Search

[Display omitted] • A framework for evaluating land use efficiency was built from the perspective of decision-makers' preferences. • As the unexpected output increases, the overall efficiency decreases. • It is necessary to abandon the previous view of "development first" in order to improve overall efficiency. • The efficiency of compact land development is higher than that of the type of expansion. • A two-stage DEA model was constructed to evaluate the efficiency of land use systems. Land resources are not only the spatial carriers of social and economic development, but also the carriers of environmental and ecological services. With the accelerated urbanization, the non-coordinated development of land resources and environmental protection will restrict economic growth and the benefits of land use changes. Moreover, the economic efficiency and environmental efficiency of land use largely depend on the value judgment of the decision makers on the future human environment. Therefore, it is extremely important to achieve a win–win outcome of land development and ecological protection. In this research, a new analysis framework for land use efficiency was proposed from the perspective of decision makers' different benefit preferences. This framework uses the unexpected output of environmental pollution as a bridge to build a two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) model to evaluate the economic efficiency, environmental efficiency and overall efficiency of land development, and weight parameters were constructed to express decision-makers' preferences. The model not only considers the objectivity of the scores of land use efficiency, but also guarantees the subjectivity of decision-makers in land use management. This is also the biggest difference between previous studies in this study. The specific conclusions are: (I) as decision makers tend to focus on economic benefits, economic efficiency first rises and then declines. It can be seen that ignoring the problem of environmental pollution will reduce economic efficiency. (II) Generally speaking, the efficiency of compact land development (0.883) in various counties and cities in Taiwan is greater than the efficiency of expanded land development (0.737). This research can provide guidance on the distribution of land resources and the development of land space on a macro-regional scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Loess Plateau has been suffering from serious soil erosion for a long time, which originated in a population growth about 2000 years ago. After then, the rapid increase in human activity has led to more areas became used for grain production. Original vegetation has been destroyed and soil erosion has become more and more serious. Most research works indicate that the soil erosion on the Loess Plateau is mainly induced by irrational land use structure and low vegetation coverage. Controlling soil erosion is a significant factor in making a sustainable land use planning for the Loess Plateau. In this study, a procedure towards such a planning is presented, based on results from a research project in a small catchment on the Loess Plateau. A land suitability evaluation for rain-fed agriculture based on biophysical parameters, and a comparison between land suitability and current land use, were first carried out. Some potential land use scenarios, based on surveys on biophysical and socio-economic parameters in the catchment, and plans by the authorities, were proposed for further evaluation of their effects on soil erosion, economic feasibility and social acceptance. The scenarios were tested by (i) simulation modeling, to show the differences in erosion, and (ii) from studies on the influence of the scenarios on farmers'' economy and their response. The results indicated that the following land use scenario was acceptable: all land with deep soil and slopes smaller than 15° is used for agriculture cropland, possibly combined with biological conservation measures, such as mulching combined with improved fallow, and all land with steeper slopes than 15° is used for other purposes (orchards and other cash trees, woodland, shrubland, grassland). A great reduction of on-farm income, however, would be induced on the short term by such a scenario. Local farmers will find it difficult to accept it unless financial support from external sources is available. On the long term, the scenario will be promising for both economic income improvement and soil erosion control since some production will be obtained from the conversion of cropland into orchards/cash trees (preferably on slopes 15–25°). Thus the land use modification should be carried out gradually. On the short term (5 year), it is suggested that cropland on steeper slopes than 25° is returned to woodland/shrubland/grassland while also fruit trees are planted on slopes 15–25°. Within 10 years, cropland with slopes steeper than 15° is suggested to be converted into orchard/woodland/shrubland/grassland. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]