1. A series of laparoscopic liver resections with or without HALS in patients with hepatic tumors.
- Author
-
Ming-Te Huang, Po-Li Wei, Weu Wang, Chao-Jen Li, Yi-Chih Lee, Chih-Hsiung Wu, Huang, Ming-Te, Wei, Po-Li, Wang, Weu, Li, Chao-Jen, Lee, Yi-Chih, and Wu, Chih-Hsiung
- Subjects
LAPAROSCOPIC surgery ,ABDOMINAL surgery ,LIVER surgery ,TUMORS ,SURGERY ,SURGICAL hemostasis ,HEPATECTOMY ,LENGTH of stay in hospitals ,LAPAROSCOPY ,LIVER tumors ,LONGITUDINAL method ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,RETROSPECTIVE studies - Abstract
Background: Differences were compared between laparoscopic surgery with and without hand-assisted laparoscopic technique (HALS) in order to assess whether HALS is a safe and feasible alternative to laparotomy and to determine what factors contributed to successful laparoscopic liver surgery.Method: From a total of 416 liver resections, 45 patients with 46 hepatic tumors were chosen for laparoscopic liver resection with or without a hand-assisted technique. For each patient, her/his surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, tumor size and location, hospital stay after surgery, mortality, and morbidity were recorded for analysis.Results: The 45 surgical laparoscopic liver resections included 19 left lateral lobectomies, three hemihepatectomies, three segmentectomies, and 21 partial hepatectomies. A HALS was used more frequently in the right posterior group (14/16) than in the anterior group (6/29). There was no notable difference between these two groups in terms of tumor size, mean surgical time, blood loss during surgical procedure, hospital stay after surgery, and occurrence of complication.Conclusion: Surgical results between HALS and non-HALS usage were similar except for higher blood loss with HALS, higher use of HALS when liver cirrhosis was present, and less likelihood of using HALS when there was a superficial location of the tumor or lesion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF