided into non-adherence, irregular adherence, and regular adherence. After adjusting for the effects of socio-economic factors, multivariate ordinal logistic regression revealed that participants with a history of four types of gastric lesions were more likely to regularly participate in SC screening: chronic atrophic gastritis (odds ratio [OR] 1.567; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.276–1.923), gastric polyps (OR 1.565; 95% CI = 1.223–2.003), H. pylori infection (OR 1.637; 95% CI = 1.338–2.003), and peptic ulcer (OR 2.226; 95% CI 1.750–2.831). To improve participation in SC screening, it is necessary to implement personalized strategies for individuals at risk for gastric cancer in addition to population-based strategies for vulnerable groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) are common among women. However, women tend to present later and are less likely to receive guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) compared with men. We analysed prospectively collected data (2005–2018) from a multicentre registry on GDMT 30 days after percutaneous coronary intervention in 13,015 patients with LV ejection fraction <50%. Guideline-directed medical therapy was defined as beta blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker±mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Long-term mortality was determined by linkage with the Australian National Death Index. Women represented 20% (2,634) of the total cohort. Mean age was 65±12 years. Women were on average >5 years, with higher body mass index and higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, renal dysfunction, prior stroke, and rheumatoid arthritis. Guideline-directed medical therapy was similar between sexes (73% vs 72%; p=0.58), although women were less likely to be on an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (80% vs 82%; p=0.02). Women were less likely to be on statin therapy (p<0.001) or a second antiplatelet agent (p=0.007). Women had higher unadjusted long-term mortality (25% vs 19%; p<0.001); however, there were no differences in long-term mortality between sexes on adjusted analysis (hazard ratio 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.87–1.14; p=0.94). Rates of GDMT for LV dysfunction were high and similar between sexes; however, women were less likely to be on appropriate IHD secondary prevention. The increased unadjusted long-term mortality in women was attenuated in adjusted analysis, which highlights the need for optimisation of baseline risk to improve long-term outcomes of women with IHD and comorbid LV dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Española de Cardiología (18855857) is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Vertebral compression fractures are common in elderly people and most are due to osteoporosis. Osteoporosis treatment is effective for secondary prophylaxis, so initiation is recommended. Despite the clear benefits, the rate of initiation of osteoporosis treatment is very low. It is reported to be due to several factors including insufficient systems-based approaches for hospitals and post-acute care. Hospitalists, who are physicians dedicated to the treatment of patients in hospital and whose activity is generalist rather than specialized, are reported to be associated with higher-quality inpatient care because of, among other things, closer adherence to guidelines. Co-management by hospitalists for patients with vertebral compression fractures has potential benefits towards improving the outcomes. We compared the rate of initiation of osteoporosis treatment for patients with vertebral compression fractures between conventional orthopedic surgeon-led care (conventional group) and hospitalist co-management care (co-management group). This is a single-center retrospective cohort study to evaluate the rate of initiation of osteoporosis treatment and reasons for non-initiation of osteoporosis treatment. Other clinical indicators were also evaluated, including length of hospital stay, preventable complications during hospitalization, and rate of 30-day readmission. We identified 55 patients in the conventional group and 93 patients in the co-management group. The rate of initiation of osteoporosis treatment was higher in the co-management group (45.2% vs. 3.6%, OR 21.5; 95%CI 5.12–192.0; P < 0.01). Most of the patients with non-initiation in the co-management group had reasons for it described in the medical records, but in the conventional group the reasons were unknown. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay, preventable complications during hospitalization, or 30-day readmission between the groups. Hospitalist co-management of patients with vertebral compression fractures showed significantly higher rate of initiation of osteoporosis treatment than conventional orthopedic surgeon-led care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• In real life, vast majority of FH patients with established ASCVD are undertreated in cardiology outpatient clinics • The proportion of FH patients receiving high intensity statin therapy is very low • Ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitor use is almost non-existent • Drug discontinuation rates are notably high and are mostly media-related • Side effects very rarely cause cessation of LLT. • Patients' knowledge about high cholesterol and its treatment is low. Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common inherited disease, leading to premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) due to elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Achieving LDL-C goals is extremely important for preventing the complications of this fatal disease. We evaluated the management of FH patients with ASCVD in cardiology practice. We analyzed patients with ASCVD from the nationwide EPHESUS registry, which was conducted in 40 cardiology outpatient clinics, and compared those with and without FH. Of the 1482 consecutively enrolled patients with ASCVD, 618 (41.7%) had FH, among which 455 were categorized as 'Possible FH' and 163 as 'Probable or Definite FH'. Proposed LDL-C goals were not attained in more than 90% of the patients with FH. The proportion of those on statin therapy was 77% for possible and 91% for probable or definite FH, whereas 34.2 % and 59.4% were in use of high-intensity statins, respectively. None of the patients were on PCSK-9 inhibitors, and only 2 used ezetimibe. Adverse media coverage was the most common cause of statin discontinuation (32.5% in 'possible FH' and 45.7% in 'probable/definite FH'). The negative impact of media in the decision to stop lipid lowering therapy (LLT) was increasing with education level. In real life most of the FH patients with ASCVD are undertreated in cardiology practice regarding statin dosing and combined LLT. Drug discontinuation rates are notably high and are mostly media-related, and side effects very rarely cause cessation of LLT. Urgent measures are needed to increase the awareness of FH among healthcare providers and patients and to develop improved treatment strategies aimed at preventing the complications of FH. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) haemorrhage is a common emergency presentation requiring prompt resuscitation and management. Non-variceal bleeding, from peptic ulcer disease, is the most common aetiology. Bleeding related to varices, in the context of chronic liver disease, is less common but has higher associated mortality. Regardless of aetiology, initial management requires a structured approach with intravenous fluid resuscitation and a restrictive transfusion threshold of 70–80 g/L. Pre-endoscopic scoring tools enable risk stratification and identification of patients who might benefit from conservative and outpatient management strategies. Endoscopic treatment of high-risk lesions and acid suppression are the primary aims of management of non-variceal bleeding. The use of vasopressors and antibiotics, before urgent endoscopy, is the mainstay of variceal bleed management. Endoscopic strategies vary and are usually successful in controlling bleeding but in a small number of cases combined strategies with interventional radiology are required. In non-variceal bleeding, where endoscopic procedures have failed, surgery may be required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stroke is a devastating condition with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Antithrombotic therapy plays a crucial role in both primary and secondary prevention of stroke events. Single or dual antiplatelet therapy is generally preferred in cases of large-artery atherosclerosis and small-vessel disease, whereas anticoagulation is recommended in conditions of blood stasis or hypercoagulable states that mostly result in red thrombi. However, the benefit of antithrombotic therapies must be weighed against the increased risk of bleeding, which can pose significant challenges in the pharmacological management of this condition. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the currently available evidence on antithrombotic therapy for ischemic stroke and outlines an updated therapeutic algorithm to support physicians in tailoring the strategy to the individual patient and the underlying mechanism of stroke. [Display omitted] • For primary or secondary prevention of stroke due to large-artery extracranial atherosclerosis or intracranial small-vessel disease, single or dual antiplatelet therapy is generally preferred, whereas anticoagulation is recommended in cases of cardiogenic embolism associated with atrial fibrillation, mural thrombus, mechanical prosthetic heart valves, or hypercoagulable states. • In patients with acute ischemic stroke due to arterial disease or in those with carotid artery stents, the incremental benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy is greatest in the first few weeks or months, following which antiplatelet monotherapy is generally recommended. • More research is needed to define optimum antithrombotic regimens for patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source, arterial dissection, and specific forms of nonatherosclerotic vascular disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Characterizing the progression from Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD) is essential for early AD prevention and targeted intervention. Our goal was to construct precise screening schemes for individuals with different risk of AD and to establish prognosis models for them. We constructed a retrospective cohort by reviewing individuals with baseline diagnosis of MCI and at least one follow-up visits between November 2005 and May 2021. They were stratified into high-risk and low-risk groups with longitudinal cognitive trajectory. Then, we established a screening framework and obtained optimal screening strategies for two risk groups. Cox and random survival forest (RSF) models were developed for dynamic prognosis prediction. In terms of screening strategies, the combination of Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDRSB) and hippocampus volume was recommended for the high-risk MCI group, while the combination of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive 13 items (ADAS13) and FAQ was recommended for low-risk MCI group. The concordance index (C-index) of the Cox model for the high-risk group was 0.844 (95% CI: 0.815–0.873) and adjustments for demographic information and APOE ε4. The RSF model incorporating longitudinal ADAS13, FAQ, and demographic information and APOE ε4 performed for the low-risk group. This precise screening scheme will optimize allocation of medical resources and reduce the economic burden on individuals with low risk of MCI. Moreover, dynamic prognosis models may be helpful for early identification of individuals at risk and clinical decisions, which will promote the secondary prevention of AD. • A precise screening strategy was developed using multiple longitudinal markers. • Functional data analysis to track longitudinal disease progression avoided bias. • The precise prognosis models could be used for individual dynamic risk prediction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Australian Cardiovascular Alliance (ACvA), the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) and the National Heart Foundation of Australia (NHFA) recently joined forces to bring the cardiovascular and stroke community together to convene and document a national discussion and propose a national CVD Implementation and Policy agenda and action plan. This includes prevention and screening, acute care and secondary prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reducing the incidence and prevalence of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) is critical to tackling the global burden of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, a substantial number of individuals develop coronary atherosclerosis despite no SMuRFs. SMuRFless patients presenting with myocardial infarction have been observed to have an unexpected higher early mortality compared to their counterparts with at least 1 SMuRF. Evidence for optimal management of these patients is lacking. We assembled an international, multidisciplinary team to develop an evidence-based clinical pathway for SMuRFless CAD patients. A modified Delphi method was applied. The resulting pathway confirms underlying atherosclerosis and true SMuRFless status, ensures evidence-based secondary prevention, and considers additional tests and interventions for less typical contributors. This dedicated pathway for a previously overlooked CAD population, with an accompanying registry, aims to improve outcomes through enhanced adherence to evidence-based secondary prevention and additional diagnosis of modifiable risk factors observed. [Display omitted] • Patients with coronary atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction lacking modifiable risk factors face a high rate of early mortality. • An evidence-based pathway has been introduced to guide the management of such patients. • An international multicenter registry may provide insights leading to improved clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with cardiovascular disease benefit from cardiac rehabilitation, which includes structured exercise and physical activity as core components. This position statement provides pragmatic, evidence-based guidance for the assessment and prescription of exercise and physical activity for cardiac rehabilitation clinicians, recognising the latest international guidelines, scientific evidence and the increasing use of technology and virtual delivery methods. The patient-centred assessment and prescription of aerobic exercise, resistance exercise and physical activity have been addressed, including progression and safety considerations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Though asthma is a common and relatively easy to diagnose disease, attempts at primary or secondary prevention, and cure, have been disappointing. The widespread use of inhaled steroids has dramatically improved asthma control but has offered nothing in terms of altering long-term outcomes or reversing airway remodeling and impairment in lung function. The inability to cure asthma is unsurprising given our limited understanding of the factors that contribute to disease initiation and persistence. New data have focused on the airway epithelium as a potentially key factor orchestrating the different stages of asthma. In this review we summarize for the clinician the current evidence on the central role of the airway epithelium in asthma pathogenesis and the factors that may alter epithelial integrity and functionality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• This is the first study in a low-and-middle-income country to assess effects/correlates of virtual cardiac rehabilitation (CR) with focus on education. • Participants significantly increased their knowledge and self-efficacy at post-CR. • Post-CR knowledge was significantly correlated with cardiac diagnosis and surgical procedures. • Post-CR self-efficacy was significantly correlated with cardiac diagnosis and surgical procedures. Government responses and restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., limits to non-urgent health care services, including non-urgent outpatient appointments) led to the suspension of center-based (in-person) cardiac rehabilitation (CR), with many programs switching to virtual delivery. This study aimed to understand the characteristics and correlates of disease-related knowledge and exercise self-efficacy in a group of patients attending a virtual CR program during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Peru. In this prospective observational study, 240 patients receiving virtual CR care (exercise instructions and patient education) between August/2020 and December/2021 completed questionnaires pre- and post-CR assessing disease-related knowledge (CADE-Q SV questionnaire) and self-efficacy (SE; Bandura's Exercise SE scale). Paired t tests were used to investigate changes pre/post-CR and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to determine the association between knowledge/SE and patients' characteristics. Participants were mainly comprised of men, with a cardiac diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention or had a known diagnosis of hypertension and with at least one cardiovascular risk factor (95.8%). Mean total knowledge scores improved significantly at post-CR (12.9 ± 2.4 to 15.6 ± 2.0/20; p <0.001), as well as in 4/5 knowledge areas (cardiovascular risk factors, exercise, nutrition, and psychosocial risk; p <0.001). Mean SE scores improved significantly at post-CR (1.9 ± 0.9 to 3.0 ± 0.9/5; p = 0.01). Post-CR knowledge and SE were significantly correlated with cardiac diagnosis and surgical procedures (r = 0.17, p = 0.02 and r = 0.27, p = 0.02, respectively). The virtual CR program improved disease-related knowledge and SE of cardiac patients during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Post-CR outcomes were correlated with cardiac diagnosis and surgical procedures and more research with other characteristics is warrantied. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease." A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost–value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Among statin-treated patients, inflammation assessed by means of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) is a more powerful determinant of cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality than low–density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Several therapies that target residual inflammatory risk significantly reduce vascular event rates. For coronary artery disease patients already taking guideline-directed medical care, including statins, low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg/d orally) has been shown to safely lower major adverse cardiovascular events by 31% among those with stable atherosclerosis and by 23% after recent myocardial infarction. These magnitudes of benefit are larger than those seen in contemporary secondary prevention trials of adjunctive lipid-lowering agents. Low-dose colchicine is contraindicated in patients with significant renal or liver dysfunction and should be temporarily discontinued when taking concomitant agents such as clarithromycin, ketoconazole, and cyclosporine that share metabolism pathways. Lipid lowering and inflammation inhibition are not in conflict but are synergistic. In the future, combined use of aggressive LDL-C–lowering and inflammation-inhibiting therapies may become standard of care for most atherosclerosis patients. In June 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the use of low-dose colchicine to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, and cardiovascular death in adult patients with established atherosclerotic disease or with multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease. [Display omitted] • Low-dose (0.5 mg/d) colchicine, an anti-inflammatory drug, reduces cardiovascular events rates by 25% to 30% in patients with coronary atherosclerosis. • Low-dose colchicine should be considered for patients with stable ischemic heart disease who, despite guideline-directed therapy, have high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations >2 mg/L, but it should be avoided in patients with renal or hepatic impairment or those concomitantly taking CYP3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitors. • In the future, combination therapy with lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory medications may be used more frequently for patients with atherosclerosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]