1. A practical methodology to improve the dosimetric accuracy of MR-based radiotherapy simulation for brain tumors
- Author
-
Annie M. Tang, Jeffrey C.F. Lui, Kam-Hung Wong, Francis Kar-ho Lee, Jeffrey Chiu, Chi Ching Law, and Jonan C.Y. Lee
- Subjects
medicine.medical_treatment ,Biophysics ,General Physics and Astronomy ,Computed tomography ,Dose distribution ,computer.software_genre ,Voxel ,Planning study ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Radiation treatment planning ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Brain Neoplasms ,business.industry ,Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ,Significant difference ,Radiotherapy Dosage ,General Medicine ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Volumetric modulated arc therapy ,Radiation therapy ,Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ,business ,Nuclear medicine ,therapeutics ,computer - Abstract
Purpose To investigate the dosimetric accuracy of synthetic computed tomography (sCT) images generated by a clinically-ready voxel-based MRI simulation package, and to develop a simple and feasible method to improve the accuracy. Methods 20 patients with brain tumor were selected to undergo CT and MRI simulation. sCT images were generated by a clinical MRI simulation package. The discrepancy between planning CT and sCT in CT number and body contour were evaluated. To resolve the discrepancies, an sCT specific CT-relative electron density (RED) calibration curve was used, and a layer of pseudo-skin was created on the sCT. The dosimetric impact of these discrepancies, and the improvement brought about by the modifications, were evaluated by a planning study. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans for each patient were created and optimized on the planning CT, which were then transferred to the original sCT and the modified-sCT for dose re-calculation. Dosimetric comparisons and gamma analysis between the calculated doses in different images were performed. Results The average gamma passing rate with 1%/1 mm criteria was only 70.8% for the comparison of dose distribution between planning CT and original sCT. The mean dose difference between the planning CT and the original sCT were −1.2% for PTV D95 and −1.7% for PTV Dmax, while the mean dose difference was within 0.7 Gy for all relevant OARs. After applying the modifications on the sCT, the average gamma passing rate was increased to 92.2%. Mean dose difference in PTV D95 and Dmax were reduced to −0.1% and −0.3% respectively. The mean dose difference was within 0.2 Gy for all OAR structures and no statistically significant difference were found. Conclusions The modified-sCT demonstrated improved dosimetric agreement with the planning CT. These results indicated the overall dosimetric accuracy and practicality of this improved MR-based treatment planning method.
- Published
- 2021