1. The role of temporal contrast and blue light in emmetropization
- Author
-
Frances J Rucker, Mark A Henriksen, Christopher Patrick Taylor, and Tiffany Yanase
- Subjects
Light ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Standard illuminant ,Article ,050105 experimental psychology ,Reduced eye ,Contrast Sensitivity ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Animal science ,Optics ,White light ,Animals ,Contrast (vision) ,Eye growth ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,media_common ,Blue light ,Color Vision ,business.industry ,Chemistry ,05 social sciences ,Emmetropia ,Sensory Systems ,Ophthalmology ,Models, Animal ,Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells ,030221 ophthalmology & optometry ,Temporal contrast ,sense organs ,business ,Chickens - Abstract
A previous experiment showed that blue light (as a component of white light) protected against low temporal frequency dependent eye growth. This experiment investigated the role of temporal contrast. White leghorn chicks were exposed to white (with blue) or yellow (without blue) LED lighting modulated at either low (0.2 Hz) or high (10 Hz) temporal frequencies. Four cone contrast conditions were used: low (16%), medium (32%), medium-high (60%) and very-high (80%). Chicks were exposed to the lighting condition for 3 days (mean 680 lux). Exposure to high temporal frequencies, with very high temporal contrast, reduced eye growth, regardless of spectral content. However, at low temporal frequencies, eye growth was dependent on the illuminant. At lower temporal contrast levels, eye growth increased regardless of temporal or spectral characteristics. To conclude, very high temporal contrast, white light, provides a “stop” signal for eye growth that overrides temporal cues for growth that manifest in yellow light.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF