Search

Chemotherapy; Non–small cell lung cancer; RET inhibitors Quimioteràpia; Càncer de pulmó de cèl·lules no petites; Inhibidors de RET Quimioterapia; Cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas; Inhibidores de RET Introduction Nearly 1% to 2% of NSCLCs harbor RET fusions. Characterization of this rare population is still incomplete. Methods This retrospective multicenter study included patients with any-stage RET positive (RET+) NSCLC from 31 cancer centers. Molecular profiling included DNA/RNA sequencing or fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses. Clinicobiological features and treatment outcomes (per investigator) with surgery, chemotherapy (CT), immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs), CT-ICB, multityrosine kinase inhibitors, and RET inhibitors (RETis) were evaluated. Results For 218 patients included between February 2012 and April 2022, median age was 63 years, 56% were females, 93% had adenocarcinoma, and 41% were smokers. The most frequent fusion partner was KIF5B (72%). Median tumor mutational burden was 2.5 (range: 1–4) mutations per megabase, and median programmed death-ligand 1 expression was 10% (range: 0%–55%). The most common metastatic sites were the lung (50%), bone (43%), and pleura (40%). Central nervous system metastases were found at diagnosis of advanced NSCLC in 21% of the patients and at last follow-up or death in 31%. Overall response rate and median progression-free survival were 55% and 8.7 months with platinum doublet, 26% and 3.6 months with single-agent CT, 46% and 9.6 months with CT-ICB, 23% and 3.1 months with ICB, 37% and 3 months with multityrosine kinase inhibitor, and 76% and 16.2 months with RETi, respectively. Median overall survival was longer in patients treated with RETi versus no RETi (50.6 mo [37.7–72.1] versus 16.3 mo [12.7–28.8], p < 0.0001). Conclusions Patients with RET+ NSCLC have mainly thoracic and bone disease and low tumor mutational burden and programmed death-ligand 1 expression. RETi markedly improved survival, whereas ICB may be active in selected patients. Writing assistance was provided by Mrs. Sarah Mackenzie. Dr. Marinello was the recipient for the grant for DUERTECC/EURONCO (Diplôme Universitaire Européen de Recherche Translationnelle Et Clinique en Cancérologie). Dr. Mezquita received support from the Contrato Juan Rodes 2020 (ISCIII, Ministry of Health); Ayuda de la Acción Estratégica en Salud-ISCIII FIS 2021 (PI21/01653); Ayuda SEOM-Juan Rodés 2020. Dr. Cortellini acknowledges the support from the National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre. Dr. Pinato acknowledges the support from the Wellcome Trust Strategic Fund (PS3416), Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro MFAG Grant ID 25697), National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, and the Imperial College Tissue Bank.

The Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) and the Italian Association of Tumor Registries estimated about 41,500 new cases and 33,836 deaths from lung cancer in Italy in 2018,1 with a 5-year survival rate of 16% and a 10-year survival of 12% (11% for men and 15% for women). Currently, lung cancer represents the third most common neoplasm in the overall Italian population (Table 1), and it is the first cause of cancer death in men and the third in females (Table 2), with significant differences observed across the different Italian regions (Fig. 1).

Advanced stage malignant mesothelioma (asMM) patients have poor prognosis. Several trials investigated the role of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in pre-treated asMM.A systematic review of the literature of clinical trials testing single-agent anti PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs in pre-treated asMM was performed. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) data were extracted. The predictive role of PD-L1 was assessed.We selected 13 studies including 888 patients. ORR and DCR were 18.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.9-22.8%) and 55.4% (95% CI: 48.1-62.5%), respectively. Median PFS and OS ranged from 2.1 to 5.9 and from 6.7 to 20.9 months, respectively. ORR according to PD-L1 was 27.0% (95% CI: 18.7-36.2%).Anti-PD-(L)1 ICIs might be considered a treatment option for chemotherapy-resistant asMM, even if reliable predictive factors are still lacking.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions occur rarely among different cancer types, with the highest frequency reported among non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, particularly adenocarcinomas (ADCs). Exon 20 insertions fall back in the tyrosine kinase domain, and can be clustered into two principal groups represented by in frame insertions and three to 21 bp (corresponding to 1–7 amino acids) duplications within amino acids 762 and 774. The identification of these alterations is key for an adequate management of NSCLC patients due to the possibility to treat these patients with specific targeted therapies. Next generation sequencing (NGS) technology, able to detect several hotspot gene mutations for different patients simultaneously, is the best detection approach due to its higher sensitivity and specificity compared to other techniques. Here we reviewed the principal biological characteristics, the main detection technologies and treatment options for NSCLC patients harbouring EGFR exon 20 insertions.

The identification of reliable predictive biomarkers of efficacy or resistance to immune-oncology (I–O) agents is a major issue for translational research and clinical practice. However, along with PDL1 and molecular features other clinical, radiological and laboratory factors can be considered for the selection of those patients who would not be the best candidate for immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs). We examined these factors, emerging from the results of currently available studies in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), aiming to provide a useful and manageable tool which can help Oncologists in their everyday clinical practice. A thorough patient evaluation and close clinical monitoring, due to limited, early or inconclusive currently available data, should be deserved for patients with a pre-existing symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, age >75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥ 1, a time to progression (TTP) < three months and progressive disease (PD) as the best response to the previous treatment, hepatitis or HIV-infections, high neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), or on treatment with high-dose steroids, when the use of ICPIs is considered. Limited data are available to consider that ICPIs are safe in patients with interstitial lung disease, bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia and autommune diseases. Early evidence on steroids, vaccinations and antibiotics suggest their possible interaction with ICPIs and need to be more investigated in clinical trials. Oncogene-addicted NSCLC harboring EGFR-mutations and low tumor-infiltrating T-lymphocytes (TILs) seems not to gain benefit from I–O.

We are witnessing a silent revolution in the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with a series of practice-changing clinical trials enriching the therapeutic perspectives of lung cancer patients with potentially curable disease. The ADAURA study marked the advent of precision medicine and biomarker testing to the early stages setting. The IMPower-010 trial interrupted the negative trend of adjuvant lung cancer immunotherapy, paving the way to the application of immune-checkpoint inhibition in the resected disease. The ITACA trial definitively established no role for tailored adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC, while the Lung Art data questioned the efficacy of post-operative radiotherapy for pN2 resected disease. Growing evidence is supporting MRD as effective adjuvant prognostic biomarker to stratify disease's recurrence risk after radical interventions and select best candidates to the adjuvant strategies. This work summarizes the recent major breakthroughs in lung cancer adjuvant treatment, and provides a snapshot of the current real-world scenario, discussing the upcoming challenges and opportunities featuring the clinical management of early stage NSCLC patients.

Graphical abstract, Highlights • Survey to evaluate outpatient management and therapeutic decisions for NSCLC patients. • Delay of lung cancer diagnosis and a dramatic decrease of patients’ accrual within clinical trials. • Major changes in the treatment management of elderly population. • Major changes in the selection of second line treatments. • Telemedicine as a valid support to facilitate patient-healthcare interactions., This study investigated the clinical management of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients during the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Italy. A 29-questions survey was sent to 95 Italian thoracic oncologists, with 77% of them declaring significant changes in the outpatients management and treatment. The results of this survey pointed out a significant delay of lung cancer diagnosis along with a relevant reduction of patients’ accrual within clinical trials, while telemedicine emerged as a valid support for patient-healthcare interactions. Therapeutic indications followed the guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemo-radiation. Clinical indications to first-line therapies were largely confirmed, while major changes regarded the selection of second line treatment options as well as the management of elderly population. This work may represent a valid source of information to improve the clinical management of NSCLC patients during second wave of COVID-19 pandemic.

Background aMM still represents a hard-to treat disease, due to its rarity and to the modest activity of standard chemotherapy. Recently, ICIs directed against PD-1/PD-L1 have been tested in clinical trials in chemotherapy pre-treated aMM patients, but their efficacy is still debatable. Methods We searched PubMed and proceedings of major meetings, to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis (updated at September 30th 2019) of clinical trials testing ICIs in this setting, describing activity in terms of Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR). To explore the potential predictive role of PD-L1 expression, we also collected the ORR in subgroups of patients selected for PD-L1 expression (based on the highest cut-off used in each study). Results 8 studies were selected (1 phase III, 4 phase II, 2 phase IB, 1 real-world EAP data study), including 405 patients, most with pleural MM; 1 registry study was excluded due to inclusion of treatment-naive patients, 1 due to unclear inclusion criteria. 352 patients (87%) were treated with anti-PD-1 (nivolumab [N] or pembrolizumab [P]), 53 (13%) with anti-PD-L1 (avelumab [A]). Overall, ORR was 19.6% (95% CI, 16.0-23.8%) with no significant difference among drugs (N 20.0%, P 22.6%, A 9.4%; p = 0.11); DCR was 56.5% (95% CI, 51.6-61.3%) with no significant difference among drugs (N 54.0%, P 58.7%, A 58.5%; p = 0.66). When restricting the analysis to patients selected for PD-L1 expression (n evaluable=91, based on cut-offs ranging from 1% to 50% in different trials), ORR was 34.1% (95% CI, 25.2-44.3%), ranging from 18.8% to 71.4% in different trials. In unselected patients, median progression-free survival ranged from 2.5 to 6.1 months, and median overall survival ranged from 6.36 to 17.3 months. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis synthesizing the evidences of activity of PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs in pre-treated aMM. ORR and DCR in unselected patients are encouraging compared to historical results with second-line chemotherapy. Selection based on PD-L1 expression could increase the activity of immunotherapy, but trials were heterogeneous for test and cut-off. Legal entity responsible for the study The authors. Funding Has not received any funding. Disclosure M. Tagliamento: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche. P. Bironzo: Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb, BI, AstraZeneca. E. Capelletto: Advisory / Consultancy: BI, AstraZeneca. S. Novello: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Celgene, BI, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche. M. Di Maio: Honoraria (self): Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Takeda, Pfizer; Honoraria (institution): Tesaro. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

a Phase I — Early Clinical Trials Unit, Oncology Department, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem 2650, Belgium b Molecular Pathology Unit, Pathology Department, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem 2650, Belgium c Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffre 5, Palermo 90127, Italy d Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Holcombe Blvd 1400, Unit 455, Houston 77030, USA e Department of Biopathology and Medical and Forensic Biotechnologies, Section of Biology and Genetics, University of Palermo, Via Divisi 81-85, 90133 Palermo, Italy f Center for Proteomics, VITO, Boeretang 200, Mol BE-2400, Belgium g Lung Cancer Unit, Department of Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII 36, Pamplona 31008, Spain h Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, Polyclinic, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 13, 90128 Palermo, Italy i Medical Oncology Department, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy j Oncology Department, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem 2650, Belgium k Antwerp University, Groenenborgerlaan 171, Antwerpen 2020, Belgium