1. Urine toxicology screening by liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry in a quaternary hospital setting
- Author
-
Jeffrey D. Pope, Hans G. Schneider, M. Black, and Olaf H. Drummer
- Subjects
Drug ,030213 general clinical medicine ,Bioanalysis ,Adolescent ,Substance-Related Disorders ,Hospital setting ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Clinical Biochemistry ,Urinalysis ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Clinical toxicology ,Mass Spectrometry ,Hospitals, University ,Forensic Toxicology ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Urine toxicology ,medicine ,Humans ,Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid ,media_common ,Immunoassay ,Chromatography ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Illicit Drugs ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,Substance Abuse Detection ,Time-of-flight mass spectrometry ,business ,Drug metabolism - Abstract
Objective Validation of a non-targeted method for urine drug screening (UDS) by liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF), and comparison to an established GC–MS method in a hospital setting. Methods 217 UDS specimens sent to a quaternary hospital pathology department, were analysed by a CEDIA® immunoassay screen (six drug panels; amphetamines , barbiturates, benzodiazepines , cocaine metabolites, cannabinoids and opiates) on an Abbott Architect instrument. Specimens were subsequently analysed by an established non-targeted qualitative GC–MS method and results compared with a general unknown screening method by LC-QTOF that was under evaluation as a replacement method. Results 42 selected drugs were evaluated; limits of identification ranged from 2 to 100 µg/L and most drugs (n = 39) were stabile for 24 h after preparation. Matrix effects greater than 25% were observed in seven of the selected drugs. 87% of the specimens tested positive to 1 or more drug panels in a CEDIA® screen. A total of 537 positive drug findings were identified by GC–MS compared to 1,267 positive findings by LC-QTOF. On average, each GC–MS screen identified 2.5 ± 1.8 drugs and the LC-QTOF screen identified 5.8 ± 3.2 drugs. No drugs were identified in 11.3% of the GC–MS screens, whereas drugs were detected in 99% of these by the LC-QTOF. In almost all instances, the LC-QTOF screen could provide mass spectrometric confirmatory results of positive immunoassay screens and was able to identify a wider range of additional drugs and drug metabolites . Conclusions The described general unknown screening (non-targeted, qualitative) LC-QTOF method can detect a larger range of drugs encountered in a hospital setting. The method has been shown to be suitable for comprehensive toxicology screening in a clinical toxicology laboratory.
- Published
- 2021