Search

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides temporary mechanical circulatory support and simultaneous extracorporeal gas exchange for acute cardiorespiratory failure. By providing circulatory support, VA-ECMO gives treatments time to reach optimal efficacy or may be used as a bridge to a more durable mechanical solution for patients with acute cardiopulmonary failure. It is commonly used when a readily reversible etiology of decompensation is identified with very strict inclusion criteria for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation use. We present a unique case in which VA-ECMO/extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation was used after cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity in a patient with recurrent lymphoma of the left thigh with recent autologous stem cell transplant. • Coronary interventions and other therapeutic strategies in the setting of malignancy and pancytopenia require individualized, comprehensive, multidisciplinary approaches. • Patients with cancer who survive out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are less likely to receive postresuscitation treatment than patients without cancer. • When there is a potentially reversible cause of acute cardiopulmonary failure, VA-ECMO can provide temporary mechanical support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the study was to investigate what characterizes IHCAs that take place during the "day" (Monday-Friday 7 am-3 pm), "evening" (Monday-Friday 3 pm–9 pm) and "night" (Monday-Friday 9 pm-7 am and Saturday-Sunday 12 am- 11.59 pm). We used the Swedish Registry for CPR (SRCR) to study 26,595 patients from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2019. Adult patients ≥18 years with a IHCA where resuscitation was initiated were included. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate associations between temporal factors and survival to 30 days. 30-day survival and Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) was 36.8% and 67.9% following CA during the day and decreased during the evening (32.0% and 66.3%) and night (26.2% and 60.2%) (p < 0.001 and p = 0.028). When comparing the survival rates between the day and the night, survival decreased more (change in relative survival rates) in small (<99 beds) compared to large (<400) hospitals (35.9% vs 25%), in non-academic vs academic hospitals (33.5% vs 22%) and on non-Electro Cardiogram (ECG)-monitored wards vs ECG-monitored wards (46.2% vs 20.9%) (p < 0.001 for all). IHCAs that took place during the day (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 1.47 95% CI 1.35–1.60), in academic hospitals (aOR 1.14 95% CI 1.02–1.27) and in large (>400 beds) hospitals (aOR 1.31 95% CI 1.10–1.55) were independently associated with an increased chance of survival. Patients suffering an IHCA have an increased chance of survival during the day vs the evening vs night, and the difference in survival is even more pronounced when cared for at smaller, non-academic hospitals, general wards and wards without ECG-monitoring capacity. • 30-day survival and rates of ROSC following in-hospital cardiac arrest were highest during the day (36.8% and 67.9%) and decreased during the evening (32.0% and 66.3%) and night (26.2% and 60.2%) • Relatively greater decreases in survival from day to evening to night were associated with IHCAs in small hospitals, non-academic hospitals and on non-ECG-monitored wards • The difference in survival raises the question whether IHCA care is truly equal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) has declined since the COVID-19 pandemic. Because the burden of COVID-19 was uneven throughout the U.S., it remains unknown if top-performer hospitals in IHCA survival have remained top-performers since the pandemic. Within Get With The Guidelines®-Resuscitation, we identified hospitals with at least 2 years of registry participation pre-pandemic (2017–2019) and post-pandemic (July 2020–2022) and with at least 20 IHCA cases in both periods. Using multivariable hierarchical models with hospital as a random effect and adjusting for patient and arrest characteristics, we calculated risk-standardized survival rates to discharge (RSSR) for IHCA at each hospital during the pre- and post-pandemic periods. We then assessed the correlation between a hospital's pre-pandemic and post-pandemic RSSR for IHCA, and whether the correlation differed by the proportion of Black or Hispanic IHCA patients at each hospital. A total of 243 hospitals were included, comprising 122,561 IHCAs (pre-pandemic: 57,601; post-pandemic: 64,960). Pre-pandemic, the mean RSSR was 26.8% (SD, 5.2%) whereas the mean RSSR post-pandemic was 21.7% (SD, 5.5%). There was good correlation between a hospital's pre- and post-pandemic RSSR: correlation of 0.55. When hospitals were categorized into tertiles based on the proportion of their IHCA patients who were Black or Hispanic, this correlation remained similar: 0.48, 0.68, and 0.45 (interaction P-value: 0.69) for hospitals in the upper, middle and lower tertiles, respectively. Although the COVID-19 pandemic affected the U.S. unevenly, there was good correlation in a hospital's performance for IHCA survival before and after the pandemic, even at hospitals caring for a larger proportion of Black and Hispanic patients. Future studies are needed to understand what characteristics of high-performing hospitals pre-pandemic allowed many to continue to excel in the post-pandemic period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is one of the most deleterious complications of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).Objectives: We systematically analyzed the clinical characteristics of STEMI patients with IHCA, as well as predictors and treatments associated with risk of IHCA, using a nationwide database.Methods: In the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome) project (2014-2019), we stratified patients presenting with STEMI within 24 hours after symptom onset according to IHCA or no IHCA during the index hospitalization. We analyzed patients' clinical characteristics, mortality, and independent correlates of IHCA.Results: Of 40,670 STEMI patients, 2.2% (95% CI: 2.1%-2.4%) experienced IHCA. Among IHCA patients, the in-hospital mortality was 53.0% (95% CI: 49.7%-56.3%). IHCA represents 55.0% (95% CI: 51.6%-58.4%) of inpatient deaths. Age ≥75 years, female, nonsmoker, prior diabetes mellitus, prior renal failure, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, heart rate >100 beats/min, systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, and Killip IV were identified as predictors of IHCA. IHCA patients were less likely to receive β-blockers and ticagrelor during the first 24 hours after first medical contact and were less likely to undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention. After adjustment, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71-0.95), β-blockers (adjusted HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.47-0.86), and ticagrelor (adjusted HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.42-0.76) were associated with a reduced risk of IHCA.Conclusions: IHCA is rare in STEMI but is associated with high mortality. Multiple modifiable and unmodifiable factors are associated with its occurrence, suggesting that early intervention and rational drug treatment may improve its prognosis. (CCC Project- Acute Coronary Syndrome; NCT02306616). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Characteristics and outcomes of patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) have not been well-described. Thus, we compared the outcomes of patients with an IHCA in the CCL versus those in the intensive care unit (ICU) and operating rooms (OR).Methods: Within the American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines®-Resuscitation registry, we identified patients ≥ 18 years old with IHCA in the CCL, ICU, or OR between 2000-2019. Using hierarchical multivariable logistic regression, we compared rates of survival to discharge for patients with IHCA in the CCL versus ICU and OR.Results: Across 428 hospitals, 193,950 patients had IHCA, of whom 6865, 181,905 and 5180 were in the CCL, ICU and OR, respectively. Overall, 2614 (38.1%) patients with IHCA in the CCL survived to discharge, whereas 30,830 (16.9%) and 2096 (40.5%) survived to discharge from the ICU and OR, respectively. After adjustment, patients with IHCA in CCL were more likely to survive to discharge as compared to those with IHCA in the ICU (odds ratio, 1.37 [95%CI: 1.29-1.46], p < 0.001). In contrast, those who had IHCA in the CCL were less likely to survive to discharge as compared to patients with IHCA in the OR (odds ratio, 0.81 [95%CI: 0.69-0.94], p = 0.006).Conclusion: IHCA in the CCL is not uncommon and has a lower survival rate when compared with IHCA in the OR. The reasons for this difference deserve further study given that cardiac arrest in both settings is witnessed and response time should be similar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To investigate the association between socioeconomic status and outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest in Denmark.Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study based on nationwide registries and prospectively collected data on in-hospital cardiac arrest from 2017 and 2018 in Denmark. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses using regression models were performed to assess the association between socioeconomic status and outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to 30 days, survival to one year, and the duration of resuscitation among patients without ROSC.Results: A total of 3,223 patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest were included in the study. In the adjusted analyses, high household assets were associated with 1.20 (95 %CI: 0.96, 1.51) times the odds of ROSC, 1.49 (95 %CI: 1.14, 1.96) times the odds of survival to 30 days, 1.40 (95 %CI: 1.04, 1.90) times the odds of survival to one year, and 2.8 (95 %CI: 0.9, 4.7) minutes longer duration of resuscitation among patients without ROSC compared to low household assets. Similar albeit attenuated associations were observed for education. While high household income was associated with better outcomes in the unadjusted analyses, these associations largely disappeared in the adjusted analyses.Conclusions: In this study of patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest, we found that high household assets were associated with a higher odds of survival and a longer duration of resuscitation among patients without ROSC compared to low household assets. However, the effect size may potentially be small. The results varied based on socioeconomic status measure, outcome of interest, and across adjusted analyses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate the test accuracy of pre-arrest clinical decision tools for in-hospital cardiac arrest survival outcomes.Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception through January 2022 for randomized and non-randomized studies. We used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies framework to evaluate risk of bias, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to evaluate certainty of evidence. We report sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive outcome, and negative predictive outcome for prediction of survival outcomes. PROSPERO CRD42021268005.Results: We searched 2517 studies and included 23 studies using 13 different scores: 12 studies investigating 8 different scores assessing survival outcomes and 11 studies using 5 different scores to predict neurological outcomes. All were historical cohorts/ case control designs including adults only. Test accuracy for each score varied greatly. Across the 12 studies investigating 8 different scores assessing survival to hospital discharge/ 30-day survival, the negative predictive values (NPVs) for the prediction of survival varied from 55.6% to 100%. The GO-FAR score was evaluated in 7 studies with NPVs for survival with cerebral performance category (CPC) 1 ranging from 95.0% to 99.2%. Two scores assessed survival with CPC ≤ 2 and these were not externally validated. Across all prediction scores, certainty of evidence was rated as very low.Conclusions: We identified very low certainty evidence across 23 studies for 13 different pre-arrest prediction scores to outcome following IHCA. No score was sufficiently reliable to support its use in clinical practice. We identified no evidence for children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Respiratory failure is a common cause of pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and asystolic cardiac arrest, but the changes in heart rate (HR) pre-arrest are not well described. We describe HR dynamics prior to in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) among PEA/asystole arrest patients with respiratory etiology.Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 139 patients with 3-24 hours of continuous electrocardiogram data recorded preceding PEA/asystole IHCA from 2010-2017. We identified respiratory failure cases by chart review and evaluated electrocardiogram data to identify patterns of HR changes, sinus bradycardia or sinus arrest, escape rhythms, and development right ventricular strain prior to IHCA.Results: A higher proportion of respiratory cases (58/73, 79 %) fit a model of HR response characterized by tachycardia followed by rapid HR decrease prior to arrest, compared to non-respiratory cases (30/66, 45 %, p < 0.001). Among the 58 respiratory cases fitting this model, 36 (62 %) had abrupt increase in HR occurring 64 (IQR 23-191) minutes prior to arrest, while 22 (38 %) had stable tachycardia until time of HR decrease. Mean peak HR was 123 ± 21 bpm. HR decrease occurred 3.0 (IQR 2.0-7.0) minutes prior to arrest. Sinus arrest occurred during the bradycardic phase in 42/58 of cases; escape rhythms were present in all but 2/42 (5 %) cases. Right ventricular strain ECG pattern, when present, occurred at a median of 2.2 (IQR -0.05-17) minutes prior to onset of HR decrease.Conclusion: IHCAs of respiratory etiology follow a model of HR increase from physiologic compensation to hypoxia, followed by rapid HR decrease prior to arrest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Our aim was to determine the association of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for in hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) with quality of life after discharge.Methods: We performed a systematic review using available databases for studies that measured any quality-of-life or functional outcome both before and after CPR for IHCA. All screening and data abstraction was performed in duplicate.Results: We screened 10,927 records and included 24 papers representing 20 unique studies. Fifteen studies measured Cerebral Performance Category. Survival ranged from 11.8% to 39.5%. The risk of impaired cerebral function after discharged ranged from -16.1% (lower risk) to 44.7% increased risk of poor cerebral function after surviving to discharge. Four studies measured discharge to an institutional environment finding that the risk was increased by 18.2-72.2% among survivors. One study measured EQ-5D and found no difference pre and post CPR. One study measured performance of activities of daily living finding that survivors needed assistance with more activities after discharge.Conclusion: Our review is limited by the lack of adjustment for confounders, including the baseline level of each outcome, in all included studies. Therefore, although risk for most outcomes was increased after discharge vs pre-admission we cannot be certain if this is a causal relationship. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To characterize chest compression (CC) pause duration during the last 5 minutes of pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prior to extracorporeal-CPR (E-CPR) cannulation and the association with survival outcomes.Methods: Cohort study from a resuscitation quality collaborative including pediatric E-CPR cardiac arrest events ≥ 10 min with CPR quality data. We characterized CC interruptions during the last 5 min of defibrillator-electrode recorded CPR (prior to cannulation) and assessed the association between the longest CC pause duration and survival outcomes using multivariable logistic regression.Results: Of 49 E-CPR events, median age was 2.0 [Q1, Q3: 0.6, 6.6] years, 55% (27/49) survived to hospital discharge and 18/49 (37%) with favorable neurological outcome. Median duration of CPR was 51 [43, 69] min. During the last 5 min of recorded CPR prior to cannulation, median duration of the longest CC pause was 14.0 [6.3, 29.4] sec: 66% >10 sec, 25% >29 sec, 14% >60 sec, and longest pause 168 sec. Following planned adjustment for known confounders of age and CPR duration, each 5-sec increase in longest CC pause duration was associated with lower odds of survival to hospital discharge [adjusted OR 0.89, 95 %CI: 0.79-0.99] and lower odds of survival with favorable neurological outcome [adjusted OR 0.77, 95 %CI: 0.60-0.98].Conclusions: Long CC pauses were common during the last 5 min of recorded CPR prior to E-CPR cannulation. Following adjustment for age and CPR duration, each 5-second incremental increase in longest CC pause duration was associated with significantly decreased rates of survival and favorable neurological outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been associated with poor survival in multiple cardiopulmonary conditions, however its association with outcomes in cardiac arrest remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the association of PH with survival and neurologic outcomes in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).Methods: The study population included adults with IHCA undergoing resuscitation at an academic tertiary-care medical center from 2011 to 2019. Patients were classified based upon the presence versus absence of PH, defined as a pulmonary artery systolic pressure >35 mmHg on pre-arrest echocardiogram. Survival to discharge and favorable neurological outcome (defined as a Glasgow Outcome Score of 4-5) served as the primary and secondary outcomes of interest respectively.Results: Of the 371 patients studied, 203 (54.7%) had PH while 168 (45.3%) did not. Patients with PH had higher Charlson Comorbidity Score with higher rates of multiple baseline comorbidities. They also had worse multi-chamber enlargement, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, right ventricular systolic dysfunction, and valvular heart disease compared to non-PH patients. Rates of survival to discharge (11.5% vs 10.9%, p = 0.881) and favorable neurologic outcome (8.0% vs 6.2%, p = 0.550) were similar in PH and non-PH patients respectively. In multivariable analysis, PH was not associated with survival to discharge (OR 1.23, 95%CI 0.57-2.65) or favorable neurologic outcome (OR 1.69, 95%CI 0.64-4.45).Conclusions: In this contemporary registry of adults with IHCA, while PH was associated with a higher risk patient profile, it was not associated with survival or neurologic outcomes in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To investigate how socioeconomic status was associated with the risk of in-hospital cardiac arrest in Denmark.Methods: We conducted a matched case-control study based on data from nationwide registries in Denmark. A total of 3,449 cases with in-hospital cardiac arrest in 2017 and 2018 were matched at the index time based on age and sex with up to 10 controls from the total Danish population (background controls) and a hospitalized patient population (hospitalized controls), respectively. Household income, household assets, and education were used as measures of socioeconomic status. Conditional logistic regression was used to assess the association between socioeconomic status and the risk of in-hospital cardiac arrest.Results: Across all analyses of cases and controls, high household income, high household assets, and higher education were associated with decreased odds of in-hospital cardiac arrest. In the analyses of cases and background controls, high household income was associated with 0.45 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.52) times the odds of in-hospital cardiac arrest compared to low household income, which was similar for household assets. Compared to basic education, higher education was associated with 0.50 (95% CI: 0.43, 0.58) times the odds of in-hospital cardiac arrest. The results attenuated marginally after adjustment for comorbidities. Similar albeit attenuated findings were observed in the analyses of cases and hospitalized controls.Conclusions: In this matched case-control study, high socioeconomic status was associated with lower odds of in-hospital cardiac arrest compared to low socioeconomic status. The findings were consistent across household income, household assets, and education and persisted after adjustment for comorbidities. Strategies are needed to address the socioeconomic inequalities observed in the risk of in-hospital cardiac arrest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The primary results from the Vasopressin and Methylprednisolone for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (VAM-IHCA) trial have previously been reported. The objective of the current manuscript is to report long-term outcomes.Methods: The VAM-IHCA trial was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at ten hospitals in Denmark. Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) were eligible for the trial if they had an in-hospital cardiac arrest and received at least one dose of epinephrine during resuscitation. The trial drugs consisted of 40 mg methylprednisolone (Solu-Medrol®, Pfizer) and 20 IU of vasopressin (Empressin®, Amomed Pharma GmbH) given as soon as possible after the first dose of epinephrine. This manuscript report outcomes at 6 months and 1 year including survival, survival with favorable neurological outcome, and health-related quality of life.Results: 501 patients were included in the analysis. At 1 year, 15 patients (6.3%) in the intervention group and 22 patients (8.3%) in the placebo group were alive corresponding to a risk ratio of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.41-1.41). A favorable neurologic outcome at 1 year, based on the Cerebral Performance Category score, was observed in 14 patients (5.9%) in the intervention group and 20 patients (7.6%) in the placebo group (risk ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.41-1.49]. No differences existed between groups for favorable neurological outcome and health-related quality of life at either 6 months or 1 year.Conclusions: Administration of vasopressin and methylprednisolone, compared with placebo, in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest did not improve long-term outcomes in this trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This study investigated the changes in quality of life (QOL) after in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (IHCA) among survivors and examined the association between worsening QOL and 3-year all-cause mortality.Methods: This population-based cohort study used data from the National Health Insurance Service database in South Korea. Adult survivors who experienced IHCA between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2018, and were alive for over 1 year after IHCA were included. Worsening QOL among IHCA survivors was determined using three criteria: decreased household income, unemployment, and acquired disability.Results: A total of 22,611 IHCA survivors from 903 hospitals were included in the final analysis, and 7,796 (34.5%) experienced worsening QOL. Specifically, 5,595 (24.7%), 1,694 (7.5%), and 1,617 (7.2%) survivors experienced decreased household income, unemployment, and acquired disability, respectively. The proportion of brain lesion disability increased from 6.3% to 10.8% after IHCA. In multivariable Cox regression, worsening QOL was not associated with 3-year all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96, 1.11; P = 0.372). However, among the QOL factors, acquired disability was associated with a 1.29-fold higher risk of 3-year all-cause mortality among IHCA survivors (aHR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.15, 1.46; P < 0.001).Conclusion: Approximately one-third of IHCA survivors experienced worsening QOL (decreased household income, unemployment, and acquired disability) at 1-year follow-up after IHCA in South Korea. Although overall worsening of QOL was not associated with 3-year all-cause mortality, acquired disability was associated with increased 3-year all-cause mortality among IHCA survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to identify factors associated with neurological and disability outcomes in patients who underwent ECMO following cardiac arrest. This retrospective, single-center, observational study included adult patients who received ECMO treatment for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) between February 2016 and March 2020. Factors associated with neurological and disability outcomes in these patients who underwent ECMO were assessed. Hamad General Hospital, Qatar. Neurological disability outcomes were assessed using the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale. Among the 48 patients included, 37 (77 %) experienced OHCA, and 11 (23 %) had IHCA. The 28-day survival rate was 14 (29.2 %). Of the survivors, 9 (64.3 %) achieved a good neurological outcome, while 5 (35.7 %) experienced poor neurological outcomes. Regarding disability, 5 (35.7 %) of survivors had no disability, while 9 (64.3 %) had some form of disability. The results showed significantly shorter median time intervals in minutes, including collapse to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (3 vs. 6, P = 0.001), CPR duration (12 vs. 35, P = 0.001), CPR to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) (20 vs. 40, P = 0.001), and collapse-to-ECPR (23 vs. 45, P = 0.001), in the good outcome group compared to the poor outcome group. This study emphasizes the importance of minimizing the time between collapse and CPR/ECMO initiation to improve neurological outcomes and reduce disability in cardiac arrest patients. However, no significant associations were found between outcomes and other demographic or clinical variables in this study. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to validate these findings. The study underscores the significance of reducing the time between collapse and the initiation of CPR and ECMO. Shorter time intervals were associated with improved neurological outcomes and reduced disability in cardiac arrest patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We aimed to investigate the association of recent team leader simulation training (<6 months) and years of clinical experience (≥4 years) with chest compression quality during in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). This cohort study of IHCA in four Danish hospitals included cases with data on chest compression quality and team leader characteristics. We assessed the impact of recent simulation training and experienced team leaders on longest chest compression pause duration (primary outcome), chest compression fraction (CCF), and chest compression rates within guideline recommendations using mixed effects models. Of 157 included resuscitation attempts, 45% had a team leader who recently participated in simulation training and 66% had an experienced team leader. The median team leader experience was 7 years [Q1; Q3: 4; 11]. The median duration of the longest chest compression pause was 16 s [10; 30]. Having a team leader with recent simulation training was associated with significantly shorter longest pause durations (difference: −7.11 s (95%-CI: −12.0; −2.2), p = 0.004), a higher CCF (difference: 3% (95%-CI: 2.0; 4.0%), p < 0.001) and with less guideline compliant chest compression rates (odds ratio: 0.4 (95%-CI: 0.19; 0.84), p = 0.02). Having an experienced team leader was not associated with longest pause duration (difference: −1.57 s (95%-CI: −5.34; 2.21), p = 0.42), CCF (difference: 0.7% (95%-CI: −0.3; 1.7), p = 0.17) or chest compression rates within guideline recommendations (odds ratio: 1.55 (95%-CI: 0.91; 2.66), p = 0.11). Recent simulation training of team leaders, but not years of team leader experience, was associated with shorter chest compression pauses during IHCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Early studies found low survival rates for adults with COVID-19 infection and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). We evaluated the association of COVID-19 infection on survival outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).Methods: Within Get-With-The-Guidelines®-Resuscitation, we identified pediatric patients who underwent CPR for an IHCA or bradycardia with poor perfusion between March and December, 2020. We compared survival outcomes (survival to discharge and return of spontaneous circulation for ≥20 minutes [ROSC]) between patients with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 infection and non-COVID-19 patients using multivariable hierarchical regression, with hospital site as a random effect and patient and cardiac arrest variables with a significant (p < 0.05) bivariate association as fixed effects.Results: Overall, 1328 pediatric in-hospital CPR events were identified (590 IHCA, 738 bradycardia with poor perfusion), of which 46 (32 IHCA, 14 bradycardia) had suspected/confirmed COVID-19 infection. Rates of survival to discharge were similar between those with and without COVID-19 infection (39.1% vs. 44.9%; adjusted RR, 1.14 [95% CI: 0.55-2.36]), and these estimates were similar for those with IHCA and bradycardia with poor perfusion (adjusted RRs of 1.03 and 1.05; interaction p = 0.96). Rates of ROSC were also similar between pediatric patients with and without COVID-19 overall (67.4% vs. 76.9%; adjusted RR, 0.87 [0.43, 1.77]), and for the subgroups with IHCA or bradycardia requiring CPR (adjusted RRs of 0.95 and 0.86, interaction p = 0.26).Conclusions: In a large multicenter national registry of CPR events, COVID-19 infection was not associated with lower rates of ROSC or survival to hospital discharge in pediatric patients undergoing CPR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We studied the association between cardiorenal function and survival, neurological outcome and trends in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).Methods: We included cases aged ≥ 18 years in the Swedish Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Registry during 2008 to 2020. The CKD-EPI equation was used to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). A history of heart failure was defined according to contemporary guideline criteria. Logistic regression was used to study survival. Neurological outcome was assessed using cerebral performance category (CPC).Results: We studied 22,819 patients with IHCA. The 30-day survival was 19.3%, 16.6%, 22.5%, 28.8%, 39.3%, 44.8% and 38.4% in cases with eGFR < 15, 15-29, 30-44, 45-59, 60-89, 90-130 and 130-150 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively. All eGFR levels below and above 90 ml/min/1.73 m2 were associated with increased mortality. Probability of survival at 30 days was 62% lower in cases with eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73 m2, compared with normal kidney function. At every level of eGFR, presence of heart failure increased mortality markedly; patients without heart failure displayed higher mortality only at eGFR below 30 ml/min/1.73 m2. Among survivors with eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73 m2, good neurological outcome was noted in 87.2%. Survival increased in most groups over time, but most for those with eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73 m2, and least for those with normal eGFR.Conclusions: All eGFR levels below and above normal range are associated with increased mortality and this association is modified by the presence of heart failure. Neurological outcome is good in the majority of cases, across kidney function levels and survival is increasing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a score to accurately predict the probability of death for adult extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). ECPR is being increasingly used to treat refractory in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), but survival varies from 20% to 40%. Adult patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for IHCA (ECPR) were identified from the American Heart Association GWTG-R (Get With the Guidelines–Resuscitation) registry. A multivariate survival prediction model and score were developed to predict hospital death. Findings were externally validated in a separate cohort of patients from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry who underwent ECPR for IHCA. A total of 1,075 patients treated with ECPR were included. Twenty-eight percent survived to discharge in both the derivation and validation cohorts. A total of 6 variables were associated with in-hospital death: age, time of day, initial rhythm, history of renal insufficiency, patient type (cardiac vs noncardiac and medical vs surgical), and duration of the cardiac arrest event, which were combined into the RESCUE-IHCA (Resuscitation Using ECPR During IHCA) score. The model had good discrimination (area under the curve: 0.719; 95% CI: 0.680-0.757) and acceptable calibration (Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit P = 0.079). Discrimination was fair in the external validation cohort (area under the curve: 0.676; 95% CI: 0.606-0.746) with good calibration (P = 0.66), demonstrating the model's ability to predict in-hospital death across a wide range of probabilities. The RESCUE-IHCA score can be used by clinicians in real time to predict in-hospital death among patients with IHCA who are treated with ECPR. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• The trend of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) cardiac arrest has worsened over the past decade. • Coronary interventions and defibrillators/ pacemakers had survival benefits. • Ventricular assist devices did not improve mortality rates in NSTEMI cardiac arrest patients. • The trend of coronary intervention and rhythm devices implantation was steady over the years 2009-2018. Literature regarding outcomes of cardiac arrest with associated NSTEMI is limited. We aim to study the predictors and survival outcomes of cardiac arrest patients presenting to the emergency department who were diagnosed with non-ST elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Data from the nationwide emergency department sample (NEDS) that constitutes 20% sample of hospital-owned emergency departments in the United States was analyzed for the cardiac arrest related visits from 2009–2018. Cardiac arrest was defined by the ICD codes. Out of 3,235,555 cardiac arrests (mean age 64.0 ± 19.5 years, 40.7% females) there were 163,970 (5.1%) patients diagnosed with NSTEMI during the years 2009-2018. Among cardiac arrest patients, the survival for NSTEMI patients was higher than patients without NSTEMI (46.7% vs. 22.7%). These patients were more likely to be males and elderly. Among the predictors for NSTEMI cardiac arrests, hypertension (OR 1.12, p < 0.001), peripheral vascular disease (OR 1.16, p < 0.001), prior-coronary artery bypass graft (OR 1.20, p < 0.001) were the predominant ones. Cardiovascular interventions were more common in NSTEMI cardiac arrests and were associated with lower mortality rates (p < 0.001). However, trend for coronary interventions remained steady over study years. We observed an increase in prevalence of NSTEMI cardiac arrests with a worsening trend in survival from 2009–2018. NSTEMI was not uncommon in patients with cardiac arrest. NSTEMI cardiac arrest had a better prognosis than patients without NSTEMI. Cardiovascular interventions might have survival benefits. More research is required to identify NSTEMI in cardiac arrest patients and further evaluate the effect of cardiovascular interventions on survival. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• In mainland China, the DNR rate among IHCA patients is low. • Female, older age, being a local resident, pulmonary infection, respiratory insufficiency, state of shock, acute stroke, neurological dysfunction and cancer were independently associated with a higher DNR rate. • Patients with new-onset coronary artery disease were less likely to create DNR orders. Studies concerning do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in mainland China are rather scarce. We explored the prevalence and related factors of DNR orders among in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) patients at a general tertiary hospital in mainland China. We identified all IHCA patients hospital-wide between July 2019 and September 2020. Data regarding DNR status were collected from medical records. We investigated the frequency of DNR orders and explored the determinant factors of DNR establishment using logistic regression. A total of 1154 IHCA patients were included, 535 (46.4%) of whom established DNR orders. The following variables were independently associated with a higher DNR rate: female (OR 1.491; 95% CI 1.130–1.965), older age (OR 1.016; 95% CI 1.008–1.024), being a local resident (OR 1.790; 95% CI 1.344–2.383), pulmonary infection (OR 1.398; 95% CI 1052–1.859), respiratory insufficiency (OR 1.356; 95% CI 1.009–1.823), shock (OR 1.735; 95% CI 1.301–2.313), acute stroke (OR 1.821; 95% CI 1.235–2.686),neurological dysfunction (OR 1.527; 95% CI 1.149–2.028) and cancer (OR 3.316; 95% CI 2.461–4.468). Counterintuitively, patients with new-onset coronary artery disease (OR 0.592; 95% CI 0.419–0.837) were less likely to create DNR orders. In mainland China, the DNR order signing rate is low, and the establishment of a DNR order is associated with demographics and comorbidity characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Rehabilitation outcomes in cardiac arrest survivors are largely unknown, with no data comparing out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCA). This study aimed to describe and compare inpatient rehabilitation outcomes in these patients who were admitted from intensive care units (ICU).Methods: A retrospective linkage and analysis of cardiac arrest patients in the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database and the Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre inpatient dataset discharged to inpatient rehabilitation between January 2017 and June 2018. Primary outcome was the functional improvement during rehabilitation (difference between the Functional Independence Measurement (FIM) score on admission and discharge). Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with functional improvement.Results: In the 240 (84 OHCA and 156 IHCA) patients included, the median length of inpatient rehabilitation was 15 days [1st-3rd quartile (Q1-Q3): 9-24]. OHCA patients were more likely to be admitted to rehabilitation for neurological issues (41.7%) and IHCA for medical reasons (51.9%). Median (Q1-Q3) change in total FIM scores was similar between the two groups (24.5[10-37]) vs 21[11-31], adjusted p = 0.20), with most of the FIM change seen in the motor items, and this was only associated with a lower admission FIM score. The majority of OHCA and IHCA patients were discharged home (91.5% and 89.7%, respectively), although with an increased need for a carer at home compared to baseline (27.2% to 55.6%).Conclusion: Patients discharged from ICU following OHCA and IHCA achieved reasonable and similar functional improvement during inpatient rehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This observational cohort study aimed to identify factors associated with pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and asystole in in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) patients and to determine whether differences in outcome based on the initial rhythm were explained by patient- and cardiac arrest characteristics.Methods: Adults with IHCA from 2017 to 2018 were included from the Danish IHCA Registry (DANARREST). Additional data came from population-based registries. Unadjusted (RRs) and adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) were estimated for predictors of initial rhythm, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and survival.Results: We included 1495 PEA and 1285 asystole patients. The patients did not differ substantially in patient characteristics. Female sex, age>90 years, pulmonary disease, and obesity were associated with initial asystole. Ischemic heart disease and witnessed and monitored cardiac arrest were associated with initial PEA. In unadjusted and adjusted analyses, PEA was associated with increased ROSC (aRR = 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10; 1.33). PEA was also associated with increased 30-day and 1-year survival in the unadjusted analysis, while there was no clear association between the initial rhythm and 30-day (aRR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.71; 1.11) and 1-year (aRR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.69; 1.04) survival when patient- and cardiac arrest characteristics were adjusted for.Conclusion: In patients with IHCA presenting with PEA or asystole, there were no major differences in patient demographics and comorbidities. The patients differed substantially in cardiac arrest characteristics. Initial PEA was associated with higher risk of ROSC, but there was no difference in 30-day and 1-year survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: While specific factors have been associated with outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest, the association between sex and outcomes remains debated. Moreover, age-specific sex differences in outcomes have not been fully characterized in this population.Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years) with an index in-hospital cardiac arrest were included from the Danish In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry (DANARREST) from January 1st, 2017 to December 31st, 2018. Population-based registries were used to obtain data on patient characteristics, cardiac arrest characteristics, and outcomes. Unadjusted and adjusted estimates for return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to 30 days, survival to one year, duration of resuscitation, and post-cardiac arrest time-to-death were computed.Results: A total of 3266 patients were included, of which 2041 (62%) patients were male with a median age of 73 years (quartiles: 64, 80). Among 1225 (38%) female patients, the median age was 76 years (quartiles: 67, 83). Younger age was associated with higher odds of ROSC and survival. Sex was not associated with ROSC and survival in the unadjusted analyses. In the adjusted analyses, women had 1.32 (95%CI: 1.12, 1.54) times the odds of survival to 30 days and 1.26 (95%CI: 1.02, 1.57) times the odds of survival to one year compared to men. The overall association between sex and survival did not vary substantially across age categories, although female sex was associated with a higher survival within certain age categories. Among patients who did not achieve ROSC, female sex was associated with a shorter duration of resuscitation, which was more pronounced in younger age categories.Conclusions: In this study of patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest, female sex was associated with a shorter duration of resuscitation among patients without ROSC but a higher survival to 30 days and one year. While the overall association between sex and outcomes did not vary substantially across age categories, female sex was associated with a higher survival within certain age categories. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: International and national guidelines support in-hospital, family-witnessed resuscitation, provided that patients are not negatively affected. Empirical evidence regarding whether family presence interferes with resuscitation procedures is still scarce. The aim was to describe the prevalence and processes of family-witnessed resuscitation in hospitalised adult patients, and to investigate associations between family-witnessed resuscitation and the outcomes of resuscitation.Methods: Nationwide observational cohort study based on data from the Swedish Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.Results: In all, 3257 patients with sudden, in-hospital cardiac arrests were included. Of those, 395 had family on site (12%), of whom 186 (6%) remained at the scene. It was more common to offer family the option to stay during resuscitation if the cardiac arrest occurred in emergency departments, intensive-care units or cardiac-care units, compared to hospital wards (44% vs. 26%, p < 0.001). It was also more common for a staff member to be assigned to take care of family in acute settings (68% vs. 56%, p = 0.017). Mean time from cardiac arrest to termination of resuscitation was longer in the presence of family (20.67 min vs. 17.49 min, p = 0.020), also when controlling for different patient and contextual covariates in a regression model (Stand(β) 0.039, p = 0.027). No differences were found between family-witnessed and non-family-witnessed resuscitation in survival immediately after resuscitation (57% vs. 53%, p = 0.291) or after 30 days (35% vs. 29%, p = 0.086).Conclusions: In-hospital, family-witnessed resuscitation is uncommon, but the processes and outcomes do not seem to be negatively affected, suggesting that staff should routinely invite family to witness resuscitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Guideline deviations with impact on patient outcomes frequently occur during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, barriers and facilitators for preventing these guideline deviations are understudied. We aimed to characterize challenges occurring during IHCA and identify barriers and facilitators perceived by actual team members immediately following IHCA events.Methods: This was a prospective multicenter clinical study. Following each resuscitation attempt in 6 hospitals over a 4-year period, we immediately sent web-based structured questionnaires to all responding team members, reporting their perceived resuscitation quality, teamwork, and communication and what they perceived as barriers or facilitators. Comments were analyzed using qualitative inductive thematic analysis methodology.Results: We identified 924 resuscitation attempts and 3,698 survey responses were collected including 2,095 qualitative comments (response rate: 65%). Most frequent challenges were overcrowding (27%) and poor ergonomics/choreography of people in the room (17%). Narrative comments aligned into 24 unique barrier and facilitator themes in 4 domains: 6 related to treatment (most prevalent: CPR, rhythm check, equipment), 7 for teamwork (most prevalent: role allocation, crowd control, collaboration with ward staff), 6 for leadership (most prevalent: visible and distinct leader, multiple leaders, leader experience), and 5 for communication (most prevalent: closed loops, atmosphere in room, speaking loud/clear).Conclusion: Using novel, immediate after-event survey methodology of individual cardiac arrest team members, we characterized challenges and identified 24 themes within 4 domains that were barriers and facilitators for in-hospital resuscitation teams. We believe this level of detail is necessary to contextualize guidelines and training to facilitate high-quality resuscitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• The COVID-19 Code Blue protocol introduced delays in resuscitation care processes. • CPR quality measures were maintained and good, but peri-shock pauses lengthened. • Only a small number of COVID-19 positive cases were known at the time of IHCA. • The COVID-19 period was associated with poorer survival to hospital discharge. • There appeared to have been successful efforts to clarify goals of care early. We sought to evaluate the impact of a COVID-19 Code Blue policy on in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) processes of care, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality metrics, and survival to hospital discharge. We completed a health record review of consecutive IHCA for which resuscitation was attempted. We report Utstein outcomes and CPR quality metrics 33 months before (July,2017-March,2020) and after (April,2020-December,2022) the implementation of a COVID-19 Code Blue policy requiring all team members to don personal protective equipment including gown, gloves, mask, and eye protection for all IHCA. There were 800 IHCA with the following characteristics (Before n = 396; After n = 404): mean age 66, 62.9% male, 81.3% witnessed, 31.3% in the emergency department, 25.6% cardiac cause, and initial shockable rhythm in 16.7%. Among all 404 patients screened for COVID-19, 25 of 288 available test results before IHCA occurred were positive. Comparing the before and after periods: there were relevant time delays (min:sec) in start of chest compressions (0:17vs.0:37;p = 0.005), team arrival (0:43vs.1:21;p = 0.002), 1st rhythm analysis (1:15vs.3:16;p < 0.0001), 1st epinephrine (3:44vs.4:34;p = 0.02), and airway insertion (8:38vs. 10:18;p = 0.02). Resuscitation duration was similar (18:28vs.19:35;p = 0.34). Exception of peri-shock pause which appeared longer (0:06vs.0:14;p = 0.07), chest compression fraction, rate and depth were identical and good. Factors independently associated with survival were age (adjOR 0.98;p < 0.001), male sex (adjOR 1.51;p = 0.048), witnessed (adjOR 2.35;p = 0.02), shockable rhythm (adjOR 3.31;p < 0.0001), hospital location (p = 0.0002), and COVID-19 period (adjOR 0.68;p = 0.052). The COVID-19 Code Blue policy was associated with delayed processes of care but similarly good CPR quality. The COVID-19 period appeared associated with decreased survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• In this observational study of one of the largest in-hospital cardiac arrest databases we found that mechanical CPR was associated with decreased probability of survival to hospital discharge compared to manual CPR. • We found that mechanical CPR was associated with decreased likelihood of ROSC compared to manual CPR only. We sought to investigate the relationship between mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during in-hospital cardiac arrest and survival to hospital discharge. Utilizing the prospectively collected American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines database, we performed an observational study. Data from 153 institutions across the United States were reviewed with a total of 351,125 patients suffering cardiac arrest between 2011 and 2019 were screened. After excluding patients with cardiac arrests lasting less than 5 minutes, and patients who had incomplete data, a total of 111,143 patients were included. Our primary exposure was mechanical vs. manual CPR, and the primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Multivariate logistic regression models and propensity weighted analyses were used. 11.8% of patients who received mechanical CPR survived to hospital discharge versus 16.9% in the manual CPR group. Patients who received mechanical CPR had a lower probability of survival to discharge compared to patients who received manual CPR (OR 0.66 95% CI 0.58–0.75; p < 0.001). This association persisted with multi-variable adjustment (OR 0.57 95% CI 0.46–0.70, p < 0.0001) and propensity weighted analysis (OR 0.68 95% CI 0.44–0 0.92, p < 0.0001). Mechanical CPR was associated with decrease likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation after multivariate adjustment (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.60–0.76; p < 0.001). Mechanical CPR was associated with a decreased likelihood of survival to hospital discharge and ROSC compared to manual CPR. This finding should be interpreted within the context of important limitations of this study and randomized trials are needed to better investigate this relationship. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Nurses can analyze rhythm and shock quickly with an Automated External Defibrillator. • They were more likely to use an AED after watching a theory-based video. • Survival benefits were mostly seen in patients with a shockable rhythm. • Survival appeared to decrease in patients with non-shockable rhythms. • AED use is likely most appropriate when used before the Code Blue team's arrival. We sought to evaluate the impact of a medical directive allowing nurses to use defibrillators in automated external defibrillator-mode (AED) on in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) outcomes. We completed a health record review of consecutive IHCA for which resuscitation was attempted using a pragmatic multi-phase before-after cohort design. We report Utstein outcomes before (Jan.2012–Aug.2013;Control) the implementation of the AED medical directive following usual practice (Sept.2013–Aug.2016;Phase 1), and following the addition of a theory-based educational video (Sept.2016–Dec.2017;Phase 2). There were 753 IHCA with the following characteristics (Before n = 195; Phase 1n = 372; Phase 2n = 186): mean age 66, 60.0% male, 79.3% witnessed, 29.1% noncardiac-monitored medical ward, 23.9% cardiac cause, and initial ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia (VF/VT) 27.2%. Comparing the Before, Phase 1 and 2: an AED was used 0 time (0.0%), 21 times (5.7%), 15 times (8.1%); mean times to 1st analysis were 7 min, 3 min and 1 min (p < 0.0001); mean times to 1st shock were 12 min, 10 min and 8 min (p = 0.32); return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was 63.6%, 59.4% and 58.1% (p = 0.77); survival was 24.6%, 21.0% and 25.8% (p = 0.37). Among IHCA in VF/VT (n = 165), time to 1st analysis and 1st shock decreased by 5 min (p = 0.01) and 6 min (p = 0.23), and ROSC and survival increased by 3.0% (p = 0.80) and 15.6% (p = 0.31). There was no survival benefit overall (1.2%; p = 0.37) or within noncardiac-monitored areas (-7.2%; p = 0.24). The implementation of a medical directive allowing for AED use by nurses successfully improved key outcomes for IHCA victims, particularly following the theory-based education video and among the VF/VT group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Compliance with CPR guidelines in witnessed IHCA was higher on monitored wards. • Compliance with CPR guidelines was associated with increased survival to 30 days. • Compliance with CPR guidelines was associated with CPC-score 1–2 at discharge. • The place of arrest did not influence patient outcome in adjusted analysis. Adherence to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines in treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) have been associated with favourable patient outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate if compliance with initial CPR guidelines and patient outcome of witnessed IHCA events were associated with the place of arrest defined as monitored versus non-monitored ward. A total of 956 witnessed IHCA events in adult patients at six hospitals during 2018 to 2019, were extracted from the Swedish Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Initial CPR guidelines were: ≤1 min from collapse to alert of the rapid response team, ≤1 min from collapse to start of CPR, ≤3 min from collapse to defibrillation of shockable rhythm. The odds of compliance with guidelines was higher on monitored wards vs non-monitored wards, even after adjustment for factors that could affect staffing and resources. The place of arrest was not a significant factor for sustained return of spontaneous circulation, survival at 30 days, or neurological status at discharge, when adjusting for clinically relevant confounders. Compliance with initial CPR guidelines remained a significant factor for survival to 30 days and favourable neurological outcome at discharge regardless of other confounders. Compliance with initial CPR guidelines was higher in witnessed IHCA events on monitored wards than on non-monitored wards, which indicates that healthcare professionals in monitored wards are quicker to recognize a cardiac arrest and initiate treatment. When initial CPR guidelines are followed, the place of arrest does not influence patient outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improved systemic hemodynamics and outcomes in a preclinical model of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and may also have a neuroprotective role following cardiac arrest. The primary objectives of this study were to determine if iNO during CPR would improve cerebral hemodynamics and mitochondrial function in a pediatric model of lipopolysaccharide-induced shock-associated IHCA.Methods: After lipopolysaccharide infusion and ventricular fibrillation induction, 20 1-month-old piglets received hemodynamic-directed CPR and were randomized to blinded treatment with or without iNO (80 ppm) during and after CPR. Defibrillation attempts began at 10 min with a 20-min maximum CPR duration. Cerebral tissue from animals surviving 1-h post-arrest underwent high-resolution respirometry to evaluate the mitochondrial electron transport system and immunohistochemical analyses to assess neuropathology.Results: During CPR, the iNO group had higher mean aortic pressure (41.6 ± 2.0 vs. 36.0 ± 1.4 mmHg; p = 0.005); diastolic BP (32.4 ± 2.4 vs. 27.1 ± 1.7 mmHg; p = 0.03); cerebral perfusion pressure (25.0 ± 2.6 vs. 19.1 ± 1.8 mmHg; p = 0.02); and cerebral blood flow relative to baseline (rCBF: 243.2 ± 54.1 vs. 115.5 ± 37.2%; p = 0.02). Among the 8/10 survivors in each group, the iNO group had higher mitochondrial Complex I oxidative phosphorylation in the cerebral cortex (3.60 [3.56, 3.99] vs. 3.23 [2.44, 3.46] pmol O2/s mg; p = 0.01) and hippocampus (4.79 [4.35, 5.18] vs. 3.17 [2.75, 4.58] pmol O2/s mg; p = 0.02). There were no other differences in mitochondrial respiration or brain injury between groups.Conclusions: Treatment with iNO during CPR resulted in superior systemic hemodynamics, rCBF, and cerebral mitochondrial Complex I respiration in this pediatric cardiac arrest model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Current American Heart Association Pediatric Life Support (PLS) guidelines do not recommend the routine use of sodium bicarbonate (SB) during cardiac arrest in pediatric patients. However, SB administration during pediatric resuscitation is still common in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of SB on mortality and neurological outcomes in pediatric patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest.Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to January 2021. We included studies of pediatric patients that had two treatment arms (treated with SB or not treated with SB) during in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE system.Results: We included 7 observational studies with a total of 4877 pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Meta-analysis showed that SB administration during pediatric cardiac resuscitation was associated with a significantly decreased rate of survival to hospital discharge (odds ratio [OR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.63, p value = 0.0003). There were insufficient studies for 24-h survival and neurologic outcomes analysis. The subgroup analysis showed a significantly decreased rate of survival to hospital discharge in both the "before 2010" subgroup (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.30-0.73; p value = 0.006) and the "after 2010" subgroup (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.25-0.87; p value = 0.02). The certainty of evidence ranged from very low to low.Conclusions: This meta-analysis of non-randomized studies supported current PLS guideline that routine administration of SB is not recommended in pediatric cardiac arrest except in special resuscitation situations.Trial Registration: The protocol was registered with PROSPERO on 8 August 2020 (registration number: CRD42020197837). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Cognitive bias has been recognized as a potential source of medical error as it may affect clinical decision making. In this study, we explored how cognitive bias, specifically left-digit bias, may affect patient outcomes in in-hospital cardiac arrest.Methods: Using the Get With The Guidelines® - Resuscitation registry, we included adult patients with an in-hospital cardiac arrest from 2011 to 2019. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation, favorable neurological outcome, and duration of resuscitation. Using a regression discontinuity design, we explored whether there was a sudden change in survival at the age threshold of 80 years which would indicate left-digit bias. Additional analyses were performed at age thresholds of 60, 70, and 90 years.Results: A total of 26,784 patients were included for the primary analysis. The overall survival was 22% in this cohort. There was no discontinuity of survival below and above the age of 80 years (risk difference, 0.47%; 95%CI, -1.61% to 2.56%). Similar results were estimated for the secondary outcomes and for the age thresholds of 60, 70, and 90 years. The results were consistent in sensitivity analyses.Conclusions: There was no indication that cognitive bias based on age affected outcomes in in-hospital cardiac arrest in these data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The surgical indications for acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) in patients in cardiopulmonary arrest remain controversial. Outcomes of AAAD for patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were evaluated. Between 2004 and 2018, of the 519 patients who underwent AAAD repair, 34 (6.6%) required CPR before or on starting AAAD repair. The patients were divided into 2 groups, survivors (n = 13) and nonsurvivors (n = 21), to compare the early operative outcomes, including mortality and neurological events. The major cause of cardiovascular collapse requiring CPR was aortic rupture/cardiac tamponade (n = 21 [61.8%]), followed by coronary malperfusion (n = 12 [35.3%]) and acute aortic valve regurgitation (n = 3 [8.8%]). There were 3 (23.1%) patients in the survivors group and 11 (52.4%) in the nonsurvivors group who required ongoing CPR at the beginning of AAAD repair (P =.039). Of these patients, 1 survivor and 6 nonsurvivors could not achieve return of spontaneous circulation after pericardiotomy (P =.045). Although the duration from onset or arrival to the operating room was similar (P =.35 and P =.49, respectively), overall duration of CPR was shorter in survivors (10 minutes [range, 7.5-16 minutes] vs 16.5 minutes [range, 15-20 minutes]; P =.044). All survivors without any neurological deficits showed return of spontaneous circulation after pericardiotomy. Multivariate regression modeling showed that CPR duration >15 minutes was a significant risk factor for in-hospital mortality (P =.0040). CPR duration beyond 15 minutes may be a contraindication for AAAD repair. Moreover, we should reconsider surgery for patients who cannot achieve return of spontaneous circulation after pericardiotomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused over 1 200 000 deaths worldwide as of November 2020. However, little is known about the clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients with active COVID-19 after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).Aim: We aimed to characterize outcomes from IHCA in patients with COVID-19 and to identify patient- and hospital-level variables associated with 30-day survival.Methods: We conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study across 11 academic medical centres in the U.S. Adult patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation and/or defibrillation for IHCA between March 1, 2020 and May 31, 2020 who had a documented positive test for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 were included. The primary outcome was 30-day survival after IHCA.Results: There were 260 IHCAs among COVID-19 patients during the study period. The median age was 69 years (interquartile range 60-77), 71.5% were male, 49.6% were White, 16.9% were Black, and 16.2% were Hispanic. The most common presenting rhythms were pulseless electrical activity (45.0%) and asystole (44.6%). ROSC occurred in 58 patients (22.3%), 31 (11.9%) survived to hospital discharge, and 32 (12.3%) survived to 30 days. Rates of ROSC and 30-day survival in the two hospitals with the highest volume of IHCA over the study period compared to the remaining hospitals were considerably lower (10.8% vs. 64.3% and 5.9% vs. 35.7% respectively, p < 0.001 for both).Conclusions: We found rates of ROSC and 30-day survival of 22.3% and 12.3% respectively. There were large variations in centre-level outcomes, which may explain the poor survival in prior studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To analyse the association of thoracic cage size and configuration with outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).Methods: A single-centred retrospective study was conducted. Adult patients experiencing IHCA during 2006-2015 were screened. By analysing computed tomography images, we measured thoracic anterior-posterior and transverse diameters, circumference, and both anterior and posterior subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) depths at the level of the internipple line (INL). We also recorded the anatomical structure located immediately posterior to the sternum at the INL.Results: A total of 649 patients were included. The median thoracic circumference was 88.6 cm. The median anterior and posterior thoracic SAT depths were 0.9 and 1.5 cm, respectively. The ascending aorta was found to be the most common retrosternal structure (57.6%) at the INL. Multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that anterior thoracic SAT depth of 0.8-1.6 cm (odds ratio [OR]: 2.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.40-6.35; p-value = 0.005) and thoracic circumference of 83.9-95.0 cm (OR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.16-5.29; p-value = 0.02) were positively associated with a favourable neurological outcome while left ventricular outflow track or aortic root beneath sternum at the level of INL was inversely associated with a favourable neurological outcome (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15-0.91; p-value = 0.03).Conclusion: Thoracic circumference and anatomic configuration might be associated with IHCA outcomes. This proof-of-concept study suggested that a one-size-fits-all resuscitation technique might not be suitable. Further investigation is needed to investigate the method of providing personalized resuscitation tailored to patient needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cardiac arrests are often categorized into two separate groups depending on the location of the arrest: in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Despite this distinction, few studies have compared the two groups directly. The aim of this study was to compare patient characteristics, cardiac arrest characteristics, and outcomes for IHCA and OHCA patients.Methods: Data on IHCA and OHCA in Denmark were obtained from two nationwide, prospective registries. All adult (≥18 years old) patients with index IHCA or OHCA from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018 were included. Supplementary information on outcomes, hospitalizations, and chronic diseases came from additional national registries. The primary outcome was 30-day survival and secondary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and 1-year survival.Results: The study included 3501 patients with IHCA and 8846 patients with OHCA. The two groups were similar in demographics, most comorbidities, and initial cardiac arrest rhythm. In the unadjusted analysis, IHCA was associated with increased survival to 30 days compared to OHCA (risk ratio [RR] = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.30; 1.54) and 1 year (RR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.33; 1.61). Adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities did not change the RR substantially. When cardiac arrest characteristics were added to the model, the RR decreased from 1.51 (95% CI, 1.39; 1.65) to 1.06 (95% CI, 0.93; 1.20) for survival to 30 days and from 1.66 (95% CI, 1.50; 1.84) to 1.09 (95% CI, 0.94; 1.26) for survival to 1 year. In all subgroup analyses based on cardiac arrest characteristics (e.g. witnessed status), the association between location and outcome was substantially mitigated compared to the primary analyses.Conclusions: In this large, national study, we found that IHCA and OHCA patients were remarkably similar in demographics and most comorbidities. IHCA patients had better outcomes compared to OHCA patients, although these differences disappeared when comparing patients with similar cardiac arrest characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To identify factors associated with the initial rhythm in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest and to assess whether potential differences in outcomes based on the initial rhythm can be explained by patient and event characteristics.Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years old) with in-hospital cardiac arrest in 2017 and 2018 were included from the Danish In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry (DANARREST). We used population-based registries to obtain data on comorbidities, cardiac procedures, and medications. Unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (RRs) for initial rhythm, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and survival were estimated in separate models including an incremental number of prespecified variables.Results: A total of 3422 patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest were included, of which 639 (19%) had an initial shockable rhythm. Monitored cardiac arrest, witnessed cardiac arrest, and specific cardiac diseases (i.e. ischemic heart disease, dysrhythmias, and valvular heart disease) were associated with initial shockable rhythm. Conversely, higher age, female sex, and specific non-cardiovascular comorbidities (e.g. overweight and obesity, renal disease, and pulmonary cancer) were associated with an initial non-shockable rhythm. Initial shockable rhythm remained strongly associated with increased ROSC (RR = 1.63, 95%CI 1.51-1.76), 30-day survival (RR = 2.31, 95%CI 2.02-2.64), and 1-year survival (RR = 2.36, 95%CI 2.02-2.76) compared to initial non-shockable rhythm in the adjusted analyses.Conclusion: In this study, specific patient and cardiac arrest characteristics were associated with initial rhythm in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest. However, differences in patient and cardiac arrest characteristics did not fully explain the association with survival for initial shockable rhythm compared to a non-shockable rhythm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To assess whether any clinical decision rule for patients sustaining an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) can predict mortality or survival with poor neurological outcome.Methods: We searched online databases from inception through July 2020 for randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies. Two reviewers assessed studies for inclusion. We followed PRISMA guidelines for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies framework to evaluate risk of bias, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to evaluate certainty of evidence. We assessed predictive values for no return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), death before hospital discharge, and survival with unfavorable neurological outcome.Results: Out of 6436 studies, 92 studies were selected for full-text screening. We included 3 observational studies describing the derivation and external validation for the UN10 rule (Unwitnessed arrest; Nonshockable rhythm; 10 min of resuscitation without ROSC) amongst patients suffering from IHCA. No studies were identified for clinical implementation. Positive Predicted Values (PPV) for death before hospital discharge for the three studies were 100% (95% CI: 97.1%-100%), 98.9% (95% CI: 96.5%-99.7%), and 93.7% (95% CI: 93.3%-94.0%). One study reported a PPV for prediction of survival with unfavorable neurological outcome, 95.2% (95% CI: 94.9%-95.6%). The level of evidence was rated as very low certainty.Conclusions: We identified very low certainty evidence for one clinical decision rule (the UN-10 rule) that was unable to reliably predict mortality or survival with unfavorable neurological outcome for adults suffering from IHCA. We identified no evidence for children. PROSPERO CRD42020164091. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Prompt identification and management of patients having clinical deterioration on wards is one of the key steps to reduce in-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCA). Our organization implemented a novel Automated Code Blue Alert and Activation (ACBAA) system since 1st March 2018.Methods: We conducted a retrospective before-and-after ACBAA system implementation study in JurongHealth Campus (JHC) of National University Health system (NUHS), Singapore. In JHC, code blue can be activated by both manual activation and ACBAA system activation from 1st March 2018. The ACBAA system will be activated when any of the pre-defined peri-arrest criteria is met. The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of IHCA. The secondary outcome included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) of IHCA and in-hospital survival to home discharge of code blue activation.Outcomes: The incidence of IHCA per 1000 hospital admissions after-ACBAA system implementation was 14.6% lower than before-ACBAA system though not statistically significant [relative risk (RR): 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-1.34, P > 0.05]. Compared to the before-ACBAA system period, the after-ACBAA system period had a trend for higher rate of survival to home discharge after IHCA (RR: 2.13, 95% CI 0.65-6.93, P > 0.05) with good neurological outcome.Conclusions: Implementation of a novel ACBAA system has shown a trend in reducing IHCA incidence. In the era of digitalised healthcare system, the ACBAA system is practical and advisable to implement in order to reduce IHCA. Further studies are required to validate the criteria for peri-arrest code blue activation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine changes over time in 30-day survival and the incidence of shockable rhythms after in-hospital cardiac arrest, from a countrywide perspective.Methods: Patient information from the Swedish Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation was analysed in relation to monitoring level of ward and initial rhythm. The primary outcome was defined as survival at 30 days. Changes in survival and incidence of shockable rhythms were reported per year from 2008 to 2018. Also, epidemiological data were compared between two time periods, 2008-2013 and 2014-2018.Results: In all, 23,186 unique patients (38.6% female) were included in the study. The mean age was 72.6 (SD 13.2) years. Adjusted trends indicated an overall increase in 30-day survival from 24.7% in 2008 to 32.5% in 2018, (on monitoring wards from 32.5% to 43.1% and on non-monitoring wards from 17.6% to 23.1%). The proportion of patients found in shockable rhythms decreased overall from 31.6% in 2008 to 23.6% in 2018, (on monitoring wards from 42.5% to 35.8 % and on non-monitoring wards from 20.1% to 12.9%). Among the patients found in shockable rhythms, the proportion of patients defibrillated before the arrival of cardiac arrest team increased from 71.0% to 80.9%.Conclusions: In an 11-year perspective, resuscitation in in-hospital cardiac arrest in Sweden was characterised by an overall increase in the adjusted 30-day survival, despite a decrease in shockable rhythms. An increased proportion, among the patients found in a shockable rhythm, who were defibrillated before the arrival of a cardiac arrest team may have contributed to the finding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Long-term functional outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) are scarcely studied. However, survivors are at risk of neurological impairment from anoxic brain damage which could affect quality of life and lead to need of care at home or in a nursing home.Methods: We linked data on ICHAs in Denmark with nationwide registries to report 30-day survival as well as factors associated with survival. Furthermore, among 30-day survivors we reported the one-year cumulative risk of anoxic brain damage or nursing home admission with mortality as the competing risk.Results: In total, 517 patients (27.3%) survived to day 30 out of 1892 eligible patients; 338 (65.9%) were men and median age was 68 (interquartile range 58-76). Lower age, witnessed arrest by health care personnel, monitored arrest and presumed cardiac cause of arrest were associated with 30-day survival. Among 454 30-day survivors without prior anoxic brain damage or nursing home admission, the risk of anoxic brain damage or nursing home admission within the first-year post-arrest was 4.6% (n = 21; 95% CI 2.7-6.6%) with a competing risk of death of 15.6% (n = 71; 95% CI 12.3-19.0%), leaving 79.7% (n = 362) alive without anoxic brain damage or nursing home admission. When adding the risk of need of in-home care among 343 30-day survivors without prior home care needs, 68.8% (n = 236) were alive without any of the composite events one-year post-arrest.Conclusion: The majority of 30-day survivors of IHCA are alive at one-year follow-up without anoxic brain damage, nursing home admission or need of in-home care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) using an automated external defibrillator (AED) in non-monitored areas. Additionally, to detect correlated factors associated with rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival rate, among collected data.Methods: This study included 109 patients. After investigating patient characteristics and resuscitation-related factors, the correlated factors associated with ROSC rates and survival rate were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.Results: The rate of survival to hospital discharge was 21.1%. CPR with AED performed since 2013 was associated with a higher ROSC rate (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21 to 9.52, p < 0.05), but not with the survival rate after ROSC. Tracheal intubation was significantly associated with a higher ROSC rate (AOR 3.62, 95% CI: 1.27 to 11.7, p < 0.05) and a lower survival rate after ROSC (hazard ratio 6.6, 95% CI: 1.2 to 43.3, p < 0.05). Dysrhythmia as the cause of cardiac arrest and intensive care unit (ICU) admission after ROSC were associated with higher survival rates (hazard ratio 0.056, 95% CI: 0.004 to 0.759, p < 0.05, and hazard ratio 0.072, 95% CI: 0.017 to 0.264, p < 0.0001, respectively).Conclusions: The factors associated with ROSC rate and those associated with the survival rate after ROSC were different. Although initial shockable rhythms on AED were not associated with the survival rate, dysrhythmia as the etiology of cardiac arrest, and ICU admission were significantly associated with higher survival rates after ROSC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: We assessed the ability of the Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) and the Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis (CAHP) scores to predict neurological outcome following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).Methods: Retrospective review of a seven-year French multicentric database including ten intensive care units. Primary endpoint was the outcome at hospital discharge using the Cerebral Performance Category score (CPC) in all IHCA patients. OHCA and CAHP scores, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and the simplified acute physiological score 2 (SAPS-2) were compared using area under ROC curves (AUROC) and Delong tests.Results: Among 381 included patients, 125 (33%) were discharged alive with favourable outcome (CPC 1-2). Among 256 patients (77%) with unfavourable outcome (CPC 3-5), 10 were discharged alive with CPC 3 (4%), 130 died from withdrawal of life sustaining therapies because of severe neurological impairment (51%), 107 died from multiorgan failure (42%) and 9 died after discharge from complications and comorbidities (3%). OHCA and CAHP scores were independently associated with unfavourable outcome. The AUROCs to predict unfavourable outcome for OHCA, CAHP, SAPS-2 and SOFA scores were 0.76 [0.70-0.80], 0.74 [0.69-0.79], 0.72 [0.67-0.77], and 0.69 [0.64-0.74] respectively, with a significant difference observed only between OHCA and SOFA scores AUROCs (p = 0.04).Conclusion: In parallel with CAHP score, OHCA score could be used to early predict outcome at hospital discharge after IHCA. However, prediction accuracy for all scores remains modest, suggesting the use of other dedicated means to early predict IHCA patients' outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Critically ill patients in intensive care units can frequently suffer from cardiac arrest (ICU-CA), the incidence of ICU-CA is associated with high mortality. Most studies on ICU-CA focused on risk factors and intra-arrest determinants. However, there is a lack of data on organ failure after ICU-CA and its clinical implications for outcome. This study aimed to investigate ICU-CA incidence, outcome and the occurrence of organ failure after ICU-CA.Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study over a 1-year at 12 intensive care units of a tertiary care university hospital. We included all consecutive adult patients suffering cardiac arrest (CA) during the ICU stay. Incidence, clinical and neurological outcome, as well as organ failure and support were assessed.Results: Out of 7690 patients, 176 (2%) with ICU-CA were identified during the study period. Male patients comprised 63% and the median age was 70 (58-78) years. The median ICU stay before ICU-CA was 3 (1-8) days. The initial cardiac rhythm was shockable (VT/VF) in 23% of patients; defibrillation during CPR was performed in 19%. The presumed cause of CA was cardiac in 24%, and sustained ROSC was observed in 80% of patients. Before CA 57% (n = 100) of patients were sedated, 63% (n = 110) mechanically ventilated, 70% needed vasopressor therapy and renal replacement therapy was necessary in 27% (n = 48) of patients. Organ failure after ICU-CA was common, 70% suffered from post-CA cardiac failure, renal replacement therapy was newly initiated in 26% of patients and liver failure occurred in 24% of patients. Mortality at ICU-discharge and at hospital discharge was 66 % and 68 %, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis identified the SOFA score [HR 1.09, 95% CI (0.92-3.18); p < 0.05] and liver failure [HR 2.44, 95% CI (1.39-4.26); p < 0.001] after ICU-CA as independent predictors of mortality.Conclusion: The incidence of ICU-CA is rare in critically ill patients. Organ failure before and after ICU-CA is common; liver failure incidence and severity of illness after ICU-CA are independent predictors of mortality and should be considered in further decisions on ICU therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Out of hospital cardiac arrests, especially those due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias, have higher incidence in the morning. It is unknown whether in-hospital cardiac arrests follow a similar pattern.Aim Of the Study: The purpose of this study was to analyze the circadian variation of in-hospital cardiac arrest incidence.Methods: This retrospective review of data from the multicenter Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry between 2000 and 2014 used multivariable hierarchical logistic regression analysis to examine circadian rhythm of in-hospital cardiac arrest over a 24-h cycle, stratified by initial shockable versus non-shockable rhythm.Results: Among 154,038 patients, initial rhythm was recorded as asystole or pulseless electrical activity (non-shockable) in 124,918 (81%), and ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia (shockable) in 29,120 (19%). Among non-shockable events, the highest relative proportion occurred during 0400-0759 (17.9%), followed by 0000-0359 (17.1%). For shockable rhythms the greatest relative proportion occurred between 2000-2359 (17.0%), followed by 1200-1559 (16.9%). Multivariable analysis showed that the relative risk of non-shockable compared to shockable arrest was slightly higher from midnight through 0359 (aOR 1.13; 95% CI 1.06-1.20, p < 0.001) and from 0400 through 0759 h (aOR 1.14; 95% CI 1.07-1.22, p < 0.001). Although statistically significant, the magnitude of difference in incidence by time of day was small in both groups.Conclusions: Although small differences in the relative frequency of in-hospital cardiac arrest (both shockable and non-shockable rhythms) were noted during different time intervals, in-hospital cardiac arrest occurs with nearly equal frequency throughout the day. Our findings have important implications for hospital staffing models to ensure that quality of resuscitation care is consistent regardless of time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Double/dual defibrillation (DD) has been proposed as an alternative treatment for refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF). This topic has been poorly researched and data on survival rates are limited.Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates whether DD improves outcomes among patients with refractory VF in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest compared with standard defibrillation.Methods: A literature search was conducted on July 20, 2019 using MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. We gave all results as a pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed by calculating the I2 statistic and was deemed significant for a p value of < 0.10 or I2 ≥ 50%. The quality of evidence was evaluated according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines.Results: We included 27 records, of which 4 cohort studies totaling 1061 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. Of these, 20.5% (n = 217) received the intervention. DD had no effect on return of spontaneous circulation (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.44-1.04; I2 = 41%, p = 0.08) (GRADE: Very low), survival to admission (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.51-1.17; I2 = 18%, p = 0.22) (GRADE: Very low), or survival to discharge (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.38-1.15; I2 = 0%, p = 0.14) (GRADE: Very low).Conclusions: DD did not improve any outcomes of interest. Therefore, it is imperative that a well-designed study in this area be conducted. Ideally, conducting a randomized controlled trial in this population should be attempted to obtain a higher level of scientific evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Conflicting data exists regarding the association between sex and mortality in adults with in-hospital (IHCA) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We therefore conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the association between sex and mortality in adults with IHCA and OHCA.Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE and Cochrane databases to identify studies reporting sex-specific mortality in adults following IHCA or OHCA from inception to April 2020. Data were pooled using random-effects models. The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital (or 30-day) all-cause mortality.Results: We included 21 observational studies with a total of 1,029,978 adult patients - 622,085 men and 407,893 women. Seven studies included patients only with IHCA and 14 studies included patients only with OHCA. Female sex was associated with significantly higher mortality following OHCA [odds ratio (OR) 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32-1.84, p < 0.001) and a trend toward higher mortality following IHCA (OR 1.10, 95%CI 1.00-1.20, p = 0.052).Conclusions: In adults with cardiac arrest, female sex was associated with significantly higher mortality following OHCA and a trend toward higher mortality following IHCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To report the patient characteristics and clinical outcome of paediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom (UK) National Cardiac Arrest Audit (NCAA) database.Methods: Analysis of all recorded paediatric cardiac arrests in the NCAA dataset over a seven-year period ending on 31 December 2018, within acute children's hospitals (including standalone paediatric hospitals and hospitals with tertiary paediatric services) and acute general hospitals participating in NCAA. In this period 1456 patients (with 1580 events), 1 month to 16 years of age, received chest compressions and/or defibrillation and were attended by a hospital-based resuscitation team in response to an emergency call. The main outcome measure was survival to discharge.Results: For this cohort of paediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest patients the overall rates of sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) were 69.1% with unadjusted survival to hospital discharge of 54.2%. The presenting rhythm was shockable in 4.3% of events and non-shockable in 82.1% (remainder undetermined); rates of survival to hospital discharge associated with these rhythms were 63.9% and 51.7%. A difference in outcomes was observed between Children's hospitals and acute general hospitals with ROSC rates of 79.1% and 55.5% respectively and survival to hospital discharge rates of 57.7% and 49.3% respectively.Conclusions: These first results from the NCAA database describing the outcome of paediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in UK hospitals will serve as a benchmark from which to assess the future impact of changes in service delivery, organisation and treatment for in-hospital cardiac arrest in young people. Outcomes for specialist paediatric centres should be studied further as higher rates of ROSC and survival to hospital discharge were observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]