Search

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) incidence rates are increasing. From 1973 to 2009, data on all first histologically confirmed BCCs were gained from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry to estimate trends in patient-based BCC incidence rates by sex, age group, and site in the southeast Netherlands. Trends in European age-standardized rates and age- and site-specific incidence rates were assessed by calculating the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC). Between 1973 and 2009, the European standardized rate quadrupled from 40 to 165 per 100,000 person-years for men and from 34 to 157 for women, significantly increasing since 1973 in both sexes, but accelerating from 2002 until 2009 with an EAPC of 6.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.3-8.3) for men and 7.9% (95% CI, 6.2-9.7) for women. Women below the age of 40 years exhibited a constant linear increase of 6.3% since 1973. The head and neck region was most often affected in both sexes, but the steepest increase was seen for the trunk (EAPC men 13%, women 15%). In the absence of reliable tumor-based rates, these alarming patient-based rates are probably an interesting indicator for the impact of more intensive UV exposure in a prosperous European population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Aim: Few population-based studies have been published on melanoma of unknown primary origin (MUP). This study’s aim is to describe characteristics and survival of MUP patients in the Netherlands, based on nationwide data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Methods: Patient and tumour characteristics of MUP patients were retrieved from the NCR. Subgroups were made according to metastatic site: nodal or distant. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. To obtain a better insight in the composition and prognosis of the MUP group, the survival was compared to that of patients with melanoma of a known primary origin (MKP), tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) stage III and IV. Results: Of all 33,181 melanoma patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2009, 2.6% (n =857) were diagnosed with MUP. MUP patients with nodal metastases had a similar survival as MKP stage III with macroscopic nodal involvement. After stratification according to the number of involved lymph nodes, the survival of patients with nodal metastases with one involved lymph node was not significantly different between MUP and MKP. The survival of MUP patients with two or more involved lymph nodes was slightly worse than that of MKP stage III patients with macroscopic nodal involvement with two or more involved lymph nodes. MUP patients with distant metastases had a similar survival as MKP stage IV. After stratification according to number of metastatic sites and metastatic site category, the survival in MKP stage IV patients with (sub)cutaneous metastases was slightly worse than MUP distant patients with (sub)cutaneous metastases. Conclusions: The results of this study imply that MUP patients form a heterogeneous group, and that MUP patients with nodal metastases could be classified as stage III melanoma with macroscopic nodal involvement, and MUP patients with distant metastases as stage IV melanoma. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To determine the optimal radiation dose for treatment of primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (C-ALCL) with solitary or localized, multifocal or recurrent skin lesions.Methods and Materials: In this multicenter study, patients with C-ALCL who had been treated with radiation therapy (RT) between 1984 and 2016 were retrieved from the Dutch registry of cutaneous lymphomas. Distinction was made between patients first presenting with solitary or localized lesions (n=63), with multifocal skin lesions (n=6), and patients with a skin relapse (n=22). Radiation doses, treatment response, and follow-up were evaluated. Radiation doses were categorized as low-dose (≤20 Gy), intermediate-dose (21-39 Gy), and high-dose (≥40 Gy) RT.Results: Of 63 patients presenting with solitary or localized skin lesions, 61 (97%) showed a complete response (CR). There were no differences in CR between low-dose (16 of 17), intermediate-dose (15 of 15), and high-dose RT (30 of 31). After a median follow-up of 46 months, 30 of 63 patients (48%) had a relapse, but in-field relapses were never observed. Six of 6 patients (100%) initially presenting with multifocal skin lesions showed a CR (3 of 3 low-dose, 2 of 2 intermediate-dose, 1 of 1 high-dose RT). After a median follow-up of 27 months, 3 of 6 patients had a relapse. Treatment of 33 skin relapses in 22 patients showed no differences in CR between low-dose (18 of 19), intermediate-dose (6 of 6), and high-dose RT (8 of 8). In the last 10 years there has been a decrease in radiation dose used in the treatment of C-ALCL. Treatment of multifocal and recurrent lesions with a dose of 8 Gy (2 × 4 Gy) resulted in CR of 17 of 18 lesions.Conclusions: Our results show that a radiation dose of 20 Gy (8 × 2.5 Gy) is effective in patients presenting with solitary or localized skin lesions. For patients with multifocal skin lesions and patients with a skin relapse, a dose of 8 Gy (2 × 4 Gy) may be sufficient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]