Search

The durability of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is uncertain. We aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of CTO PCI with those of complex non-CTO PCI. We built a single-center registry including all patients who underwent CTO and complex non-CTO PCI between 2012 and 2017. Complex non-CTO PCI was defined as: 3 vessels treated, ≥3 stents implanted, total stent length60 mm, saphenous vein graft intervention, 2-stent bifurcation intervention, left main PCI, protected PCI, or rotational/laser atherectomy. The primary endpoint was target-lesion failure, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target-lesion revascularization. A total of 2,396 patients were included (n=609 CTO PCI, n=1,787 complex non-CTO PCI). Patients who underwent CTO PCI were younger and had higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities. CTO PCI patients exhibited worse procedural metrics and success rate (74% vs 98%, p0.001). They also suffered a higher incidence of coronary perforation (3.5% vs 2.0%, p = 0.04) and cardiac tamponade (0.8% vs 0.1%, p = 0.001). However, there was no difference in the overall incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (4.1% vs 5.0%, p = 0.40). At 36 months, there were no differences in the incidence of target-lesion failure (10.1% vs 9.9%, p = 0.91) or its individual components, between the CTO and complex non-CTO group. This finding was confirmed on multivariable analysis. In conclusion, CTO PCI is associated with lower success rates and higher risk for coronary perforation and tamponade compared with complex non-CTO PCI. The incidence of other in-hospital and long-term adverse events is similar and reasonably low.

There is conflicting evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures in patients with severe aortic stenosis and low left ventricular ejection fraction (EF). The primary aim of this study was to determine the impact of TAVI on short- and long-term mortality in patients with low EF (EF50%); the secondary aim was to analyze the impact of TAVI procedure on EF recovery in the same setting of patients.Twenty-six studies enrolling 6898 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI procedure were included in the meta-analysis and analyzed for 30-day, 6-month and 1-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality; a further meta-analysis was also performed in patients with low EF to assess EF changes post TAVI. In low EF patients, both all-cause and cardiovascular short- and long-term mortality were significantly higher when compared to patients with normal EF (30-day-all-cause mortality: 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01 to 0.25, I(2)=49.65, Q=21.85; 1-year-all-cause mortality: 0.25; 95% [CI]: 0.16 to 0.34, I(2)=25.57, Q=16.12; 30-day-cardiovascular mortality: 0.03; 95% [CI]: -0.31 to 0.36, I(2)=66.84, Q=6.03; 1-year-cardiovascular mortality: 0.29; 95% [CI]: 0.12 to 0.45, I(2)=0.00, Q=1.88). Nevertheless, in low EF patients TAVI was associated with a significant recovery of EF, which started at discharge and proceeded up to 1-year-follow-up.Patients with low EF severe aortic stenosis have higher mortality following TAVI compared to normal EF patients, despite a significant and sustained improvement in EF.

Objectives The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of the 2 different neuroprotection systems in preventing embolization during carotid artery stenting (CAS), as detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI). Background Data from randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing both types of embolic protection devices revealed contrasting evidence about their efficacy in neuroprotection, as assessed by the incidence of new ischemic lesions detected by DW-MRI. Methods Eight studies, enrolling 357 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Our study analyzed the incidence of new ischemic lesions/patient, comparing filter cerebral protection and proximal balloon occlusion. Results Following CAS, the incidence of new ischemic lesions/patient detected by DW-MRI was significantly lower in the proximal balloon occlusion group (effect size [ES]: −0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.84 to −0.02, I2 = 70.08, Q = 23.40). Furthermore, following CAS, the incidence of lesions at the contralateral site was significantly lower in the proximal protection group (ES: −0.50; 95% CI: −0.72 to −0.27, I2 = 0.00, Q = 3.80). Conclusions Our meta-analysis supports the concept that the use of proximal balloon occlusion compared with filter cerebral protection is associated with a reduction of the amount of CAS-related brain embolization. The data should be confirmed by a randomized clinical trial.