Search

Background: The perception of takotsubo syndrome (TTS) has evolved significantly over the years, primarily driven by increased recognition of acute complications and mortality., Objectives: This study aimed to explore temporal trends in demographic patterns, risk factors, clinical presentations, and outcomes in patients with TTS., Methods: Patients diagnosed with TTS between 2004 and 2021 were enrolled from the InterTAK (International Takotsubo) registry. To assess temporal trends, patients were divided into 6 groups, each corresponding to a 3-year interval within the study period., Results: Overall, 3,957 patients were included in the study. There was a significant demographic transition, with the proportion of male patients rising from 10% to 15% (P = 0.003). Although apical TTS remained the most common form, the diagnosis of midventricular TTS increased from 18% to 28% (P = 0.018). The prevalence of physical triggers increased from 39% to 58% over the years (P < 0.001). There was a significant increase in 60-day mortality over the years (P < 0.001). However, a landmark analysis excluding patients who died within the first 60 days showed no differences in 1-year mortality (P = 0.150)., Conclusions: This study of temporal trends in TTS highlights a transition in patients demographic with a growing prevalence among men, increasing recognition of midventricular TTS type, and increased short-term mortality and rates of cardiogenic shock in recent years. This transition aligns with the rising prevalence of physical triggers, as expression of increased recognition of TTS in association with acute comorbidities., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Templin has received institutional grants from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, and SMT; and has received consulting grants from Biotronik, Microport, and Innova. Dr Airaksinen has received grants or has contracts with the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research; and has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bayer, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca. Dr Bauersachs has received grants from or has contracts with Abiomed, CVRx, Norgine, Roche, and Zoll; holds patents PCT/EP2007/008772 and PCT/EP2009/051986 for microRNA and downstream targets for diagnostics and therapeutic purposes; has received consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardior, Corvia, CVRx, Edwards, Norgine, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Vifor; and has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardior, CVRx, Norgine, Novartis, Pfizer, and Vifor. Dr Boehm has received grants from or has contracts with Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft research support (DFG, SFB-TTR 219, S-01); has received speaker honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Novartis, Servier, and Vifor; and is on the advisory board of Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Novartis, Pfizer, ReCor, Servier, and Vifor. Dr Ferreira has received payments for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from A Menarini, Medinfar, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Biotronik, and Medtronic; and has received payments for participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Medtronic. Dr Dichtl has received consulting fees from Reata. Dr Kaiser has received consulting fees from the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health; and has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Medtronic, Abbott, and Europa Organization. Dr Kobza has received institutional grants on behalf of the Luzerner Kantonsspital from Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Medtronik, and Sis-Medical; and has received consulting fees from Biosense Webster, Biotronik, and Medtronic. Dr Koenig has received grants and provision of reagents to the institution from Singulex, Dr.Beckmann Pharma, Abbott, and Roche Diagnostics; has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer, The Medicines Company, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Corvidia Therapeutics, OMEICOS, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novo Nordisk, New Amsterdam Pharma, TenSixteen Bio, Esperion, and Genentech; and has received lecture fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Amgen, Berlin-Chemie, Sanofi, and AstraZeneca. Dr Lüscher has received research or educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Vifor; is the president elect of the European Society of Cardiology; is chairman of the research committee of the Swiss Heart Foundation; is President of the Board of the Zurich Heart House; and is Trustee of the London Heart House. Dr Karakas has received grants or has contracts with Vifor Pharma and Daiichi-Sankyo; has received consulting fees or payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Vifor, Pharmacosmos, and Sphingotec; and has received equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or other services from Sphingotec and Vifor Pharma. Dr Niederseer has received consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gerson Lehmann Group (GLG) Consulting, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Zoll; has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer; and has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Abbott, Amgen, Bayer, and Novo Nordisk. Dr Roffi has received institutional research grants from Boston Scientific, Cordis, Terumo, Biotronik, and Medtronic. Dr Ruschitzka has not received personal payments by pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers in the last 3 years; the Department of Cardiology (University Hospital of Zurich/University of Zurich), however, reports research, educational, and/or travel grants from Abbott, Abiomed, Alexion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, At the Limits Ltd, Bayer, Berlin Heart, B. Braun, Biosense Webster, Biosensors Europe AG, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bracco, Cardinal Health Switzerland, Concept Medical, Corteria, CSL, Daiichi-Sankyo, Diatools AG, Edwards Lifesciences, Guidant Europe NV, Hamilton Health Sciences, IHF, Innosuisse, Johnson/Johnson, Kaneka Corporation, Kantar, Kiniksa, Labormedizinisches Zentrum, MedAlliance, Medical Education Global Solutions, Medtronic, MicroPort, MSD, Mundipharma Medical Company, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orion, Pfizer, Quintiles Switzerland Sarl, RecorMedical, Roche Diagnostics, Roche Pharma, Sahajanand IN, Sanofi, Sarstedt AG, Servier, SIS Medical, Sorin CRM SAS, SSS International Clinical Research, Stromal, Terumo Deutschland, Trama Solutions, V-Wave, Vascular Medical, Vifor, Wissens Plus, and ZOLL. Prof Ruschitzka has not received personal payments by pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers in the last 3 years; remuneration for the time spent in the following consulting activities were made directly to the University of Zurich and do not impact on his personal remuneration: AstraZeneca (IMC), Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Citi Research, Klub Class, Novo Nordisk, Radcliffe Group, Stiftung Pfizer Forschungspreis, and Vifor; remuneration for the following lectures were made directly to the University of Zurich and do not impact on his personal remuneration: Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca (A+ Science AB), Bayer (At the Limits), Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific (CCE Services), Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, C.T.I GmbH, FomF, Hôpitaux Universitaires des Genève (GECORE), Luzerner Kantonsspital, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Medcon, Medscape (WebMD), Medtronic, Medworld, Novartis, Roche, Ruwag, Swiss Heart Failure Academy, The Hong Kong Heart Failure Society, Trama Solutions SL, Inselspital Bern, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Medical Education Global Solutions), Romanian Society of Cardiology, ÖKG Österreichische Gesellschaft für Kardiologie, and Zoll; has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca (IMC/A+ Science AB), Boehringer Ingelheim, Centro Hospitaler de Vila Nova de Gaia, C.T.I. GmbH (Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf), European Society of Cardiology, Monocle, Novartis, Spektar Putovanja, Austrian Heart Failure Association, and Heart Failure Association of the ESC; remuneration for following Advisory Boards were made directly to the University of Zurich and do not impact on his personal remuneration: Bayer, Roche, IMC/AstraZeneca, and Amgen; and he has received secretarial and administrative support of the HFA for his role as President/Past-President for 2018 to 2020. Dr Schunkert has received consulting fees from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Merck Sharp and Dohme, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Servier; has received honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, Servier, and Synlab; and has received honoraria for his participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board of Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, and Amgen. Dr Wolfrum has received consulting fees from NVT/Biosensors as well as payments for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from NVT/Biosensors; and has equities in Hi-D Imaging, Winterthur, Switzerland. Dr Crea has received personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Abbott, Menarini, Chiesi, and Daiichi-Sankyo, outside of the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sham-controlled trials demonstrated safety and efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) to lower blood pressure (BP). Association of baseline heart rate with BP reduction after RDN is incompletely understood., Objectives: The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the impact of baseline heart rate on BP reduction without antihypertensive medications in the SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED (Global Clinical Study of Renal Denervation With the Symplicity Spyral Multi-electrode Renal Denervation System in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension in the Absence of Antihypertensive Medications) Pivotal trial., Methods: Patients removed from any antihypertensive medications were enrolled with office systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥150 and <180 mm Hg and randomized 1:1 to RDN or sham control. Patients were separated according to baseline office heart rate <70 or ≥70 beats/min. BP changes from baseline to 3 months between treatment arms were adjusted for baseline SBP using analysis of covariance., Results: Scatter plots of 3-month changes in 24-hour and office SBP illustrate a wide range of changes in SBP for different baseline heart rates. Treatment difference at 3 months between RDN and sham control with baseline office heart rate ≥70 beats/min for 24-hour SBP was -6.2 mm Hg (95% CI: -9.0 to -3.5 mm Hg) (P < 0.001) and for baseline office heart rate <70 beats/min it was -0.1 mm Hg (-3.8 to 3.6 mm Hg) (P = 0.97) with an interaction P value of 0.008. Results were similar for changes in office, daytime, and nighttime SBP at 3 months, with a greater reduction in SBP with baseline office heart rate ≥70 beats/min., Conclusions: Reduction in mean office, 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime SBP for RDN at 3 months was greater with baseline office heart rate ≥70 than <70 beats/min, suggesting an association between baseline heart rate and BP reduction after RDN. (SPYRAL PIVOTAL-SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Study; NCT02439749)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The trial is sponsored by Medtronic and was designed in collaboration with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration by the steering committee and sponsor. Profs Böhm, Ukena, Ewen, and Mahfoud are supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TTR219, S-01, M-03, M-05). Prof. Böhm has received consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Bayer AG, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Servier, Medtronic, Vifor, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Tsioufis has received honoraria for advisory boards and lectures from Medtronic, Servier, Bayer, Menarini, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Pythagoras, Sanofi, and Amgen. Dr Kandzari has received institutional research/grant support from Medtronic CardioVascular and Ablative Solutions; and has received personal consulting honoraria from Medtronic CardioVascular. Prof. Kario has received scientific support and speaker honoraria from Daiichi-Sankyo, Sanwa Chemical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Omron Healthcare, A & D Inc, Fukudadenshi Inc, Medtronic, and ReCor Medical. Prof. Weber has received consulting fees from Medtronic, ReCor, and Ablative Solutions. Prof. Schmieder has received consultant fees from Medtronic and ReCor; and has received grant support from Medtronic, ReCor, and Ablative Solutions. Prof. Townsend has received consultant fees from Medtronic, Axio, and Regeneron. Dr Pocock has received consultant fees from Medtronic. Prof. Weil has received honoraria from Medtronic, Novartis, ReCor, Cardinal Health, Bayer, and AstraZeneca. Mr Fahy is an employee of and shareholder for Medtronic. Prof. Mahfoud is supported by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie; and has received scientific support and speaker honoraria from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, and ReCor Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) occurs predominantly in post-menopausal women but is also found in younger patients., Objectives: This study aimed to investigate age-related differences in TTS., Methods: Patients diagnosed with TTS and enrolled in the International Takotsubo Registry between January 2011 and February 2017 were included in this analysis and were stratified by age (younger: ≤50 years, middle-age: 51 to 74 years, elderly: ≥75 years). Baseline characteristics, hospital course, as well as short- and long-term mortality were compared among groups., Results: Of 2,098 TTS patients, 242 (11.5%) patients were ≤50 years of age, 1,194 (56.9%) were 51 to 74 years of age, and 662 (31.6%) were ≥75 years of age. Younger patients were more often men (12.4% vs. 10.9% vs. 6.3%; p = 0.002) and had an increased prevalence of acute neurological (16.3% vs. 8.4% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.001) or psychiatric disorders (14.1% vs. 10.3% vs. 5.6%; p < 0.001) compared with middle-aged and elderly TTS patients. Furthermore, younger patients had more often cardiogenic shock (15.3% vs. 9.1% vs. 8.1%; p = 0.004) and had a numerically higher in-hospital mortality (6.6% vs. 3.6% vs. 5.1%; p = 0.07). At multivariable analysis, younger (odds ratio: 1.60; 95% confidence interval: 0.86 to 3.01; p = 0.14) and older age (odds ratio: 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.80; p = 0.75) were not independently associated with in-hospital mortality using the middle-aged group as a reference. There were no differences in 60-day mortality rates among groups., Conclusions: A substantial proportion of TTS patients are younger than 50 years of age. TTS is associated with severe complications requiring intensive care, particularly in younger patients., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prognosis of Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) remains controversial due to scarcity of available data. Additionally, the effect of the triggering factors remains elusive., Objectives: This study compared prognosis between TTS and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients and investigated short- and long-term outcomes in TTS based on different triggers., Methods: Patients with TTS were enrolled from the International Takotsubo Registry. Long-term mortality of patients with TTS was compared to an age- and sex-matched cohort of patients with ACS. In addition, short- and long-term outcomes were compared between different groups according to triggering conditions., Results: Overall, TTS patients had a comparable long-term mortality risk with ACS patients. Of 1,613 TTS patients, an emotional trigger was detected in 485 patients (30%). Of 630 patients (39%) related to physical triggers, 98 patients (6%) had acute neurologic disorders, while in the other 532 patients (33%), physical activities, medical conditions, or procedures were the triggering conditions. The remaining 498 patients (31%) had no identifiable trigger. TTS patients related to physical stress showed higher mortality rates than ACS patients during long-term follow-up, whereas patients related to emotional stress had better outcomes compared with ACS patients., Conclusions: Overall, TTS patients had long-term outcomes comparable to age- and sex-matched ACS patients. Also, we demonstrated that TTS can either be benign or a life-threating condition depending on the inciting stress factor. We propose a new classification based on triggers, which can serve as a clinical tool to predict short- and long-term outcomes of TTS. (International Takotsubo Registry [InterTAK Registry]; NCT01947621)., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the interaction between blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) reduction and changes in left ventricular (LV) structure and function following renal sympathetic denervation (RDN)., Background: Hypertension results in structural and functional cardiac changes. RDN reduces BP, HR, and LV mass and improves diastolic dysfunction., Methods: We evaluated LV size, mass, and function before and 6 months after RDN in 66 patients with resistant hypertension and analyzed results in relation to systolic BP (SBP) and HR., Results: SBP decreased by 11 ± 3 mm Hg in the first, 18 ± 5 mm Hg in the second, and 36 ± 7 mm Hg in the third tertile of SBP at baseline (p < 0.001). HR decreased by 13 ± 4 beats/min, 8 ± 3 beats/min, and 11 ± 6 beats/min in tertiles of SBP (p for interaction between tertiles = 0.314). In all SBP tertiles, LV mass index (LVMI) decreased similarly (LVMI -6.3 ± 2.2 g/m(2.7), -8.3 ± 2.1 g/m(2.7), and -9.6 ± 1.9 g/m(2.7); p for interaction = 0.639). LVMI decreased unrelated to HR at baseline (p for interaction = 0.471). The diastolic parameters E-wave deceleration time, isovolumetric relaxation time, and E'-wave velocity improved similarly in all tertiles of SBP and HR. Changes in LV mass and function were also unrelated to reduction in SBP or HR. Vascular compliance improved dependently on BP but independently of HR reduction., Conclusions: In patients with resistant hypertension, LV hypertrophy and diastolic function improved 6 months after RDN, without significant relation to SBP and HR. These findings suggest a direct effect of altered sympathetic activity in addition to unloading on cardiac hypertrophy and function., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The autonomic nervous system contributes to the creation of atrial fibrillation substrates. Atrial electrophysiology is influenced differently by sympathetic and parasympathetic activation. Several strategies are available to modulate the complex interaction between the autonomic nervous system and the heart. However, different approaches target the problem differently making the prediction of arrhythmogenic and/or antiarrhythmic effects difficult. We discuss the role of the autonomic nervous system on the development of a substrate for atrial fibrillation and explore the potential antiarrhythmic and/or arrhythmogenic effect of modulation of the autonomic nervous system by renal sympathetic denervation, ganglionated plexi ablation, ganglion stellatum ablation, high thoracic epidural anesthesia, low-level vagal nerve stimulation, and baroreflex stimulation., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the effect of renal denervation (RDN) in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension according to the established definition (Joint National Committee VII and European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology guidelines), that is, office blood pressure (BP) ≥140/90 mm Hg (with at least three antihypertensive drugs, including a diuretic, in adequate doses) and confirmed by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM)., Background: RDN emerged as an innovative interventional antihypertensive therapy. However, so far, only patients with severe hypertension (systolic BP ≥160 mm Hg or ≥150 mm Hg for patients with type 2 diabetes) have been investigated., Methods: In this study, there were 54 patients with moderate treatment-resistant hypertension (office BP ≥140/90 mm Hg and <160/100 mm Hg and diagnosis confirmed by 24-h ABPM of ≥130/80 mm Hg) who underwent catheter-based RDN using the Symplicity catheter (Medtronic Inc., Mountain View, California)., Results: Patients were treated with 5.1 ± 1.4 antihypertensive drugs on average. Office BP was significantly reduced by 13/7 mm Hg 6 months after RDN (systolic: 151 ± 6 mm Hg vs. 138 ± 21 mm Hg, p < 0.001; diastolic: 83 ± 11 mm Hg vs. 75 ± 11 mm Hg, p < 0.001). In patients (n = 36) who underwent ABPM 6 months after treatment, there was a reduction in average 24-h ABPM by 14/7 mm Hg (systolic: 150 ± 16 mm Hg vs. 136 ± 16 mm Hg, p < 0.001; diastolic: 83 ± 10 mm Hg vs. 76 ± 10 mm Hg, p < 0.001). In 51% of patients, office BP was controlled below 140/90 mm Hg after RDN. In addition, heart rate decreased from 67 ± 11 to 63 ± 10 beats/min (p = 0.006)., Conclusions: Our data indicate that RDN may reduce office and 24-h ambulatory BP substantially in patients with moderate treatment-resistant hypertension. (Renal Denervation in Treatment Resistant Hypertension; NCT01687725)., (Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the heart frequently resulting from viral infections and/or post-viral immune-mediated responses. It is one of the important causes of dilated cardiomyopathy worldwide. The diagnosis is presumed on clinical presentation and noninvasive diagnostic methods such as cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for in vivo diagnosis of myocarditis. The therapeutic and prognostic benefits of endomyocardial biopsy results have recently been demonstrated in several clinical trials. Although remarkable advances in diagnosis, understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms, and treatment of acute myocarditis were gained during the last years, no standard treatment strategies could be defined as yet, apart from standard heart failure therapy and physical rest. In severe cases, mechanical support or heart transplantation may become necessary. There is some evidence that immunosuppressive and immunomodulating therapy are effective for chronic, virus-negative inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Further investigations by controlled, randomized studies are needed to definitively determine their role in the treatment of myocarditis., (Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the effects of interventional renal sympathetic denervation (RD) on cardiorespiratory response to exercise., Background: RD reduces blood pressure at rest in patients with resistant hypertension., Methods: We enrolled 46 patients with therapy-resistant hypertension as extended investigation of the Symplicity HTN-2 (Renal Denervation With Uncontrolled Hypertension) trial. Thirty-seven patients underwent bilateral RD and 9 patients were assigned to the control group. Cardiopulmonary exercise tests were performed at baseline and 3-month follow-up., Results: In the RD group, compared with baseline examination, blood pressure at rest and at maximum exercise after 3 months was significantly reduced by 31 ± 13/9 ± 13 mm Hg (p < 0.0001) and by 21 ± 20/5 ± 14 mm Hg (p < 0.0001), respectively. Achieved work rate increased by 5 ± 13 W (p = 0.029) whereas peak oxygen uptake remained unchanged. Blood pressure 2 min after exercise was significantly reduced by 29 ± 17/8 ± 15 mm Hg (p < 0.001 for systolic blood pressure; p = 0.002 for diastolic blood pressure). Heart rate at rest decreased after RD (4 ± 11 beats/min; p = 0.028), whereas maximum heart rate and heart rate increase during exercise were not different. Heart rate recovery improved significantly by 4 ± 7 beats/min after renal denervation (p = 0.009). In the control group, there were no significant changes in blood pressure, heart rate, maximum work rate, or ventilatory parameters after 3 months., Conclusions: RD reduces blood pressure during exercise without compromising chronotropic competence in patients with resistant hypertension. Heart rate at rest decreased and heart rate recovery improved after the procedure. (Renal Denervation With Uncontrolled Hypertension; [Symplicity HTN-2]; NCT00888433)., (Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)