Search

Adoptive immunotherapy using natural killer (NK) cells is currently under investigation, especially in situations where anti-neoplastic effect is needed but infusion of T cells is considered hazardous, such as in recipients of haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) from haploidentical donors. NK-cell therapy is mainly but not exclusively investigated in the setting of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. NK cells may induce potent anti-leukaemic and possibly anti-rejection activity, and may even mitigate graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). It remains to be determined whether such effects are clinically important and whether or not they are mediated mainly or exclusively by KIR–HLA class I interactions. Recent advances in graft engineering has provided methods for isolating large numbers of purified NK cells. Several groups have shown that clinical-grade NK cells at doses up to 107/kg may be collected and purified for the purpose of infusion to patients. Early results in a limited number of patients show that these cell doses may be administered without adverse events and possibly without inducing GvHD. Further study is required to determine whether such infusions will be useful in preventing graft rejection, exerting graft-versus-leukaemia effects, and/or hastening immune recovery. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

This review is intended to reflect upon the current status and perspectives of cell-based immunotherapy at a time when the promise of extensive pre-clinical research has been translated into encouraging clinical responses. However, some of these have also been complicated by significant adverse reactions. As the field moves towards definitive late stage trials, with a growing interest from pharmaceutical companies, we realize that novel cell therapy strategies pose questions that are familiar to traditional drug development, along with new considerations due to the potential of T cells to persist long term and to expand after adoptive transfer. These questions address the safety of the product, the efficacy, the mode of action, and the anticipation of risks. From different perspectives, we intend to address exciting opportunities and safety concerns in current concepts of cellular immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To expand the current knowledge about azacitidine (Aza) and donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) as salvage therapy for relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and to identify predictors for response and survival, we retrospectively analyzed data of 154 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 124), myelodysplastic (MDS, n = 28), or myeloproliferative syndrome (n = 2). All patients received a median number of 4 courses of Aza (range, 4 to 14) and DLI were administered to 105 patients (68%; median number of DLI, 2; range, 1 to 7). Complete and partial remission rates were 27% and 6%, respectively, resulting in an overall response rate of 33%. Multivariate analysis identified molecular-only relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 9.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 43.5; P = .004) and diagnosis of MDS (HR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 12.2; P = .011) as predictors for complete remission. Overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 29% ± 4%. Molecular-only relapse (HR, .14; 95% CI, .03 to .59; P = .007), diagnosis of MDS (HR, .33; 95% CI, .16 to .67; P = .002), and bone marrow blasts <13% (HR, .54; 95% CI, .32 to .91; P = .021) were associated with better OS. Accordingly, 2-year OS rate was higher in MDS patients (66% ± 10%, P = .001) and correlated with disease burden in patients with AML. In summary, Aza and DLI is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with relapse after allo-HSCT, in particular those with MDS or AML and low disease burden. The latter finding emphasizes the importance of stringent disease monitoring and early intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: We analyzed karyotype stability in 22 patients with acute leukemia at relapse or disease progression after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Karyotypes before and at relapse after allo-SCT were different in 15 patients (68%), the most frequent type being clonal evolution either alone or combined with clonal devolution (13 patients). Patients with and without a karyotype change did not differ significantly in overall survival (OS) (median, 399 vs. 452 days; P = 0.889) and survival after relapse (median, 120 vs. 370 days; P = 0.923). However, acquisition of additional structural chromosome 1 abnormalities at relapse after allo-SCT occurred more frequently than expected and was associated with reduced OS (median, 125 vs. 478 days; P = 0.008) and shorter survival after relapse (median, 37 vs. 370 days; P = 0.002). We identified a previously undescribed clonal evolution involving t(15;17) without PML-RARA rearrangement in an AML patient. We conclude that a karyotype change is common at relapse after allo-SCT in acute leukemia patients. Moreover, our data suggest that additional structural chromosome 1 abnormalities are overrepresented at relapse after allo-SCT in these patients and, in contrast to a karyotype change per se, are associated with reduced OS and shorter survival after relapse. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: In patients treated with rituximab and alemtuzumab for lymphomas or CLL, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) is a major mechanism of action. Therefore, assessment of ADCC is mandatory to understand the complex mechanisms leading to the anti-lymphoma effects of monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Due to methodical difficulties, little is yet known about the relevant cell subpopulations and effector mechanisms leading to tumor lysis in ADCC. Methods: We used a novel flow cytometric assay that detects CD107a as a marker for NK-cell degranulation to characterize and quantify peripheral blood natural killer (NK) cells mediating ADCC in vitro and in vivo. Results: We observed specific and dose-dependent NK-cell activation after administration of rituximab and alemtuzumab. The number of degranulating NK cells was closely related to the concentration of mAb and the effector:target ratio. We were able to quantify and characterize the peripheral blood NK cells mediating ADCC. The majority of degranulating NK cells had the phenotype: CD56dim, CD69+, NKG2D+, NKp30−, NKp46−, and CD94−. Furthermore, we found that the CD107a assay can also visualize ADCC under clinical conditions as we observed increased numbers of NK cells degranulating in response to CD20+ lymphoma cell lines in patients with non-Hodgkin''s lymphoma treated with rituximab. Conclusions: We were able to quantify and characterize NK cells mediating ADCC with a new and feasible method. The CD107a assay may be useful for predicting treatment responses of individual patients and may help find the optimal dosage and timing for treatment with mAb. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Although ATG is frequently used in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and solid organ transplantation, little is known on its effects on NK cells, which mediate important functions in post-transplantation immunology. We incubated peripheral blood lymphocytes of healthy donors with Thymoglobulin, Lymphoglobulin or ATG-Fresenius. Cell death and apoptosis of NK cells and T cells were determined by flow cytometry using propidium iodide and Annexin V. As expected, there were no significant differences between the different ATGs regarding their T cell toxicity. Surprisingly, we found profound differences between the different ATGs regarding their impact on NK cells: In clinically relevant concentrations Lymphoglobulin had less toxic effects on NK cells as compared to Thymoglobulin or ATG-Fresenius: the median percentages of apoptotic or necrotic NK cells in response to 1 μg/ml Lymphoglobulin, ATG-Fresenius and Thymoglobulin were 2%, 35% and 38%, respectively (p<0.001). This is the first report of differential effects of different ATGs on NK cells. Lymphoglobulin appears to be superior to Thymoglobulin or ATG Fresenius regarding the preservation of NK cell mediated immunity. Randomized trials addressing the impact of different ATGs on lymphocyte subpopulalions in the clinical setting are urgently warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]