Search

Objectives To explore the in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility among clinically important Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in Taiwan. Methods From 2016 through 2018, a total of 5458 GNB isolates, including Escherichia coli (n = 1545), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 1255), Enterobacter species (n = 259), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1127), Acinetobacter baumannii complex (n = 368), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 179), were collected. The susceptibility results were summarized by the breakpoints of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of CLSI 2020, EUCAST 2020 (for colistin), or published articles (for ceftolozane/tazobactam). The resistance genes among multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-GNB were investigated by multiplex PCR. Results Significantly higher rates of non-susceptibility (NS) to ertapenem and carbapenemase production, predominantly KPC and OXA-48-like beta-lactamase, were observed in Enterobacterales isolates causing respiratory tract infection than those causing complicated urinary tract or intra-abdominal infection (12.7%/3.44% vs. 5.7%/0.76% or 7.7%/0.97%, respectively). Isolates of Enterobacter species showed higher rates of phenotypic extended-spectrum β-lactamase and NS to ertapenem than E. coli or K. pneumoniae isolates. Although moderate activity (54–83%) was observed against most potential AmpC-producing Enterobacterales isolates, ceftolozane/tazobactam exhibited poor in vitro (44.7–47.4%) activity against phenotypic AmpC Enterobacter cloacae isolates. Additionally, 251 (22.3%) P. aeruginosa isolates exhibited the carbapenem-NS phenotype, and their MDR and XDR rate was 63.3% and 33.5%, respectively. Fifteen (75%) of twenty Burkholderia cenocepacia complex isolates were inhibited by ceftolozane/tazobactam at MICs of ≤4 μg/mL. Conclusions With the increase in antibiotic resistance in Taiwan, it is imperative to periodically monitor the susceptibility profiles of clinically important GNB.

Objectives: The prevalence of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) demonstrating extensive, multiple antimicrobial resistance is increasing in England, leaving few treatment choices. Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin approved in Europe for the treatment of aerobic GNB infections in adults with limited treatment options. We report pooled data for a clinical isolate set collected in England between 2014–2018. Methods: MICs were determined by broth microdilution according to International Organization for Standardization guidelines. Cefiderocol susceptibility was tested using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Muller–Hinton broth. Susceptibility rates were based on EUCAST breakpoints. In the absence of a species-specific breakpoint, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints were used. Results: Of 1886 isolates from England [74.1% Enterobacterales (18.7% Escherichia coli, 17.2% Klebsiella pneumoniae), 25.9% non-fermenters (18.4% Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 3.7% Acinetobacter baumannii)], 98.7% were cefiderocol-susceptible. Cefiderocol susceptibility in Enterobacterales (99.0%) was significantly (P < 0.01) greater than ceftolozane/tazobactam (94.3%), but similar to meropenem (99.3%) and ceftazidime/avibactam (99.4%). Overall, cefiderocol susceptibility (98.0%) in non-fermenters was significantly (P < 0.01) higher than comparators (range, 84.5–92.4%). Susceptibility to cefiderocol was 98.3–99.6% by infection source and was significantly (P < 0.01) greater than comparators for isolates from patients with nosocomial pneumonia (cefiderocol, 98.3%; comparators range, 79.8–93.8%). Excluding intrinsically meropenem-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, 47/1846 isolates (2.5%) were meropenem-resistant. A high proportion of meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa were susceptible to cefiderocol (95.0%). All S. maltophilia isolates (40/40) were cefiderocol-susceptible. Conclusion: A substantial proportion of clinical isolates from England, representing a wide range of pathogens across multiple infection sources, was cefiderocol-susceptible. Cefiderocol retained activity against meropenem-resistant strains.

Objectives To describe the real-world clinical use of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) and associated outcomes in France. Patients and methods Multicenter, prospective cohort study conducted in 22 hospitals. All adult patients who received at least one dose of C/T were asked to participate (2018-2019). Patients were treated according to standard hospital practice and followed up until C/T stop. Results At the time of the analysis, 84 patients were evaluated. The median age was 64.8 years, and 67.9% (57/84) of patients were males. Fifty-seven patients (57/82, 69.5%) had one or more risk factors for multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections (missing MDR risk factor data for two patients). Most patients were critically ill and had several comorbidities. A majority (59/84, 70.2%) of patients had nosocomial infections. Half of all patients (n = 42) had a diagnosis of pneumonia, of which 69% (29/42) were hospital acquired. Overall, 90.5% (76/84) of patients had MDR bacteria. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequently isolated bacterium (71/80, 88.8%), including 93% (80/86) of C/T-susceptible strains. C/T was prescribed as the first-line treatment to 29.8% (25/84) of patients. A concomitant antibiotic treatment was prescribed to 48.8% (41/84) of patients, of whom 65.9% (27/41) were prescribed concomitant antibiotics at the same time as C/T initiation. Empirical C/T prescription was microbiologically appropriate in 11/16 patients after susceptibility testing. Most patients (44/72, 61.1%) were cured and four (4/72, 5.6%) deaths were reported. Conclusions The results showed that C/T was most frequently prescribed for documented cases of P. aeruginosa infections. Most outcomes were positive, including among pneumonia patients.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate third-generation cephalosporin (3GC) resistance determinants [extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC β-lactamases and OXA-type β-lactamases] in contemporary clinical Enterobacterales isolates and to determine the in vitro activity of β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, including the investigational combination of cefepime and the novel β-lactamase inhibitor enmetazobactam. Methods: Antibacterial susceptibility of 7168 clinical Enterobacterales isolates obtained between 2016–2018 from North America and Europe was determined according to CLSI guidelines. Phenotypic resistance to the 3GC ceftazidime (MIC ≥ 16 µg/mL) and/or ceftriaxone (MIC ≥ 4 µg/mL) but retaining susceptibility to meropenem (MIC ≤ 1 µg/mL) was determined. β-Lactamase genotyping was performed on clinical isolates with ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime or meropenem MIC ≥ 1 µg/mL. Results: Phenotypic resistance to 3GCs occurred in 17.5% of tested isolates, whereas 2.1% of isolates were resistant to the carbapenem meropenem. Within the 3GC-resistant subgroup, 60.1% (n = 752) of isolates encoded an ESBL, 25.6% (n = 321) encoded an AmpC-type β-lactamase and 0.9% (n = 11) encoded an OXA-type β-lactamase. Susceptibility of the subgroup to piperacillin/tazobactam (57.5%) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (71.3%) was

Objectives Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against Gram-negative bacilli. We report the use of ceftolozane/tazobactam in Canada using a national registry. Methods The CLEAR registry uses REDCapTM (Research Electronic Data Capture) (online survey, https://is.gd/CLEAR_ceftolozanetazobactam) to capture details associated with clinical use of ceftolozane/tazobactam. Results Data from 51 patients treated in 2020 with ceftolozane/tazobactam are available. Infections treated included hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (37.3% of patients), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (15.7%), bone/joint infection (11.8%), complicated intra-abdominal infection (7.8%) and complicated skin and skin structure infection (7.8%). 17.6% of patients had bacteremia and 47.1% were in intensive care. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was primarily used as directed therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections (92.2% of patients). Ceftolozane/tazobactam was used because of resistance to (86.3%), failure of (11.7%), or adverse effects from (2.0%) previously prescribed antimicrobials. Ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptibility testing was performed on isolates from 88.2% of patients. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was used in combination with another antimicrobial active versus Gram-negative bacilli in 39.2% of patients (aminoglycosides [15.7%], fluoroquinolones [7.8%] and colistin/polymyxin B [7.8%]). The dosage regimen was customized in all patients based on their creatinine clearance. Treatment duration was primarily >10 days (60.8% of patients) with microbiological success in 60.5% and clinical success in 64.4% of patients. 7.8% of patients had adverse effects not requiring drug discontinuation. Conclusions In Canada, ceftolozane/tazobactam is used as directed therapy to treat a variety of severe infections caused MDR P. aeruginosa. It is commonly used in combination with other antimicrobials with relatively high microbiological/clinical cure rates, and an excellent safety profile.

Background The limited armamentarium against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli led to the development of a new generation of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL/BLI). Objectives To evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and imipenem/relebactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from patients hospitalized with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in several countries around the world. Methods A total of 360 P. aeruginosa isolates were consecutively collected from 47 medical centers located in Western Europe, Eastern Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, and Latin America. Susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution method at a monitoring laboratory. EUCAST breakpoints were applied. Results Ceftazidime/avibactam (98.3% susceptible), ceftolozane/tazobactam (98.6% susceptible), and imipenem/relebactam (98.3% susceptible) were the most active compounds after colistin (100.0% susceptible) and retained activity against isolates nonsusceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, imipenem, and/or ceftazidime. Meropenem-vaborbactam was active against 94.2% of isolates. Ceftazidime/avibactam was the most active BL/BLI against meropenem-nonsusceptible (92.6% susceptible) and imipenem-resistant (93.8% susceptible) isolates, whereas ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active BL/BLI against piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant (91.1% susceptible) and ceftazidime-resistant (91.7% susceptible) isolates. Conclusions The recently approved BL/BLIs demonstrated potent activity and broad coverage against contemporary P. aeruginosa isolates from patients with SSTIs.

Introduction We characterized AmpC β-lactamase mutations that resulted in ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance in extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from patients treated with this agent from June 2016 to December 2018. Methods Five pairs of ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible/resistant P. aeruginosa XDR isolates were included among a total of 49 patients treated. Clonal relationship among isolates was first evaluated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was further performed. AmpC mutations were investigated by PCR amplification of the blaPDC gene followed by sequencing. Results The ST175 high-risk clone was detected in four of the pairs of isolates and the ST1182 in the remaining one. All resistant isolates showed a mutation in AmpC: T96I in two of the isolates, and E247K, G183V, and a deletion of 19 amino acids (G229–E247) in the other three. The G183V mutation had not been described before. The five isolates resistant to ceftolozane/tazobactam showed cross-resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam and lower MICs of imipenem and piperacillin/tazobactam than the susceptible isolates. Conclusions Ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance was associated in all of the cases with AmpC mutations, including a novel mutation (G183V) not previously described. There is a vital need for surveillance and characterization of emerging ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance, in order to preserve this valuable antipseudomonal agent.

Significant advances were made in antibiotic development during the past 5 years. Novel agents were added to the arsenal that target critical priority pathogens, including multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. Of these, 4 novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam) reached clinical approval in the United States. With these additions comes a significant responsibility to reduce the possibility of emergence of resistance. Reports in the rise of resistance toward ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam are alarming. Clinicians and scientists must make every attempt to reverse or halt these setbacks.

Background To determine the turnaround time from a blue-carba result until a final microbiological report (bacterial identification plus antimicrobial susceptibility profile) and to infer the impact of an early therapeutic intervention based on the blue-carba results. Methods Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were recovered from hospitalized patients from Porto Alegre, Brazil, and tested by blue-carba test. Time required for a blue-carba result, right after the sample processing, was compared with those required to get final report (specie identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profile) Isolates blue-carba positive were tested by phenotypically and genotypically for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase and metallo-β-lactamase genes. Results A total of 199 isolates were analyzed and 23 (11.6%) were blue-carba positive and harboring the blaSPM-1-like gene. Fifty-two (26.1%) isolates were blue-carba negative but resistant to meropenem and/or imipenem. Polymyxin B and ceftolozane/tazobactam (this latter except for SPM-1 producers) were 100% active for all P. aeruginosa isolates, a blue-carba test allow an earlier intervention or adequacy of therapy. Conclusions Early adequacy can be promoted by blue-carba test for 11.6% of SPM-1-producing P. aeruginosa isolates, polymyxin B could be prior associated and ceftolozane/tazobactam withdrawn from therapy. For the remaining isolates, empirical therapy involving ceftolozane/tazobactam can be maintained with greater likelihood of adequacy. An active communication between laboratory and clinical services is necessary to better explore these earlier blue-carba results, significantly reducing the time for a first intervention.

Intravenous fosfomycin is undergoing clinical development in the United States for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and may be prescribed as a component of dual antibiotic regimens against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE). Fosfomycin, aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and tobramycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by gradient diffusion strip (GDS) against CPE isolates (N = 49). The GDS cross method was used to assess antibiotic interactions between fosfomycin and the aforementioned parenteral antibiotics. The resultant fractional inhibitory concentration index was used to classify interactions. Fosfomycin-containing combinations were evaluated only if nonsusceptible to the second agent. The fosfomycin MIC50 was ≥1024 mg/L by GDS. Synergy or additivity was detected in 80 (22%) fosfomycin-containing combinations. Antagonism was not observed. Ceftolozane/tazobactam most frequently displayed synergy [8 (16.3%) isolates]. When CPE are isolated, clinical laboratories should consider performing GDS synergy tests to identify favorable antibiotic interactions.

Ceftolozane is MSD's 5th generation cephalosporin antibiotic with broad-spectrum gram-negative activity. While refining the synthetic route to the drug substance, a dimeric impurity was observed in the final active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) of ceftolozane. Through impurity enrichment and preparative isolation, the structure of the impurity was subsequently established through LC/HRMS, HRMSMS, H/D exchange and 2D-NMR studies. A kinetic study of the impurity formation was conducted to determine the best conditions to control it in the final chemical process.

Tazobactam/ceftolozane is a combination of a β-lactamase inhibitor and a cephalosporin antibiotic, with recommended dosage for patients with normal renal function of tazobactam 0.5 g/ceftolozane 1 g administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion every 8 h. The doses in patients with moderate and severe renal impairment are recommended to be reduced by half and 1/4th, respectively. The dose in patients undergoing dialysis is a single loading dose of 750 mg followed after 8 h by a 150 mg maintenance dose. In order to evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK) in Japanese patients, individual Bayes PK parameters were derived using the previously developed population PK models. Furthermore, attainment of PK/pharmacodynamic target in Japanese patients was calculated to confirm the recommended dosage. Based on PK data from 200 Japanese patients in the phase 3 studies, including patients with mild and moderate renal impairment, individual tazobactam/ceftolozane PK parameters were derived. No clinically relevant difference was observed in tazobactam/ceftolozane exposures between Japanese and non-Japanese patients. All Japanese patients achieved a target percent of time that free ceftolozane concentrations are above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 30% for MICs of up to 8 μg/mL. Also for tazobactam, all Japanese patients achieved a target percent of time that the free tazobactam concentration exceeds a threshold concentration (1 μg/mL) of 20%. The results suggest that the doses will be efficacious in the Japanese population. The results indicate that the recommended dose in patients with normal renal function or renal impairment is appropriate in Japanese patients.

Eradicating multi-drug resistant (MDR) organisms has been a major challenge in healthcare settings worldwide. Newly approved drugs and those currently in the pipeline may have a promising solution to this issue. The purposes of this review are to describe the various resistance mechanisms of Gram-negative bacteria and to provide a summary of the current literature available on the newer agents, such as ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and other emerging agents used for the treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections. Given that MDR organisms confer resistance to treatment by various methods, including enzymatic degradation, efflux pumps, and porin mutation, an understanding of mechanisms of bacterial resistance combined with information on newer antimicrobial agents against MDR Gram-negative bacteria will further assist clinicians in determining the best suitable therapy for the treatment of various complicated infections.

Tazobactam/ceftolozane, a novel antimicrobial therapy, is active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and most extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae. We report the results of the efficacy and safety of tazobactam/ceftolozane in Japanese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI). A multicenter, open-label, noncomparative study (MK-7625A Protocol 013, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02739997 ) to investigate the efficacy and safety of tazobactam/ceftolozane used in combination with metronidazole in Japanese patients with cIAI was conducted. One hundred Japanese patients with cIAI received tazobactam/ceftolozane 1.5 g (tazobactam 0.5 g/ceftolozane 1 g) plus metronidazole 500 mg intravenously every 8 h for 60 min for 4–14 days. The clinical response rate at the Test-of-Cure visit (TOC; Day 28 ± 2 days) was 92.0% (81/88 subjects). By disease type, the clinical response rates were 92.3% (24/26) for cholecystitis, 100% (6/6) for liver abscess, 93.5% (58/62) for intra-abdominal abscess and 90.2% (55/61) for peritonitis. The per-subject microbiological response rate at the TOC was 90.2% (55/61). Per-pathogen microbiological response rates in the most common baseline pathogens were Escherichia coli 90.2% (37/41), Kebsiella pneumoniae 91.7% (11/12), Streptococcus anginosus 100% (11/11), Streptococcus constellatus 90.0% (9/10) and Bacteroides fragilis 95.2% (20/21). The most common drug-related AEs were aspartate aminotransferase increased (11.0%) and alanine aminotransferase increased (9.0%). No serious drug-related AE was reported during the study. The favorable effect of tazobactam/ceftolozane in the treatment of cIAI suggests that the agent will be useful in clinical practice in Japan.

Summary Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common pathogen causing nosocomial infection. In particular, bloodstream infection (BSI) is associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a new β-lactam/β-lactamase antimicrobial with activity against P. aeruginosa as well as multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram negative Enterobacteriaceae. Ceftolozane/tazobactam has frequently been used in salvage therapy for MDR P. aeruginosa infections. The aim of this study was to determine the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against P. aeruginosa isolates from BSIs collected from three clinical microbiology laboratories in Queensland, Australia, with a high proportion of isolates demonstrating β-lactam resistance. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution using custom made sensititre plates sourced from ThermoFisher Scientific. In addition to ceftolozane/tazobactam, we also tested piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, doripenem, imipenem, aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gentamicin, amikacin, tobramycin and colistin. Overall, ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active agent tested [(MIC50/90 = 1/2 μg/mL, 96% susceptible (S)]. Against 44 isolates with resistance to at least one other β-lactam agent, 40 were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam. Three ceftolozane/tazobactam resistant isolates were susceptible to colistin, with one of those isolates also susceptible to levofloxacin but not to any other antimicrobials tested. One ceftolozane/tazobactam resistant isolate was susceptible only to meropenem and doripenem but was non-susceptible to imipenem. An association was found between fluoroquinolone resistance and aminoglycoside resistance but not with β-lactam resistance. In summary, ceftolozane/tazobactam was active against most strains tested, including those resistant to other β-lactams. Laboratories should consider testing P. aeruginosa against ceftolozane/tazobactam in suspected MDR or extensively drug resistant (XDR) infections.

Objectives The steady progress in resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) has led to difficulties in treating infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) has in vitro activity against many of these strains, however clinical experience with CAZ/AVI is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of eight patients with infections due to MDR- or XDR-PA treated with CAZ/AVI, including four strains resistant to ceftolozane/tazobactam. Methods This was a retrospective descriptive study of patients admitted to a teaching hospital between January 2016 and May 2017 who received CAZ/AVI as initial or continuation therapy for infection due to MDR- and XDR-PA. Results The sources of infection were hospital-acquired lower respiratory tract infection in five patients (62.5%) and osteomyelitis, meningitis and catheter-related bacteraemia in one patient each. Clinical cure was achieved in 4 patients (50.0%). The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 12.5% and 37.5%, respectively. One patient (12.5%) developed encephalopathy that improved with discontinuation of the drug. Conclusions CAZ/AVI may be a valuable option for serious infections due to resistant PA.

Imipenem-relebactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam are new antimicrobial options for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant bacilli. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the activity of imipenem-relebactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and KPC-producing Enterobacterales. Imipenem-relebactam was effective against 96% and 63% of KPC-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenemase-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, respectively. However, ceftolozane-tazobactam inhibited 77% of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Therefore, when comparing the in vitro activities of ceftolozane-tazobactam and imipenem-relebactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam was more active against carbapenemase-nonproducing P. aeruginosa, whereas imipenem-relebactam was more active against KPC-producing Enterobacterales.

Objectives The incidence of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-Pa) has become a concern of increasing relevance nowadays. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is a novel fifth-generation cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against MDR-Pa. Methods The clinical records of all patients diagnosed from May 2016 to May 2017 with an infection due to a MDR-Pa treated with C/T were retrospectively reviewed. Results A total of 23 patients with 24 episodes of infection due to MDR-Pa were included. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of C/T against MDR-Pa ranged from 0.75–8 μg/mL. In 14 cases (58%) the use of C/T was off-label, including 8 respiratory tract infections (RTIs) and 6 skin and soft-tissue infections, whilst in 10 cases the use was for approved indications, including 7 urinary tract infections and 3 intra-abdominal infections. C/T was the first-line therapy in only three cases with a mean ± standard deviation treatment duration of 9.3 ± 4 days, and it was associated with another active drug (aminoglycoside or colistin) in 16 cases. The global clinical cure rate was 88% (21/24 episodes), and the 6-week mortality rate was 22% (5/23 patients) being higher in RTIs (37%). In these infections, three patients received 2/1 g every 8 h (q8h) and were cured without mortality, whilst three (60%) of five patients receiving 1/0.5 g q8h died. Conclusion C/T had good clinical responses in different types of infection, including both FDA-accepted and off-label indications. The results support the use of higher doses in RTIs.

Infections due to multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDR) are currently a clinical challenge, mainly in elderly patients. The antimicrobial spectrum, safety and efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) make it an attractive option for the treatment of MDR bacterial infections beyond the indications approved to date. Here we report our experience with C/T in four cases of osteomyelitis and three cases of skin and soft-tissue infections due to extensively-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

To evaluate the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with other broad-spectrum antimicrobials against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae, 497 non-duplicate P. aeruginosa and 802 Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates were consecutively collected during the period from September 2014 to April 2015 from patients in Germany with bloodstream, lower respiratory tract, intra–abdominal or urinary tract infections. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution. Results were interpreted according to EUCAST criteria. Ceftolozane/tazobactam showed good activity against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates with MIC50/90 values of 0.25/0.5 mg/L and 0.25/1 mg/L, respectively. Comparatively, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime and meropenem MIC50/90 values were 2/8 mg/L, 0.25/8 mg/L and ≤0.03/ ≤ 0.03 mg/L, respectively, for E. coli, and 2/16 mg/L, 0.12/8 mg/L, and ≤0.03/ ≤ 0.03 mg/L, respectively, for K. pneumoniae isolates. The activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against P. aeruginosa was superior to that of other antipseudomonal antimicrobials. Based on MIC50/90 values, ceftolozane/tazobactam (0.5/2 mg/L) was more active than piperacillin/tazobactam (8/64 mg/L), ceftazidime (2/16 mg/L), cefepime (2/16 mg/L) or meropenem (0.5/8 mg/L). In conclusion, ceftolozane/tazobactam exhibited the best in vitro potency of the antibiotics tested against P. aeruginosa, including isolates that were resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, ceftazidime, doripenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, amikacin, and tobramycin. Ceftolozane/tazobactam has the potential to become a useful addition to the limited armamentarium of drugs that can be used to treat this problem pathogen.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region with healthcare-associated infections. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is an antipseudomonal cephalosporin combined with a well-established β-lactamase inhibitor. A total of 1963 Gram-negative organisms (489 P. aeruginosa and 1474 Enterobacteriaceae) were consecutively collected using a prevalence-based approach from 14 medical centres in the APAC region. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution method as described by the CLSI and the results were interpreted according to EUCAST and CLSI breakpoint criteria. Ceftolozane/tazobactam [MIC 50/90 , 0.25/4 µg/mL; 89.2/85.8% susceptible (CLSI/EUCAST)] and meropenem [MIC 50/90 , ≤0.06/≤0.06 µg/mL; 96.3/96.5% susceptible (CLSI/EUCAST)] were the most active compounds tested against Enterobacteriaceae. Isolates displayed susceptibility rates to other β-lactam agents ranging from 85.8/81.0% for piperacillin/tazobactam to 74.4/72.7% for cefepime and 72.8/68.1% for ceftazidime using CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints. Among the Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 3.6% were carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and 25.6% exhibited an extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) non-CRE phenotype. Ceftolozane/tazobactam showed good activity against ESBL non-CRE phenotype strains of Enterobacteriaceae (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/16 µg/mL), but not against isolates with a CRE phenotype (MIC 50/90 , >32/>32 µg/mL). Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most potent (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/4 µg/mL) β-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa isolates, inhibiting 90.8% at an MIC of ≤4 µg/mL. Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibited high rates of susceptibility to amikacin [91.2/89.4% (CLSI/EUCAST)] and colistin [98.4/100.0% (CLSI/EUCAST)]. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active β-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa and demonstrated higher in vitro activity than available cephalosporins when tested against Enterobacteriaceae.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a novel antimicrobial agent with activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other common Gram-negative pathogens. In this study, we determined the antimicrobial susceptibility for a total of 149 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa for the most commonly used antimicrobials including the new agent ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T). Broth microdilution was performed to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration against various antimicrobials including C/T. Among the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor, overall susceptibility was 67%, 55% and 51% for C/T, Piperacillin/Tazobactam (P/T) and Cefoperazone/Sulbactam, respectively. The variations in the susceptibility rates were noted among the three different β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors. Interestingly, 33% susceptibility was noted for C/T against isolates that were resistant to P/T, indicating the higher activity of C/T. This finding suggests about 33% of the P/T-resistant isolates can still be treated effectively with C/T. C/T could be a better alternative for the treatment of ESBL-producing organism, and thereby usage of higher antimicrobials can be minimised.

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (TLc), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), and aztreonam (AT) were determined for 6 SPM-1-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) using Etest® strips and the synergistic effect of such antimicrobials against was evaluated by gradient diffusion strip crossing (GDSC) test. The fraction inhibitory concentration indexes (FICI) were calculated and showed a synergistic (n = 3) and additive (n = 2) effects of TLc + AT against SPM-1 producers, while TLc + C/T combination caused no effect. Average MIC reduction of TLc and AT by GDSC was 3-fold and 2-fold dilutions, respectively. Thus, TLc + AT might be a candidate as a combination therapy to treat SPM-1-producing PSA infections.

Background Antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative resistance has developed without a commensurate response in the successful development of antibiotic agents, though recent progress has been made. Aims This review aims to provide a summary of the existing evidence on efficacy, spectrum of activity and the development of resistance of new agents that have been licensed or have completed advanced clinical trials and that possess activity against resistant Gram-negative organisms. Sources A review of the published literature via MEDLINE database was performed. Relevant clinical trials were identified with the aid of the clinicaltrials.gov registry. Further data were ascertained from review of abstracts from recent international meetings and pharmaceutical companies. Content Data on the mechanism of action, microbiological spectrum, clinical efficacy and development of resistance are reported for new agents that have activity against Gram-negative organisms. This includes the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and aztreonam/avibactam; cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin; plazomicin and eravacycline. Implications The development of new agents with activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens has provided important therapeutic options for clinicians. Polymyxins appear to have been supplanted by new agents as first-line therapy for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase producers. Cefiderocol and ceftazidime/avibactam/aztreonam are promising options for metallo-β-lactamase producers, and cefiderocol and ceftolozane/tazobactam for multiply resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but definitive data showing clinical efficacy is as yet lacking. Reports of the development of resistance early after the release and use of new agents is of concern. Orally administered options and agents active effective against Acinetobacter baumannii are under-represented in clinical development.

Recent studies have shown that the pharmacodynamic (PD) index driving the efficacy of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations such as ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam is the percentage of time the free inhibitor concentration is above a threshold ( f T >threshold ). However, data with piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) are scarce. Here we aimed to assess the relationship between f T >threshold and TZP antibacterial efficacy by a population pharmacokinetic study in mice and dose–effect experiments in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model with two isogenic strains of Escherichia coli differentially expressing TEM-1 β-lactamase. We also explored the dynamics of resistance selection with the innovator and a non-equivalent generic, extrapolated the results to the clinic by Monte Carlo simulation of standard TZP doses, and estimated the economic impact of generic-selected resistance. The f T >threshold index described well the efficacy of TZP versus E. coli , with threshold values from 0.5 mg/L to 2 mg/L and mean exposures of 42% for stasis and 56% for 1 log 10 kill. The non-equivalent generic required a longer exposure ( f T >threshold 33%) to suppress resistance compared with the innovator ( f T >threshold 22%), leading to a higher frequency of resistance selection in the clinical simulation (16% of patients with the generic vs. 1% with the innovator). Finally, we estimated that use of TZP generics in a scenario of 25% therapeutic non-equivalence would result in extra expenses approaching US$1 billion per year in the USA owing to selection of resistant micro-organisms, greatly offsetting the savings gained from generic substitution and further emphasising the need for demonstrated and not assumed therapeutic equivalence.

The proliferation of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens has been exacerbated by a lack of novel agents in current development by pharmaceutical companies. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections and complicated urinary tract infections. In the present study, the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against four isogenic Escherichia coli strains was investigated in a hollow-fibre infection model simulating various clinical dosing regimens. The four investigational E. coli strains included #2805 (no β-lactamase), #2890 (AmpC β-lactamase), #2842 (CMY-10 β-lactamase) and #2807 (CTX-M-15 β-lactamase). Each strain was exposed to regimens simulating 1 g ceftolozane, 2 g ceftolozane, 1 g ceftolozane/0.5 g tazobactam, and 2 g ceftolozane/1 g tazobactam utilising a starting inoculum of ca. 106 CFU/mL. Whereas 1 g of ceftolozane eradicated strains #2805 and #2842 without subsequent regrowth, 1 g ceftolozane/0.5 g tazobactam was required to eradicate strain #2890. For strain #2890, ceftolozane monotherapy led to bacterial growth on plates impregnated with 20 mg/L ceftolozane by 24 h, whilst combination treatment with tazobactam completely suppressed the development of ceftolozane resistance. In contrast, none of the regimens, including 2 g ceftolozane/1 g tazobactam, were able to entirely suppress bacterial growth in strain #2807, with bacterial counts exceeding 108 CFU/mL by 48 h and ceftolozane-resistant populations being amplified after 24 h. Thus, the combination of ceftolozane and tazobactam achieved bactericidal activity followed by sustained killing over 10 days for three of four isogenic E. coli strains. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a promising new agent to counter multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes a variety of life-threatening infections, some of which are associated with planktonic and others with biofilm states. Herein, we tested the combination of the novel cephalosporin, ceftolozane, with the β-lactamase inhibitor, tazobactam, against planktonic and biofilm forms of 54 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, using cefepime as a comparator. MIC values were determined following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) values were determined using biofilm-laden pegged lids incubated in antimicrobial challenge plates containing varying concentrations of ceftolozane/tazobactam. Pegged lids were then incubated in growth recovery plates containing cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth to determine the minimum biofilm bactericidal concentration (MBBC). Ceftolozane/tazobactam was highly active against planktonic P. aeruginosa, with all 54 isolates studied testing susceptible (MIC ≤4/4μg/mL). On the other hand, 51/54 biofilm P. aeruginosa had MBICs ≥16/4μg/mL, and all 54 isolates had MBBCs >32μg/mL. Of the 54 isolates, 45 (83.3%) tested susceptible to cefepime, with the MIC50/MIC90 being 4/16μg/mL, respectively, and the MBIC90 and MBBC90 both being >256μg/mL. Although ceftolozane/tazobactam is a promising antimicrobial agent for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections, it is not highly active against P. aeruginosa biofilms.

The continuing increase in multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) worldwide has created new challenges in treating complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). A number of novel antimicrobial agents have been developed against resistant pathogens. To target extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing pathogens, novel β-lactam antibiotics, such as ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, aztreonam/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and S-649266, are antimicrobial alternatives for cIAIs. Two new drugs, eravacycline and plazomicin, have activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and ESBL-producers. New lipoglycopeptides and oxazolidinones provide feasible options against resistant Gram-positive pathogens. These novel antimicrobials may play a role in improving the clinical outcomes of cIAIs caused by MDROs.

Infections caused by resistant pathogens are increasing and are a major threat to patient outcomes. A 2013 US Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention report on antibiotic resistance threats indicates that 2 million Americans acquire antibiotic-resistant infections annually and at least 23,000 die. Increasing resistance of bacterial pathogens to virtually all available antimicrobial classes signals the emergent need for new agents. Only 12 antibiotics were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration between 2000 and 2012. Initiatives to increase the number of effective antibiotics have been enacted. This study addresses the mechanism of action, microbiology, indications, dose, safety, drug interactions, and place in therapy of dalbavancin, tedizolid, oritavancin, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and ceftazidime/avibactam.

Ceftazidime pentahydrate/avibactam sodium (AvycazeActavis) is the second combination of a cephalosporin and beta-lactamase inhibitor to be marketed, joining ceftolozane/tazobactam (Zerbaxa). Ceftazidime is a cephalosporin antibacterial agent that has been available as a single agent for many years. Avibactam is the new betalactamase inhibitor that protects ceftazidime against inactivation by beta-lactamase enzymes, thereby increasing the activity of the antibacterial agent against gram-negative bacteria. Avibactam is a nonbeta-lactam and may inhibit certain bacteria-produced beta-lactamases that are not inhibited by other beta-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., tazobactam, sulbactam). Of particular importance is the activity of the new combination against gram-negative bacteria that produce Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase. Like ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam is administered by intravenous infusion for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) and complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), although there are some differences in the specific bacteria that have been demonstrated to be susceptible to the two combination formulations. Ceftazidime/avibactam is used in a regimen that also includes metronidazole for the treatment of adults with cIAIs caused by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Providencia stuartii, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella oxytoca, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. It is also indicated for the

Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections due to Gram-negative bacteria, particularly extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Here we report a case of MDR P. aeruginosa skin and soft-tissue infection successfully treated with C/T.

The purpose of this work was to develop and validate a single sensitive, selective and rapid bioanalytical method to determine ceftolozane and tazobactam concentrations in human plasma and urine and to use this method to analyze samples from a human clinical study. Human plasma and urine samples were prepared by protein precipitation using a solution of acetonitrile, water and formic acid. Following protein precipitation, samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Chromatographic resolution was achieved on a Kinetex PFP column using a gradient elution, a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min, and a total run time of 5 min. Positive electrospray ionization was employed and analytes were quantitated using multi-reaction monitoring mode. Method validation was conducted in accordance with Unites States Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. Calibration curves were determined to linear over the range of 0.1 to 40 µg/mL for ceftolozane and 0.05 to 20 µg/mL for tazobactam. The method was determined to be accurate (−6.24 to 12.53 percent relative error), precise (less than 13.28 percent standard deviation) and sensitive in both human plasma and urine. Ceftolozane and tazobactam were determined to be stable across a battery of stability studies including autosampler, benchtop, freeze/thaw and long-term stability. This validated method successfully applied to human clinical samples to determine the concentration versus time profiles of the intravenously administered combination of Zerbaxa (ceftolozane-tazobactam) in burn patients.

Although multiple antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants can confer the same in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) phenotype, their differing effect on optimal therapeutic choices is uncertain. Using a large population-based collection of clinical strains spanning a 3.5-year period, we applied WGS to detect inhibitor resistant (IR), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), and carbapenem resistant (CR) β-lactamase (bla) genes and compared the genotype to the AST phenotype in select isolates. All blaNDM-1 (9/9) and the majority of blaNDM-1/OXA-48 (3/4) containing isolates were resistant to CAZ/AVI as predicted by WGS. The combination of ATM and CAZ/AVI restored susceptibility by disk diffusion assay. Unexpectedly, clinical Kp isolates bearing blaKPC-8 (V240G) and blaKPC-14 (G242 and T243 deletion) did not test fully resistant to CAZ/AVI. Lastly, despite the complexity of the β-lactamase background, CAZ/AVI retained potency. Presumed phenotypes conferred by AMR determinants need to be tested if therapeutic decisions are being guided by their presence or absence.

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-defined broth microdilution testing method (M07, 11th edition, 2018) was used to determine MICs for ceftolozane/tazobactam and eight comparator agents against 21,952 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae submitted by 161 clinical laboratories in 51 countries in 2016 as a part of the SMART global surveillance program. MICs were interpreted using CLSI breakpoints (M100 29th edition, 2019). 89.7% of isolates of Enterobacteriaceae were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam, compared to 70.0%, 76.3%, 77.7%, 84.7%, 93.6%, and 96.4%, respectively, for ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, ertapenem, and meropenem. 82.4% of isolates of ESBL-positive, carbapenemase-negative Enterobacteriaceae were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam, compared to 1.5%, 7.8%, 20.3%, 71.1%, 94.7%, and 98.7%, respectively, for ceftriaxone, cefepime, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, ertapenem, and meropenem. In vitro susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam was >60% higher than susceptibility to other advanced-generation cephalosporins among all Enterobacteriaceae and >10% higher than susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam among ESBL-positive Enterobacteriaceae collected globally in 2016.

The aim of this study was to investigate the susceptibility of respiratory Gram-negative bacteria to ceftolozane/tazobactam and other antibiotics in the Asia-Pacific region during 2015-2016. MICs were determined using the CLSI standard broth microdilution method and interpreted accordingly. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1574 isolates), Klebsiella pneumoniae (1226), Acinetobacter baumannii (627) and Escherichia coli (476) accounted for 73.1% of 5342 Gram-negative respiratory pathogens. Susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam of individual Enterobacteriaceae was >80%, except for Enterobacter cloacae (76.6%). Ceftolozane/tazobactam inhibited 81.9% of K. pneumoniae and 91.9% of E. coli, with respective MIC50/MIC90 values of 0.5/>32 and 0.25/2 mg/L. For carbapenem-susceptible, ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae and E. coli, susceptibility was 65.5% and 93.3%, respectively, and respective MIC50/MIC90 values were 2/>32 and 0.5/2 mg/L. BlaCTX-M-1 group was most prevalent in selected ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae (40 of 54 isolates) and E. coli (15 of 22 isolates), with ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptibility rates of 50% and 80%, respectively. BlaSHV-ESBL was the second most prevalent, and ceftolozane/tazobactam inhibited 20% of 20 K. pneumoniae isolates with blaSHV-ESBL. The only effective antibiotics for carbapenem-non-susceptible K. pneumoniae (111 isolates) and E. coli (24 isolates) were amikacin and colistin. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was effective against almost all tested P. aeruginosa and carbapenem-non-susceptible strains, with susceptibility of 92.3% and 72.8%, respectively; the respective MIC50/MIC90 values were 1/4 and 2/>32 mg/L. The high susceptibility of ceftolozane/tazobactam remained in different age groups, patient locations, recovery times and countries, except Vietnam. In conclusion, ceftolozane/tazobactam was effective against most respiratory Gram-negative pathogens in the Asia-Pacific region; however, the emergence of carbapenem resistance mandates ongoing surveillance.

β-Lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) have played an important role in combatting β-lactam resistance in Gram-negative bacteria, but their effectiveness has diminished with the evolution of diverse and deleterious varieties of β-lactamases. In this review, a new generation of BLIs and inhibitor combinations is presented, describing epidemiological information, pharmacodynamic studies, resistance identification and current clinical status. Novel serine BLIs of major interest include the non-β-lactams of the diazabicyclo[3.2.1]octanone (DBO) series. The DBOs avibactam, relebactam and RG6080 inhibit most class A and class C β-lactamases, with selected inhibition of class D enzymes by avibactam. The novel boronic acid inhibitor RPX7009 has a similar inhibitory profile. All of these inhibitors are being developed in combinations that are targeting primarily carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative pathogens. Two BLI combinations (ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam) were recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the designation of a Qualified Infectious Disease Product (QIDP). Other inhibitor combinations that have at least completed phase 1 clinical trials are ceftaroline fosamil/avibactam, aztreonam/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/RPX7009 and cefepime/AAI101. Although effective inhibitor combinations are in development for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria with serine carbapenemases, better options are still necessary for pathogens that produce metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). The aztreonam/avibactam combination demonstrates inhibitory activity against MBL-producing enteric bacteria owing to the stability of the monobactam to these enzymes, but resistance is still an issue for MBL-producing non-fermentative bacteria. Because all of the inhibitor combinations are being developed as parenteral drugs, an orally bioavailable combination would also be of interest.

Summary Background Treatment of complicated urinary-tract infections is challenging due to rising antimicrobial resistance. We assessed the efficacy and safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam, a novel antibacterial with Gram-negative activity, in the treatment of patients with complicated lower-urinary-tract infections or pyelonephritis. Methods ASPECT-cUTI was a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority trial done in 209 centres in 25 countries. Between July, 2011, and September, 2013, hospital inpatients aged 18 years or older who had pyuria and a diagnosis of a complicated lower-urinary-tract infection or pyelonephritis were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenous 1·5 g ceftolozane-tazobactam every 8 h or intravenous high-dose (750 mg) levofloxacin once daily for 7 days. The randomisation schedule was computer generated in blocks of four and stratified by study site. The next allocation was obtained by the study site pharmacist via an interactive voice-response system. The primary endpoint was a composite of microbiological eradication and clinical cure 5–9 days after treatment in the microbiological modified intention-to-treat (MITT) population, with a non-inferiority margin of 10%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01345929 and NCT01345955. Findings Of 1083 patients enrolled, 800 (73·9%), of whom 656 (82·0%) had pyelonephritis, were included in the microbiological MITT population. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was non-inferior to levofloxacin for composite cure (306 [76·9%] of 398 vs 275 [68·4%] of 402, 95% CI 2·3–14·6) and, as the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI around the treatment difference was positive and greater than zero, superiority was indicated. Adverse event profiles were similar in the two treatment groups and were mainly non-serious. Interpretation Treatment with ceftolozane-tazobactam led to better responses than high-dose levofloxacin in patients with complicated lower-urinary-tract infections or pyelonephritis. Funding Cubist Pharmaceuticals.

The aim of this study was to compare ceftolozane with ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) and imipenem in an experimental rabbit model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Efficacy was assessed following 2 days of treatment by total colony counts in different tissues (lung, spleen and blood culture). Mean ± standard deviation pulmonary bacterial loads were 4.9 ± 0.3, 3.6 ± 0.3, 4.8 ± 0.2, 5.5 ± 0.8 and 3.9 ± 0.3 log₁₀CFU/g of lung for ceftolozane (1g), ceftolozane (2g), ceftazidime, TZP and imipenem, respectively, compared with 6.3 ± 0.9 log₁₀CFU/g of lung for control animals. The higher ceftolozane dose [2g three times daily (t.i.d.)] showed significantly better efficacy than the lower dose (1g t.i.d.). In conclusion, in this rabbit model of P. aeruginosa pneumonia, ceftolozane had an efficacy equivalent to that of comparator agents at a dose of 1g t.i.d. and had better efficacy at a higher dose (2g t.i.d.).

During 2012, a total of 2968 isolates were consecutively collected from 59 medical centres in the USA and 15 European countries from hospitalised patients with pneumonia. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (tazobactam at a fixed concentration of 4mg/L) and comparator agents were tested by reference methods, and MIC endpoints were interpreted by CLSI (2013) and EUCAST (2013) breakpoint criteria. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common isolated pathogen (1019 strains; 34.3%), and ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active β-lactam tested against P. aeruginosa (MIC50/90, 0.5/4 mg/L; 94.1% inhibited at ≤ 8 mg/L). P. aeruginosa exhibited moderate susceptibility to meropenem (MIC50/90, 0.5/>8 mg/L; 73.7% susceptible), ceftazidime (MIC50/90, 2/>32 mg/L; 73.6% susceptible), cefepime (MIC50/90, 4/>16 mg/L; 76.5% susceptible), piperacillin/tazobactam (MIC50/90, 8/>64 mg/L; 69.5% susceptible), levofloxacin [MIC50/90, 0.5/>4 mg/L; 69.9/61.0% susceptible (CLSI/EUCAST criteria)] and gentamicin (MIC50/90, 2/>8 mg/L; 80.7% susceptible). Ceftolozane/tazobactam exhibited activity against many ceftazidime-non-susceptible, meropenem-non-susceptible and piperacillin/tazobactam-non-susceptible, multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa isolates. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was active (MIC50/90, 0.25/4mg/L; 94.6% inhibited at ≤ 8 mg/L) against 1530 Enterobacteriaceae, including activity against many MDR and XDR strains. MDR and XDR prevalence varied widely between countries both for P. aeruginosa (24.1% MDR and 17.1% XDR overall) and Enterobacteriaceae (15.4% MDR and 2.7% XDR overall). All β-lactams had limited activity against Acinetobacter spp. and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated greater in vitro activity than currently available cephalosporins, carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam when tested against P. aeruginosa. In addition, ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated greater activity than contemporary cephalosporins and piperacillin/tazobactam when tested against most Enterobacteriaceae.

The activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam was tested against 50 nonduplicate Pseudomonas aeruginosa from 18 cystic fibrosis children collected in 2012-2014. These isolates were multidrug resistant with susceptibility to meropenem, ceftazidime, and piperacillin/tazobactam of 46%, 58%, and 50%, respectively. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active with MIC50, MIC90, and percent susceptibility of 2mg/L, 8 mg/L, and 86%.

• Ceftolozane/tazobactam (Zerbaxa), cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor, and ceftazidime/avibactam (Avycaz), a third-generation cephalosporin and β-lactamase inhibitor combination, are 2 new antibiotics for gram-negative organisms.