Search

Nonselective β blockers (NSBBs) facilitate the development of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in liver cirrhosis. Considering the potential effect of NSBBs on neutrophils and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), we speculated that NSBBs might promote the development of PVT by stimulating neutrophils to release NETs. Serum NETs biomarkers were measured, use of NSBBs was recorded, and PVT was evaluated in cirrhotic patients. Carbon tetrachloride and ferric chloride (FeCl 3) were used to induce liver fibrosis and PVT in mice, respectively. After treatment with propranolol and DNase I, neutrophils in peripheral blood, colocalization and expression of NETs in PVT specimens, and NETs biomarkers in serum were measured. Ex vivo clots lysis analysis was performed and portal vein velocity and coagulation parameters were tested. Serum MPO-DNA level was significantly higher in cirrhotic patients treated with NSBBs, and serum H3Cit and MPO-DNA levels were significantly higher in those with PVT. In fibrotic mice, following treatment with propranolol, DNase I significantly shortened the time of FeCl 3 -induced PVT formation, lowered the peripheral blood neutrophils labelled by CD11b/Ly6G, inhibited the positive staining of H3Cit and the expression of H3Cit and MPO proteins in PVT tissues, and reduced serum nucleosome level. Furthermore, the addition of DNase I to tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) significantly accelerated clots lysis as compared with tPA alone. Propranolol reduced portal vein velocity in fibrotic mice, but did not influence coagulation parameters. Our study provides a clue to the potential impact of NETs formation on the association of NSBBs with the development of PVT. [Display omitted] • Nonselective β blockers (NSBBs) can increase the risk of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with liver cirrhosis. • NSBBs may influence neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) formation, which can affect the development of thrombosis. • Clinical studies supported the association of serum NETs biomarkers with use of NSBBs and PVT in cirrhotic patients. • Experimental studies suggested that NETs formation may participate in the effect of NSBBs on the development of FeCl 3 -induced PVT model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment often requires transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, TACE efficacy is controversial in the presence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Although transarterial radioembolization (TARE) benefit was previously documented in PVT, neither the objective tumor response (OTR) after TARE with Iodine-131-lipiodol (131I-lipiodol) nor the PVT effect on the results of locoregional therapies was accurately measured in prospective clinical trials. The aim of this study was to compare OTR and survival obtained by TARE with 131I-lipiodol versus TACE in patients with cirrhosis and HCC, as well as between those with and without PVT. 33 patients were included, from whom 38 tumors were assessed. OTR was quantified by a special algorithm to measure hypervascular HCC tissue. 19 tumors received each therapy. Nine subjects (27%) had PVT, most of them in the TARE group (p = 0.026). Mean OTR according to the tumor volumes was 24.2% ± 56% after TARE and 32.8% ± 48.9% after TACE, with no difference between the treatments (p = 0.616). Similar values were also observed between those with and without PVT (p = 0.704). Mean survival was 340 days and did not differ between the two treatments (p = 0.596), but was 194 days in PVT cases (p = 0.007). This is the first study in which OTR obtained by TARE with 131I-lipiodol is accurately measured. Additionally, PVT impact on survival after TARE and TACE was precisely documented. Although the TARE group had more PVT subjects (who had shorter survival), TARE and TACE achieved similar OTR and OS rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) against the combined treatment of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) and propranolol in managing patients with cirrhosis diagnosed with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). A literature search from inception to September 2023 was performed using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. Independent screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed. The main measured outcomes were the incidence and recurrence of variceal bleeding (VB), hepatic encephalopathy, and overall survival. A total of 5 studies were included. For variceal eradication, there was initially no significant difference between the groups; however, after sensitivity analysis, a significant effect emerged (risk ratio [RR], 1.55; P <.0001). TIPS was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of VB (RR, 0.34; P <.0001) and a higher probability of remaining free of VB in the first 2 years after the procedure (first year: RR, 1.41; P <.0001; second year: RR, 1.58; P <.0001). TIPS significantly reduced the incidence of death due to acute GI bleeding compared with EBL + propranolol (RR, 0.37; P =.05). TIPS offers a comprehensive therapeutic advantage over the combined EBL and propranolol regimen, especially for patients with cirrhosis with PVT. Its efficacy in variceal eradication, reducing rebleeding, and mitigating death risks due to acute GI bleeding is evident. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are the most common cause of noncirrhotic, nontumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Over 90 % of MPN patients with PVT carry the JAK2V617F mutation. Compared to other etiologies of PVT, patients with JAK2V617F MPNs are at increased risk of developing significant portal hypertension. However, when these patients develop refractory portal hypertensive complications requiring portosystemic shunt placement, they have limited options. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion is often not feasible, as these patients tend to have extensive, occlusive portal thrombus with cavernous transformation. Surgical portosystemic shunt creation can be an alternative; however, this is associated with significant mortality. In this report, we describe the novel use of a percutaneous mesocaval shunt for successful portomesenteric decompression in a patient with portal hypertension from PVT associated with JAK2V617F positive essential thrombocythemia. • 90% of myeloproliferative neoplasms with portal thrombosis have JAK2V617F mutation. • JAK2 - portal thrombosis is at increased risk of significant portal hypertension. • Cavernous portal transformations limits intrahepatic shunt creation in JAK2. • Percutaneous mesocaval shunts can provide pre-hepatic portal decompression. • Percutaneous mesocaval shunt may have utility for JAK2 -portal thrombosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The term porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) was recently proposed to replace that of idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) to describe patients with typical histological lesions in absence of cirrhosis, irrespective of the presence/absence of portal hypertension (PH), and new diagnostic criteria were defined. The study aimed to compare the applicability between the diagnostic criteria of PSVD and those of INCPH. 53 patients affected by PSVD were enrolled. Biochemical, clinical, ultrasound and histological data, the presence and type of associated diseases were recorded in a database. According to the new criteria, histological data and signs of PH were divided into specific and non-specific. Percutaneous and transjugular biopsies were compared to establish the usability of the two methods for diagnostic purposes. In 85% of the patients the diagnosis of PSVD was obtained by applying the first criterion (25 had specific histological signs with specific signs of PH); one patient presented with specific histological signs but no PH. In 8 patients the diagnosis was obtained by applying the second criterion. 19% of patients had portal vein thrombosis. Finally, the prevalence of the various histological lesions was similar between the patients submitted to percutaneous and transjugular liver biopsy. The study confirms that the diagnostic criteria of PSVD lead to the inclusion of a greater number of patients than INCPH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Allogeneic vessels (AV) are commonly used in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with portal vein resection (PVR), but the epidemiological characteristics of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) are still unclear. Methods: The clinicopathological data of patients who underwent PD combined with PVR in our hospital from January 2011 to October 2022 were retrospectively collected. All patients underwent regular contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen after surgery to identify PVT or recurrence and metastasis of the tumor. Results: A total of 878 patients received PD, of which 213 patients who also underwent PVR were included in the study. Among them are 16 (7.5%) tangential/patch reconstructions, 51 (23.9%) end-to-end anastomosis, and 146 (68.5%) AV reconstructions. The cumulative incidence of PVT in 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after surgery was 0.9%, 7.3%, 7.3%, 15.9%, 23.4%, and 27.6%, respectively. The results of logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes, operation procedure, and AV reconstruction were independent risk factors for PVT (P < 0.05). In the Cox analysis, PVT was clearly correlated with tumor recurrence (P = 0.038, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.553) and overall survival (P = 0.044, HR = 1.592) of pancreatic cancer patients. Conclusion: The prevalence of PVT is high in PD with PVR, particularly in patients undergoing AV reconstructions. The occurrence of PVT has a clear correlation with the patient's long-term prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Historically, anticoagulants were contraindicated in patients with cirrhosis owing to concerns about bleeding risks. However, recent studies have shown that patients with cirrhosis are not naturally anticoagulated and are at increased risk of prothrombotic events, such as portal venous thrombosis. In this article, we review preclinical and clinical data on the effects of anticoagulants in cirrhosis, including their potential benefits in reducing liver fibrosis, portal hypertension, and improving survival. Despite promising preclinical evidence, clinical translation has proven challenging. Nevertheless, we discuss the use of anticoagulation in specific clinical scenarios, such as patients with atrial fibrillation and portal vein thrombosis, and highlight the need for further research, including randomised-controlled trials, to determine the optimal role of anticoagulants in the management of patients with cirrhosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Major hepatectomy with associated biliary or even vascular reconstruction is the standard surgical treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. • The incidence of post-hepatectomy portal thrombosis varies between 2 and 14% depending on the center. • Rapid management adapted to the severity of portal thrombosis probably reduces the morbidity and mortality of this complication. • Particular attention should be paid to the portal anatomy (angulation, stenosis) after radical right hepatectomy, whether or not there is venous reconstruction. Portal reconstruction should only be motivated by a suspicion of invasion. • In the rare cases where the choice is possible, an enlarged left hepatectomy in the anterior sector can be preferred. To study the incidence, risk factors and management of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). Single-center retrospective analysis of 86 consecutive patients who underwent major hepatectomy for PHCC, between 2012 and 2019, with comparison of the characteristics of the groups with (PVT+) and without (PVT−) postoperative portal vein thrombosis. Seven patients (8%) presented with PVT diagnosed during the first postoperative week. Preoperative portal embolization had been performed in 71% of patients in the PVT+ group versus 34% in the PVT− group (P = 0.1). Portal reconstruction was performed in 100% and 38% of PVT+ and PVT− patients, respectively (P = 0.002). In view of the gravity of the clinical and/or biochemical picture, five (71%) patients underwent urgent re-operation with portal thrombectomy, one of whom died early (hemorrhagic shock after surgical treatment of PVT). Two patients had exclusively medical treatment. Complete recanalization of the portal vein was achieved in the short and medium term in the six survivors. After a mean follow-up of 21 months, there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between the two groups. Post-hepatectomy PVT for PHCC is a not-infrequent and potentially lethal event. Rapid management, adapted to the extension of the thrombus and the severity of the thrombosis (hepatic function, signs of portal hypertension) makes it possible to limit the impact on postoperative mortality. We did not identify any modifiable risk factor. However, when it is oncologically and anatomically feasible, left ± extended hepatectomy (without portal embolization) may be less risky than extended right hepatectomy, and portal vein resection should only be performed if there is strong suspicion of tumor invasion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The incidence of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) in cancer patients has increased in recent years and its real clinical significance and management can be challenging. This study aimed to describe the clinical presentation and short-term outcomes of patients with cancer-associated SVT. This was a retrospective observational study of consecutive patients with cancer-associated SVT diagnosed during the period 2015–2020. The primary objective was to describe the clinical presentation of SVT. Patients were clinically classified into two groups based on the presence of symptoms on SVT diagnosis. The main outcomes were overall and SVT-related mortality, major and non-major bleeding rates, and the thrombosis recurrence rate in the first 30 days of follow-up. This study enrolled 203 patients. Intra-abdominal tumors (76 %) and metastatic disease (68 %) predominated. A total of 79 (39 %) patients without symptoms were diagnosed with SVT during a scheduled radiological test and were classified as "asymptomatic", while 124 (61 %) patients presented some potential SVT symptoms and were considered as "symptomatic". Although the 30-day outcomes showed no significant differences between the two groups, mortality in the asymptomatic group was slightly lower compared to the symptomatic group (3 % vs. 10 %, p = 0.085). Almost 40 % of cases of cancer-associated SVT are asymptomatic. There were no significant differences in short-term outcomes between the symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. More studies are required to better define long-term management and outcomes in these patients. • The real clinical significance of SVT in patients with cancer remains challenging. • We describe the clinical presentation of cancer-associated SVT in a cohort of 203 patients. • Intra-abdominal tumors and metastatic disease predominate in cases of SVT. • 39 % of cases were asymptomatic while 61 % presented some potential SVT symptoms. • There were no differences in outcomes in the first 30 days of follow-up in both groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare disease in children and may be complicated by portal hypertension (PH), hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) and portopulmonary hypertension (PPHTN) but their incidence and risk factors are unknown. An observational, retrospective cohort study of all consecutive children (≤18 years) with PVT treated at the Emma Children's Hospital Amsterdam University Medical Centers between January 1996 and January 2022 was conducted to identify the incidence and risk factors of these post thrombotic complications (PTC) in pediatric patients. In total 43/ 703 thrombosis patients had PVT (boys 72.1 %; mean age 1.3 ± 0.5 years). Overall, 51 % of patients developed PH (n = 22), complicated by PPHTN in one of them. In 16 of 22 patients, PVT presented with portal hypertension. Clinically relevant bleeding due to portal hypertension occurred in 13 (59.1 %) patients with PH. The mean age at the first clinically relevant bleeding was 5.1 ± 5.9 years. Risk factors for the development of PH were lack of complete thrombus resolution (OR 24.3, 95 % CI 1.2–7.0; p = 0.008) and unprovoked VTE (OR, 35.4; 95 % CI 1.4–6.3; p = 0.012). Median time from PVT to PH was 137 days (range: 0 days to 5.04 years). We demonstrated that half of the patients develop PH after PVT, with a lack of thrombus resolution and unprovoked VTE as independent risk factors. This high incidence underlines the importance of long-term standardized follow-up of patients after PVT and standard screening in patients at risk of PTC. • Portal vein thrombosis in children has a high rate of post thrombotic complications. • Portal vein thrombosis presents with portal hypertension in 73 %. • Risk factors are a lack of thrombus resolution and unprovoked thrombosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Portal vein and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis (PVT/SMVT) are potentially morbid complications of radiation dose–escalated local therapy for pancreatic cancer. We retrospectively reviewed records for patients treated with and without intraoperative radiation (IORT) to identify risk factors for PVT/SMVT. Methods: Ninety-six patients with locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical exploration from 2009 to 2014. Patients at risk for close or positive surgical margins received IORT boost to a biologically effective dose (BED10) > 100. Prognostic factors for PVT/SMVT were evaluated using competing risks regression. Results: Median follow-up was 79 months for surviving patients. Fifty-six patients (58%) received IORT. Twenty-nine patients (30%) developed PVT/SMVT at a median time of 18 months. On univariate competing risks regression, operative blood loss and venous repair with a vascular interposition graft, but not IORT dose escalation or diabetes history, were significantly associated with PVT/SMVT. The development of thrombosis in the absence of recurrence was significantly associated with a longstanding diabetes history, post-neoadjuvant treatment CA19-9, and operative blood loss. All 4 patients who underwent both IORT and vascular repair with a graft developed PVT/SMVT. PVT/SMVT in the absence of recurrence is not associated with significantly worsened overall survival but led to frequent medical interventions. Conclusions: Approximately 30% of patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation for PDAC developed PVT/SMVT a median of 18 months following surgery. This was significantly associated with venous reconstruction with vascular grafts, but not with escalating radiation dose. PVT/SMVT in the absence of recurrence was associated with significant morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The knowledge of natural history and prognostic factors of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is still based on a limited number of studies. To describe our single-center experience with 79 consecutive non-neoplastic non-cirrhotic patients with PVT (15 recent/64 chronic PVT). Among patients with recent PVT, 7 received anticoagulation alone, 4 systemic thrombolysis, 3 direct thrombolysis through a TIPS and 1 TIPS alone. Portal recanalization was achieved in 11 patients. In patients with chronic PVT, the rate of variceal progression was high (20% at one year and 50% at two years). The thrombotic involvement of splenic and superior mesenteric veins was the only risk factor for variceal enlargement. The cumulative bleeding rates were 10% at one year and 20% at two years. A multisegmental thrombosis and large varices at entry and a previous variceal bleeding were the independent predictors for variceal bleeding. The cumulative rate of new thrombotic events was 14% at one year and 18% at two years. Eight patients died, 2 because of thrombotic events. There were no bleeding-related deaths. Two-year cumulative survival rate was 90%. Our study supports the importance of anticoagulation especially when a more extended thrombosis is present. Moreover, in patients with chronic PVT, the timing of follow-up endoscopy should be based on the extension of thrombosis and not, as in cirrhosis, on the size of varices at first endoscopy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is an uncommon manifestation of venous thromboembolism in the splanchnic venous system, with scarce evidence surrounding its management. We assessed the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) to low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), vitamin-k antagonists (VKAs), or no anticoagulation. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with the primary efficacy outcome being complete recanalization of affected vessels and primary safety outcome being major bleeding. Meta-analysis was done using a random-effects model, with dichotomous outcomes being synthesized with odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % CIs. Seven non-randomized and one randomized study involving 883 participants were included for analysis. DOACs were more effective than VKAs (OR = 4.33; 95 % CI: 2.4, 7.83; n = 1 study) in non-cirrhotic patients and no anticoagulation in cirrhotic patients (OR = 3.86; 95 % CI: 1.49, 10.03; n = 3 studies). DOACs had a statistically significant reduction in major bleeding compared to observation [OR = 0.09; 95 % CI: 0.03, 0.29; n = 3 studies], LMWHs [OR = 0.13; 95 % CI: 0.03, 0.29; n = 1 study] and VKAs [OR = 0.12; 95 % CI: 0.02, 0.69; n = 2 studies] in non-cirrhotic patients. No difference in major bleeding was found between DOACs and observation, LMWH, or VKAs in cirrhotic patients. DOACs appear to be a favorable alternative to VKAs and LMWHs in non-cirrhotic patients. This avenue of research would benefit from larger studies that adjust for SVT etiologies, patient risk factors, and overall bleeding risk. [Display omitted] • DOACs appeared more effective than VKAs or observation in non-cirrhotic patients. • DOACs appeared safer than VKAs, LMWH, or observation in non-cirrhotic patients. • Similar safety between DOACs and observation, LMWH, or VKAs in cirrhotic patients [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since 1988, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been an effective therapy for portal hypertension in many settings. Thanks to continuous technical improvements and a wiser selection of patients, excellent results have been achieved with this therapeutic strategy. The historical indications for TIPS placement, in the context of liver cirrhosis, such as refractory ascites and variceal bleeding are now well established and known. However, in recent years, new indications are emerging. These have been investigated and approved in some studies but are not yet included in guidelines and clinical practice. This review aims to highlight what is new for the role of TIPS in portal vein thrombosis (especially in patients awaiting liver transplantation), in recurrent ascites and not only refractory ascites, as a neoadjuvant therapy before abdominal surgery and, finally, in the setting of noncirrhotic portal hypertension. All these new aspects are addressed in this review with a critical approach based on the literature revision and clinical practice. Future research is needed to explore and validate the new role of TIPS in these scenarios. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• NAFLD is already established as one of the important factors contributing to PVT. • Changes in all three stages of hemostasis in NAFLD contribue to the occurrence of PVT. • The higher risk of PVT in NAFLD/NASH should receive more attention. • Lifestyle interventions are the first-line therapy for the prevention of PVT in NAFLD. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the leading chronic liver diseases with increased morbidity and mortality rates for extrahepatic diseases (including cardiovascular disease, portal vein thrombosis, etc.). There is an increased risk of thrombosis in both the portal and systemic circulation in patients with NAFLD, independent of traditional liver cirrhosis. However, increased portal pressure, the most critical factor, is frequently observed in NAFLD patients, predisposing them to portal vein thrombosis (PVT). It has been reported that there is an 8.5% incidence of PVT among patients with non-cirrhotic NAFLD in a prospective cohort study. Based on the prothrombotic status of NAFLD itself, patients combined with cirrhosis may accelerate the development of PVT and lead to a poor prognosis. Moreover, PVT has been shown to complicate the procedure and adversely affect the outcome during liver transplantation surgery. NAFLD is in a prothrombotic state, and its underlying mechanisms have not been fully understood so far. Particularly noteworthy is that gastroenterologists currently overlook the higher risk of PVT in NAFLD. We investigate the pathogenesis of NAFLD complicated with PVT from the perspective of primary, secondary, and tertiary hemostasis, and also summarize relevant studies in humans. Some treatment options that may affect NAFLD and its PVT are also explored to improve patient-oriented outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a well-known complication in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). Limited data exist on the incidence and factors of PVT in patients with AP. We investigate the incidence and clinical predictors of PVT in AP. We queried the 2016–2019 National Inpatient Sample database to identify patients with AP. Patients with chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer were excluded. We studied demographics, comorbidities, complications, and interventions in these patients and stratified the results by the presence of PVT. A multivariate regression model was used to identify factors associated with PVT in patients with AP. We also assessed the mortality and resource utilization in patients with PVT and AP. Of the 1,386,389 adult patients admitted with AP, 11,135 (0.8%) patients had PVT. Women had a 15% lower risk of developing PVT (aOR-0.85, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the age groups in the risk of developing PVT. Hispanic patients had the lowest risk of PVT (aOR-0.74, p < 0.001). PVT was associated with pancreatic pseudocyst (aOR-4.15, p < 0.001), bacteremia (aOR-2.66, p < 0.001), sepsis (aOR-1.55, p < 0.001), shock (aOR-1.68, p < 0.001) and ileus (aOR-1.38, p < 0.001). A higher incidence of in-hospital mortality and ICU admissions was also noted in patients with PVT and AP. This study demonstrated a significant association between PVT and factors such as pancreatic pseudocyst, bacteremia, and ileus in patients with AP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) leads to significant morbidity and mortality burden in patients with cirrhosis. An improved understanding of the utility of anticoagulation in patients with PVT will aid clinical decision making and inform future research. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between anticoagulation therapy and clinical outcomes in the context of treatment for PVT in cirrhosis. Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 13, 2022, for studies comparing the use of anticoagulation to other modalities as treatment for PVT in cirrhosis. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using a random-effects model for PVT improvement, recanalization, progression, bleeding events, and all-cause mortality in treatment studies. We identified 944 records, of which 16 studies (n = 1126) examining anticoagulation as PVT treatment were included for subsequent analysis. Anticoagulation as PVT treatment was associated with PVT improvement (OR 3.64; 95% CI 2.56–5.17), PVT recanalization (OR 3.73; 95% CI 2.45–5.68), decreased PVT progression (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.23–0.63), and decreased all-cause mortality (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.29–0.75). The use of anticoagulation was not associated with bleeding events (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.39–1.66). All analyses demonstrated low heterogeneity. These results support the use of anticoagulation in cirrhosis as treatment for PVT. These findings may inform the clinical management of PVT and highlight the need for further studies such as large randomized controlled trials characterizing the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation for PVT in cirrhosis. Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) leads to a significant morbidity burden in patients with cirrhosis and represents a clinical challenge for which an indisputable intervention does not yet exist. Given its association with bleeding risk, anticoagulation for PVT remains highly debated. In this issue of JCEH, Yao & Zhao have conducted a meta-analysis on comparative studies assessing outcomes following anticoagulation for treatment of PVT in patients with cirrhosis. Among 944 studies eligible for screening, 16 (n=1,126) investigated the use of anticoagulation therapy against control methods and were included for analysis. The results of this meta-analysis demonstrated that anticoagulation was associated with PVT improvement, PVT recanalization, less PVT progression, lower all-cause mortality, and no increased risk of bleeding. The authors concluded the findings may provide support for the role of anticoagulation in PVT management for patients with cirrhosis. As such, this study is particularly relevant towards informing the guidance of PVT management. [Display omitted] • Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) represents a clinical challenge for which an indisputable intervention does not yet exist. • This meta-analysis focuses on comparative studies assessing outcomes following anticoagulation for PVT in cirrhosis. • Among 944 studies screened, 16 (n = 1126) comparing anticoagulation against control methods were included for analysis. • Anticoagulation was associated with PVT improvement, PVT recanalization, less PVT progression, and lower mortality. • Anticoagulation was not associated with risk of bleeding events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Alteration of platelet status associates with decompensation and death in cirrhosis, while its effect on portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains unclear. We aimed to retrospectively investigate whether PVT associates with platelet-fibrin clot strength and platelet activation in decompensated cirrhosis. Platelet-fibrin clot strength (G) was measured by thromboelastography (TEG). Platelet activation was reflected by plasma concentrations of soluble p-selectin (sPs) and a platelet aggregation test adjusted for platelet counts. Among 166 patients, 45 had PVT. The platelet count was significantly lower in PVT. While the G value was positively correlated with platelet count (ρ = 0.74, P < 0.01), increased G was associated with PVT after adjusting for platelet count in the logistic regression (P = 0.04). The normalized G value according to the linear relation with platelet count was calculated as follows: G platelet = [(G - 2622)/platelet count]. This coefficient had no correlation with platelet count and was an independent risk factor of PVT (OR = 1.03, CI 95% : 1.01-1.05, P = 0.012). In two subanalyses, the collagen-induced platelet aggregation (n = 37, P = 0.029) and plasma concentration of sPs (n = 56, P = 0.001) adjusted for platelet count were significantly higher in PVT. This study showed a positive correlation of high platelet-fibrin clot strength detected via TEG and platelet activation with PVT in decompensated cirrhosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Complex portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a challenge in liver transplantation (LT). Extra-anatomical approaches to portal revascularization, including renoportal (RPA), left gastric vein (LGA), pericholedochal vein (PCA), and cavoportal (CPA) anastomoses, have been described in case reports and series. The RP4LT Collaborative was created to record cases of alternative portal revascularization performed for complex PVT. An international, observational web registry was launched in 2020. Cases of complex PVT undergoing first LT performed with RPA, LGA, PCA, or CPA were recorded and updated through 12/2021. A total of 140 cases were available for analysis: 74 RPA, 18 LGA, 20 PCA, and 28 CPA. Transplants were primarily performed with whole livers (98%) in recipients with median (IQR) age 58 (49-63) years, model for end-stage liver disease score 17 (14–24), and cold ischemia 431 (360-505) minutes. Post-operatively, 49% of recipients developed acute kidney injury, 16% diuretic-responsive ascites, 9% refractory ascites (29% with CPA, p <0.001), and 10% variceal hemorrhage (25% with CPA, p = 0.002). After a median follow-up of 22 (4-67) months, patient and graft 1-/3-/5-year survival rates were 71/67/61% and 69/63/57%, respectively. On multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, the only factor significantly and independently associated with all-cause graft loss was non-physiological portal vein reconstruction in which all graft portal inflow arose from recipient systemic circulation (hazard ratio 6.639, 95% CI 2.159-20.422, p = 0.001). Alternative forms of portal vein anastomosis achieving physiological portal inflow (i.e., at least some recipient splanchnic blood flow reaching transplant graft) offer acceptable post-transplant results in LT candidates with complex PVT. On the contrary, non-physiological portal vein anastomoses fail to resolve portal hypertension and should not be performed. Complex portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a challenge in liver transplantation. Results of this international, multicenter analysis may be used to guide clinical decisions in transplant candidates with complex PVT. Extra-anatomical portal vein anastomoses that allow for at least some recipient splanchnic blood flow to the transplant allograft offer acceptable results. On the other hand, anastomoses that deliver only systemic blood flow to the allograft fail to resolve portal hypertension and should not be performed. [Display omitted] • Cases of complex portal vein thrombosis undergoing first LT with extra-anatomical portal vein reconstruction were recorded. • Reconstructions delivering splanchnic blood to transplant graft offer acceptable post-transplant results. • Reconstructions delivering only systemic blood to graft result in dismal post-transplant survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In cirrhosis, decreased portal flow velocity, thrombophilia factors, and portal hypertension are considered risk factors for portal vein thrombosis (PVT). In cirrhosis, the transformation of the stellate cells causes a progressive decrease of ADAMTS-13, while VWF multimers secretion by endothelial cells is strongly enhanced. This imbalance leads to an accumulation of ultra-large VWF multimers that in sinusoidal circulation could favor PVT both in intra- and extra-hepatic branches, mostly in decompensated cirrhosis. This prospective study was aimed at identifying possible clinical, biochemical, and hemostatic factors predictive for non-tumoral PVT in a cohort of patients with compensated cirrhosis. Seventynine compensated cirrhosis patients were prospectively followed for 48 months, receiving a periodic Doppler-ultrasound liver examination associated with an extensive evaluation of clinical, biochemical, and hemostatic profile. Five patients developed PVT (cumulative prevalence = 6.3%), occurring 4–36 months after enrollment. In logistic regression analysis, the ADAMTS-13/VWF:GpIbR ratio < 0.4 was the only independent variable significantly associated with PVT (OR 14.6, 95% C.I.:1.36–157.2, p = 0.027). A Cox-regression-analysis confirmed this finding (HR = 7.7, p = 0.027). The ADAMTS-13/VWF ratio < 0.4 measured in compensated cirrhosis could be a reliable predictive biomarker for PVT development, paving the way to novel therapeutic strategies to prevent and treat PVT in this clinical setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pediatric living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become one of the most effective therapies for pediatric end-stage liver diseases. We aim to investigate the risk factors for intra-operative portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and the short- and long-term outcomes in children post LDLT. This was a retrospective analysis from 584 cases of biliary atresia (BA) patients who had undergone LDLT from January 2014 to December 2019 at our hospital. Patients were divided into PVT and non-PVT groups according to the occurrence of PVT during LDLT. The median age of recipients at transplantation was 7.22 (quartiles, 6.03, 9.50) months, the incidence of intra-operative PVT was 5.31% (31/584). The independent risk factors for intra-operative PVT were the diameter of the recipient's PV not greater than 4 mm and a higher ratio of graft-to-recipient PV diameter. The cumulative survival rates of grafts and recipients were 93.5% and 93.5% in the PVT group, and 94.9% and 95.3% in the non-PVT group, respectively, without significant difference. The recovery of graft function was similar in recipients with or without interposed graft vessel (IGV). However, the incidence of PV stenosis was higher in recipients with IGV after LDLT. Intra-operative PVT is a common complication in pediatric LDLT, but an excellent prognosis can be achieved by appropriate and individualized surgical treatment. We noted that intra-operative PVT did not affect the survival rates of grafts and recipients, but there was a higher incidence of PV complications after LDLT. Ⅲ [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the obesity rate continues to rise, portal vein thrombosis (PVT) has emerged as a more frequent complication following bariatric surgery, with an incidence reported at approximately 0.4 % according to recent meta-analyses. PVT, characterized by the development of a thrombus within the portal vein, can be life-threatening due to its subtle and often nonspecific symptoms, complicating timely diagnosis and treatment. In this case report, we present a 45-year-old female patient with a history of morbid obesity who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and hiatal hernia repair. On postoperative day 16, she developed symptoms of severe abdominal pain and intolerance to oral intake, suggesting the presence of portal vein thrombosis. Laboratory findings showed significantly elevated D-dimer levels, and contrast-enhanced CT imaging confirmed an extensive thrombus within the portal vein. The patient was promptly admitted to the critical care unit, where she was managed conservatively with therapeutic anticoagulation, including subcutaneous heparin preoperatively and postoperatively, and discharged with a prescription for apixaban. Early diagnosis of PVT in the post-bariatric population is critical, as it allows for timely intervention with evidence-based therapeutic options such as anticoagulation, thereby improving both short- and long-term patient outcomes. This case not only underscores the importance of heightened vigilance for PVT in patients presenting with nonspecific abdominal symptoms after bariatric surgery but also highlights the potential risk factors unique to this patient, such as prolonged operative time and underlying comorbidities, which may have contributed to the thrombotic event. A multidisciplinary approach, involving both medical and surgical teams, is essential for optimal management of such complex cases. This case underscores the critical importance of early recognition and prompt management of portal vein thrombosis in post-bariatric surgery patients. By emphasizing the role of thorough perioperative DVT prophylaxis, including the use of heparin and sequential compression devices, this report not only aims to improve patient outcomes but also contributes to the growing body of knowledge on the prevention and treatment of PVT in the bariatric population. These insights may serve as a valuable framework for managing similar clinical scenarios in the future. • Bariatric surgery is a preferred treatment option for obese patients. • Obese patients are at risk of developing portal vein thrombosis formation. • Physicians need to be highly suspicious of any symptom of portal vein thrombosis developed by patients. • The wait-and-see approach is preferable for treating patients with portal vein thrombosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with robotic radiosurgery in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with macrovascular invasion (HCC-PVT). Patients with inoperable HCC-PVT, good performance score (PS0-1) and preserved liver function [up to Child-Pugh (CP) B7] were accrued after ethical and scientific committee approval [Clinical trial registry-India (CTRI): 2022/01/050234] for treatment on robotic radiosurgery (M6) and planned with Multiplan (iDMS V2.0). Triple-phase contrast computed tomography (CT) scan was performed for contouring, and gross tumour volume (GTV) included contrast-enhancing mass within main portal vein and adjacent parenchymal disease. Dose prescription was as per risk stratification protocol (22–50 Gy in 5 fractions) while achieving the constraints of mean liver dose <15 Gy, 800 cc liver <8 Gy and the duodenum max of <24 Gy). Response assessment was done at 2 months' follow-up for recanalization. Patient- and treatment-related factors were evaluated for influence in survival function. Between Jan 2017 and May 2022, 318 consecutive HCC with PVT patients were screened and 219 patients were accrued [male 92%, CP score: 5–7 90%, mean age: 63 years (38–85 yrs), Cancer of the Liver Italian Program <3: 84 (40%), 3–6117 (56%), infective aetiology 9.5%, performance status (PS): 0–37%; 1–56%]. Among 209 consecutive patients accrued for SBRT treatment (10 patients were excluded after accrual due to ascites and decompensation), 139 were evaluable for response assessment (>2 mo follow-up). At mean follow-up of 12.21 months (standard deviation: 10.66), 88 (63%) patients expired and 51 (36%) were alive. Eighty-two (59%) patients had recanalization of PVT (response), 57 (41%) patients did not recanalize and 28 (17%) had progressive/metastatic disease prior to response evaluation (<2 months). Mean overall survival (OS) in responders and non-responders were 18.4 [standard error (SE): 2.52] and 9.34 month (SE 0.81), respectively (P < 0.001). Mean survival in patients with PS0, PS1 and PS2 were 17, 11.7 and 9.7 months (P = 0.019), respectively. OS in partial recanalization, bland thrombus and complete recanalization was 12.4, 14.1 and 30.3 months, respectively (P -0.002). Adjuvant sorafenib, Barcelona Clinic Liver Classification stage, gender, age and RT dose did not influence response to treatment. Recanalization rate was higher in good PS patients (P -0.019). OS in patients with response to treatment, in those with no response to treatment, in those who are fit but not accrued and in those who are not suitable were 18.4, 9.34, 5.9 and 2.6 months, respectively (P -<0.001). Thirty-six of 139 patients (24%) had radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) [10 (7.2%) had classic RILD & 26 (19%) had non-classic RILD]. Derangement in CP score (CP score change) by more than 2 was seen in 30 (24%) within 2-month period after robotic radiosurgery. Eighteen (13%) had unplanned admissions, two patients required embolization due to fiducial-related bleeding and 20 (14%) had ascites, of which 9 (6%) patients required abdominocentesis. PVT response or recanalization after SBRT is a statistically significant prognostic factor for survival function in HCC-PVT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients presents a significant clinical challenge. This study aims to (1) explore the impact of anticoagulation therapy on patient outcomes; (2) comparative outcomes in portal vein thrombosis treated between direct oral anticoagulant and Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA). We leveraged the TriNetX database to analyze a cohort comprising 4224 patients with liver cirrhosis and PVT who were treated with anticoagulation, alongside a comparison group of 15,300 patients with the same conditions but not receiving anticoagulation therapy. The anticoagulated group showed a significant reduction in mortality (27.9 % vs. 34.2 %, HR = 0.723, 95 % CI: 0.678–0.770, P < 0.001). When comparing direct oral anticoagulant versus. VKA, in compensated liver cirrhosis, the direct oral anticoagulant group exhibited significantly lower mortality rates compared to VKA (17.7 % vs. 26.5 %, HR = 0.655, 95 % CI: 0.452–0.951, P = 0.025), with no significant difference in liver transplantation rates (4.0 % vs. 4.7 %, P = 0.080). In decompensated liver cirrhosis, the direct oral anticoagulant group exhibited lower mortality compared to the VKA group (23.6 % vs. 30.6 %, HR = 0.732, 95 % CI: 0.629–0.851, P < 0.001), and a higher frequency of liver transplantation was observed in the VKA group (10.6 % vs. 16.0 %, HR = 0.622, 95 % CI: 0.494–0.784, P < 0.001). Hospitalization rates were significantly lower in the direct oral anticoagulant group compared to the VKA group in decompensated cirrhosis (33.4 % vs. 38.3 %, HR = 0.830, 95 % CI: 0.695–0.992, P = 1.937). Our study offers compelling evidence supporting the use of anticoagulation therapy in liver cirrhosis with portal vein thrombosis. The use of DOACs in patients with both compensated and decompensated liver cirrhosis showed a marked mortality benefit. • Significant reduction in mortality among patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis treated with anticoagulants. • Patients with cirrhosis show better survival on DOACs than on VKAs. • Similar major bleeding rates in decompensated cirrhosis with DOACs vs. VKAs. • No significant mortality difference in decompensated cirrhosis between DOACs, VKA. • Lower hospital stays for cirrhosis patients on DOACs boost healthcare efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

After liver transplantation (LT), synthesis of coagulation factors by the graft recovers faster for pro thrombotic than anti thrombotic factors, resulting in a potential pro thrombotic imbalance. We studied the thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications in our pediatric LT series, providing supplementation of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and/or antithrombin (AT) in the prophylactic antithrombotic regimen. This was a retrospective observational single center study. All isolated pediatric LTs performed between 1/11/2009 and 31/12/2019 (n = 181) were included. Postoperatively, in addition to low molecular weight heparin, 22 patients (12%) received FFP (10 ml/kg twice daily for 10 days), 27 patients (15%) were given FFP (reduced duration) and AT (50–100 IU/kg/day if AT activity remained <70%), and 132 (73%) received AT only. Complications, outcome, and coagulation profiles in postoperative days 0–10 were analyzed. In all three treatment groups, AT activity normalized by day 4 while prothrombin remained <70% of normal until day 9. Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), portal vein thrombosis (PVT), and hemorrhagic complications occurred in 2.8%, 3.3%, and 3.9% of LTs. One- and 5-year patient and graft survival were 88% (±2.4% Standard Error) and 84% (±2.5%), and 86% (±2.6%) and 84% (±2.7%), respectively, without difference between groups. HAT were associated with low AT on days 0 and 1, and PVT with low AT on day 0. Low antithrombin activity after LT was associated with postoperative thromboses. FFP and/or AT supplementation allowed early normalization of AT activity, while thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications were rare, suggesting efficient and safe management of post-LT coagulopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence and incidence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in liver cirrhosis. • In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the target population does not include patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or abdominal surgery. • Approximately one seventh of cirrhotic patients have PVT, and one tenth will develop PVT. • Progression of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension seems to be in parallel with risk of PVT. Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) may be associated with negative outcomes in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, the prevalence and incidence of PVT in liver cirrhosis are heterogeneous among studies and have not been sufficiently determined yet. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Eligible studies would explore the prevalence and/or incidence of PVT in liver cirrhosis without hepatocellular carcinoma or abdominal surgery. Pooled proportion with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using a random-effect model. Factors associated with the presence/occurrence of PVT were also extracted. Among the 8549 papers initially identified, 74 were included. Fifty-four studies explored the prevalence of PVT in liver cirrhosis with a pooled prevalence of 13.92% (95%CI=11.18–16.91%). Based on cross-sectional data, Child-Pugh class B/C, higher D-dimer, ascites, and use of non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) were associated with the presence of PVT in liver cirrhosis. Twenty-three studies explored the incidence of PVT in liver cirrhosis with a pooled incidence of 10.42% (95%CI=8.16–12.92%). Based on cohort data, Child-Pugh class B/C, higher model of end-stage liver disease score, higher D-dimer, lower platelets count, decreased portal flow velocity, ascites, use of NSBBs, and moderate or high-risk esophageal varices could predict the occurrence of PVT in liver cirrhosis. Approximately one seventh of cirrhotic patients have PVT, and one tenth will develop PVT. Progression of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension seems to be in parallel with the risk of PVT. Prospective studies with detailed information about classification and extension of PVT in liver cirrhosis are needed. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) occurs in a heterogenous group of patients secondary to a variety of risk factors including liver disease. Minimal data regarding natural history and outcomes of SVT exists to inform management decisions. As such, there is equipoise regarding the utility of anticoagulation in cirrhotic patients with SVT. We sought to identify clinical factors predictive of new or progressive thrombosis in a cohort of patients with untreated SVT. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of cirrhotic patients over 18 years of age diagnosed with SVT at the Oregon Health & Science University from 2015 to 2020, excluding those initially treated with anticoagulation. The primary study endpoint was a composite of the following: imaging-confirmed progression of SVT, development of cavernous transformation, intestinal ischemia, portal cholangiopathy or new venous or arterial thrombosis. 261 patients were included in the analysis (median age 61 years, 68% male, 32% female). Forty percent of all patients experienced the primary composite endpoint. Multivariable logistic regression found that only the presence of pancreatitis or abdominal infection at diagnosis was associated with an increased likelihood of experiencing thrombus progression in patients with untreated SVT (OR 3.61, P = 0.02). There was a statistically significant overall survival difference between patients that did and did not experience the primary composite endpoint after controlling for confounding variables. (p = 0.0068). Overall, only the presence of pancreatitis or intrabdominal infection were found to be significantly associated with thrombotic progression, with varices identified as marginally non-significant risk factor. Notably, thrombotic progression was associated with a significant reduction in overall survival. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is no longer an absolute contraindication for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This study aimed to assess the short-term outcomes of LDLT and compare the 1-year survival rates between patients with and without preoperative PVT. This combined prospective and retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent LDLT at Ain Shams Centre for Organ Transplantation (ASCOT) between 2008 and 2020. The study included 60 patients with PVT and 60 patients without PVT. The two groups were compared in terms of preoperative data, operative details, postoperative complications, and 1-year survival. Most patients with PVT were Child C (65%) and had higher model for end stage liver disease scores (16.23 ± 4.03) compared to the non-PVT group (13.9 ± 4.5). The PVT group showed longer cold ischemic time (CIT), hospital stay, and intensive care unit stay and significantly shorter 1-year survival rate (63.3%) compared to the non-PVT group (86.7%) (P = 0.003). Those with PVT grades I, II, and III had 1-year survival rates of 72.5%, 50%, and 40%, respectively. Preoperative PVT reduces the 1-year survival after transplantation, with patients with higher PVT grades exhibiting lower 1-year survival. LDLT for PVT still remains challenging and requires further studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with cirrhosis frequently acquire complex changes in their haemostatic system including a decreased platelet count and decreased levels of various haemostatic proteins. Although historically patients with cirrhosis were thought to have a haemostasis-related bleeding tendency, it is now widely accepted that the haemostatic system of patients with cirrhosis remains in balance as a result of simultaneous changes in pro- and anti-haemostatic systems. The concept of rebalanced haemostasis has led to changes in clinical management, although firm evidence from well-designed clinical studies is largely lacking. For example, many invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis and a prolonged prothrombin time are now performed without prophylaxis with fresh frozen plasma. Conversely, clinicians have become more aware of the need for anti-thrombotic therapy, even in those patients with abnormal routine coagulation tests. This paper will outline recent advances in pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of both bleeding and thrombotic complications in patients with cirrhosis. Among other topics, we will discuss the haemostatic status of acutely ill patients with cirrhosis, the various causes of bleeding in patients with cirrhosis, and how best to prevent or treat bleeding. In addition, we will discuss the hypercoagulable features of patients with cirrhosis, new insights into the pathogenesis of portal vein thrombosis, and how best to prevent or treat thromboses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The current pandemic of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) originated in Wuhan, China in December 2019. The most common clinical manifestations are fever, fatigue, and cough. Other common symptoms include anorexia, chest tightness and shortness of breath. Extrapulmonary manifestations including gastrointestinal symptoms were also reported in patients with COVID-19 infection. It has been found that the ACE2 receptor of SARS-CoV-2 is expressed more in the pancreas than in the lungs. However, only few cases reported with pancreatic injury were caused by COVID-19. In this paper, we report a young patient presenting with acute necrotizing pancreatitis that is complicated with portal vein thrombosis and found to have COVID-19 infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is an uncommon manifestation of venous thromboembolism. Epidemiological data on SVT-related mortality rate is not available to date. We investigated time trends in SVT-related mortality rate, 2008–2019, in Veneto, an Italian high-income region of approximatively 5,000,000 inhabitants. SVT-related deaths were identified by the following ICD-10 codes: I81 (portal vein thrombosis), K75.1 (phlebitis of portal vein), K76.3 (liver infarction), K76.5 (hepatic veno-occlusive disease) or I82.0 (Budd-Chiari syndrome). During the study period, a total of 557,932 deaths were recorded. SVT was reported in 823 cases; 776 (94%) consisted of portal vein thrombosis. The age-standardized SVT-related mortality rate varied from 1.47 (year 2008) to 1.52 (year 2019) per 100,000 person-years. An increase in the cause-specific annual mortality rate was observed in women (0.56 in 2008 to 1.04 per 100,000 person-years in 2019; average annual percent change +5.7%, 95%CI +3.1; +8.3%). In men, the cause-specific mortality rate moved from 2.53 in 2008 to 2.03 per 100,000 person-years in 2019 (average annual percent change −1.2%, 95%CI -4.0; +1.6%). After conditioning for age and sex, the odds of having a concomitant liver disease were higher for SVT-related deaths (OR 31.6; 95%CI 17.1–37.0) compared with non-SVT-related deaths. This also applies to gastrointestinal cancers (OR 1.28; 95%CI 1.07–1.55), although to a lesser extent. We report first epidemiological estimates of SVT-related mortality in a Western country. These values will serve as a reference to weight novel potential factors associated with SVT-related death and interpret them from an epidemiological perspective. • This is the first epidemiological study on splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT)-related mortality • SVT-related mortality was twice as high in men compared to women. • We observed a strong association for both sexes between SVT and liver diseases. • In women, the trend in SVT-related mortality rate was toward increase between 2008 and 2019. • Bleedings were two-time higher among patients with SVT-related deaths. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is considered a relatively rare thrombotic complication in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Most reported cases of PVT develop within 2 weeks from COVID-19 onset. We report a fatal case of extensive gastrointestinal necrosis due to portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis approximately 6 weeks after the onset of critical COVID-19. Excessive elevation of his plasma D-dimer level had continued for weeks during the hospitalization contrary with improvement of respiratory failure. Thrombotic complication should be cautiously paid attention even in the post-acute phase of COVID-19, especially in patients with persistent elevation of plasma D-dimer level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is associated with a higher risk of liver-related complications. Recent guidelines recommend direct-acting anticoagulants (DOAC) in patients with cirrhosis and non-tumoral PVT. However, data on the efficacy and safety of DOAC in these patients remain limited. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of DOAC compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) to treat non-tumoral PVT in patients with cirrhosis. We performed a systematic search of six electronic databases using MeSH term and free text. We selected all studies comparing the use of DOACs with vitamin K antagonist to treat PVT in cirrhosis. The primary outcome was PVT recanalization. Secondary outcomes were and PVT progression, major bleeding, variceal bleeding and death. From 944 citations, we included 552 subjects from a total of 11 studies (10 observational and 1 randomized trial) that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We found that DOAC were associated with a higher pooled rate of PVT recanalization (RR = 1.67, 95%CI: 1.02, 2.74, I2 = 79%) and lower pooled risk of PVT progression (RR = 0.14, 95%CI: 0.03–0.57, I2 = 0%). The pooled risk of major bleeding (RR = 0.29, 95%CI: 0.08–1.01, I2 = 0%), variceal bleeding (RR = 1.29, 95%CI: 0.64–2.59, I2 = 0%) and death (RR = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.01–9.578, I2 = 80%) was similar between DOAC and VKA. For the treatment of PVT in patients with cirrhosis, the bleeding risk was comparable between DOAC and VKA. However, DOAC were associated with a higher pooled rate of PVT recanalization. Dedicated randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a relatively frequent event in patients with cirrhosis. While different risk factors for PVT have been reported, such as decreased portal blood flow velocity (PBFV) and parameters related with severity of portal hypertension, these are based on retrospective studies assessing only a discrete number of parameters. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the incidence and risks factors for non-tumoral PVT development in a large prospective cohort of patients with cirrhosis. We performed an exhaustive evaluation of clinical, biochemical, inflammatory and acquired/hereditary hemostatic profiles in 369 patients with cirrhosis without PVT who were prospectively followed-up. Doppler ultrasound was performed at baseline and every 6 months or whenever clinically indicated. PVT development was always confirmed by computed tomography. Twenty-nine patients developed non-tumoral PVT, with an incidence of 1.6%, 6% and 8.4% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Low platelet count, PBFV <15 cm/sec and history of variceal bleeding were factors independently associated with a high PVT risk. No relationship between PVT development and any other clinical biochemical, inflammatory and acquired or hereditary hemostatic parameter was found. In patients with cirrhosis, the factors predictive of PVT development were mainly those related to the severity of portal hypertension. Our results do not support the role of hemostatic alterations (inherited or acquired) and inflammatory markers in the prediction of PVT in patients with cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis and more severe portal hypertension are at higher risk of non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis development. Acquired or inherited hemostatic disorders, as well as inflammatory status, do not seem to predict the development of portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis. [Display omitted] • Factors related to more severe portal hypertension are associated with higher risk of PVT in cirrhosis. • Acquired and inherited alterations of coagulation do not predict PVT development during follow-up. • Cirrhosis-associated inflammation or generation of NETs are not relevant factors predicting PVT development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute non-cirrhotic and non-malignant portal vein thrombosis (aPVT) is a rare and heterogenous condition. Current guidelines recommend early initiation of therapeutic anticoagulation to prevent extension of thrombosis, and favor recanalization. Although not formally defined, a poor outcome in the acute setting would include thrombosis extension with progression to intestinal infarction. Patients are also at risk of negative long-term outcomes related to complications of portal hypertension, such as variceal bleeding, ascites, and portal cholangiopathy. Identifying patients at risk of these events despite early initiation of anticoagulation remains challenging. Trials comparing treatment strategies in those failing standard therapy with meaningful radiological and clinical endpoints, whether in the short or long term, are desperately needed. The objective of this review will be to discuss a real-life clinical case and propose a treatment approach for aPVT based on the available evidence. We will mainly focus on management strategies including anticoagulation, prognostic factors, and options beyond anticoagulation, such as thrombolysis, thrombectomy, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. This review will not cover tumor portal vein thrombosis or thrombosis associated with cirrhosis. • Acute portal vein thrombosis is an uncommon and heterogenous disease. • Complete thrombosis of portal and superior mesenteric vein predicts worse outcome. • Immediate anticoagulation is the mainstay of therapy. • If failing anticoagulation, consider thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A higher rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with portal hypertension from cirrhosis is well recognized; however, the rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality among patients with portal hypertension from non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (NCPVT) is largely unknown. Method: All adults undergoing abdominal and pelvic surgery were identified from the National Inpatient Sample database from 2002 to 2015. Patients were then categorized into three groups: non-cirrhotic non-portal vein thrombosis (NCNPVT), NCPVT, and cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (CPVT). Inpatient mortality, type of disposition, transfusions, length of stay, postoperative complications, and total charges were compared. Logistic regression and ordinary least squares regression analyses were performed for factors associated with inpatient mortality, transfusions, surgery-related complications, and log length of stay. Results: Patients with NCPVT had significantly higher inpatient mortality rates, surgery-related complications, and longer length of stays compared with patients with NCNPVT (2.64% vs. 0.34%, 10.26% vs. 3.26%, 8 vs. 2 days) but less than patients with CPVT (2.64% vs. 6.31%, 10.26% vs. 17.48%, 8 vs. 11 days). In multiple logistic regression analyses, NCPVT groups remained associated with increased inpatient mortality rate, transfusions, and postoperative complications with odds ratios of 3.71 (1.88, 7.32), 3.43 (2.54, 4.62), and 3.08 (2.16, 4.39), respectively. NCPVT was also associated with 2.4 times increased length of stay. Discussion: Patients with NCPVT had significantly higher risks of postoperative morbidity and mortality than patients with NCNPVT but less than patients with CPVT. Future studies with detail regarding the characteristics of PVTs are needed to confirm the findings in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is an increasingly recognised complication of cirrhosis whose incidence increases in parallel with the severity of cirrhosis. Several risk factors have been associated with the occurrence and progression of PVT. Although the negative effect of complete PVT on the surgical outcome of liver transplant recipients is clear, its impact on cirrhosis progression remains uncertain. Treatment options include anticoagulants and interventional thrombolytic therapies, which are chosen almost on a case-by-case basis depending on the characteristics of the patient and the thrombus. In this manuscript, we review current knowledge regarding the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis and classification, natural history, clinical consequences and treatment of non-neoplastic PVT in cirrhosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is increasing evidence that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a significant risk of venous thromboembolism. While information are mainly available for deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb and pulmonary embolism, scarce data exist regarding acute splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) in this setting. PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar English-language articles published up to 30 January 2021 on SVT in COVID-19 were searched. Overall, 21 articles reporting equal number of patients were identified. 15 subjects presented with portal vein thrombosis, 11 with mesenteric vein thrombosis, four with splenic vein thrombosis, and two with Budd-Chiari syndrome. Male sex was prevalent (15 patients), and median age was 43 years (range 26–79 years). Three patients had a history of liver disease, while no subject had known myeloproliferative syndrome. Clinical presentation included mainly gastrointestinal symptoms. Anticoagulation was started in 16 patients. Three patients underwent bowel resection. Ten subjects developed gastric or bowel ischemia, seven of whom underwent bowel resection, and four died after SVT diagnosis. Although rare, SVT should be seen as a complication of COVID-19. Patients with severe gastrointestinal symptoms should be screened for SVT, as rapid recognition and correct management are essential to improve the outcome of these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To review available evidence to assess the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis therapy for non-cirrhosis-related portal vein thrombosis (PVT) that has not improved with anti-coagulation.Methods: A literature search of databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED, Cochrane and World Wide Web identified studies after 2000 utilizing portal vein thrombolysis in non-cirrhotic patients, with a minimum of 5 patients. Nine studies met criteria with 134 patients. The primary outcome evaluated was radiological re-canalization of the portal vein and symptomatic improvement post treatment. Secondary data points obtained included morbidity, mortality, thrombolysis approach and technique.Results: The re-canalization rate following thrombolysis was 84% (0.67-1.02 CI 95%) and the symptomatic improvement rate 86% (0.70-1.01 CI 95%). The major complication rate was 7% (0.01-0.14 CI 95%) and the overall complication rate 25% (0.08-0.41 CI 95%). The direct and systemic thrombolysis approach showed no significant re-canalization rates with an odds ratio of 0.78 (0.24-2.55 CI 95%, P = 0.68). Thrombectomy in conjunction with thrombolysis demonstrated no improved patency or symptom relief with an odds ratio of 1 (0.17-6.03 CI 95%, P = 1.00).Conclusion: Thrombolysis is an effective and safe therapy for portal vein thrombosis in non-cirrhotic patients where systemic anti-coagulation has failed. The heterogenicity of study thrombolysis protocols limits the evaluation of secondary outcomes, and future data should be standardized to determine the role of the thrombolysis access route and thrombectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are the most frequent cause of non-tumoural non-cirrhotic splanchnic vein thrombosis (NC-SVT). Diagnosis of MPN is based on blood cell count alterations, bone marrow histology, and detection of specific gene mutations. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows the simultaneous evaluation of multiple genes implicated in myeloid clonal pathology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential role of NGS in elucidating the aetiology of NC-SVT. DNA samples from 80 patients (75 with idiopathic or exclusively local factor [Idiop/loc-NC-SVT] and 5 with MPN and NC-SVT [SVT-MPN] negative for Janus kinase 2 gene JAK2 V617F and exon 12], calreticulin gene CALR , and thrombopoietin gene MPL mutations by classic techniques) were analysed by NGS. Mutations involved in myeloid disorders different from JAK2 , CALR , and MPL genes were categorised as high-molecular-risk (HMR) variants or variants of unknown significance. In 2/5 triple-negative SVT-MPN cases (40%), a mutation in exon 12 of JAK2 was identified. JAK2 -exon 12 mutation was also identified in 1/75 patients with Idiop/loc-NC-SVT. Moreover, 28/74 (37.8%) of the remaining Idiop/loc-NC-SVT had at least 1 HMR variant. Sixty-two patients with Idiop/loc-NC-SVT were not receiving long-term anticoagulation and 5 of them (8.1%) had recurrent NC-SVT. This cumulative incidence was significantly higher in patients with HMR variants than in those without. NGS identified JAK2 -exon12 mutations not previously detected by conventional techniques. In addition, NGS detected HMR variants in approximately one-third of patients with Idiop/loc-NC-SVT. These patients seem to have a higher risk of splanchnic rethrombosis. NGS might be a useful diagnostic tool in NC-SVT. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) performs massive sequencing of DNA allowing the simultaneous evaluation of multiple genes even at very low mutational levels. Application of this technique in a cohort of patients with non-cirrhotic non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis (NC-SVT) and a negative study for thrombophilic disorders was able to identify patients with a mutation in exon 12 not previously detected by conventional techniques. Moreover, NGS detected High Molecular Risk (HMR)-variants (Mutations involved in myeloid disorders different from JAK2, CALR and MPL genes) in approximately one third of patients. These patients appear to be at increased risk of rethrombosis. All these findings supports NGS as a potential useful tool in the management of NC-SVT. • NGS allows the simultaneous evaluation of multiple genes associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms, even at low mutational levels. • NGS could identify JAK2 -exon12 mutations not previously detected by the conventional techniques. • NGS also identified high-molecular-risk HMR variants associated with clonal haematopoiesis. • Patients with idiopathic/local factor NC-SVT harbouring HRM variants seem to be at a higher risk of recurrent splanchnic thrombosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Portomesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT) may occur after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Previous studies have shown that PMVT patients may have undiagnosed thrombophilia. We recently changed our practice to check thrombophilia panel in every LSG patient preoperatively. To estimate the thrombophilia prevalence in patients seeking LSG, and determine if extended chemoprophylaxis post LSG reduces PMVT. University hospital. Thrombophilia panels were drawn on every patient seeking LSG after July 2018 at 2 high-volume accredited bariatric surgery centers. A positive panel included factor VIII >150%; protein C <70%; protein S <55%; antithrombin III <83%; and activated protein C resistance <2.13. Patients with a positive panel were discharged on extended chemoprophylaxis. PMVT rates and bleeding occurrences were recorded for LSG patients from August 2018 to March 2019 and were compared with a historic cohort of LSG performed from January 2014 to July 2018. One thousand seventy-five patients seeking LSG had thrombophilia panel checked preoperatively. The cohort was 83% female; mean age and body mass index were 39.2 years and 43 kg/m2, respectively. Of the cohort, 52.4% (563/1075) had positive thrombophilia panel, including factor VIII elevation (91.5%), antithrombin III deficiency (6.0%), protein S deficiency (1.1%), protein C deficiency (.9%), and activated protein C resistance (.5%). Between January 2014 and July 2018, 13 PMVT were diagnosed among 4228 LSG (.3%) and there were 17 bleeding occurrences (.4%). After August 2018, one PMVT was diagnosed among 745 LSG (.1%) and there were 5 bleeding occurrences (.6%). The estimated thrombophilia prevalence in patients seeking LSG is 52.4%. The majority (91.5%) of these patients have factor VIII elevation. Extended prophylaxis may decrease PMVT postLSG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Portal vein thrombosis increases the technical difficulty of liver transplantation. • Surgical technique should be adapted to the extent of thrombosis, presence of collaterals and of porto-systemic shunts. • In particular cases, a mesoportal jump graft obtained using iliac bifurcation may represent a valuable technical option. Once considered a contraindication to liver transplantation, portal vein thrombosis still represents a significant challenge to the liver transplant surgeon. Yerdel grade 3 thrombosis is usually managed by interposing a donor iliac vein jump graft between graft portal vein and distal superior mesenteric vein. Venous patch is normally placed in a retrogastric position to avoid its kinking. We report a new technical variant of standard mesoportal jump graft, in which a U-shaped graft was obtained using iliac bifurcation. This technique was used to manage a case of grade 3 portal vein thrombosis in which portal vein was unsuitable due to severe pylephlebitis and pylorus dissection had to be abandoned due to inflammatory changes issue of chronic pancreatitis. The venous patch was of sufficient length and shape to bypass pancreatic head and first duodenum, avoiding the need for its retrogastric placement and pylorus dissection. This case is a further demonstration that technical approach to portal vein thrombosis must be tailored according to its extent and surgical scenario. In selected cases, use of a curved U-shaped jump graft may represent a valuable option. This technical option should be included among options for the management of portal vein thrombosis and be part of the armamentarium of liver transplant surgeon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Liver transplantation continues to rapidly evolve, and in 2020, 8906 orthotopic liver transplants were performed in the United States. As a technically complex surgery with multiple vascular anastomoses, stenosis and thrombosis of the venous anastomoses are among the recognized vascular complications. While rare, venous complications may be challenging to manage and can threaten the graft and the patient. In the last 20 years, endovascular approaches have been increasingly utilized to treat post-transplant venous complications. Herein, the evaluation and interventional treatment of post-transplant venous outflow complications, portal vein stenosis, portal vein thrombosis, and recurrent portal hypertension with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) are reviewed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Liver transplantation is a technically demanding surgical procedure with known complications, and the optimal approach to addressing vascular and biliary complications requires a coordinated effort between surgical and interventional radiology teams. Vascular complications involving the hepatic artery, portal vein, or hepatic veins can be characterized by their mechanism, chronicity, and timing of presentation. These factors help determine whether the optimal therapeutic approach is surgical or endovascular. Very early presentation in the perioperative period favors surgical revision, while later presentation is best addressed endovascularly. Biliary complications can be categorized as leaks or strictures, and coordinated surgical, endoscopic, and percutaneous management is needed to address these types of complications. Through advances in technique and the management of complications, outcomes after liver transplantation continue to improve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a main cause of portal hypertension in children. We describe the characteristics at presentation and outcome of a cohort of patients with PVT to determine clinical features and predictors of outcome. We recorded: (1) Associated factors: prematurity, congenital malformations, neonatal illnesses, umbilical vein catheterization (UVC), deep infections, surgery; (2) congenital and acquired prothrombotic disorders; (3) features at last follow up including survival rate and need for surgery. 187 patients, mean age at diagnosis 4 ± 3.7 years, had a history of prematurity (61%); UVC (65%); neonatal illnesses (79%). The diagnosis followed the detection of splenomegaly (40%), gastrointestinal bleeding (36%), hypersplenism (6%), or was incidental (18%). Of 71 patients who had endoscopy at presentation 62 (87%) had oesophageal varices. After 11.3 years' follow up 63 (34%) required surgery or TIPS. Ten-year survival rate was 98%, with 90% shunt patency. Spleen size, variceal bleeding and hypersplenism at presentation were predictors of surgery or TIPS (p < 0.05). PVT is associated with congenital and acquired co-morbidities. History of prematurity, neonatal illnesses and UVC should lead to rule out PVT. Large spleen, variceal bleeding and hypersplenism at presentation predict the need for eventual surgery in a third of cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Budd-Chiari syndrome and non-cirrhotic non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis are 2 rare disorders, with several similarities that are categorized under the term splanchnic vein thrombosis. Both disorders are frequently associated with an underlying prothrombotic disorder. They can cause severe portal hypertension and usually affect young patients, negatively influencing life expectancy when the diagnosis and treatment are not performed at an early stage. Yet, they have specific features that require individual consideration. The current review will focus on the available knowledge on pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of both entities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is an unusual-site thrombosis commonly encountered in patients with malignancies, cirrhosis, and acute abdominal inflammatory conditions (AIC). Current recommendations suggest that anticoagulation may improve recanalization rates but there is limited information on venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence rates and whether the etiologies of PVT respond similarly with anticoagulation. Objective To characterize the natural clinical course and outcomes of patients diagnosed with PVT based on etiology. Patients/methods Patients with a diagnosis of PVT between 2005 and 2015 who were followed for at least one year and had revised imaging at 12 months ± 3 months were identified. Comorbidities, demographics, anticoagulation choice and clinical outcomes including VTE recurrence, cavernous transformation, PVT recanalization, progression and mortality were obtained. Results Of 698 patients diagnosed with PVT, 85 patients were evaluable according to criteria: 54 had cirrhosis (63.5%), 15 malignancy (17.6%) and 16 AIC (18.8%). Mean age was 55.6 ± 13.1 years. At presentation, 40% patients were symptomatic and 29.4% received anticoagulation. Patients with AIC were anticoagulated more frequently compared to those with malignancy or cirrhosis (87.5% vs. 33.3% vs. 11.1%). Overall, patients with cirrhosis had lower rates of PVT progression (0% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.02) and patients with AIC had higher rates of cavernous transformation compared to cirrhosis or malignancy-associated PVT (31.3% vs. 7.4% vs. 0%, p = 002). Among untreated patients, those with malignancy had significantly higher rates of VTE recurrence and PVT progression than patients with cirrhosis (20% vs. 4.2% and 20% vs. 0%). Conclusions The natural course of PVT differs among etiologies. In the absence of anticoagulation, patients with malignancy are more prone to VTE recurrence and PVT progression compared to patients with cirrhosis. Given the high rate of VTE recurrence at 12 months in patients with malignancy-associated PVT, anticoagulation should be considered for this group. Highlights • The natural course of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) differs among etiologies. • Thrombosis recurrence and progression rates are higher in malignancy than cirrhosis. • Anticoagulation should be considered for patients with malignancy-associated PVT. • PVT recanalization rates are high in cirrhosis, even without anticoagulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]