Search

Recent therapeutic strategies, particularly MAP kinase pathway inhibitors (BRAF, MEK) and immune checkpoint blockers (CTLA-4, PD-1), have been put on the test for their differential impact on long-term survival of metastatic melanoma patients. Various agents, dose regimens and combinations have been tested against each other vigorously within these two therapy groups. However, results from prospective head-to-head comparative trials comparing both strategies against each other are still lacking. We performed an exploratory analysis of survival data from selected clinical trials representative for these two treatment strategies in advanced metastatic melanoma. 84 Kaplan–Meier survival curves from 26 trials were digitised and grouped by therapy strategy and treatment line. For each of these groups, mean survival curves were generated for progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by weighted averaging. Survival curves grouped together by therapy strategy revealed a high concordance, with a larger extent in the first-line setting compared to higher treatment lines. In first-line therapy, the averaged 3-year OS proportions were 41.3% for BRAF plus MEK inhibition, 49.9% for PD-1 inhibition, and 58.4% for CTLA-4 plus PD-1 inhibition. Comparison of the mean PFS and OS curves of kinase inhibition and checkpoint blockade revealed a superiority of combined BRAF plus MEK inhibition within the first 12 months, later changing to a superiority of PD-1 blockers alone or in combination with CTLA-4 blockade. In second-line or higher, BRAF plus MEK inhibition was superior to anti-PD-1 monotherapy throughout the first three years; averaged 3-year OS proportions were 42.4% for BRAF plus MEK inhibition, and 40.1% for PD-1 inhibition. and relevance: These results need confirmation by head-to-head comparative randomised clinical trials. Image 1 • An exploratory analysis was performed on 84 survival curves from 26 clinical trials in advanced metastatic melanoma. • In first-line, BRAF plus MEK inhibition was superior to PD-1 plus/minus CTLA-4 blockade within the first 12 months. • After 12 months, checkpoint blockers revealed superiority in the long-term survival. • In second-line or higher, BRAF plus MEK inhibition was superior to anti-PD-1 monotherapy throughout the first three years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Melanoma harbours genetic alterations in genes such as BRAF, NRAS and KIT. Activating NRAS mutations are present in about 20% of melanomas. Even though BRAF mutations can be effectively targeted with specific inhibitors, this approach has proven more challenging in cases of NRAS mutations. Previous reports suggested that immunotherapy might be more successful in NRAS-mutated compared to BRAF-mutated or BRAF/NRAS wildtype melanoma. Patients and methods In this study, overall survival and response to anti-PD-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab) and anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) therapy of 364 patients with metastatic melanoma were assessed comparing 236 NRAS-mutated patients with 128 NRAS wildtype patients. Subtyping of NRAS mutation in 211 cases revealed 12 different genotypes of which Q61 mutations were predominant (95%). Results Patients with NRAS mutant melanoma showed similar response rates to checkpoint inhibitor therapy compared to NRAS wildtype patients with 15% versus 13% for ipilimumab ( P = 0.731), 21% versus 13% for anti-PD-1 monotherapy ( P = 0.210) and 40% versus 39% for ipilimumab and anti-PD-1 therapy in combination or sequence ( P = 0.859). Nevertheless, median overall survival of patients with NRAS mutant melanoma was significantly lower with 21 months compared to 33 months in NRAS wildtype melanoma patients ( P = 0.034). Therapy with oral MEK inhibitors before or after checkpoint inhibitor therapy showed a trend toward a survival benefit in patients with NRAS mutant melanoma. Conclusions Immune checkpoint inhibition shows comparable response rates in NRAS-mutated and NRAS wildtype melanoma even though survival is less favourable in case of NRAS mutation. Additional MEK inhibition might improve clinical benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The treatment of metastatic melanoma is still undergoing a process of major change. The two most important novel therapeutic strategies, selective kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockers, both significantly prolong survival times of patients with advanced metastatic disease. Different agents, dose regimens and combinations have been tested against each other vigorously within these two groups. However, results from prospective head-to-head comparative studies of both strategies are still lacking. We performed an exploratory analysis of survival data from selected clinical trials representative for the new treatment strategies in advanced metastatic melanoma. Eighty-three Kaplan–Meier survival curves from 25 trials were digitised and grouped by therapeutic strategy and treatment line. For each of these groups, mean survival curves were generated for progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by weighted averaging. Survival curves grouped together by therapeutic strategy revealed a high concordance, particularly in the first-line setting. For kinase inhibitors, the most favourable PFS and OS in all therapy lines were observed for combined BRAF plus MEK inhibition. For immune checkpoint inhibitors, combined PD-1 plus CTLA-4 inhibition demonstrated the best survival outcome in all categories except for OS in first-line therapy. For the latter, combined PD-1 plus CTLA-4 inhibition showed similar outcomes as single-agent PD-1 inhibition. Comparison of kinase inhibitors and checkpoint blockers revealed a superiority of combined BRAF plus MEK inhibition within the first 6 months, later changing to a superiority of PD-1 blockers alone or in combination with CTLA-4 blockers. These results need confirmation by prospective clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The survival of advanced metastatic melanoma has been greatly improved within the past few years. New therapeutic strategies like kinase inhibitors for BRAF-mutant melanoma and immune checkpoint blockers proved to prolong survival times within clinical trials, and many of them have already entered routine clinical use. However, these different treatment modalities have not yet been tested against each other, which complicate therapy decisions. We performed an explorative analysis of survival data from recent clinical trials. Thirty-five Kaplan–Meier survival curves from 17 trials were digitised, re-grouped by matching inclusion criteria and treatment line, and averaged by therapy strategy. Notably, the survival curves grouped by therapy strategy revealed a very high concordance, even if different agents were used. The greatest survival improvement was observed with the combination of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors as well as with Programmed-death-1 (PD1) blockers with or without cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) blockers, respectively, with these two treatment strategies showing similar survival outcomes. For first-line therapy, averaged survival proportions of patients alive at 12 months were 74.5% with BRAF plus MEK inhibitor treatment versus 71.9% with PD-1 blockade. This explorative comparison shows the kinase inhibitors as similarly effective as immune checkpoint blockers with regard to survival. However, to confirm these first trends for implementation into an individualised treatment of melanoma patients, data from prospective clinical trials comparing the different treatment strategies head-to-head have to be awaited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chemotherapeutic drugs are clinically used to treat cancer because of their cytotoxic activities against tumor cells. Recently, however, evidence is accumulating-including the report of Hervieu et al. (2012) in the current issue of The Journal of Investigative Dermatology-indicating that at least some of these drugs have broader activities and that they should also be considered immunomodulatory agents. Indeed, Hervieu demonstrates that dacarbazine (DTIC) exerts immunostimulatory effects by inducing local activation of natural killer (NK) and T cells, suggesting that upon treatment with DTIC, the tumor participates in the initiation of an immune response: (i) DTIC treatment elicits the expression of ligands of the immunoreceptor NKG2D on melanoma cells; (ii) engagement of the ligands by NKG2D on NK cells leads to their activation, allowing enhanced tumor-cell killing and the release of IFN-γ; and (iii) IFN-γ in turn upregulates major histocompatibility complex class I expression on tumor cells, which favors their recognition by cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes (CTLs). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 has been associated with improvement in response and survival over anti-PD-1 monotherapy in unselected patients with advanced melanoma. Whether patients with liver metastases also benefit from the combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 over anti-PD-1, is unclear. In this study, we sought to assess whether the combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 leads to better response, progression-free survival and overall survival, compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy for patients with liver metastases. We have conducted an international multicentre retrospective study. Patients with advanced melanoma with liver metastases treated with 1st line anti-PD1 monotherapy or with anti-CTLA-4 were included. The endpoints of this study were: objective response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival. With a median follow-up from commencement of anti-PD-1 monotherapy or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 of 47 months (95% CI, 42–51), objective response rate was higher with combination therapy (47%) versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy (35%) (p = 0.0027), while progression-free survival and overall survival were not statistically different between both treatment groups. However, on multivariable analysis with multiple imputation for missing values and adjusting for predefined variables, combination of anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA-4 was associated with higher objective response (OR 2.21, 1.46 – 3.36; p < 0.001), progression-free survival (HR 0.73, 0.57 – 0.92; p = 0.009) and overall survival (HR 0.71, 0.54 – 0.94; p = 0.018) compared to anti-PD1 monotherapy. Findings from this study will help guide treatment selection for patients who present with liver metastases, suggesting that combination therapy should be considered for this group of patients. • It's unclear if PD1 +IPI is better than PD1 for melanoma patients with liver metastases. • In this study, PD1 +IPI was associated with better ORR, PFS and OS over PD1 in these patients. • PD1 +IPI should be considered for melanoma patients with liver metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for the treatment of melanoma has resulted in remarkable and durable responses. Given the potential role of immunosenescence, age may contribute to differential ICI efficacy and toxicity. While older patients have been studied in detail, outcomes from ICI in young patients (≤40 years) are not well characterised. We performed a multi-institutional, retrospective study of patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy or ICI combination (ipilimumab and anti-PD-1). Response rates, survival, and toxicities were examined based on age comparing those under 40 years of age with older patients (age 41–70 and ≥ 71 years). A total of 676 patients were included: 190 patients (28%) aged ≤40 years, 313 (46%) between ages 41–70, and 173 patients (26%) aged ≥71. Patients ≤40 years had higher response rates (53% vs 38%, p = 0.035) and improved progression-free survival (median 13.7 vs 4.0 months, p = 0.032) with combination ICI compared to monotherapy. Progression-free survival was similar among groups while overall survival was inferior in patients >70 years, who had low response rates to combination therapy (28%). ICIs had a similar incidence of severe toxicities, though hepatotoxicity was particularly common in younger patients vs. patients >40 with monotherapy (9% vs. 2%, p = 0.007) or combination ICI (37% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). ICIs had comparable efficacy between younger and older patients, although outcomes were superior with combination ICI compared to monotherapy in patients aged ≤40 years. Toxicity incidence was similar across age groups, though organs affected were substantially different. • Patients above and below 40 had similar outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibitors. • Combination therapy produced particularly good outcomes in young patients. • Hepatotoxicity was frequent in young patients with monotherapy and combo therapy. • Young patients had similar mutation burdens but low T-cell activation signatures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized melanoma treatment, but the high number of non-responders still emphasizes the need for improvement of therapy. One potential avenue for enhancing anti-tumor treatment is through the modulation of coagulation and platelet activity. Both have been found to play an important role in the tumor microenvironment, tumor growth and metastasis. Preclinical studies indicate a beneficial effect, clinical data has been inconsistent. We examined a cohort of advanced, non-resectable melanoma patients (n = 2419) derived from the German prospective multicenter skin cancer registry ADOReg, who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The patients were classified based on whether it was documented that they received platelet aggregation inhibition (PAI) (n = 137) (acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) or clopidogrel), anticoagulation (AC) (n = 185) (direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC), phenprocoumon, heparins) at the start of ICI or no antithrombotic medication (n = 2097) at any point during ICI treatment. The study endpoints were best overall response (BOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A significantly improved PFS was observed in patients documented to receive ASA (15.1 vs 6.4 months, HR 0.67, 95 % CI: 0.5 to 0.88, p = 0.0047) as well as in patients to receive AC (15.1 vs. 6.4 months, HR 0.7, 95 % CI: 0.53 to 0.91, p = 0.01) compared to patients for whom no antithrombotic medication was documented. Multivariate analysis of OS showed significant risk reduction in patients who received DOAC (HR 0.68, 95 % CI: 0.49 to 0.92, p = 0.0170) or phenprocoumon (HR: 0.44, 95 % CI: 0.19 to 0.85, p = 0.0301). Our study indicates a positive prognostic effect of anticoagulant and antiplatelet concomitant medication in melanoma patients receiving ICI. Further studies are needed to confrim the cancer-related benefit of adding anticoagulation or platelet inhibition to ICI treatment. [Display omitted] • Concomitant antithrombotic therapies potentially enhance effectiveness of ICIs. • Anticoagulants probably prolong overall survival in advanced, ICI-treated melanoma. • Antithrombotic therapy may improve progression-free survival in ICI-treated melanoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presence of micrometastases in the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is currently used to assess prognosis of melanoma patients. The immunoactivity within the SLN is known to be influenced by the primary tumor (PT), which may in turn impact the SLNs' metastatic state. We characterize the temporal dependence and underlying mechanisms of the immunological effects of the PT on the SLN. The prognostic value of SLN state as a function of PT removal time was evaluated. To put the results into a functional context, selected PTs and corresponding SLNs were analyzed for gene and protein expression patterns. In a cohort of 202 patients with known distant metastasis and similar PT prognostic characteristics, SLNs removed before or within one week after the PT (IM-SLN) had a higher incidence of micrometastases than those removed at least one week after the PT (DEL-SLN). The immunoactivity in IM-SLN was found to be lower than in DEL-SLN. Specifically, in IM-SLNs, T helper 17 / regulatory T-cells were predominant, whereas in DEL-SLNs, cytotoxic γδT-cells were more frequent. The higher immune activity in DEL-SLNs was probably facilitated by CD209+ antigen-presenting cells. Indeed, in PT with high TGFβ expression CD209+ cells appear to be trapped and no increased immunoactivity was observed in DEL-SLN. Presence of micrometastases in DEL-SLNs have a higher negative prognostic value as in IM-SLNs since they indicate not only a melanoma's propensity to metastasize, but possibly also its capacity to escape immune responses. [Display omitted] • Immune activity of SLNs correlates with primary melanoma characteristics. • The delay of SLN excision after PT removal influences intranodal immune activity. • Immune reconstitution in DEL SLNs is mediated via melanoma derived CD209+ cells. • TGFβhigh PTs trap CD209+ DCs curbing SLN's immune reconstitution after PT removal. • Metastases in DEL SLNs have a higher negative prognostic value than in IM SLNs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced encephalitis (ICI-iE) is a rare but life-threatening toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. We aim to identify the characteristics of ICI-iE and describe factors that discriminate it from herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 encephalitis and anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (anti-LGI1) encephalitis, as two alternative entities of encephalitis. In this retrospective multicentre cohort study, we collected patients with ICI-iE reported to the Side Effect Registry Immuno-Oncology from January 2015 to September 2021 and compared their clinical features and outcome with 46 consecutive patients with HSV-1 or anti-LGI1 encephalitis who were treated at a German neurological referral centre. Thirty cases of ICI-iE, 25 cases of HSV-1 encephalitis and 21 cases of anti-LGI1 encephalitis were included. Clinical presentation of ICI-iE was highly variable and resembled that of HSV-1 encephalitis, while impairment of consciousness (66% vs. 5%, p =.007), confusion (83% vs. 43%; p =.02), disorientation (83% vs. 29%; p =.007) and aphasia (43% vs. 0%; p =.007) were more common in ICI-iE than in anti-LGI1 encephalitis. Antineuronal antibodies (17/18, 94%) and MRI (18/30, 60%) were mostly negative in ICI-iE, but cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showed pleocytosis and/or elevated protein levels in almost all patients (28/29, 97%). Three patients (10%) died of ICI-iE. Early immunosuppressive treatment was associated with better outcome (r = 0.43). ICI-iE is a heterogeneous entity without specific clinical features. CSF analysis has the highest diagnostic value, as it reveals inflammatory changes in most patients and enables the exclusion of infection. Early treatment of ICI-iE is essential to prevent sequelae and death. • Presentation of ICI-iE is variable and resembles that of HSV-1 encephalitis. • Abnormal MRI and antineuronal antibodies are less common than previously reported. • Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid has the highest diagnostic value in ICI-iE. • ICI-iE has a mortality of 10% and long-term sequelae occur in 47% of patients. • Early immunosuppressive treatment of ICI-iE is associated with full recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

MEK inhibitors (MEKi) have shown clinical efficacy for NRAS-mutated, metastasized melanoma in randomised controlled trials, yet their clinical use is currently restricted to advanced, pre-treated patients, which is a different situation compared to previous trials. Data on their efficacy in the current real-world use are scarce. In this retrospective, multi-centre study, we evaluated the clinical course of disease of patients treated with MEKi with at least one previous treatment line in five German cancer centres. Thirty-three patients were included, 19 males (58%) and 14 females (42%), with a median age of 64 years. Ninety-one percent of patients were pre-treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, 90% of patients had elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels at treatment initiation, 33% suffered from cerebral metastases and 30% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or higher. The response rate was 18.2%; the disease control rate was 48.5%. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6–3.9 months), and median overall survival was 7.1 months (95% CI: 5.8–8.3 months). In subgroup analysis, clinical efficacy was similar also in patients with high LDH levels and cerebral metastases, and there was a better outcome in males and in patients treated with trametinib vs. other MEKi, which may be based on selection bias. Overall, the clinical efficacy was similar compared to previous clinical trials in earlier treatment lines. MEKi fulfil the need for an in-between treatment to stabilise the course of disease in advanced NRAS-mutated melanoma, but expectations regarding ongoing tumour response should be tempered. • Thirty-three patients with off-label MEK inhibitor monotherapy in NRAS-mutated melanoma. • Pre-treated and highly progressed patient cohort of 5 German skin cancer centres. • The overall response rate was 18%; the disease control rate was 49%. • Overall, results are comparable to available early-line randomised controlled trials. • MEK inhibitors may provide stabilisation of disease in this challenging cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway inhibitors (MAPKi) has been proposed to enhance the durability of anti-tumour responses induced by MAPKi. Here, we present phase I safety results from an open-label, phase I/II study of pembrolizumab (PEM), encorafenib (ENC) and binimetinib (BIN) triplet therapy in advanced, B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF)V600–mutated melanoma (IMMU-TARGET, NCT02902042). The dose finding phase I part used a 3 + 3 design, starting with the approved doses of PEM (200 mg every three weeks), ENC (450 mg once daily [QD]) and BIN (45 mg twice daily [BID]) as dose level (DL) 0. Reduction of the ENC and BIN doses (300 mg QD and 30 mg BID at DL - 1 and 200 mg QD and 30 mg BID at DL-2) was preplanned in case of ≥2 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Primary objectives were to estimate the recommended phase II dose of the triplet combination, DLT and safety. As per the sponsor's decision, the study was terminated after the phase I part, as the clinical efficacy of the combination is currently being investigated in a pivotal, placebo-controlled (PEM mono), double-blinded phase III trial (STARBOARD, NCT04657991). Fifteen patients were enrolled. DLTs of DL0 were creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation plus cytokine release syndrome (n = 1) and gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase (n = 1). No DLT was observed in further 3 + 3 patients at DL-1. One (isolated GGT elevations) DLT of DL0 was questionable, as the patient had further episodes of isolated GGT elevations after treatment discontinuation. Hence, further 6 patients were enrolled at DL0: here, no DLT occurred. In total, 13 of 15 patients (87%) experienced a treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) and 8 patients (53%), a grade ≥III TRAE; there were no TRAE-related deaths. Increases in aspartate aminotransferases, GGT (6/15 patients) and CPK elevations (4/15) were the most common grade III–IV TRAE. In median, patients received triplet therapy for 24 weeks (interquartile range [IQR], 12–45). Of the 14 patients evaluable for efficacy, the overall response rate was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35–87). At a median follow-up of 25 months (IQR, 9–28), progression-free survival at 12 months was 41% (95% CI, 13–68). Triplet therapy with PEM, ENC and BIN as used in the study was feasible and safe and led to clinically meaningful disease control. [Display omitted] • Phase I results combining pembrolizumab (PEM), encorafenib (ENC) and binimetinib (BIN) in BRAF V600 melanoma suggests a managable safety profile and clinical efficacy. • Thirteen of 15 patients (87%) experienced a treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). • There were no TRAE-related deaths. • The overall response rate was 64% (95% confidence interval 35–87). • Triplet therapy with pembrolizumab (200 mg Q3W), encorafenib (450 mg QD) and binimetinib (45 mg BID) was feasible and safe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Forty to 60% of patients with advanced or metastatic melanoma respond to first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and half of all patients in the metastatic setting eventually progress. This review evaluated the latest long-term data from clinical trials. It also considered data from recent retrospective studies, as these address important questions for clinical practice. 'Retreatment' defined as 'repeated treatment with the same therapeutic class following relapse after adjuvant treatment has ended' and showed activity in selected patients with recurrence after regular completion of adjuvant PD-1 treatment. In melanoma patients with adjuvant PD-1 monotherapy who recur during adjuvant treatment, further treatment with PD-1 monotherapy seems to have no clinical utility, indicating the need for a therapy switch or escalation in these patients. Targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors and ipilimumab-based therapy (alone or combined with PD-1 blockade) show clinical activity in patients who recur during and after adjuvant treatment. 'Rechallenge ' , defined as 'repeated treatment with the same therapeutic class following disease progression in patients who had clinical benefit with prior treatment for unresectable or metastatic disease', with pembrolizumab at progression in the advanced setting achieving additional disease control. If possible, 'escalation' (PD-1 inhibitors combined with additional agents) should be preferred to PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy rechallenge as higher response rates were demonstrated. The combination of PD-1 plus CTLA-4 was found to be more effective but not more toxic than CTLA-4 alone. Promising antitumor activity was observed for escalation to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, entinostat plus pembrolizumab, and relatlimab plus nivolumab. Retreatment, rechallenge and escalation are available options for patients with melanoma who relapse in the adjuvant or advanced setting. • Retreatment, rechallenge and escalation are options for patients who relapse. • Relapse during/after adjuvant PD-1 responds to targeted and ipilimumab-based therapy. • Rechallenge with PD-1 inhibitor in advanced setting can achieve disease control. • Escalation should be preferred to PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy rechallenge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Effective treatment options are limited for patients with advanced melanoma who have progressed on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapies (TT). Preclinical models support the combination of ICI with TT; however, clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of triplet combinations in first-line setting showed limited advantage compared to TT only. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study, that included patients with advanced melanoma who were treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors in combination with an anti-PD-(L)1 antibody (triplet therapy) after failure of at least one anti-PD-(L)1-based therapy and one TT in seven major melanoma centers between February 2016 and July 2022. A total of 48 patients were included, of which 32 patients, 66.7% had brain metastases, 37 patients (77.1%) had three or more metastatic organs and 21 patients (43.8%) had three or more treatment lines. The median follow-up time was 31.4 months (IQR, 22.27–40.45 months). The treatment with triplet therapy resulted in an ORR of 35.4% (n = 17) and a DCR of 47.9% (n = 23). The median DOR was 5.9 months (range, 3.39–14.27 months). Patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors as the last treatment line showed a slightly lower ORR (29.6%) compared to patients who received ICI or chemotherapy last (ORR: 42.9%). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 25% of patients (n = 12), with seven patients (14.6%) requiring discontinuation of treatment with both or either drug. Triplet therapy has shown activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced melanoma and may represent a potential treatment regimen after failure of ICI and TT. • Unmet need for advanced melanoma after failure of immune- and targeted therapy (TT) • Combination of BRAF/MEK inhibitors plus anti-PD-(L)1 as so-called triplet therapy • Triplet therapy showed efficacy after failure of anti-PD-1-based therapy and TT • Triplet therapy as a viable regimen after failure of immune- and targeted therapy [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cutaneous melanoma is notorious for the development of in-transit metastases (ITM). For unknown biological reasons, ITM remain the leading tumour manifestation without progression to distant sites in some patients. In total, 191 patients with initially unresectable stage III ITM and satellite metastases from 16 skin cancer centres were retrospectively evaluated for their tumour characteristics, survival and therapy response. Three groups according to disease kinetics (no distant progress, slow (>6 months) and fast (<6 months) distant progression) were analysed separately. Median follow-up time was 30.5 (range 0.8–154.0) months from unresectable ITM. Progression to stage IV was observed in 56.5% of cases. Patients without distant metastasis were more often female, older (>70 years) and presented as stage III with lymph node or ITM at initial diagnosis in 45.7% of cases. Melanoma located on the leg had a significantly better overall survival (OS) from time of initial diagnosis compared to non-leg localised primaries (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40–0.91; p = 0.017), but not from diagnosis of unresectable stage III (HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.45–1.02; p = 0.06). Forty percent of patients received local therapy for satellite and ITM. Overall response rate (ORR) to all local first-line treatments was 38%; disease control rate (DCR) was 49%. In total, 72.3% of patients received systemic therapy for unresectable stage IIIB-D. ORR for targeted therapy (n = 19) was highest with 63.2% and DCR was 84.2% compared to an ORR of 31.4% and a DCR of 54.3% in PD-1 treated patients (n = 70). Patients receiving PD-1 and intralesional talimogene laherparepvec (n = 12) had an ORR of 41.7% and a DCR of 75%. Patients with unresectable ITM and without distant progression are more often female, older, and have a primary on the leg. Response to PD-1 inhibitors in this cohort was lower than expected, but further investigation is required to elucidate the biology of ITM development and the interplay with the immune system. • Patients with unresectable in-transit metastases show prolonged overall survival. • Favourable disease course is more common in female patients with a primary leg tumour. • 40% received local therapy before systemic therapy for stage III unresectable disease. • ORR of PD-1 therapy was 31.4% (n = 70). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiological imaging such as computed tomography (CT) is used frequently for disease staging and therapy monitoring in advanced skin cancer patients. Detected lesions of unclear dignity are a common challenge for treating physicians. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and outcome of CT-guided biopsy (CTGB) of radiologically unclear, suspicious lesions and to depict its usefulness in different clinical settings. This retrospective monocentric study included advanced skin cancer patients (melanoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, angiosarcoma, cutaneous lymphoma) with radiologically unclear lesions who underwent CTGB between 2010 and 2018. Of 59 skin cancer patients who received CTGB, 47 received CTGB to clarify radiologically suspicious lesions of unclear dignity. 32 patients had no systemic therapy (cohort A), while 15 patients received systemic treatment at CTGB (cohort B). In both cohorts, CTGB revealed skin cancer metastasis in a large proportion of patients (37.5%, 40.0%, respectively), but benign tissue showing inflammation, fibrosis or infection in an equally large percentage (37.5%, 46.7%, respectively). Additionally, a significant number of other cancer entities was found (25.0%, 13.3%, respectively). In patients receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitors, CTGB confirmed suspicious lesions as skin cancer metastasis in 83.3%, leading to treatment change. In immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated patients, skin cancer metastasis was confirmed in 11.1% of patients only, whereas benign tissue changes (inflammation/fibrosis) were found in 77.8%. Our results highlight the relevance of clarifying radiologically unclear lesions by CTGB before start or change of an anti-tumour therapy to exclude benign alterations and secondary malignancies. • Lesions of unclear dignity are frequent in imaging of skin cancer patients. • CT-guided biopsy (CTGB) can be helpful for clarification. • Frequency, outcome and clinical impact of CTGB of such lesions were assessed. • CTGB revealed >50% unexpected findings (benign findings and secondary carcinomas). • CTGB can therefore prevent unnecessary treatment initiation or discontinuation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) triggers immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The relevance of lipase elevation remains unclear. Skin cancer patients with newly detected serum lipase elevation (at least twofold upper normal limit) or newly diagnosed type I diabetes mellitus upon ICI therapy were retrospectively collected at 14 German skin cancer centres. We identified 68 patients with lipase elevation occurring after a median time of 19 (range 1–181) weeks on ICI, 15 (22%) thereof had symptoms consistent with pancreatitis. Forty-seven patients (73%) had other irAE, mainly colitis. Discontinuation (n = 24, 35%) or interruption (n = 26, 38%) of ICI resulted in decrease of lipase after reinduction of ICI lipase levels increased again in 12 of 24 patients. In 18 patients (27%), ICI was continued unchanged, and in 12 (67%) of them, lipase levels normalised. Twenty-two patients were identified with newly diagnosed type I diabetes mellitus related to ICI, and 12 (55%) thereof had also lipase elevation mainly shortly before or after the diagnosis of diabetes. Fourteen (64%) patients had other irAE, mainly thyroiditis. Irrespective of lipase elevation, patients frequently showed a rapid onset with ketoacidosis, decreased c-peptide, and strongly increased blood glucose levels. Increased serum lipase during ICI is often not associated with pancreatitis but with other irAE as possible cause. Therefore, it might be sufficient to regularly monitor blood glucose levels and perform further workup only in case of signs or symptoms of pancreatitis and/or exocrine pancreas insufficiency. • Lipase elevation is often associated with e.g. colitis but not pancreatitis. • Immune checkpoint inhibition diabetes occurs often with endocrine immune-related adverse event and in 50% with lipase elevation. • Lipase elevation shortly precedes the onset of type I diabetes mellitus. • Therefore, blood glucose but not lipase monitoring is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The development of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) among melanoma patients is associated with short survival. Unspecific clinical symptoms and imprecise diagnostic criteria often delay diagnosis. Because melanoma patients with LMD have been excluded from most clinical trials, the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and targeted therapies (TTs) has not been adequately investigated among these patients. We performed a retrospective study in two tertiary-referral skin cancer centres to evaluate the clinical characteristics, diagnostics, treatments, and overall survival (OS) of melanoma patients with LMD between June 2011 and March 2019. In total, 52 patients were included. The median age at LMD diagnosis was 58 years. Most patients (n = 30, 58%) were men. The median time from the first diagnosis of unresectable disease to the first diagnosis of LMD was 8.5 months (range 0–91.5 months). Most patients (65%, n = 34) were BRAF V600 mutated. Sixteen patients (31%) presented with LMD only, whereas 36 patients (69%) presented with concomitant brain metastases at LMD diagnosis. Eleven patients (21%) showed no evidence of extracranial disease. Forty-four patients (85%) had clinical symptoms at LMD diagnosis. Forty-two patients (81%) had received at least one prior therapy. Forty patients (77%) received at least one treatment after LMD diagnosis, including TT (n = 17), ICB (n = 13), bevacizumab (n = 1), radiotherapy (n = 3), and intrathecal chemotherapy (n = 1); five patients received both TT and ICB. Twelve patients (23%) received no treatment because of rapid progression of LMD. The median OS for the entire cohort was 2.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7–4.1). Among patients receiving systemic therapy, OS was 3.7 months (95% CI 2.4–4.9). Systemic treatment with TT or ICB seems to improve OS among patients with LMD. However, despite new therapy modalities, the prognosis of LMD remains poor. [Display omitted] • Around 20% of the patients with leptomeningeal disease (LMD) received no treatment. • The presence of a BRAF mutation seems to be higher in patients with LMD. • At diagnosis of LMD, most of the patients had concomitant brain metastases. • The prognosis of LMD remains poor with a median overall survival of 2.9 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the increasing use of checkpoint inhibitors, rare immune-related adverse events (irAE) are being identified. Haematological irAE (hem-irAE) are difficult to treat and have shown high mortality rates. In order to improve side-effect management for these potentially life-threatening events, we analysed frequency, severity and outcomes. Patients who developed hem-irAE while being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) therapy were retrospectively identified from 18 international cancer centres. In total, more than 7626 patients treated with ICI were screened, and 50 patients with hem-irAE identified. The calculated incidence amounts to 0.6% and median onset was 6 weeks after the ICI initiation (range 1–128 weeks). Thrombocytopenia and leucopaenia were the most frequent hem-irAE with 34% (17/50) and 34% (17/50), respectively, followed by anaemia 28% (14/50), hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (4% (2/50)), aplastic anaemia (2% (1/50)), acquired haemophilia A (2% (1/50)) and coagulation deficiency (2% (1/50)). Simultaneous thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred in two patients, concurrent anaemia and thrombocytopenia in one patient. Other than cessation of ICI (in 60%) and corticosteroids (in 78%), treatment included second-line immunosuppression in 24% of cases. Events resolved in 78% (39/50), while 18% (9/50) had persistent changes, and 2% (1/50) had fatal outcomes (agranulocytosis). Hem-irAE can affect all haematopoietic blood cell lineages and may persist or even be fatal. Management may require immunosuppression beyond corticosteroids. Although these irAE are rare, treating physicians should be aware, monitor blood counts regularly and promptly act upon detection. • Haematological immune-related adverse events are rare and initially asymptomatic. • Anaemia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia comprised ~1/3 of cases each. • Regular blood count and prompt management are crucial as hem-irAE can be fatal. • Management may require immunosuppression beyond corticosteroids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented concerning a study in polyomavirus found in Merkel cell cacinoma (MCC) of European patients.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is one of the most common malignancies of the skin. Even though most patients are sufficiently treated by surgical resection, some will eventually metastasize and need systemic therapy. Phase I and II studies have shown efficacy for programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, but cohort sizes are low and real-world data especially on long-term outcome are pending. Patients from six German skin cancer centers treated with PD-1 inhibitors (pembrolizumab, nivolumab or cemiplimab) for advanced cSCC were retrospectively studied. Internal patient records were analyzed for clinical outcome including response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Of 46 evaluable patients (median age: 76 years), the overall response rate (RR) was 58.7%, including 15.2% with complete response. The disease control rate was 80.4%. Both median PFS and OS were not reached, Kaplan–Meier estimated 1-year PFS was 58.8%. Patients responding to therapy showed durable remission. Response was independent of the PD-1 inhibitor used and also independent of the presence of distant metastases vs. locally advanced disease. Two predictive factors were found: Patients with primaries located on the leg had a poorer therapy outcome and patients with high lactate dehydrogenase serum levels at baseline. Treatment was overall tolerated well, with less than 10% of patients discontinuing therapy due to toxicity. PD-1 inhibitors fulfill the need for an efficient systemic therapy for advanced cSCC and should be the new standard of care. With high RRs and durable disease control, neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens should be evaluated. • Patients treated with programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitorsfor advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. • An extraordinary efficacy in routine clinical use was found, comparable to clinical trials. • The response rate was 59%, disease control rate was 80%. • Efficacy was high in both locally advanced and metastasized disease. • The treatment was very well tolerated in the mostly elderly patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anti-[programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)] antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab were approved for adjuvant treatment of melanoma as they demonstrated improved relapse-free survival. Currently, combined anti-PD-1 plus anti-[cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4)] blockade is being investigated in adjuvant and neoadjuvant trials. Sarcoidosis-like reactions have been described for immune checkpoint inhibitors and are most likely drug-induced. The reported rate of sarcoidosis/sarcoidosis-like reactions within clinical melanoma trials is <2%. We observed that a remarkably higher number of melanoma patients (10/45 patients, 22%) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) within an adjuvant clinical trial-developed drug induced sarcoidosis-like reaction (DISR) mimicking metastasis. Of 45 stage III melanoma patients who were treated at our institute with adjuvant ICI (either nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab) within a two-armed, blinded clinical trial, ten developed a DISR. Three of the ten patients were men, median age was 52 years (range, 32–70 years). DISRs were asymptomatic and generally detected radiographically at first radiographic imaging after the start of therapy (median time, 2.8 months) and described as a differential diagnosis to tumour progression. In one patient, DISR was only apparent 13.1 months after start of therapy and 4 weeks after the end of ICI treatment. DISR presented as mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy in 8/10 patients (as only site or in addition to lung, skin and/or bone involvement), one patient had only lung and cutaneous, one patient only cutaneous DISR. Biopsies from lymph nodes, skin and bone were taken in 8/10 patients, and histology confirmed sarcoidosis-like reactions (SLRs). As patients were asymptomatic, no treatment for DISR was required, and study treatment was stopped for DISR in only one patient due to bone involvement. DISRs have resolved or are in remission in all patients. At a median follow-up time of 15.3 months (range, 12–17.6 months), two patients experienced melanoma relapse. In most cases, sarcoidosis could only be differentiated from melanoma progression on biopsy. Treating physicians as well as radiologists have to be aware of the potentially higher rate of DISR in patients receiving adjuvant ICI. A thorough interdisciplinary workup is required to discriminate from true melanoma progression and to decide on continuation of adjuvant ICI treatment. • Potentially higher rate of sarcoidosis-like reactions (SLR) in patients who receive adjuvant immunotherapy than in patients with metastatic disease. • Differentiation between SLR and progression of disease in most cases only possible with biopsy. • No clinical symptoms of the SLR in our patients, no steroid treatment required. • No progression of the SLR after continuation of treatment. • Patients that developed SLR and patients that did not had an equal relapse rate (20%). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The interaction of gut microbiome and immune system is being studied with increasing interest. Disturbing factors, such as antibiotics may impact the immune system via gut and interfere with tumor response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). In this multicenter retrospective cohort study exclusively treatment-naïve patients with cutaneous or mucosal melanoma treated with first-line anti-PD-1 based ICB for advanced, non-resectable disease between 06/2013 and 09/2018 were included. Progression-free (PFS), and overall survival (OS) according to antibiotic exposure (within 60 days prior to ICB and after the start of ICB vs. no antibiotic exposure) were analyzed. To account for immortal time bias, data from patients with antibiotics during ICB were analyzed separately in the time periods before and after start of antibiotics. Among 578 patients with first-line anti-PD1 based ICB, 7% of patients received antibiotics within 60 days prior to ICB and 19% after starting ICB. Antibiotic exposure prior to ICB was associated with worse PFS (adjusted HR 1.75 [95% CI 1.22–2.52]) and OS (adjusted HR 1.64 [95% CI 1.04–2.58]) by multivariate analysis adjusting for potential confounders. The use of antibiotics after the start of ICB had no effect on either PFS (adjusted HR 1.19; 95% CI 0.89–1.60) or OS (adjusted HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.75–1.57). Antibiotic exposure within 60 days prior to ICB seems to be associated with worse PFS and OS in melanoma patients receiving first-line anti-PD1 based therapy, whereas antibiotics after the start of ICB do not appear to affect PFS or OS. • Impact of antibiotics before/during first-line ICB for melanoma on survival. • Antibiotics prior to first-line ICB for melanoma are associated with worse PFS/OS. • Antibiotics after start of ICB do not appear to affect PFS and OS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The impact of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) on immune-checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is unclear. Patients with unresectable advanced melanoma (MM) treated with ICI in the years 2011–2020 were identified from the prospective multicenter German skin cancer registry ADOREG. Patients with IST within 60 days before, or within 30 days after start of ICI were compared to patients without IST. End points were disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) determined by Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated in a Cox regression model. Of 814 patients treated with ICI, 73 (9%) received concomitant IST, mainly steroids. Patients with brain metastases (BM) received IST more frequently (n = 34/130 patients; 26%), than patients without BM (39/684 patients; 6%). In patients without BM, IST initiated before, but not IST initiated after start of ICI was significantly associated with worse PFS (univariate hazard ratio (HR) 2.59, 95% confidence interval (95%-CI) 1.07–6.28, p = 0.035; multivariate HR 3.48, 95%-CI 1.26–9.6, p = 0.016). There was no association between IST and OS or DCR. In patients with BM, IST initiated before, but not after start of ICI was significantly associated with worse OS (univariate HR 2.06, 95%-CI 1.07–3.95, p = 0.031; multivariate HR 5.91, 95%-CI 1.74–20.14, p = 0.004). There was no association between IST and PFS or DCR. Patients receiving IST 60 days before start of ICI showed a tendency to an impaired therapy outcome. IST initiated within 30 days after start of ICI, mainly due to early side effects, did not affect the efficacy of ICI therapy. • Immunosuppressive drugs before start of ICI may negatively impact treatment efficacy. • This effect was seen in patients with and without brain metastases. • Immunosuppressive drugs given after start of ICI did not impact treatment efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Melanomas arising in acral sites are associated with a poorer prognosis than other melanoma subtypes. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical-pathological and genetic characteristics as well as therapeutic responses of a larger cohort of patients with melanomas arising in acral sites. Clinical data of 134 patients with melanomas arising in acral sites from the Dept. of Dermatology Essen were collected and analysed with regard to clinicopathological characteristics and treatment responses. Genetic analysis with targeted next-generation sequencing was done on 50 samples. In our cohort, BRAF (30%) , NRAS (28%) , TERT promoter (26%) , NF1 (14%) and KIT (6%) were frequently identified mutations. Comparing tumours situated on palms and soles with melanomas arising on dorsal acral sites, a higher frequency of NRAS (39.1% versus 25%) and NF1 (17.3% versus 0%) and lower frequencies of BRAF (21.7% versus 75%) and TERT promoter (8.6% versus 50%) mutations were observed. MAPK activating mutations were identified in 64% of tumours. Overall survival was longer in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment than in patients receiving other systemic therapies (i.e. BRAF/MEK inhibitors and chemotherapy). Our data suggest that the genetics of melanomas arising in acral sites varies by tumour location and may influence biological behaviour. • Mutations in the TERT promoter were observed in 26% of tumour samples. • MAPK activating mutations were identified in 64% of tumours. • Tumours on palms and soles had ore NRAS and less BRAF and TERT promoter mutations in than dorsal site tumours. • Longer overall survival in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors than other first-line systemic therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging system introduced several revisions. To assess the impact of the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC8) staging system on subgrouping and survival, patients with melanoma from two tertiary skin cancer centres were classified according to both the 7th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC7) and AJCC8. A total of 1948 patients aged ≥18 years with cutaneous melanoma stage II-IV were included. The impact of sex and age on reclassification was assessed by log binomial models. The inverse probability of censoring weighting method was used to compute ROC curves from time-to-event data to assess the discriminatory ability of AJCC7 and AJCC8. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated, and age- and sex-adjusted MSS hazard ratios were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Of all, 23.5% of patients were assigned a different subgroup when classified according to AJCC8. Owing to upshifting to stage IIIC (AJCC7 24.8% vs. AJCC8 50.8%), patient numbers of stages IIIA and IIIB decreased from 28.7% to 16.2% and 46.5% to 28.3%. The prediction accuracy for AJCC7 and AJCC8 was comparable (integrated time-dependent area under the curve [AUC] of 0.75 and 0.74, respectively). Five-year MSS of IIB and IIC AJCC8 was poor and lower than that of IIIA AJCC8 (80%, 67% and 89%, respectively). Compared to results of the International Melanoma Database and Discovery Platform, 5-year MSS was 10–15% points lower for stages IIC, IIIB and IIIC. Upshifting affects primarily stage III subgroups, while effects in stage II are minor. Stage IIB/C (AJCC8) patients have 67–80% MSS and should be considered for adjuvant treatment, while in stage IIIA, the indication of adjuvant treatment is questionable. • Melanoma classification according to the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC8) does not improve discriminatory ability compared with the 7th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC7). • Five-year melanoma-specific survival (MSS) of stages IIB/IIC is lower than that of IIIA. • MSS is worse in all substages than results of the International Melanoma Database and Discovery Platform cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Targeted therapy (TT) is an effective treatment for advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma, but most patients eventually acquire resistance and progress. Here, we evaluated the outcome of second-line immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) after progression on dual BRAF and MEK inhibition. Patients with metastatic melanoma progressing on combined BRAF + MEK inhibition and receiving second-line ICB between 2015 and 2019 in 9 tertiary referral centres were enrolled. Demographic and clinical data and blood counts of all patients were collected retrospectively. We identified 99 patients with stage IV melanoma receiving ICB (nivolumab, pembrolizumab [n = 39] or ipilimumab plus nivolumab [n = 60]) after progression on combined TT. The median progression-free survival was similar in the PD-1 and ipilimumab plus nivolumab group (2.6 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.0–3.1] vs. 2.0 [95% CI, 1.4–2.6], p = 0.15). The objective response rate was 18.0% in the PD-1 and 15.0% in the ipilimumab plus nivolumab group (p = 0.70). The disease control rate was 25.7% for monotherapy and 18.3% for combined ICB (p = 0.39). The median overall survival was 8.4 months (95% CI, 5.1–11.7) for patients receiving PD-1 monotherapy and 7.2 months (95% CI, 5.2–9.1) for patients receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab (p = 0.86). The latter was associated with a higher rate of treatment-related adverse events (AEs). No significant association of laboratory values or clinicopathological characteristics with response to second-line ICB was observed. PD-1 monotherapy and combined ipilimumab plus nivolumab show similar activity and outcome in patients with melanoma resistant to BRAF + MEK inhibition. However, combined ipilimumab plus nivolumab was associated with a higher rate of treatment-related AEs compared with monotherapy. • After progression on targeted therapy, outcome of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is poor. • Response rates were similar for PD-1 plus CTLA-4 and PD-1 monotherapy. • Overall survival after ICB was similar in both groups. • Dual ICB was associated with a higher rate of immune-related adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Targeted therapies with BRAF plus MEK inhibitors (BRAFi; MEKi) represent the major treatment strategy for patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma (MM). Previous analyses suggested a correlation between programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumour tissues and the outcome of targeted therapies. This study investigated PD-L1 as a potential predictive biomarker of BRAFi-based targeted therapies in MM patients. Patients and methods We analysed two independent cohorts of BRAF V600-mutated MM patients undergoing BRAFi-based therapies for PD-L1 expression in pre-treatment tumour tissues. The oligocentre cohort 1 included 83 patients whose tumour tissues were analysed retrospectively with the anti-PD-L1 antibody clone E1L3N. The multicentre cohort 2 included 58 patients whose tumour tissues were analysed prospectively within the framework of the “Registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Onkologie” (ADOREG) and “Tissue Registry in Melanoma” (TRIM) project using the anti-PD-L1 antibody clone 28–8. Results PD-L1 expression in pre-treatment tumour tissue did not correlate with response or survival to BRAFi-based therapies in both MM patient cohorts. This finding was not influenced by retrospective versus prospective immunohistochemistry analyses, oligocentre versus multicentre cohorts or the different anti-PD-L1 antibody clones used. In cohort 1, PD-L1 positivity was detected in tumour tissue of 41.0% and 18.1% of patients (cut-off 1% and 5%, respectively). In cohort 2, 58.6% and 39.7% of patients showed PD-L1 positivity (cut-off 1% and 5%, respectively). Conclusion In two independent cohorts including a total of 141 MM patients, PD-L1 expression in tumour tissue did not correlate with the outcome of BRAFi-based treatment. Therefore, PD-L1 cannot be recommended for the use as a predictive biomarker of BRAFi-based therapy in BRAF V600-mutated MM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors are a common treatment strategy for metastatic melanoma and other tumour entities. Clinical trials usually exclude patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases, thus experience with PD-1 inhibitor (PD-1i) in this patient population is limited. Patients and methods Metastatic melanoma patients with preexisting autoimmune disorders or previous ipilimumab-triggered immune-related adverse events (irAE) undergoing treatment with PD-1i from seven German skin cancer centres were evaluated retrospectively with regard to flare of the preexisting autoimmunity and development of new, not preexisting irAE as well as response to PD-1i therapy. Results In total, 41 patients had either preexisting autoimmunity (n = 19, group A, including two patients with additional ipilimumab-triggered autoimmune colitis) or ipilimumab-triggered irAE (n = 22, group B). At PD-1i therapy initiation, six patients in group A and two patients in group B required immunosuppressive therapy. In group A, a flare of preexisting autoimmune disorders was seen in 42% of patients, new irAE in 16%. In group B, 4.5% of patients showed a flare of ipilimumab-triggered irAE and 23% new irAE. All flares of preexisting autoimmune disorders or irAE were managed by immunosuppressive and/or symptomatic therapy and did not require termination of PD-1i therapy. tumour responses (32% in group A and 45% in group B) were unrelated to occurrence of autoimmunity. Conclusion While preexisting autoimmunity commonly showed a flare during PD-1i therapy, a flare of ipilimumab-triggered irAE was rare. Response rates were above 30% and unrelated to irAE. PD-1i therapy can be considered in patients with autoimmune disorders depending on severity and activity of autoimmunity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Immune-checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of metastatic melanoma based on several phase III trials. Patients after organ transplantation and patients with impaired renal function were excluded from these studies. Recently, allograft rejections were reported in organ transplant recipients receiving PD-1 blocking antibodies. Patients and findings Four patients with metastatic melanoma and impaired kidney function (baseline serum creatinine 1.79–2.59 mg/dl) were treated with immune-checkpoint blockers, of which one was a kidney-transplant recipient receiving immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus and prednisolone. The patient was initially treated with the anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab after detailed explanation of the potential risk of allograft rejection. Upon disease progression, therapy was switched to the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab. The other three patients were treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab, two of them after previous therapy with ipilimumab. Results The patients received a median of six doses (range 3–21) of anti-PD-1 antibodies and 3–4 doses of ipilimumab. Kidney function tests remained stable throughout the course of checkpoint blockade. In the kidney transplant recipient, neither ipilimumab nor nivolumab led to an allograft rejection. Responses to anti-PD-1 treatment were divergent with two patients showing disease progression, one achieving a mixed response and one experiencing a complete response. Conclusion These cases show that checkpoint inhibitors can be a safe therapeutic option in patients with impaired kidney function. Furthermore, we report the first organ transplant patient with malignant melanoma who received ipilimumab followed by nivolumab without experiencing a kidney allograft rejection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Anti-programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) antibodies represent an effective treatment option for metastatic melanoma as well as for other cancer entities. They act via blockade of the PD-1 receptor, an inhibitor of the T-cell effector mechanisms that limit immune responses against tumours. As reported for ipilimumab, the anti-PD-1 antibodies pembrolizumab and nivolumab can induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These side-effects affect skin, gastrointestinal tract, liver, endocrine system and other organ systems. Since life-threatening and fatal irAEs have been reported, adequate diagnosis and management are essential. Methods and findings In total, 496 patients with metastatic melanoma from 15 skin cancer centers were treated with pembrolizumab or nivolumab; 242 side-effects were described in 138 patients. In 116 of the 138 patients, side-effects affected the skin, gastrointestinal tract, liver, endocrine, and renal system. Rare side-effects included diabetes mellitus, lichen planus, and pancreas insufficiency due to pancreatitis. Conclusion Anti-PD1 antibodies can induce a plethora of irAEs. The knowledge of them will allow prompt diagnosis and improve the management resulting in decreased morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies represent an effective treatment option for metastatic melanoma and other cancer entities. They act via blockade of the PD-1 receptor, an inhibitor of the T-cell effector mechanisms that limit immune responses against tumours. As reported for ipilimumab, the anti-PD-1 antibodies pembrolizumab and nivolumab can induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These side-effects can involve skin, gastrointestinal tract, liver, the endocrine system and other organ systems. Since life-threatening and fatal irAEs have been reported, adequate diagnosis and management are essential. Methods and findings In total, 496 patients with metastatic melanoma from 15 skin cancer centres were treated with pembrolizumab or nivolumab. Two hundred forty two side-effects in 138 patients have been analysed. In 77 of the 138 patients side-effects affected the nervous system, respiratory tract, musculoskeletal system, heart, blood and eyes. Not yet reported side-effects such as meningo-(radiculitis), polyradiculitis, cardiac arrhythmia, asystolia, and paresis have been observed. Rare and difficult to manage side-effects such as myasthenia gravis are described in detail. Conclusion Anti-PD-1 antibodies can induce a plethora of irAEs. The knowledge of them will allow prompt diagnosis and improve the management resulting in decreased morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: BRAF-mutant melanoma can be successfully treated by BRAF kinase inhibitors (BRAFi) and MEK kinase inhibitors (MEKi). However, the administration of BRAFi followed by MEKi did not generate promising response rate (RR). The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the time to progression (TTP) with a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway upstream inhibition strategy in BRAF mutated melanoma patients. BRAF mutation positive metastatic melanoma patients were identified within the Dermatology Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG) network and were treated first with a MEKi and upon progression with a selective BRAFi. A total of 23 melanoma patients (six females, 17 males, aged 47–80years) were retrospectively analysed for TTP. The total median TTP was 8.9months. The median TTP for MEKi was 4.8 (1.2–23.2) and subsequent for BRAFi 4.5 (1.2–15.7) months, respectively. A higher RR for MEKi (39%, nine partial responses and 0 complete responses) than previously reported was observed. Our analysis suggests that the reversed inhibition of the MAPK pathway is feasible in BRAF mutated melanoma. The median TTP (8.9months) is close to the promising BRAF- and MEKi combination therapy (median progression-free survival (PFS) 9.4months). The total treatment duration of the MAPK inhibition when a MEKi is administered first is similar compared to the reversed sequence, but TTP shifts in favour to the MEKi. This approach is feasible with reasonable tolerability. This clinical investigation encourages further studies in prospective clinical trials to define the optimal treatment schedule for the MAPK pathway inhibition and should be accompanied by molecular monitoring using repeated biopsies. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Aim of the study: To describe the current management of patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma and melanoma in situ in Germany and assess for adherence with the existing German guideline in a first prospective population-based analysis. Methods: Prospective and longitudinal population-based study using online questionnaires. Registration by practitioners and hospitals was open for all patients diagnosed with melanoma between April and June 2008 in Germany. For data analysis, patients with melanoma stages 0–III (AJCC 2002) were included. Results: Data from 1081 patients registered by 106 different centres were available for analysis. Male patients were significantly older than female patients (61.4years versus 55.8years, p <0.0001) and presented with thicker primary tumours (1.62mm [median 0.9mm] versus 1.48mm [median 0.8mm], p =0.01). Excessive safety margin excisions were most often applied in melanoma in situ and in small centres. Insufficient excision margins (6.9%) were associated with head and neck localisation, geographical region and implementation of further staging procedures. Decision on sentinel lymph node biopsy complied with the German guideline in >85% of cases and was dependent on age and tumour localisation. Only 60% of patients received a complete lymph node dissection (CLND) after a positive SLNB, the rate of CLND was lowest in older patients. Adjuvant treatments were initiated in only 34% of patients formally qualifying for adjuvant treatment based on guideline recommendations. Approximately half of all staging procedures were done in no-risk/low-risk tumour patients. Conclusions: Management of melanoma in Germany did not show great dependency on centre size, geographical area or treating physician but rather on patient and tumour characteristics. The low rate of adjuvant treatment initiations reflects the need of treatment options in this patient group. Excessive initial staging procedures generate significant costs. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Genetic variants in DNA repair enzymes contribute to the susceptibility to cutaneous melanoma; consequently, we analyzed whether common nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA repair enzyme genes might also influence the course of disease. To this end, we determined eight polymorphisms of seven different DNA repair enzymes in 742 patients with cutaneous melanoma, and correlated these with overall survival. Univariate Cox proportional hazards model analyses revealed that ERCC5 (XPG) 1104 His/His was significantly associated with impaired survival. Indeed, the univariate hazard ratio (HR) was 2.8 times higher for patients with ERCC5 1104 His/His (P<0.001) compared with ERCC5 1104 Asp/Asp. Accordingly, the 5-year survival rate was 55% (95% confidence interval 43-71) for patients with ERCC5 1104 His/His, whereas 82% (95% confidence interval 78-86) of patients with ERCC5 1104 Asp/Asp were still alive at this time. Importantly, adjusted Cox regression analysis not only confirmed ERCC5 1104 His/His as an independent prognostic factor (multivariate HR=4.5; P<0.001), but also revealed the significant impact of ERCC2 (XPD) 751 Gln/Gln on prognosis, with a 2.2-fold increased HR compared with ERCC2 751 Lys/Lys (P=0.009). Thus, ERCC5 codon 1104 and ERCC2 codon 751 polymorphisms are independent prognostic factors in patients with cutaneous melanoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a highly metastatic skin tumor. To assess the relevance of the Ras/Raf/MEK/MAP kinase pathway, we analyzed for activating B-Raf mutations and we elucidated the presence of the Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein (RKIP) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) as well as the phosphorylation status of ERK. All MCC samples were negative for the B-RafV600E mutation. Remarkably, RKIP, which was shown to interfere with the activation of MEK by Raf, was highly expressed in primary as well as in metastatic MCC. Immunohistochemical analysis of the phosphorylation status of ERK revealed in 42 out of 44 samples a complete lack of activated ERK in the tumor cells although ERK is expressed; in the two positive cases phosphorylated ERK was restricted to a minor fraction of the tumor cells. Western blot analysis of three MCC-derived cell lines revealed in one case the pattern present in situ (i.e. high RKIP expression and complete absence of phosphorylated ERK). In summary, our data demonstrate the inactivity of the classical MAP kinase signal transduction pathway in MCC, which seems to be because of lack of activation as well as active deactivation. These findings should be accounted for in future therapeutic approaches for this tumor.Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2006) 126, 1135–1142. doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700170; published online 23 February 2006 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SummaryIn chronic inflammatory conditions, mononuclear cells infiltrate the connective tissue attracted by fibroblast-secreted chemokines. The role of fibroblasts in sustaining the lymphocyte immune response upon cellular infiltration is so far unresolved. We here report that, upon prolonged stimulation with tumor necrosis factor-α, dermal fibroblasts enhance proliferation of activated T cells whereas unstimulated fibroblasts do not. T cell growth stimulation requires cell contact of tumor necrosis factor-α stimulated fibroblasts to T cells and is not due to soluble factors. Growth stimulation is substantially blocked by neutralizing antibodies to interleukin-15. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter analyses revealed that tumor necrosis factor α stimulated fibroblasts expose interleukin-15 in a membrane-bound form on the cell surface whereas nonstimulated fibroblasts and interferon-γ treated fibroblasts do not. The amount of membrane interleukin-15 increases with the duration of tumor necrosis factor-α stimulation for at least 3 d. Unstimulated fibroblasts, however, accumulate interleukin-15 in the cytoplasm. No interleukin-15 could be detected in the culture supernatant. Immunohistochemical analyses confirmed membrane interleukin-15 on dermal fibroblasts in discoid lupus erythematosus skin lesions whereas no membrane interleukin-15 was found on the surface of fibroblasts in healthy skin. We conclude that dermal fibroblasts upon long-term tumor necrosis factor-α stimulation during chronic inflammation are involved via membrane-bound interleukin-15 in stimulating proliferation of accumulated, activated T cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]