Search

Background - Continuing Professional Development is important for maintaining and developing knowledge and skills. Evidence regarding direct impact on practice is limited. Existing literature often lacks sufficient detail regarding the initiative or its evaluation, making transferability problematic.\ud \ud Objective - To explore the impact and perceived value of multi-disciplinary Continuing Professional Development workshops for Health Visitors who support families with children with complex health needs.\ud \ud Design - Realistic Evaluation principles guided the research. Workshop attendees were invited to participate (n.21), 81% (n.17) agreed. Data collection included a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis.\ud \ud Setting - One North of England Health Service Trust.\ud \ud Findings - Interrelated temporal themes emerged. Before the workshop expectations included, uncertainty regarding content and ambiguity regarding attendance. During workshops comments focused on networking opportunities, the detail, content and facilitation of the learning experience. ‘Emotional safety’ enabled interaction, sharing and absorption of information, and potentially increased trust, confidence and social capital. Participants viewed the workshop as informative, enhancing insight regarding roles, services and processes. Post-workshop participants reported examples of practice enhancements attributed to workshop attendance including: f building; improved team working; facilitation of early referral and accessing additional support for families.\ud \ud Conclusions - Findings suggest initiative developers aiming CPD at new or existing teams need to consider nurturing social capital and to pay attention to the context and mechanisms, which can prompt attendance, engagement and subsequent practice application.

Aim/objective\ud Through an exploration of student nurses and lecturers’ professionalism discourses, this study illuminates influences on professional socialization and offers an appreciation of the processes of language (discourse) adoption involved.\ud \ud Background\ud Professionalism is a complex concept to define. Nursing research has predominantly explored professionalism in clinical practice; however, the time spent university is key to professional socialization and identity development. Previous research focused on socialization in the clinical area only. This study examined how student nurses and their lecturers construct their talk regarding professionalism while at university.\ud \ud Design\ud A social constructionism approach was adopted, where it is assumed that we jointly construct our world on shared assumptions and that language is central to this process.\ud \ud Methods\ud Employing a Discourse and Social Psychology (DASP) approach to discourse analysis, seven nursing students (Adult, Child, and Mental Health fields) and 8 lecturers participated in a total of 16 interviews.\ud \ud Results\ud The findings indicated participants drew on several interpretative repertoires. These changed over the 3 year degree. Analysis led to development of a Model of Professional Discourse Adoption, illustrating a three phased process, resonating with theories of professional socialization in nursing.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud The study offers insights into how education strategies may support learning and teaching, and professionalism communication.

Background There is a continuous decline in cervical cancer screening uptake, especially in young women, even though screening saves over 4500 lives annually in the UK. Psychological factors that could influence participation identified in previous studies included anxiety, embarrassment, and fear. The context of these factors is broad and ill-defined. This study aimed to unpick the deeper issues and factors affecting participation and non-participation in young women aged 25–34 years. Methods The method drew on the principles of grounded theory to understand how participants' form meanings and make decisions on issues such as screening. Maximum variation purposive sampling was used to recruit 26 participants from communities (cervical cancer screening call and recall register, three universities, community centre). Data were obtained by semi-structured interviews (16 participants) and a focus group (eight). Analysis aided by mind mapping software (MindGenius Business 6) led to the organisation of data into codes, themes, and categories. Findings Data analysis showed that sexual association was the core underlying category. This association was drawn from four elements: awareness, human issues, emotional attribution, and acceptability. Low awareness was mainly about screening procedure and body anatomy (location of the cervix). Overall, perception of the screening was positive and acceptability was expressed. Factors within emotional attribution and human issues were major impacts on screening behaviour and decision. Non-participation or delayed participation were strongly linked to the basic social psychological process, associating screening with sex, and created negative emotions such as embarrassment and anxiety. These associations included the screening procedure mimicking sex (penetration), the intrusive nature of screening (exposure, intimate, private), and sociocultural beliefs (promiscuity, taboo, and body insecurities). Screening that touched on fundamental human issues such as reproduction (infertility) and mortality (death from cancer) affected participation. These identified issues were sometimes unspoken and unconsciously influenced screening decision in some participants. Interpretation Our findings suggest that sexual association is a hidden issue affecting participation in cervical screening. This research is expected to inform future practices and policy implementation towards increasing screening uptake. Suggested service improvement strategies included alternative screening methods (eg, home self-testing), educating health professionals on sensitivity, and an invitation letter explaining in-depth details of the procedure. These changes could help improve the perception of screening among women of all ages. Funding None.

Background Bowel cancer is the third most common cancer and the second major cause of cancer deaths in the UK. Research suggests that the risk of death from bowel cancer can be reduced by 16% through regular screening. An initial scientific literature review shows little research in this area. Previous studies identify non-attendance and low uptake as a major challenge and suggest that these factors could be affected by literacy level, fear, and anxiety. However, many of these studies were undertaken in other locations and countries, limiting replication or generalisation in the UK. There is therefore a need for qualitative investigation into the reasons and motives for low uptake. We explored reasons for participation and non-participation in the NHS bowel cancer screening programme, which requires participants to undertake a faecal occult blood test. We aimed to develop an understanding of behaviour regarding bowel cancer and the screening process; explore how people make sense of information gathered and how this influences their decisions; and describe similarities and differences regarding different groups' perceptions of bowel cancer screening. Methods Qualitative research methods are used to unpick participants' sense-making processes. A grounded theory approach has allowed the development and understanding of how participants form meanings and make decisions dependent on factors such as culture and sex. 26 participants were recruited through the bowel cancer screening hub in accordance with ethics approval. Participants were those who completed the faecal occult blood test (with negative result) and those who declined during the first round of the programme. Data were obtained with semistructured, face-to-face interviews and were analysed with grounded theory techniques. Analysis was done by organisation of data into codes, themes, and categories by Nvivo and Mind Genius software. Interviewer bias was minimised by use of credibility strategies such as member checking, reflexivity, and peer review. Findings Data analysis showed participants' low awareness of the faecal occult blood test before they received the invitation for screening. Awareness of bowel cancer was mainly through past experience or family history or was work-related. Data suggested that demography and cultural issues such as age, sex, taboo, attitudes, altruism, so-called ostrich syndrome, and stoicism can affect behaviour and decisions. Knowledge and awareness were identified as factors in breaking some of the cultural barriers affecting uptake. Main reasons for uptake were health protection or peace of mind. All participants viewed screening positively and will continue with screening. Men seemed very keen to participate in screening and seemed as mindful of their health as were women. Possible reasons to decline the invitation included "if I don't know it won't happen to me", "taboo subject", "method of stool sample collection", "fear", and "messy and not pleasant". Limitations of our study included the small number of people who declined screening: only two declined in the first round, but have completed subsequent screening. Several practical issues have been identified that will inform service provision—eg, improvement of the invitation letter and information about sample collection. Interpretation We expect the output of this research to inform future practice and policy implementation towards increased awareness, improved perception and uptake of screening, and service improvement that could lead to a substantial reduction in bowel cancer deaths. The findings will also be drawn on to explore the role of social marketing in improving perception and uptake of the bowel cancer screening programme. Funding Northumbria University at Newcastle upon Tyne in conjunction with North East, Yorkshire and Humber Quality Assurance Reference Centre for Cancer Screening (NEYHQARC).