Search

This study aims to introduce and evaluate a novel technique to treat unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) by electrocauterization of the mandibular condyle via an intraoral approach. Patients suffering from unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) were included in this study. All patients underwent electrocauterization of the affected condyle. An intraoral incision on the anterior border of the mandibular ramus was made to expose the external surface of the ramus and access the anterior border of the condylar head. A hole was then drilled into the condyle and cauterization was performed; six patients also received orthognathic surgery during the procedure. Patients underwent careful clinical assessment and radiological evaluation including panoramic view, lateral and posteroanterior cephalometry, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and scintigraphy to assess condylar growth for a period of 12–24 months. Ten patients (5 male and 5 female) with active UCH type 1B or 2A were included in this study with a mean age of 20.7 years (range, 18–21.7 years). At the 12-month postoperative assessment, clinical evaluation showed stable dental occlusion with no midline shift; scintigraphy showed persistently reduced cellular activity, and computed tomography scans revealed no degeneration in either of the condyles with complete healing of the drilled holes. Within the limitations of this study it seems that the proposed treatment approach might be an alternative to previously established protocols. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article outlines a conceptual approach to the reconstruction of jaw deformities associated with abnormalities in the mandibular condyle. The authors describe a hierarchy of reconstruction, emphasizing use of the least invasive and progressing to the most complex and invasive techniques, depending on the nature and severity of the underlying deformity, prior operations, patient age, and stage of growth. Consider joint preservation orthognathic surgical correction, followed by biological techniques for replacement of the condyle, and avoid replacing a functional temporomandibular joint based only on radiographic remodeling and concerns about potential future flare-ups of disease based on anecdotal data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hemifacial hyperplasia (HFH) is characterized by an increase in volume of all affected tissues of half of the face. It is present at birth, subsequently grows proportionally, and stops growing before adulthood. Unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) consists of progressive asymmetric growth of the mandible and develops typically in early adulthood. Both disorders have an unknown aetiology. The overgrowth limited to one body part suggests somatic mosaicism, as this has been found in other similar localized overgrowth disorders. Often this includes a variant in a gene in the (PIK3CA)/PI3K/(PTEN)/AKT1/mTOR pathway. Here we report the case of an HFH patient with asymmetry present at birth, in whom a progressive growth pattern similar to UCH subsequently occurred, causing marked mandibular asymmetry. A condylectomy was successfully performed to stop the progressive growth. Somatic mosaicism for a mutation in PIK3CA was detected in the condylar tissue. This finding might indicate that both HFH and UCH can be caused by variants in genes in the (PIK3CA)/PI3K/(PTEN)/AKT1/mTOR pathway, similar to other disorders that result in asymmetrical bodily overgrowth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) causes progressive asymmetry of the mandible. The aetiology of this growth disorder is unknown. A two-centre prospective study was established, and 10 consecutive adult UCH patients scheduled for high condylectomy were included. The resected condylar tissue was divided into two parts, one for regular histopathology and one for DNA extraction. A panel of eight selected overgrowth genes (AKT1 , AKT3 , MTOR , PIK3CA , PIK3R2 , PTEN , TSC1 , TSC2) were sequenced using next-generation sequencing, with coverage of a minimum 500 times in order to be able to detect low-grade mosaicisms. Subsequently, untargeted whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed to detect variants in other genes present in three or more patients. No mutation was detected in any of the overgrowth genes, and untargeted exome sequencing failed to detect any definitively causative variant in any other gene. Ten genes had a rare variant in three or more patients, but these cannot be designated as causative without additional functional studies. The hypothesis that the cause in at least some patients with UCH is a somatic mutation in a gene that controls cell growth could not be confirmed in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) of the mandible is a disorder affecting the condyle size, resulting in facial asymmetry. This study was a retrospective review of 27 patients with UCH who underwent condylectomy between 2000 and 2017 at Yonsei University Dental Hospital. Patient demographic characteristics were summarized. UCH was divided into three subtypes: hemimandibular elongation (HE, n = 15), hemimandibular hyperplasia (HH, n = 4), and osteochondroma (OC, n = 8). Of the 27 patients, only one with the HE type and five (18.5%) with the OC type complained of joint pain. Bone scans of all patients showed higher uptake on the UCH side. Lip and maxillary canting was prominent in the HH and HE types. Five patients (18.5%) underwent condylectomy alone, 13 (48.1%) underwent condylectomy with orthodontic treatment, and nine (33.3%) underwent adjunctive jaw surgery with orthodontic treatment. The treatment modalities varied according to the subtype. In all OC type patients, removal of the hyperplastic condyle treated the facial asymmetry. Additional post-surgical orthodontic treatment was necessary in only three cases (37.5%). All HH type patients required mandibuloplasty. All patients showed a stable occlusal outcome without relapse and an improvement in subjective symptoms, despite a decrease in mouth opening of 2.2 mm. These findings might be useful in treatment planning for UCH patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Purpose Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia (UCH) is an acquired deformity of the mandible, which can highly influence the symmetry of the face due to its progressive nature. It is caused by growth resembling pathology in one of the mandibular condyles. Definition as well as classification is subject to discussion. The aim of this study is to evaluate a large cohort of alleged UCH patients, and to describe the clinical characteristics, demographic features, classification and follow up. Secondly an algorithm is presented, in order to achieve uniformity in diagnosis and treatment. Patients and methods From 1994 to 2014 a database of consecutive patients from 3 maxillofacial departments (Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; VU Medical Center, Amsterdam and Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem) with suspected UCH was set up. Patients were referred by orthodontists, dentists, general practitioners or maxillofacial surgeons. Demographic features, bonescan outcomes, laterality, classification and follow-up were noted. Secondarily, all patients were retrospectively diagnosed by one surgeon (JWN), using available documentation. Missing data and follow-up were additionally retrieved from orthodontic offices. Results 394 asymmetric patients were evaluated. In 309 (78%) patients, the diagnosis UCH was justified and SPECT data were available. The mean age at presentation was 20.3 years (SD ± 7.7, range 9.0–54.5 years). In 48% of the patients, the bonescan was positive. 80% of these patients received surgical treatment, of which 62% were treated with a condylectomy only, 33% were treated with condylectomy plus additive corrective surgery, and 5% underwent corrective surgery only. Of the patient group without positive bonescan 42% of the patients received surgical treatment: 34% condylectomy only, 15% condylectomy plus additive corrective surgery, and 51% corrective surgery only. In total (N = 309) 96 (31%) patients underwent condylectomy as only surgical treatment and 124 (40%) patients received no surgical treatment at all. Treatment could be finalized with orthodontic treatment without further surgery in 64% and 41% respectively. 96 patients were subject to comparison of the classification as noted by the clinician and the author (JWN). In only 72% of the cases, the secondary screening was in agreement with the initial classification. Conclusion Based on this study not all (active) UCH patients require corrective (orthognathic) surgery. A (transoral) partial condylectomy for active patients is recommended, with a postoperative remodeling period of 6 months with or without orthodontic treatment. Second stage correcting surgery may be necessary upon evaluation, using general orthognathic diagnostic and planning procedures. It appears difficult to classify patients reliably using the available clinical and radiological documentation. Objectivity and quantification in the diagnostic process is necessary: uniformity in documentation and parameters. The attached documentation form and UCH treatment algorithm is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) is characterized by an excessive growth of a mandibular condyle, resulting in facial, and occlusal deformities. Scintigraphic hyperactivity usually triggers the need of condylectomy. Delaire has presented a protocol for the treatment of active or non-active UCH using systematically a proportional condylectomy, which could solve both aetiology and adaptive deformities. The aim of this study was to evaluate this protocol by clinical and radiographical analysis. Materials and methods Seventy-three patients with UCH were included in this retrospective study, and divided by clinical and cephalometric analysis in vertical, or transversal forms of UCH according to Delaire's classification. All patients were treated with ‘proportional condylectomy’, any indicated orthognathic procedures, along with maxilla-mandibular elastic therapy, and rehabilitation. Architectural, aesthetical, occlusal, and functional features were evaluated using clinical, cephalometric, and photographic measurements both preoperatively, and at the end of the follow-up. Results A female predominance was observed (65.8%). Vertical forms were more represented than transversal forms (61.6% versus 38.4%). There was a significant improvement of the occlusal plane, the posterior vertical excess, the chin deviation and the soft-tissue features (p < 0.0001), regardless of the preoperative scintigraphic activity status (p < 0.0001). The occlusion, and temporo-mandibular joint (TMJ) functions was considered as normal in respectively 72.7%, and 93% of the patients. Conclusion The results of this study have demonstrated that a protocol using a ‘proportional condylectomy’, any indicated orthognathic techniques, maxilla-mandibular elastic therapy, and rehabilitation, is a reliable option for treating UCH, regardless the activity status of the pathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to describe the condylar layer and cartilage island in subjects with unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH). Five individuals (15–18 years old) with a diagnosis of UCH, treated in a university hospital in Temuco, Chile, were included. The analysis examined the presence, extension, and thickness of the layers on the condylar surface, the number, depth, and area of the cartilage islands, and the argyrophilic proteins of the nucleolar organizer region (AgNOR) score. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. The fibrocartilaginous layer was thickest (0.13 ± 0.05 mm) and the joint layer was thinnest (0.07 ± 0.01 mm) ( P < 0.05). With respect to the number, depth, and area of the islands, case 1 presented the highest values, followed by case 2; the cartilage island was related to the fibrocartilaginous layer ( P < 0.05). All cases had AgNOR proteins in the proliferative and fibrocartilaginous layers, as well as the islands with the greatest presence of chondrocytes ( P = 0.245). A relationship was observed between the histopathological alterations in the different layers on the condylar surface and the thickness of the fibrocartilaginous layer, as well as the thickness of the latter and the number, depth, and area of the cartilage islands in the trabecular bone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Three-dimensional quantification of asymmetry in UCH has not been reported yet, but would be useful for diagnosing and evaluating the degree of deformity in this disease. It enables profound decision-making and timing of surgery. Unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) can subjectively be classified in hemimandibular elongation (HE), hemimandibular hyperplasia (HH) and a combination of these two (hybrid form). The main purpose of this study was to quantify mandibular asymmetry in UCH patients with a reliable and reproducible method. Secondly, it was evaluated whether the existing classification can be confirmed. Materials and methods 37 UCH-patients with progressive mandibular asymmetry, supported by a positive bone scan and/or such clinical progression that condylectomy was performed, were included in this retrospective study. A group of healthy subjects, matched for age and gender, was used as the control group. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were imported in Maxilim ® software. Each mandibular half was divided into three skeletal segments (condyle, ramus, and body). Linear and volumetric measurements were calculated for these skeletal units on the affected and unaffected side, for both patients and controls. Results Significant differences between affected and unaffected sides in the patient group were found in condylar, ramus, and body segments for linear (p < 0.01) as well as for volumetric quantitative measurements (p < 0.0040). A mean linear difference between affected and unaffected sides in the condylar region of the UCH patient group was found of 3.6 mm (sd 2.9) versus 0.2 mm (sd 1.5) in controls. For volumetric measurements there was a mean difference between the left and right condyle of 718 mm 3 (sd 638) in the patient group versus 8 mm 3 (sd 225) difference in the control group. The condyle was the most affected segment. Differences between sides were significantly larger in the patient group than in the control group (p < 0.001). It was not possible to objectify differences between HE and HH. Conclusion CBCT is a useful and accurate modality for quantification and evaluation of mandibular asymmetry in UCH. It enables objective monitoring. The existing classification in HE and HH could not be confirmed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mandibular condylar hyperplasia (MCH) is a rare, idiopathic disorder, which can cause both functional and aesthetic problems. MCH has often been described in the literature, but a comprehensive analysis of the current literature on MCH has not been undertaken. This study presents a systematic review analyzing the efficacy of high condylectomy in patients with MCH, with an emphasis on its role in the management of unilateral condylar hyperplasia. A systematic search of the current literature on high condylectomy was performed to find studies with sample sizes of more than five patients using a set of inclusion/exclusion criteria. The search terms revealed 664 studies, of which only 11 articles with a total of 289 patients were eligible for inclusion. Due to differences in the presentation of data, a meta-analysis was not conducted. High condylectomy appears to be a relevant surgical method to correct unilateral condylar hyperplasia. The current literature indicates large variations in terms of aetiology, use of diagnostic tools, and preferred time of intervention. Thus, further systematic studies are needed to determine which procedures offer the best aesthetic and functional results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with suspected unilateral condylar hyperplasia are often screened radiologically with a panoramic radiograph, but this is not sufficient for routine diagnosis and follow up. We have therefore made a quantitative analysis and evaluation of panoramic radiographs in a large group of patients with the condition. During the period 1994–2011, 132 patients with 113 panoramic radiographs were analysed using a validated method. There was good reproducibility between observers, but the condylar neck and head were the regions reported with least reliability. Although in most patients asymmetry of the condylar head, neck, and ramus was confirmed, the kappa coefficient as an indicator of agreement between two observers was poor (−0.040 to 0.504). Hardly any difference between sides was measured at the gonion angle, and the body appeared to be higher on the affected side in 80% of patients. Panoramic radiographs might be suitable for screening, but are not suitable for the quantitative evaluation, classification, and follow up of patients with unilateral condylar hyperplasia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Bone scan analyses and clinical assessment are used to diagnose unilateral condylar hyperactivity (UCH). This review compares the diagnostic accuracy of planar and SPECT bone scans. Studies diagnosing patients with possible UCH using bone scans, published between 1968 and 2008, were included in this review. Of 15 articles that met the inclusion criteria, 7 presented results in sufficient detail to calculate index test characteristics. Three control studies show that the difference in uptake values of the left and right condylar regions in the normal population does not exceed 10%. The pooled sensitivity of the planar bone scan (n =130) was 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.57–0.82), which was significantly lower (p =0.04) than that of the bone SPECT technique (n =88), which was 0.90 (0.79–0.97). The pooled specificity of the SPECT scan was 0.95 (0.82–0.99), which did not significantly differ (p =0.58) from that of the planar scan (0.92 (0.83–0.97)). Future studies should include a diagnostic analysis of the data, including two-by-two contingency tables, so the accuracy of the diagnostic test may be evaluated. Bone scans are best performed using SPECT, conducting a quantitative analysis by calculating the percentile differences between the left and right condylar regions. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: This study aimed to compare different analytical methods and identify the optimal analysis method to distinguish patients with unilateral condylar hyperactivity (UCH) from those with inactive condyles. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans of patients with progressive and nonprogressive mandibular asymmetry (each group, n =26), were analyzed using the region of interest technique. Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for the different analytic methods. The ROC curve illustrates that UCH can be diagnosed significantly better by determining the percentile bone activity in both condyles. The area under the curve (AUC) of the percentile comparison between the affected and contralateral condyles was 0.93±0.04, that for the condyle/clivus ratio was 0.75±0.07 and for the condyle/cervical spine (CS) ratio 0.57±0.08. Sensitivity for the condyle/clivus ratio was 65% and specificity 61%. Sensitivity for the condyle/CS ratio was 85% and specificity 31%. For the percentile difference of the condyles, sensitivity and specificity were 88%. For UCH patients, direct comparison of bone activity between the affected and contralateral condyle in SPECT scans is the analysis method of choice. Comparison of condylar bone activity to reference bone activity does not have additional value in the diagnosis of UCH. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]