Search

Background: Appropriate primary end points in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) improve the quality of the measurement and enable comparison of the findings with those of other trials.Objective: To assess the quality of reporting primary end points in RCTs recently published in dermatology journals.Methods: We identified 134 primary reports of RCTs among original articles in 4 dermatology journals published from January 2016 to December 2018. Details were extracted from articles, supplements, and trial registries. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with adequate primary end point reporting.Results: Adequate primary end point reporting was conducted in 76 of 134 RCTs (56.7%). Nine missed the definition of primary end points, and 13 did not define the timing of primary end points in the publications. Among 113 RCTs reporting primary end points explicitly in the articles, 16 showed discrepancies between registration and publication, and 21 were not able to valuate prespecification of primary end points. Multicenter studies and sponsor-initiated trials were significantly associated with adequate reporting quality after adjusting for covariates.Limitations: Prespecification was evaluated based on a comparison of the article and registry.Conclusions: The quality of primary end point reporting, particularly in prespecification, has remained unsatisfactory in the recent dermatology literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The appropriate classification of study designs is important for review and assessment of the relevant scientific literature as a basis for decision making; however, little is known about whether study designs have been appropriately reported in the dermatology literature.Objective: We aimed to validate the study designs in the dermatology literature and investigate discrepancies between author-reported and actual study designs.Methods: We reviewed all issues of 3 major dermatology journals from January to December 2016. A total of 295 original articles investigating associations between exposures and health outcomes were included for analysis. We used a validated algorithm to classify the study designs.Results: Among the 295 articles, 174 (59.0%) clearly mentioned the study design in the text. All interventional studies were correctly classified on the basis of study design (n = 42); however, 35 of 132 observational studies (26.5%) showed discrepancies between the author-reported and actual study design. When the author-reported design was a prospective cohort, retrospective cohort, or case-control study (n = 61), approximately half of the studies were misclassified by the authors (n = 30).Limitations: We analyzed only 3 journals in the dermatology field.Conclusions: Our findings revealed substantial discrepancies between author-reported and actual study designs in the dermatologic literature, particularly among observational studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The consumption of dietary antioxidants is considered to be a good strategy against photo-aging. However, the results of previous clinical trials that investigated the effects of oral consumption of high-flavanol cocoa products on skin photo-aging have been contradictory.Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether high-flavanol cocoa supplementation would improve the moderately photo-aged facial skin of female participants, by assessing skin wrinkles and elasticity.Methods: We performed a 24-wk, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effects of oral supplementation of cocoa flavanols on cutaneous photo-aging. All participants were moderately photo-aged Korean women with visible facial wrinkles (age range: 43-86 y). Participants were randomly assigned to receive a placebo beverage or cocoa beverage that contained 320 mg total cocoa flavanols/d. We measured wrinkles, skin elasticity, and hydration at baseline and at 12 and 24 wk. The primary endpoint was the mean percentage change in the average roughness value (Rz) at 24 wk.Results: At 24 wk, the mean percentage change in Rz (primary endpoint) was significantly lower in the cocoa group than in the placebo group (-8.7 percentage points; 95% CI: -16.1, -1.3 percentage points; P = 0.023). The mean percentage changes in gross elasticity, as determined by a cutometer, also differed between the groups at 12 wk (9.1 percentage points; 95% CI: 1.5, 16.7 percentage points; P = 0.020) and 24 wk (8.6 percentage points; 95% CI: 1.0, 16.2 percentage points; P = 0.027). However, there were no significant differences in skin hydration and barrier integrity between the 2 groups.Conclusions: In moderately photo-aged women, regular cocoa flavanol consumption had positive effects on facial wrinkles and elasticity. Cocoa flavanol supplementation may contribute to the prevention of the progression of photo-aging. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02060097. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented regarding a study on the role of endogenous estrogen to ultraviolet (UV)-induced inflammation and photoaging in mice.

Background: Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease that may involve any skin site. In particular, psoriasis on the face gives rise to considerable concern because of associated cosmetic problems and psychosocial distress. Some authors have reported that a significant proportion of patients with psoriasis have facial involvement, and several reports have suggested that facial involvement is a marker of severe psoriasis. However, patients with facial psoriasis seem to have clinical characteristics that depend on the distributions of their facial lesions. Objective: We sought to classify facial psoriasis and evaluate clinical characteristics according to the distribution of facial psoriatic lesions, and to compare the severities of body and scalp psoriasis in patients with central or peripheral facial lesions. Methods: A total of 194 patients with psoriasis with facial involvement who presented at our psoriasis clinic were enrolled in this study. Onset of psoriasis, family history, history of phototherapy or systemic therapy, and admission history were recorded. Severity of psoriasis on whole body, face, and scalp were rated using Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores. Patients were categorized into 3 types according to facial lesion distribution: peripherofacial type (PF) (upper forehead and/or periauricular lesions), centrofacial type, and mixed type. Results: The PF and mixed type were more common than the centrofacial type. Peripherofacial involvement was related to a high scalp PASI score, whereas centrofacial involvement was associated with a high whole body PASI score. Disease duration before facial lesion development was less for the PF. Early onset of disease and extensive treatment were more frequent for centrofacial type than PF. The relationship between facial and body psoriasis progression was less strong for PF. Limitations: This was a retrospective study conducted at a single location, and the severity and extent of psoriasis were evaluated only once, at first visits. Conclusion: Facial psoriasis can be categorized into 3 different types. Peripherofacial involvement might be a consequence of severe scalp psoriasis, whereas centrofacial involvement might be a marker of severe body psoriasis. Thus, it would help during the treatment of patients with psoriasis to consider that different lesion distributions may reflect different clinical characteristics. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]