Search

Background A minimally invasive approach through an upper ministernotomy (UMS) has been used in our Division since 1997. On the basis of favorable outcome we have gradually extended this approach from isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) to more complex cardiac surgery procedures and it is currently our first choice for a variety of procedures. Here we report our 11 years experience. Methods From 1997 to December 2007, 1,126 procedures were performed at our department, using UMS. Isolated procedures on the aortic valve were performed in 695 patients (61%). Isolated procedures on the aortic valve as redo operation were performed in 77 patients (7%). Complex cardiac surgery procedures (including double valve replacement-repair, ascending aorta-aortic arch replacement, aortic root replacement, aortic dissection, AVR combined with coronary surgery, and complex redo procedures) were performed in 354 patients (32%). Early postoperative outcome was evaluated considering three different groups according to the surgical procedure (first time AVR, redo AVR, and complex procedure). Results Overall conversion to full sternotomy was required in 16 patients (1.4%) with no significant differences between isolated AVR (9 patients, 1.3%) and complex or redo procedures (1 patient [1.2%] and 6 patients [1.6%], respectively). Forty-seven patients died in hospital (cumulative in-hospital mortality of 4.1 %). Mortality according to the procedure was 6.7, 3.8, and 2.8% for complex, redo AVR, or isolated AVR procedures, respectively, with a significant difference only for the complex procedures. Similarly, early postoperative outcome in terms of incidence of prolonged mechanical ventilation and ICU stay was significantly different only in the complex procedure group. Incidence of surgical revision (5.1, 2.9, and 2.7% for complex, redo, or isolated AVR procedures, respectively) showed no statistically significant differences regardless the type of procedures. Conclusions Our experience clearly shows that a minimally invasive approach through upper ministernotomy is feasible and safe not only for isolated AVR but that it can also be utilized for a variety of complex surgical procedures. Minimizing surgical access may be helpful in patients undergoing complex surgical procedures, especially redo procedures, without compromising the surgical result.

Atrial tachycardia is an infrequent but potentially dangerous arrhythmia which often determines cardiac enlargement. Surgical ablation of the arrhythmia is effective and safe, provided a careful atrial mapping is performed and the surgical technique is tailored to the individual focus location. Eight patients underwent surgical ablation of ectopic atrial tachycardia between 1977 and 1990. Different techniques were adopted for each patient according to the anatomical location of the focus and possibly associated arrhythmias. Whenever possible, a closed heart procedure was chosen. In 1 patient a double focal origin was found and treated by separate procedures. In 1 patient with ostium secundum atrial septal defect and atrial flutter, surgical isolation of the right appendage and the ectopic focus was performed. In all patients ectopic atrial tachycardia was ablated with maintenance of the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodal function as well as internodal conduction. In follow-up up to December 1991, no recurrency was recorded.