Search

Resumen Objetivo Los sarcomas uterinos son tumores raros con mal pronóstico debido a las altas tasas de recurrencia. El papel actual de la 18F-FDG PET/TC en la vigilancia posterior a la terapia aún no está establecido. Material y metodos Cuarenta y una mujeres con sarcoma uterino se sometieron a 73 estudios 18F-FDG PET/TC para la reestadificación en la presunta recurrencia o durante el seguimiento en pacientes asintomáticos. Los resultados histopatológicos y/o el seguimiento clínico/de imágenes durante al menos 12 meses se consideraron el estándar de referencia. Se calculó la precisión diagnóstica y el impacto clínico de la 18F-FDG PET/TC. Resultados treinta y tres estudios 18F-FDG PET/TC fueron positivos, mientras que los 40 estudios restantes fueron negativos. La sensibilidad general, la especificidad, el valor predictivo positivo (VP+), el valor predictivo negativo (VP-) y la precisión de la 18F-FDG PET/TC fueron del 88%, 98%, 97%, 91% y 93%. Considerando pacientes con sospecha clínica o radiológica de recidiva (n = 47) y durante el seguimiento (n = 26) la sensibilidad y especificidad, VP+, VP− y precisión de 18F-FDG PET/TC fueron del 89%, 100%, 100%, 86% y 94%, y 80%, 95%, 80%, 95% y 92% respectivamente. La 18F-FDG PET/TC tuvo un impacto clínico positivo en 9/73 (12%) estudios y cambió el manejo clínico en 8/41 (20%) pacientes. Conclusion La 18F-FDG PET/TC es un método preciso para la detección y localización de recidivas a distancia en pacientes con sarcoma uterino con buena sensibilidad y especificidad e impacto significativo en la toma de decisiones clínicas. Abstract Purpose Uterine sarcomas are rare tumors with poor prognosis due to the high recurrence rates. The current role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the post-therapy surveillance is not established yet. Materials and Methods Forty-one women with uterine sarcoma underwent 73 18F-FDG PET/CT for restaging in suspected recurrence or during follow-up in asymptomatic patients. Histopathology results and/or clinical/imaging follow-up for at least 12 months were considered the reference standard. The diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT was calculated. Results Thirty-three 18F-FDG PET/CT were positive, while the remaining 40 studies were negative. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT were 88%, 98%, 97%, 91% and 93%, respectively. Considering patients with clinical or radiological suspicion of recurrence (n = 47) and those during follow-up (n = 26), sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT were 89%, 100%, 100%, 86% and 94%, and 80%, 95%, 80%, 95% and 92%, respectively. 18F-FDG PET/CT had a positive clinical impact in 9/73 (12%) studies and changed the clinical management in 8/41 (20%) patients. Conclusions 18F-FDG PET/CT seems to be an accurate method for detection and localization of local and distant recurrence in patients with uterine sarcoma with good sensitivity and specificity and significant impact on clinical decision making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background We reviewed the available literature on the accuracy of sentinel node mapping in the lymph nodal staging of uterine cervical cancers. Methods MEDLINE and Scopus were searched by using “sentinel AND (cervix OR cervical)” as key words. Studies evaluating the accuracy of sentinel node mapping in the lymph nodal staging of uterine cervical cancers were included if enough data could be extracted for calculation of detection rate and/or sensitivity. Results Sixty-seven studies were included in the systematic review. Pooled detection rate was 89.2% [95% CI: 86.3–91.6]. Pooled sensitivity was 90% [95% CI: 88–92]. Sentinel node detection rate and sensitivity were related to mapping method (blue dye, radiotracer, or both) and history of pre-operative neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Sensitivity was higher in patients with bilaterally detected pelvic sentinel nodes compared to those with unilateral sentinel nodes. Lymphatic mapping could identify sentinel nodes outside the routine lymphadenectomy limits. Conclusion Sentinel node mapping is an accurate method for the assessment of lymph nodal involvement in uterine cervical cancers. Selection of a population with small tumor size and lower stage will ensure the lowest false negative rate. Lymphatic mapping can also detect sentinel nodes outside of routine lymphadenectomy areas providing additional histological information which can improve the staging. Further studies are needed to explore the impact of sentinel node mapping in fertility sparing surgery and in patients with history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: To quantify the rate of patients without thyroid remnants, to identify predictive factors for the absence of residual thyroid tissue and to evaluate number, site, size and function of thyroid remnants after total thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods: Thousand one hundred and seventy-eight patients who underwent total thyroidectomy for DTC were evaluated; 343 patients with lymph node or distant metastases and 115 patients with detectable thyroglobulin autoantibodies (TgAb) were excluded. 131I ablative treatment (RAI) without preliminary diagnostic 131I whole body scans (DxWBS), and 24-h 131I quantitative neck uptake (RAIU test) and thyroglobulin (Tg) off L-T4 evaluation were performed in the remaining 720 pts. In 252 patients a 99mTc-pertecnetate pre-operative thyroid scan (99mTc-scan) was used for comparison with 131I neck scans after RAI to evaluate site of thyroid remnants. Only patients with thyroid remnants were evaluated for successful ablation 6–10 months after RAI. Results: Post-treatment whole body scan (TxWBS) demonstrated lack of thyroid remnants in 50/720 patients and the best predictive factors for the absence of residual thyroid tissue were RAIU <1% and undetectable Tg off L-T4. Thyroid remnants were present in 670/720 patients. In 252 patients with 99mTc-scan, 617 sites of functioning thyroid tissue were found: 381 within and 236 outside the thyroid bed. Complete successful ablation was achieved in 610/670 patients with thyroid remnants. Conclusions: This study confirms that most patients (93.1%) have thyroid remnant after total thyroidectomy for DTC. Most thyroid remnants were contralateral to tumour site and were even observed outside thyroid bed. However, a real total thyroidectomy, demonstrated by negative TxWBS, RAIU <1% and undetectable Tg off L-T4, was achieved in 6.9% of patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: A high number of combinations of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with other anti-cancer therapies are in clinical development. The usefulness of phase II trials in evaluating their efficacy and safety is unclear.Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic search on PubMed and Cochrane Library for phase II trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with other anti-cancer therapies (systemic therapy and/or radiotherapy) published between January 1st 2018 and December 31st 2020. Study design, primary endpoint and main outcomes were registered for each paper.Results: 119 articles reporting on 65 regimens were included in our analysis. Backbone agents were more frequently PD-1 inhibitors (pembrolizumab = 47, nivolumab = 41, camrelizumab = 3) followed by anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab = 19, atezolizumab = 6, avelumab = 3). Therapeutic partners were other immunotherapeutic agents (n = 46), targeted therapies (n = 40), chemotherapy (n = 22) or radiotherapy (n = 11). The majority of articles reported on single-arm trials (n = 87, 73%) and response rate was the most frequent primary endpoint (n = 69, 58%). Objective responses, registered in 109 (92%) articles, ranged between 0% and 91%. The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events, clearly reported in 97 (82%) articles, spanned from 0 to 100%. Five combinations received regulatory approval by Food and Drug Administration or European Medicine Agency for 9 different indications, based on the results of a phase II trial (n = 3) or on a confirmatory phase III trial (n = 6).Conclusions: The landscape of phase II trials evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with other anticancer therapies is heterogeneous. Combinations of two immunotherapeutic agents have been the most investigated. Only a minority of indications (8%) granted regulatory approval. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]