1. Making a bridge between general hospital and specialised community-based treatment for alcohol use disorder—A pragmatic randomised controlled trial
- Author
-
Bent Nielsen, Anne-Sophie Schwarz, Jes Søgaard, and Anette Søgaard Nielsen
- Subjects
Adult ,Counseling ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Referral ,Brief alcohol intervention ,Audit ,Alcohol use disorder ,Hospitals, General ,Toxicology ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Ambulatory Care ,Humans ,Medicine ,Single-Blind Method ,Pharmacology (medical) ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Referral and Consultation ,Alcohol treatment ,Pharmacology ,Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test ,business.industry ,Attendance ,Community Health Centers ,Transitional Care ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,SBIRT ,Patient Discharge ,Hospitalization ,Alcoholism ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Treatment Outcome ,Number needed to treat ,Physical therapy ,Female ,Brief intervention ,business ,RCT ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Aim To investigate if more patients in the intervention group attended specialized alcohol treatment compared with a treatment-as-usual group (TAU). Methods Pragmatic randomized controlled trial where consecutive patients, admitted to somatic hospitals, filled out a lifestyle questionnaire with the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) embedded. Patients scoring 8+ on AUDIT were included in the study. Included patients were randomized to either a Danish screening brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) called the Relay model or TAU depending on date of admission. The Relay group was offered a brief alcohol intervention by an outreach alcohol therapist. Patients scoring 16 points and above on the AUDIT test also received referral to alcohol treatment. Outcome was attendance at specialized outpatient alcohol treatment centres after discharge from hospital. Information on patients was gathered from municipal databases at 18 months follow-up. Results A total of 3534 patients completed the questionnaire, and 609 patients (17%) scored AUDIT 8+. 48 patients were lost to follow-up, and the final sample had 561 patients. Only 33 patients (6%) attended outpatient treatment at 18-months follow-up, but significantly more patients in the Relay group sought alcohol treatment than in the TAU group (OR = 2.5 [1.2;5.2] (p = 0.017)). Number needed to treat (NNT) was 20 [95% CI 11.2;112.3]. Conclusion The Relay intervention was associated with more patients attending specialized treatment, but further research is needed to establish if general hospitals are an excellent platform for performing SBIRT.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF