Search

La promontofixation cœlioscopique est considérée comme le traitement de choix du prolapsus de la femme jeune car elle associe les avantages de la chirurgie prothétique par voie abdominale, avec celles d'une technique mini-invasive. De nombreuses variantes se sont développées autour de cette intervention et rendent parfois difficile l'analyse des résultats. L'objectif de cet article est de faire une mise au point sur les différents aspects de la technique chirurgicale. Description et recommandations sur les différents aspects de la technique chirurgicale fondée l'expérience des auteurs (trucs et astuces) mais aussi à partir des données de la littérature. Nous décrirons les différents temps de la double promontofixation cœlioscopique avec conservation utérine. Bien qu'il n'existe pas de données comparatives concernant les sites et modes de fixation des prothèses, il convient de se référer aux résultats des grandes séries et de privilégier de la fixation des prothèses à l'aide de fils, en avant sur l'isthme utérin et la paroi vaginale antérieure et en arrière sur les muscles releveurs. De même, il est conseillé de fixer sans tension excessive les prothèses sur le promontoire à l'aide de fils non résorbables et d'effectuer une péritonisation de ces prothèses. Il n'est pas recommandé de mettre systématiquement une prothèse postérieure inter recto-vaginale en prévention de rectocèle secondaire. L'utilisation de prothèses non résorbables par voie haute (promontofixation) permet de traiter les prolapsus des organes pelviens avec des bons résultats et peu de complications y compris en termes d'exposition et d'infection de prothèses. Elle est considérée à ce titre comme la technique chirurgicale de référence et les différents aspects de la technique chirurgicale doivent donc à ce titre être bien codifiés. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is considered as the gold standard for the surgical treatment for urogenital prolapse because it combines the advantages of abdominal route for prosthetic prolapse repair with those of a minimally invasive technique. Many variants have been described and make results difficult to analyze. The purpose of this article is to focus on the different technical aspects of this surgery. Description and recommendations on different aspects of the surgical technique based on the experience of the authors (tips and tricks) but also from the data of the literature. We will describe the different steps of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with two mesh and with uterine preservation. Although there are no comparative data on sites and methods of fixation of prostheses, we have to refer to the results of large series. There is a consensus on fixation of prostheses with the help of threads, forward on uterine isthmus and the anterior vaginal wall and back on the levator muscles. Similarly consensus is to fix prostheses on the promontory without excessive tension and with non-absorbable thread and close the peritoneum on these prostheses. It is not recommended to systematically put an inter-recto-vaginal prosthesis in prevention of secondary rectocele. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with non-resorbable prostheses can treat pelvic organ prolapse with good results and few complications including in terms of prothetic exposure or infection. Considered as the reference surgical technique for prolapse repair, the various aspects of this procedure must therefore be well codified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Proges en Urologie is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Proges en Urologie is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Proges en Urologie is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Proges en Urologie is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Proges en Urologie is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)